...Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were widely considered the best civil rights activists in the 1960’s. Back then, black people did not have as near as many rights as white people. This angered not only African Americans, but even white people, all over the country. Two of these enraged people were MLK and Malcolm X, who fought to earn their civil rights. The question is, who had the better philosophy though? By philosophy, I mean their ideas of what they want and how they should achieve it. Because Malcolm X was a realist, separatist, and a believer in equal rights for all African Americans, I believe he had the better philosophy. Malcolm X had the better philosophy because he was a realist. This means he realizes that the only way that African...
Words: 485 - Pages: 2
...peace is the answer and Malcolm X who believes that violence is the answer. I have always thought that Martin Luther King had the best philosophy. Three reason why I think this is every time you kill someone it creates a much bigger problem for you, Martin Luther King solved many things with peace, and he believed in integration. Although Malcolm had a great philosophy, I thought his was a little too violent and I think that you should only use violence for self defense. I think that Martin Luther King (MLK) had a better...
Words: 559 - Pages: 3
...In his oxford union debate speech, Malcolm X delivered his thoughts on what he thought about the segregation issue at hand and at the same time expressing what he thought of King’s approach somewhat indirectly. Malcolm is aware of the “alternative” approach suggested by King, which results in his justifying of extremism is his speech. He explains why he believes in this method stating that his method of extremism is “intelligently directed extremism” (1:04). Perhaps suggesting that King saw extremism as illogical. Malcolm continues to justify his stance by addressing the circumstances in which laws that had been established were not in any way put to use. With this he implies that it is not reasonable to calmly negotiate for something when in turn all that will be received is hypocrisy. By mentioning these circumstances he provides the backbone to his stance, opposing King’s. Later in the speech, Malcolm introduces his suggestion as to what should be done which is quite obviously directed at King’s approach. Malcolm states “A racialist never understands a peaceful language, he never understands the nonviolent language” (9:00). With this statement he implied to turning to violence or as he put it “speak the language they understand” (8:57). Furthermore, he continues to justify his belief and express his opinion of nonviolence by asserting that he believes it is reasonable to engage in extremism as long as it is for the purpose of justice. He also suggests that anyone who stands...
Words: 329 - Pages: 2
...The 1960s was a time dealing with civil rights. There were many leaders during this time that had a huge impact on civil rights like Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Both of these leaders were fighting for the rights of african americans, but they both had different viewpoints. MLK was a peaceful man, while Malcolm X was more aggressive. The two of these civil rights leaders had different philosophies but were both successful. However, Martin Luther King Jr. was more helpful during this time period. One reason Martin Luther King Jr.’s philosophy made more sense than Malcolm X’s philosophy is, Martin Luther KIng Jr. wanted to work together with whites to act upon segregation. For example, MLK said “With this faith we will be able to work...
Words: 956 - Pages: 4
... 02 March 2016 MLK Jr vs Malcolm X Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X had many similarities and differences when it came to their roles in the civil rights movement. A huge similarity of the two is they fought hard for their people with getting treated bad. They both wanted to see black people in the best position possible. Risking their lives everyday for the rights they felt they deserve. They were both assassinated because of their leadership role positions they played during this time. Even though they had different beliefs/religions, both their religions played a significant role in their approaches. They both had the greatest impact on the civil rights movement during the 1960s. One of the main reasons why Malcolm X and MLK Jr is different is their approach to the civil rights movement. While MLK Jr wanted to keep the peace and have a non-violent protest, Malcolm X was very opposite. Malcolm X felt that if they wanted to be violent then so should his people. Also, MLK Jr thought more of people being equal and Malcolm X was more for his people being in high power and being controlled by themselves. Also, their religion was a extremely huge difference and had an impact on the way they went about things. MLK Jr grew up in a Christian home where his parents stressed necessary things such as education and religion. Malcolm X converted to Islam after being arrested for drugs and burglary. His outlook on things were far more violent than MLK Jr. MLK Jr believed that...
Words: 599 - Pages: 3
...Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were very prominent African American individuals throughout the fight for equality in America. They fought for what they believed in but each in their own way. Their many different views and beliefs are easily a result of the environment they grew up in and the households they came from. MLK grew up in a middle class family and was well educated, while Malcolm X grew up in an underprivileged environment that was very hostile with poor education. Martin Luther King Jr. was always against violence throughout his entire struggle and he always stood his ground. Most importantly, even though he may have been physically attacked, he never reacted with violence. On the other hand, Malcolm X’s most famous line was “By any Means Necessary” he was willing to do whatever it took to fight against the oppressors, whether it is violent or non-violent. The more we learn about each of these men the more we...
