Free Essay

Right to Refuse Treatment

In:

Submitted By crose
Words 1422
Pages 6
-------------------------------------------------
Right to refuse treatment
Cathy Rose

HR 107
Loretta horton
11/6/14
HR 107
Loretta horton
11/6/14
Hutchinson Community College
Hutchinson Community College

Freedom. It is one of the most powerful words in the world and the basis of our United States Constitution. Americans have more freedoms than any other country in the world. But is freedom an absolute? To have absolute freedom would mean to have no laws put upon society. No laws against stealing, killing, or doing other harm to others. I doubt anyone would disagree that we need laws which inhibit our freedoms in order to protect society against harmful acts by others. But what about our individual freedoms such as to smoke or wear seatbelts? It’s harmful to us and others through second hand smoke yet we have the freedom or right to smoke or not smoke. We can be fined for not wearing one yet it does not harm others if we don’t. This law is in place to protect us in case of an accident. Our government has opted for laws which protect us from making decisions that could result in harm to our persons if not followed and left some of our freedoms intact even though they are known to be harmful to us. One such freedom or “right” they have left in our hands is the “Right to Refuse Medical Treatment”. The US Supreme Court has determined that we, as individuals, have a constitutional right to determine our fate when it comes to what medical treatments we want and don’t want (1). However, this is not an absolute or unlimited right. There are many factors that come into play for you to be able to make this decision such as competency, legal status, and religious beliefs. There are many other factors that also can determine your right to refuse treatment but this paper will examine the issues of competency, legal status, religious beliefs, and what it means to make an informed decision. Before a person can refuse the treatment they must be informed of what the treatment is and what the expected outcome will be and risks of having the treatment. The physician providing treatment is responsible for providing this information to the patient. Once you have the information you can accept or refuse the treatment if you are of legal status and competent. Legal status means you are of legal age, which may vary from state to state, or be an emancipated minor. An emancipated minor is one that is legally responsible for themselves and their children. For example, a 15 year girl with a child is considered an emancipated minor. If you are of legal status then you still have to be deemed competent. To be competent you must be mentally able to understand what you are being told and the consequences of actions to be taken or not taken. Sometimes the courts have to make the determination of competency such as for the mentally handicapped. There are also issues that can arise that would make a normally competent person incompetent to make this type of decision. An example would be someone in the emergency room that is under extreme pain or maybe unconscious. The courts have determined that extreme pain can alter a person’s ability to make good decisions and thus gives the emergency room physician the right to treat them against their will. Let’s look at three scenarios to better understand these issues.
The first scenario is a woman of 35 who goes to her primary physician for stomach problems. After several tests, her physician tells her she has stage 4 stomach cancer and should start chemotherapy followed by radiation as soon as possible. After the initial shock wears off the patient asks her doctor about other options and life expectancy with this type of cancer. Her physician tells her that the success rate of survival for this type of cancer with and without treatment. He also informs her that there are no alternatives to the chemotherapy and radiation as surgical removal is not an option. The patient still wants more information so her doctor schedules an appointment with an oncologist. The oncologist confirms the information that the attending physician has told the patient. The oncologist also tells her that the chemotherapy and radiation would at best extend her life by 1 year on average if it worked and shrunk the tumor. He tells her that each patient’s outcome is different and cannot be predicted. The patient makes a decision based on this information not to have the treatment and would rather live out the rest of her life as best she can. This is an informed decision. But does she have the right to refuse the treatment? She is of legal age, she has asked questions and been informed of what will happen if she does not take the treatment. She understands that she will die without it but also understands that the likelihood of survival with treatment is minimal. She would be considered competent to make this decision even though it means she will die sooner than later.
The second scenario is a man who is brought into the emergency along with his wife. They have just been in a car accident. His wife is unconscious and in critical condition. The husband has a foot that has been crushed in the accident and should be removed immediately. The man is in severe pain and in distress over his wife. He will not give consent to any treatment or the removal of his foot. Instead he is continually asking about his wife who has been taken into surgery. The emergency room doctor trying to treat him informs him of what will happen if he does not allow them to treat him including the removal of his foot. He again dismisses the doctor and refuses asking about his wife again. After a few more moments, the man goes unconscious due to blood loss. The doctor makes the determination that the man is incompetent to refuse treatment due to pain and distress. The physician notes this in the medical record and proceeds by stabilizing him and then sending the man into surgery to remove his foot and save his life. The emergency room physician has right to make this decision.
Now let’s look at one more scenario and perhaps the most difficult. This one is a boy of 12 who needs a liver transplant. His parents refuse stating their religion does not allow this type of treatment or their souls cannot go to heaven. The doctor informs the parents that the child will die without the transplant. The parents still refuse as does the child. The doctor confers with the hospitals legal staff for what can be done to save this child’s life. The doctor is told that they do have the option to contact child protective services to have the child taken from the parents for neglect or child endangerment. The doctor is hesitant to do this as the parents, other than this issue, are very good parents and love their son. The legal staff makes the decision to call child protective services who in turn removes the child temporarily from the home. The child’s fate is now in the hands of the court system to determine if the parents have the right to decline their child a transplant. This decision can be appealed by both the parents and child protective services causing a delay in treatment which could result in the child’s death before the courts come to a final ruling. Should parents have this right to let their child die? Should the fact that the child says no to the transplant, understanding he will die have any part in the decision? As Americans we have the freedom of religion but to what extent should that right allow someone to die?
American ethics are ever changing. Each generation brings more change and this change tends to push for individual freedoms including the right to die. No one knows what our society will desire in the future but the right to refuse treatment will continue to be debated for many years to come.

