Free Essay

Tweleve Angry Men

In:

Submitted By loorz
Words 1913
Pages 8
Twelve Angry Men – Book Report
How does your background and peer pressure influence your opinions and decisions? The play we read “twelve angry men” shows how a jury makes such an important decision of either sending the defendant to his death or keeping him alive – the jury determinates the fate of a 16 year old boy. As the title suggests that there are 12 men in the jury who do not know one another, and do not know the defendant, but these jurors have to work as one united group to argue and reach an agreement. They all have to be convinced wither the boy is guilty or not. The trial is about a sixteen year old boy accused with the murder of his father. The story has no plot because it tells us how these 12 jurors argue about the case in a small room and reach the final decision. They have to think as a group because, otherwise, it could not work, that means that they will get to the wrong decision, and cause or the release of a killer or the death of an innocent young man. The play emphasizes how they deal with the case and how they make a decision vital for the boy’s life. The jury is actually a group of randomly chosen members of society. Each one of them represents a particular class of the society, not only as a mass of people, but also the way this class of society thinks and behaves. Therefore, every one of them is sensitive to different issues and social norms and also each one of them confirms to different society standards and values of society. It is very important to note that each one of the characters- the jurors- is an ordinary person, has an ordinary life, problems and family and is surrounding by an ordinary people. They exhibit different perspectives, points of view, analysis and behavior in specific situations they experienced at the trial. Although there is plot, but the attitudes and behavior of the jurors constitute the main “actions” in the story. The juror’s perspectives, beliefs and attitude are the only thing in the story that let us infer about their personality and allow us to see how an individual behaves in different situations and events during his lifetime. For example, at the beginning of the story when conducted the first vote, only one of the jurors was convinced that the boy did not kill his father and voted for “not guilty”. The other eleven men assumed that the facts and the evidence were true and that the boy deserved to be sent to the electric chair, to his death. The 8th juror who dissented on the first vote started to contradict the other jury members by presenting the evidence and the facts again while looking into the details more closely and deeply. The 8th juror was not sure about all the testimonies in the first place, he proved and convinced the others step by step, that the evidence they have and all the testimonies were false. On the second vote two jurors call “not guilty” vote. However, we all know that people do not change their minds easily especially when they know they are wrong and simply they do not want to admit it. Their behavior is probably affected by internal attitudes and external influence. These social influences are, sometimes, the main reason why we act, behave and talk in a particular way. For an example, in the story the 7th juror has a baseball tickets for a game on the same night of the trial, so he prefers to go to the game, not caring about the defendant’s life. He tries to make the process as hurried as possible, and reach the final decision so he can be free to go to the game. The 3rd juror is so aggressive and he tries to convince all the others that he is right. He has no doubt about the truth, in his words. He has a really bad experience by living among, working and dealing with the group of people that he calls “criminals” which led him to reject these people and believe that anything they say and do is wrong. That makes him believe that the defendant who comes from this low sector of society is guilty without questioning or discussing.
The character of this juror shows the normative social influence that is a strong force in forming a person’s behavior. He believes that the boy is nothing different from all the others low class kids. We can infer that he thinks that if someone mixed with “bad people” he will be influenced him in a bad way. According to him, they are all criminals and stands for his social norms that he was younger and living among them, which now conduct his behavior. As a delegate of a particular class of society, this character expresses the opinion of the higher classes about neighborhoods called Projects. (It is like other word for place where poor Afro-American and low classes, who use drugs and are criminals live). This juror is very strong in the story because he always tries to tell his points and to convince everyone else with his opinions by arguing persistently and even yelling when he has to defend his arguments and perspectives. On the other hand, there is the character of the 8th juror who was the first one to oppose the presented evidence and tried to take a deeper look into important details before putting his belief in the testimonies and facts that they have. He presents to the others every single detail, starting with the smallest to the very bigger and important one. His arguments influence the whole group of jurors. They start to doubt the facts, the testimonies and the truth of the trial. He voices out what information the jury has on the case and tries to persuade the others to express what they also know and feels sure about in the trial. This sways the members of the jury who were not sure and feel uncertain about their positions. The information that the 8th juror’s presents to prove his point influences the other jurors and it continues to materialize throughout the story to the end of it. Through presenting new information, the 8th juror makes the others really think more deeply, as he does. And as we know, most of the people accept other people’s views because it contains valuable and true information that they did not know or think about, so they can learn from it. He studies each detail very closely and presents new information about it. Therefore, the other members of the group change their mind influenced by the information they are exposed to. Nevertheless, here comes the conformity of each member to his group standards. These 12 men have different way of thinking each of which is influenced by the social norms and standards they grew up in or live by presently. An example of conformity to a group is the 12th juror who changes his opinion in the story several times. He tries to adjust his way of thinking and behavior to the standard set by the group itself. So he is influenced several times by the opinions of the others and in order to be part of the group he sets the same opinion too. That means that the 12th juror feels that he is an outsider, he does not feel that he belongs to the group. In order, he changes his mind, so he can feel among. However, when he is pressured by the other members of the group, who believes the boy to be guilty, he changes his mind quickly and votes “guilty”. This is an example how a person is unsure in himself and adjusts himself to a group that its standards and beliefs influenced strongly by the opinions of the others. This goes to show that this person has very weak personal control and personality and can not form his own opinion about the trial. On the other hand, of the 3rd juror is an elderly man who realizes his own drama through the story. He has problems with his son, which are so bad that they have not spoken for years. This man is very sure that the boy is the killer of his own father, but at the end he realizes that he has been swayed by his own drama. This character is very strong in the play because he gives the whole action in the story. He is jumpy and nervous. He even shouts and wants to fight the opposition because they do not accept the facts and distort them. This sets an example of weak personal control and also shows what a huge extent our past dramatic events in our life affect our present behavior. The aggressiveness of some of the jurors in the play “Twelve Angry Men” shows weak personal control that makes them vulnerable to other opinions. They behave in a way dictated by their social status and personal background. Through the play the 8th juror leads the other members of the jury to accept small things in order that at the end, they understand the whole picture and to accept the vital truth whether the boy is guilty or not. There is also a group of jurors that occur when people in a group discuss things that most of them either favor or oppose. In the story there are several jurors that change their positions only because more members of the group do. And the very obvious example is when the 8th juror votes “not guilty” while everyone else votes “guilty”, the other jurors begin to think deeper into the 8th juror’s decision and to change theirs. Towards the end of the play, only two jurors are in favor that the boy is guilty of killing his father. These are the 3rd juror; the elderly man whose son abandoned him years ago, the 10th juror; who claims that he lived with the low class all his life, and the 4th juror; who claims that the boy’s story is a total bullshit and a huge lie, because the boy could not remember what movie he saw when the cop asked him at the same night. The 10th juror, at the end, realizes that the most obvious or the thing that comes first to his mind is not always the right thing or the obvious truth. The 10th juror gives up also because he can see that he will no longer be able to change anyone’s mind. And, the 3rd juror realizes that he should not be so aggressive though he is a lonely and a sad person. The 4th juror changes his mind because one of the jurors claims that what happened with the boy is a result of emotional stress, so he asked him if he remember what is the last movie he saw with his wife, the 4th juror could not remember either, because of the pressure he is under, so he changes his mind. The final vote is “not guilty” and the boy is discharge with the prosecution. The play shows us how your personal control and behavior designed by the social class we belong to and the background we come from and how that is the reasons for most of what we do and say.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Tweleve Angry Men

