...Monroe Response Monroe’s written statement included mostly opinion based information that lined up with the neutrality that was planned for America. This statement was created to keep the European nations from not settling on America’s land and colonizing it. His main points behind this reasoning were to make European nations fully settle their land first and stay away from political sides. Monroe pulls the ‘we didn’t touch your stuff, so you shouldn’t touch ours’. In a way it could count as convincing, however it does not have much ground for support to back up why he chose this policy. Monroe also uses a reason stating, “The citizens of the United States cherish sentiments the most friendly in favor of the liberty and happiness of their...
Words: 261 - Pages: 2
...The Venezuelan Crisis The Venezuelan Crisis of 1895 happened over a longstanding territory dispute with Great Britain. The territory that was being fought over was Guayana Esequiba, Britain claimed that the territory belonged to them and was part of British Guiana and Venezuela considered it to be property of Venezuela. The dispute would become a crisis in 1895 when William L. Scruggs who was Venezuela’s lobbyist argued that Britain’s behavior over the issue was a violation of the Monroe Doctrine and was able to get Washington D.C. to pursue the matter. This issue over the territory of Guayana Esequiba had been brewing for a long time between Great Britain and Venezuela. The territory in dispute was once property of the Spanish Empire which was inherited by Venezuela after it gained independence in 1830 and the Dutch Empire which was inherited by Great Britain in 1814 along with the Dutch territories of Essequibo, Demerara and Berbice. Britain wanted to use the Schomburgk Line to divide the territory and was drawn up by Robert Schomburgk during his four-year expedition for the Royal Geographical Society from 1835-1839. Venezuela did not agree with the Schomburgk Line and in 1844 declared the Essequibo River the dividing line. The British did offer to make changes to the line but Venezuela never responded. They finally decided in 1850 that both countries would not enter into the disputed territory, and everything was good until around 1876 when diplomatic exchanges started...
Words: 1156 - Pages: 5
...On December 2, 1823, America introduced the Monroe Doctrine to the world. The doctrine focused on the issue of European colonial powers in the Americas, and noted that if any European power were to attempt colonization or interfere with the politics of nations in the Americas, it would be met with intervention from the United States. The Monroe Doctrine is warned that a firm foreign policy is expected. The doctrine was prepared by Secretary of State John Quincy Adams, Adams persuaded President Monroe to declare an American national policy with respect to the Western Hemisphere. At Adams’s request, Monroe announced in his Annual Message to Congress on December 2, 1823, as a protest to European intervention in Latin America in order to restore...
Words: 779 - Pages: 4
...Monroe decided to make this doctrine on the simple fact that Latin American was struggling against the rule of Spain and Portugal. That struggle of independence made him worried that European powers will try to expand again in the western hemisphere. I believe Monroe wanted the rest of America to stay free as well, as Americans wanted their neighboring countries to gain independence from their European powers and govern themselves however they may. Monroe feared that if European powers started to expand and conquer free lands in the Western Hemisphere, the American Government might have been involving in another war with the European powers. The justification of keeping European powers away from the Western Hemisphere was logically sound....
Words: 251 - Pages: 2
...It has been said that the US is renounces the Monroe Doctrine but Secretary of State John Kerry said, “ that the era of the Monroe Doctrine is over”. Kerry said that Monroe’s state address it has asserted our authority to step in and oppose the influence of European powers in Latin America also through out history that our nation’s president have reinforced the doctrine and made a similar choice but we made a different choice that the era Monroe Doctrine is over that the relationship we have seek that we have worked on fostering is not the U.S declaration on how it will intervene in the affairs of other American states. It’s all of our countries viewing one as equals, sharing responsibilities, cooperating on security issues, and adhering...
Words: 760 - Pages: 4
...Eric Quetschke HST 480 Research Paper During the nineteenth century the United States was growing its empire through economics, politics, and military actions. The first step in growing their empire was to limit the actions of European countries. The Monroe Doctrine of 1823 asserted the United State’s position by warning European powers against any further attempts to colonize lands in the Western Hemisphere. The American continents are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European power. With the economic growth of Latin America and the Pacific the United States began to see the need for a more efficient and secure route to the east coast. The Isthmus of Panama was identified as that route and...
Words: 1812 - Pages: 8
...APUSH Study Guide 8 A weak Confederacy and the Constitution, 1776-1790 Themes/Constructs: The federal Constitution represented a moderately conservative reaction against the democratilizing effects of the Revolution and the Articles of Confederation. The American Revolution was not a radical transformation like the French or Russian revolutions, but it produced political innovations and some social change in the direction of greater equality and democracy. The American Revolution did not overturn the social order, but it did produce substantial changes in social customs, political institutions, and ideas about society and government. Among the changes were the separation of church and state in some places, the abolition of slavery in the North, written political constitutions, and a shift in political power from the eastern seaboard toward the frontier. The first weak government, the Articles of Confederation, was unable to exercise real authority, although it did successfully deal with the western lands issue. The Confederation’s weakness in handling foreign policy, commerce and the Shays Rebellion spurred the movement to alter the Articles. Instead of revising the Articles, the well-off delegates to the Constitutional Convention created a charter for a whole new government. In a series of compromises, the convention produced a plan that provided for a vigorous central government, a strong executive, the protection for property, while still upholding republican...
Words: 3481 - Pages: 14
...DBQ: What were the Underlying Causes of World War I? World War I was the first devastating war the world ever saw. From July 28, 1914, to November 11, 1918, over 17 million people died and 20 million more were wounded. The two main alliances that fought each other were called the allied powers and the central powers. The allied powers consisted of France, Great Britain, Russia, and America. While the central power consisted of Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, and Ottoman Empire. Both the allied powers and central powers devoured each other. But, for what cost and why did this happen? There are 4 major reasons why World War I happened. Militarism, Alliances, Imperialism and Nationalism these 4 are the major causes for World War I. First, as Europe advanced their technology and economy because of Industrial revolution; they also increased their military power and the spendings. In the analysis Richard Overy created in 1999, it shows that money spent on Army and Navy from 1890 to 1914 increased greatly. Germany especially had a huge amount of growth when it came to Military.The spendings increased because of the concept people had back then. Like Emile Zola in 1891 said: “We must eat and be eaten so that World may live”. Prince Bernhard von Bulow of Germany also said “In the coming...
Words: 749 - Pages: 3
...DBQ: Nationalism & Sectionalism By John A. Braithwaite DIRECTIONS: The following DBQ is based upon the accompanying documents and your knowledge of the time period involved. This question tests your ability to work with historical documents. Your answer should be derived mainly from the documents, however, you may refer to historical facts, materials, and developments NOT mentioned in the documents. You should assess the reliability of the documents as historical sources where relevant to your answer. Check your school and community libraries for materials and also, surf the internet to help you find relevant outside information. QUESTION FOR ANALYSIS: In the period from 1815 to 1858, two giant forces—nationalism and sectionalism--ostensibly in opposition to each other—prevailed simultaneously in the first half of 19th century America. Describe these two forces and discuss the geographic, political, constitutional, economic, and diplomatic contrasts of both forces. PROMPT: Formulate a thesis statement Use documents as well as your own outside knowledge of the period. Deal evenly with all aspects of the questions Be sure to cover the time period given • Assess the validity of the documents • Draw effective and specific conclusions whenever possible TEXTBOOK RECOMMENDATIONS Gillon & Matson The American Experiment Boydston & McGerr Making A Nation Murrin, et.al Liberty, Equality, Power Norton...
Words: 3103 - Pages: 13