References: 1. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 110 S. Ct 2841, 111 l. Ed. 2d 224 (1190).
Bibliographies:
1. John F. Kennedy Online database:
MedlinePlus www.nlm,nih.gov/medlineplus/medicalethics.html 2. The Sullivan Group www.thesullivangroup.com 3. AAOS www.aaos.org 4. American Cancer Society www.cancer.org

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Sharna And Ginty Case Summary

...Identify Issues and Collect Information Identify the problem 1. Does Ginty have a capacity to refuse or withdraw her treatment and does the nurse, Sharna, have a duty of care towards Ginty and her decision to refuse treatment which would prolong her life. 2. Does Sharna have an obligation to report suspected child abuse to protect Ginty’s children? Who is involved? • Ginty McTaggart (patient) • Nurse Sharna • Ginty’s cousin Garry • Ginty’s daughters • Medical team 2. Evaluate the Issue Ethical Principles Autonomy –Autonomy in the health framework is described as ‘every human being of adult, more than 18 years and with a capacity has a right to determine what should be done with their own body’ (Schloendorff v Society of New York...

Words: 1628 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Patient's Decisions

...a. The patient has the right to fee will with their own mind and body. b. Religious reasons may be a larger deciding factor to refuse. c. One's cultural norm is not the same as another's and there for treatment cannot be forced. d. Irrational patients, their guardians, and treatment. e. Specific case examples. 3) Counterargument – Examples of invalid arguments. 4). Response. a. Examples to prove the argument valid. 5) Conclusion. Patient Decisions Not to Treat The purpose of this paper is to introduce and analyze the topic of patient decisions on the health care professional. Specifically it will discuss whether a patient's irrational decision to refuse treatment is binding to a health care professional. A patient's consent to treatment has become a thorny issue in the courts and in the nation's health care facilities. A patient has the right to refuse medical treatment for moral, religious, or cultural reasons. However, if the patient is irrational or uninformed, it could have profound implications for the health care professionals treating the patient, and they could end up in court if they do not have the proper documentation of consent. Patient's rights are a critical concern in the health care profession today, and few will argue that a competent patient has the right to free will and to choose what happens to their own body. Some patients with religious convictions may choose to refuse certain treatments, such as abortion, and some...