Words: 831 - Pages: 4
...would it lead us in the future. Two people who are famous enough to change the racism in the whole nation. Martin Luther King, and Malcolm X they both have different perspective, but they shared the same goal. There are two differences which are their history and believes, and they shared the same faith. First of all, MLK and Malcolm X they have grown up in a different environment. MLK was very educated because his family could afford to pay for his schooling. In the other hand, Malcolm X grown up in unfavorable environment with barely any education. Although, both of their fathers was murdered which has a strong impact on them. In addition, MLK he believed that violence shouldn’t face with violence, and he would not use the violence even if he was been forced. However, some of MLK believes was related to christian faith. Also, Malcolm X is a muslim who has his own principle, and he believed to defend himself if the police officers try to attack him. Also, there is a famous saying “ by any means necessary”. After discussing the two differences between MLK and Malcolm X, we must not forget to mention some similarities between them. one of the important common things was that both of them have educated wives. However, eventually both of them was assassinated at the same age while they are looking for civil rights. In conclusion, MLK and Malcolm X the fact that they came out from different history and believes, but they share the same goal is very fascinated. Personally,...
Words: 290 - Pages: 2
...Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK) and Malcolm X were two fortunate African American leaders who fought for the freedom of Black America. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of a kind just like his “I Have a Dream “speech which explained the injustice and violation of freedom towards African Americans even after slavery had ended it also explains how he wants both African Americans and whites to unite as one. As to Malcolm X, his most famous speech was “God’s Judgement” which also explained the injustice towards the African American race but leans more towards the violent path rather than the peaceful way. Both characters have similarities and differences between their speeches like the imagery they each portray, the tone/mood they present, and the type of character that they each show throughout the speech. The imagery that both speeches portrayed was in a way much different. For Example, MLK’ s “I Have a Dream” speech was intended to portray a world where both African Americans and whites were united and together without judgment and...
Words: 543 - Pages: 3
...Malcolm X is evoked as one of the greatest and influential African American figures, at the same time degraded for the violence he provoked as well as his black supremacy teachings. Martin Luther King, Jr., on the other hand, is recognized as the greatest influential character in the black Civil Rights Movement, with teachings of non-violent resistance and equal rights for blacks and whites. After spending several years in prison, Malcolm converted to the Muslim religion and utilized newspaper columns, radio, and television to convey the Nation of Islam's (NOI) message. King strived to gain credentials from his audiences by everything from his tone to quoting biblical figures. Malcolm X was not able to influence the black community as well as Martin Luther King, Jr. Due to their differences in childhood and religion, their philosophies differed, causing supporters to accord more with the statements of Martin Luther King, Jr. Born Malcolm Little on May 19, 1925 in Omaha, Nebraska, to Earl Little, a Baptist minister; and to Louise Norton Little, a housewife busy with the family's eight children. Earl Little was a supported of Marcus Garvey, the founder of the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA). This prompted the Little family with death threats and by age four, Malcolm's Lansing, Michigan home was burned to the ground. Two years later, Earl Little was murdered by a white mob. Louise trying to keep the family in order, suffered an emotional breakdown and was...
Words: 1083 - Pages: 5
...African Americans equal. Although the main movement was getting blacks equal there was also hispanic movements to trying to become equal. The civil rights movement lasted from 1919 to the 1960’s. The Civil Rights movement impacted the society tremendously. There was two different tactics coming into this movement. There was the violent/ defense tactic which was lead by Malcolm X. Malcolm X was a minister in the Nation Of Islam, then he left the group in the year 1964. Malcolm preached black supremacy and rejected Martin Luther King JR’s movement and attempt to integrate. His whole idea was to use violence to get his point across...