...Two Good Guys To Kill A Mockingbird and Twelve Angry Men have the similar characters, Atticus and Juror 8. They both are middle-aged men. They are good at talking. They did something unpopular. But as we know Juror 8 didn’t know this boy before. He could just let it go, But he didn’t. Then he won the case. Atticus is a lawyer. It’s his job to fight for people who need help. Although Atticus from To Kill A Mockingbird and Juror 8 from Twelve Angry Men are similar in that they both disagree with most people’s ideas and they are in a trial, the outcome of the trials were different. Atticus he loved his family. His neighbors liked him before he got Tom’s case, however, when he get that case his neighbor didn’t like him anymore. But as he said,”It’ll never come back”(Lee168). It’s show us how good that man is. It’s hard to see someone help a black man without prejudice in 1960 in the South. Juror 8 is kind of superman. We don’t know anything about him. We had enough sense of justice to help a kid he didn’t know. As he said,”No jury can declare a man guilty unless it’s sure”(Rose66). He is no shortcoming. He is perfect. Both Atticus and Juror 8 are good men. But I think Juror 8 is clever than Atticus, because they didn’t like he at first but they respected him at the end of story. He won respect on his own. Atticus had respect before, but he lost it. They both are good men. But Juror 8 is a perfect man. Atticus is a normal person. I can’t say who I like better, but...