Words: 1949 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Bouvia V. Superior Court

...1.3 Bouvia v. Superior Court Dawnyel Donaldson Franklin University Healthcare Law and Ethics HCM742-H1WW (F14) Julia Matthews JD/MPH November 13, 2014 The case of Elizabeth Bouvia v. Superior Court is a well-known case in the patient’s right to refuse treatment. Elizabeth Bouvia was born with cerebral palsy, which worsened, as she grew older and subsequently caused her to become a quadriplegic. She additionally developed severe degenerative arthritis that caused her to be in continuous unbearable pain. At the age of twenty-eight her condition had worsened to the point that she was said to be bed ridden and completely dependent on others for her activities of daily living. Although she had many physical challenges she was a smart competent young woman. In her early adult years she had obtained a college degree and at one point had gone back to school to begin a Master’s in Social Work program. She was also married for a short time. However as a result of her inability to make a living and her physical disabilities she found herself in 1986 without a place to live, requiring constant analgesic treatment for her arthritis pain and unable to consume large amounts of food by mouth. Due to her lack of a permanent living situation and need for continuous care she checked herself into a Los Angeles Public hospital. During this stay her weight was recorded to be as low as 60 -70 pounds and she was unable to consume solid foods in any significant amount. As a result...

Words: 1639 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Anorexia

...Should Individuals with Anorexia Nervosa Have the Right to Refuse Life-Sustaining Treatment? Psych 515 March 25, 2013 Should Individuals with Anorexia Nervosa Have the Right to Refuse Life-Sustaining Treatment? There is a longstanding debate over whether treating an individual against the persons will is ethical or not. In cases of suicide most people agree that treatment with or without the person’s consent is preferable. In the case of anorexia nervosa, however, there is debate over if the person is competent enough to make decisions about life-sustaining treatment. This paper will process two differing views on the right to refuse life-sustaining treatment, one for and one against the use. The paper will cover the facts as well as opinions presented by both sides and the strengths, weaknesses, and how credible both sides were in the argument. Finally, the paper will select which side the author agrees with more as well as which side contemporary research supports. Facts and Opinions On one side of the argument is Heather Draper who believes that individuals with anorexia nervosa should be allowed to refuse life-sustaining treatment. According to Harper professionals should respect the individual’s right to refuse treatment, especially when the individual’s refusal is grounded in arguments about the quality of life and the burden of therapy (Halgin, 2009). Harper continues the argument with questions regarding the effectiveness of force feeding an individual, which...

Words: 1366 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Dax's Case

...Cindy Siegel Did Dax have an ethical right to refuse care? A legal right? Why/why not? Using the Ethical Analysis Paradigm from class slides; there are four principles that need to be addressed in order to reach an ethical decision. • Medical Indications – diagnosis, prognosis, treatment option o Dax had severe burns to 65% of his body, including his face, hands, eyes o Without treatment and allowed to return home, would likely result in death from infection • Patient Preferences – preferences and values, capacity to decide, informed o Repeatedly demanded that treatment be discontinued o Demanded to be discharged to home o Informed of risks and refused treatment o Had capacity to make and communicate decisions • Quality of Life – as experienced by patient o Excruciatingly painful treatments o Amputation of several fingers – minimal use of hands o Blind o Dependent on others • Contextual Factors – family, law, financial o Legal right to refuse treatment At issue is Dax’s ethical right to refuse care. While he may not have made the choice that physicians and/or hospitals would, he has a fundamental right to make choices concerning his treatment and there should be respect for his autonomy in doing so. Physicians, who take an oath to “First do not harm...,” may struggle with their ethical viewpoints, however, this decision is about Dax’s ethical right, not theirs. Since Dax is presumed competent, he does have the ethical right to refuse care, even when doing so will most certainly...