Words: 544 - Pages: 3
...similar in some ways, such as speaking out on the Vietnam War. The aims of MLK differed significantly from those of Black Power activists. The aims and methods of MLK did differ from those of Black Power activists. For example, King’s campaigns such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott in 1955 and Birmingham 1963 were very peaceful, despite facing violence. King’s peaceful message was due to him being a devout Christian and believing in love for all mankind. As a result, they were successful because they drew on the support from white people. In contrast, was Black Power Activists who some like Malcolm X, believed that blacks should defend themselves because it made them look weak and allowed whites to take advantage. Malcolm X wasn’t a Christian and so he didn’t believe in King’s Christian philosophy. This is a clear difference in both methods and ideology. King also wanted integration with whites, which can be contributed to his ‘love your fellow man’ philosophy. This was clear in King’s March on Washington 1963, where both whites and blacks marched on Washington to hear speeches from civil rights leaders. King didn’t just want integration with whites, as shown in his Poor Peoples Campaign 1968. In this, King called for a coalition of blacks, Native Americans, Hispanics and poor whites. This is a clear sign that King not only wanted to help blacks but others in American society. In contrast was Malcolm X again, who believed that integration would bring about a new form of slavery...
Words: 971 - Pages: 4
...The 1960’s, full of questionable philosophies of activists expressing what they seemed to be their right of knowledge and ethics for others to follow but none were sure of to be the most senseful of the all. King believed in to be the most notable activist around the 1960’s along with Malcolm X. The two followed nearly complete opposite philosophies in which people sought out and followed along with their community for change and equality. Malcolm X a black nationalist, a devoted follower of Islam, Elijah Muhammad. X expressed and taught that white race brainwashed blacks to be patient while enduring injustice around their home and country, preaching anti-white rhetoric and change of America by any means necessary. Some expressed his thoughts on creating an all black society of their own throughout the civil rights era. King seemed as an opposite in most ways but with the same goal of respect and equality of the black community. Following the teachings of Gandhi, throughout his works even though King was a Christian priest. He pursued his vision through a philosophy of peaceful change through sit ins etc. to desegregate the nation. The philosophy of the two were nothing but opposites yet during the 60’s MLK’s ideology was the most suitable for America at that time....
Words: 922 - Pages: 4
...To what extent did the aims and methods of Martin Luther King differ from those of black power activists? There is no question that the aims and methods of Martin Luther King differed from those of Black Power activists. King was peaceful and wanted integration with whites while Black Power activists confronted violence and believed in black supremacism and separatism. But they were also similar in some ways, such as speaking out on the Vietnam War. The aims of king differed significantly from those of Black Power activists. The aims and methods of MLK did differ from those of Black Power activists. For example, King’s campaigns such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott in 1955 and Birmingham 1963 were very peaceful, despite facing violence. King was brought up by a rich black family, with a good education, and a good chance at life. He was a black aristocrat, and a wealthy man. King’s peaceful message was due to him being a devout Christian and believing in love for all mankind. As a result, they were successful because they drew on the support from white people. King also wanted integration with whites, which can be contributed to his ‘love your fellow man’ philosophy. This was clear in King’s March on Washington 1963, where both whites and blacks marched on Washington to hear speeches from civil rights leaders. King didn’t just want integration with whites, as shown in his Poor Peoples Campaign 1968. In this, King called for a coalition of blacks, native Americans, Hispanics...
Words: 1079 - Pages: 5
...heart and to act with violence was something that Martin Luther King didn’t believe in. He believed in love and peaceful protest was the way to go for change to happen.While on the other side, Malcolm X violence and non peaceful protests were the way to go to get your point across more efficiently. During the 1950s and 1960s, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X took two different approaches in an attempt to change the way society acted towards African Americans. Malcolm X chose a more aggressive yet passionate route for change. He believed that we shouldn’t just let Caucasian people treat African American the way they do. We should stand up for what and protect each other. King thought the exact opposite, he believed that violence solves problems temporarily and non violence has lasting results. Using violence to fight oppression isn’t ideal because it portrays the cause in a negative light, creates fear and anxiety within a community, and it doesn’t have lasting results....
Words: 517 - Pages: 3
...made the most sense for America in the 1960’s- Dr King or Malcolm X? Many people of color have been discriminated against and have struggled for equality. They have been harmed as a result of superioristic views of some white people. Nevertheless, the 1960’s was an important era because it sparked advances for civil rights. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two influential people that tried to get rights for equality but in very different ways. Where Martin Luther King spread change through nonviolence, Malcolm X believed in gaining equality through the idea of separatism and by any means necessary. Dr. King’s philosophy made the most sense for America during the 1960’s because it enacted change...
Words: 1040 - Pages: 5