Words: 1238 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

End of Life

...at the end of a person's life: the withdrawal and withholding of life-sustaining treatment, whether based on the consent of patients or others close to them; suicide; assistance to commit suicide; and active euthanasia. The laws governing each of these practices reflect a judgment about the appropriate balance between individual autonomy and society's interest in preventing harm. At one end of the spectrum, the law covering treatment decisions embraces individual autonomy as its central concern, granting competent individuals a broad right to refuse medical treatment necessary to sustain their lives. Decisions about suicide and euthanasia fall at the other end of the continuum, where the law constrains individuals' actions for their own benefit and for the sake of the common good. Societal limits on suicide are reflected in laws that prohibit assisted suicide and euthanasia, regardless of the individual's consent. Likewise, while it is no longer illegal in New York State to commit suicide, there is no "right" to commit suicide as a matter of constitutional or common law. The Right to Decide About Treatment Under New York law, competent adults have a firmly established right to accept or reject medical treatment. This right includes the right to refuse medical interventions necessary to prolong the patient's life. The New York Court...

Words: 1367 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Case Study

...later than Week 8 Case: Mother refuses Blood, Spouse Disagrees (Perkins v. Lavin) pg. 417-418 Summary: Mother (Plaintiff Perkins) signs a form state the refusal of a blood transfusion, due to religious beliefs. Her husband who is not of the same religious beliefs, consented to a blood transfusion, which was administered. Mother files claim against the defendant for assault and battery. The claim was upheld. Although both parties have noted that the plaintiff’s husband provided his consent for the transfusion, the defendant has not argued that his consent was sufficient to overcome plaintiff’s direction that she was not to receive a transfusion. Mother submitted sufficient evidence to the trail court to establish that there was, at least a genuine issue as to whether the defendant intentionally invaded her right to be free from offensive contact. Because of the Mother’s recognition that the defendant acted to save her life, a jury may find that she is entitled to only nominal damages. 1) Should the court be the ultimate decision maker when there is a dispute over whether or not a lifesaving measure should be taken with a nonconsenting person? No I don’t agree that the court should be the ultimate decision maker when there is a dispute over whether or not a lifesaving measure should be taken with a nonconsenting person. If a nonconsenting person chooses to refuse lifesaving measures, they have a right to refuse treatment. A competent nonconsenting person...

Words: 415 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Aneroxia Nervosa

...an exemplar of the numerous cases that nurses’ encounter when patients refuse treatments that could save their lives. Hendrick (2000) indicates that in such cases, nurses, with patients’ best interest at heart question the possibility of employing coercion or other means to make the patient undergo the treatment. Veitch (2007) warns nurses or any medical practitioner on making patients comply with treatment citing that in healthcare, best practices, in reference to legal rights and ethical practices should act as effective tools that should make nurses and other medical practitioners decide on patients that refuse treatment. In addition, every case should be examined individually to decide the best course of action that nurses and the medical practitioners should take. Hence, in deciding on Sally’s case, the key question lies on whether Sally has a legal basis or right, as well as the ethical right of refusing treatment. Respect for autonomy, granted under the individual legal right to refuse or consent treatment automatically grants Sally the legal right to refuse treatment. However, the complexity, in reference to the limited nature of the law and respect for autonomy as an ethical principle coupled with the characteristic of anorexia nervosa, as a psychological disorder that makes a patient incompetent to make medical decisions reveal that against all odds, Sally has no legal right to refuse her treatment. One of the contributing factors to developing anorexia is an individual’s...

Words: 511 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

NES Seizure: A Case Study

...However developing a policy for treating AMA patients might offer assistance with this dilemma. The frequent AMA patient needs to have a social service consult initiated upon admission and daily competency assessments. As with all patients, communication is essential and important, but increasingly more so for the AMA patient. These patients need to be updated on a daily bases about the plan of care, treatments, testing, and discharge planning. Furthermore, they need to be informed of delays that have or could occur and how they are being resolved. Not surprisingly, many of these patients having history of substance abuse or psychological issues, that would best be addressed upon admission and treatment initiated if needed (Bartley,...

Words: 1654 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Task 3a

...Right to choose a GP: Every person in the UK, irrespective of gender, race, religion/belief, sexual orientation, disability or age has the right to be registered with a GP of their choice as set out in the NHS Constitution the latest version of which was published in March 2011 (NHS Choices 25.04.15). Patients have the choice of which GP practice that they wish to register with although in certain circumstances a GP practice can refuse to register a patient, however, the patient must be informed of the reason for this refusal in writing. A patient also has the right to choose which GP they wish to see within the practice, although exercising this may delay their ability to get an appointment. Patients also have the right to change GP should they be unhappy with the level of care or service that they receive. Other rights that may affect this is the patients right to autonomy “Freedom to determine one’s own actions and behaviours”. In practice it is an obligation for us under our PMS contract (subject to the practices own policy on living outside of the practice boundary) to meet this right for the patient. Task 3a) Right to refuse treatment: Every patient that is registered with the NHS has the right to refuse treatment or medication offered to them, as long as they have the mental capacity to make an informed choice. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 states “Everyone has the right to make his or her own decisions. Health and care professionals should always assume an individual...

Words: 653 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Patient Nursing Role

...those details are crucial in the care of a patient because that small amount of communication can help or hurt a patients’ mind set of wanting to get better and making their own decisions for their healthcare. If patients are being treated with respect while in the care of healthcare professionals it tends to make their condition more manageable due to the cooperation and understanding of their rights. Some types of rights that patients have are rights to refuse medications and very important rights to safe care. All patients should be treated equally and fairly regardless of their race, religion, or socioeconomic background. No one patient is better than the next person. There should be one common goal in all healthcare settings especially in the acute settings and that should be focusing on getting the patients back to their...

Words: 602 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Racism In Healthcare

...next generation”(Tyson,2001).This means that doctors don't have a choice of who they want and not want to treat. However, others see that both doctors and patients should have a right to seek...

Words: 1456 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Ethical Issues In Health And Social Care Essay

...discussion debates the ethical dilemma created by a woman who refuses to engage in the care of her gestational diabetes mellitus. The situation has been discussed with her obstetrician and midwife and the woman and her husband have been provided with full education. Every possible strategy has been implemented and clearly documented, including the use of an interpreter, and the couple are well aware of the risk to the mother and her unborn baby. Despite this, they...

Words: 992 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Health & Quality of Life

...diagnosed at the doctor’s office with his parents in the room who refuses treatment right away for Daniel due to religious beliefs. Daniels family thought that alternatives to chemo would be better to Daniel. Once the word got out that the parents were refusing treatment the court ordered that this needed to be investigated for the child’s health. Judge John Rodenburg ruled against the family using the statement “medically neglected” and ordered that Daniel needed to be in the hands of child protective services for his safety. I believe that the court ruling was unfair to the family. The family of Daniel serves the right to make whatever medical decisions they choose. Daniel is not 18 so his voice would not have any role in the decisions therefore it is up to his parents to choose treatment or not. If they felt is if it was morally wrong to their beliefs it is not fair to force the treatment upon them or even taking there child to protective services. If Daniel wanted treatment and parents still refused the treatment I could understand where the court needs to be involved on making the decisions due to maybe a financial problems or something along those lines. In my eyes the policy for cancer treatment should be in the hands of the patient and their family. If the patient has any sort of financial problems and needs help with treatment court should have the right to grant a sum of money for help in treatment or deny you depending on the situation as long as the court shows...

Words: 421 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Physician Assisted Suicide Case Study

...Physically, she is very ill. She exhibits emphysema, hernia, and a whole slew of ailments which burden her to the point where getting up is difficult. As for mentally, she feels like a burden and is at the point where she doesn’t consider loss of her life as a significant issue. In fact, she goes through measures in order to hasten her own death. Roberta’s aforementioned plan is to refuse life sustaining treatment or in this case hydration. This is not considered committing suicide since neither Roberta or the doctor who withdraws aid are intending to death in the sense of killing the...

Words: 1328 - Pages: 6