Words: 301 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Tweleve Angry Men

...snap judgements were made that heavily influenced the case at hand, however throughout the course of the play we see that these prejudices were broken down. Arguments: 1. Prejudice displayed through the 3rd, 7th, 10th and 2nd jury members and their apparent lack of compassion and sympathy for a boy none of them know that is on trial for a murder case 2. How easily the other, quieter jury members where influenced by authority/ influential members of the jury team (juror 8, juror 3) 3. The American justice system in the 1950s to today’s views on punishment 4. The 1950s and how social/ political and economic choices all influenced the juror’s decisions in the murder case Title, author Context Contention However statement Twelve Angry Men, a play by Reginald Rose, unfolds within the archetypical and unceasing setting of a 20th Century American court room. The audience bear witness to the procession of a court case in which twelve jury members are set to delegate a murder case where the defendant is a young African American boy who is on trial for the alleged killing his father after a heated argument between the accused and the victim. The play’s theme of prejudice is heavily shown to be a prominent theme in which the majority of the jury members make hasty and potentially deadly decisions based on a pre-existing judgement based on the ill-conceived philosophies of that time period, and of what the America justice system should be for the white community and the black community...

Words: 370 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Opposing Thoughts in a Coexisting World

...Opposing Thoughts in a Coexisting World The foundation of life of this world, is coexisting with one another at the same time or in the same place in peace. In the story “Twelve Angry Men” written by Reginald Rose, he creates a theoretical question, if opposing ideas can coexist as well. Justice verses mercy and certainty versus doubt is the underlying conflict throughout the story displayed by each juror with their personal backgrounds either leading to condemning or saving a teen’s life. After act one, we see the struggle between each juror going from certainty and pushing for justice only to be later filled with doubt and demanding mercy. These opposing ideas disrupt the vary balance of peace leading for any coexisting out the door. The Idea of justice versus mercy is constantly questioned and played out by juror number eight and juror number three. The struggle for justice by juror number three using laws to fairly judge and punish the teen for his father’s murder is contradicted by juror number eight as he seeks for merciful truth. In act one, juror number three says, “I never saw a guiltier man in my life. You sat right in court and heard the same thing I did. The man’s a dangerous killer…”(Rose 3) followed by juror number eight explaining his not guilty vote saying, “… this boy’s been kicked around all his life. You know, living in a slum, his mother dead since he was nine … I think maybe we owe him a few words, that’s all” (3). Juror number three is an extremely opinionated...

Words: 622 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Angry Young Man in Drama

...The Life and Music of the original Angry Young Man On May 8th 1956, Look Back in Anger opened at the Royal Court Theatre as the third production of the newly formed English Stage Company. It was viewed as a play that would provide a euphoric blow to the customary and old English theatre. The changes in popular culture between 1950 and 1960 in Britain have been called a “cultural revolution”. Whatever was revolutionary about this era must have some bearing on both the genesis and reception of the ground-breaking play Look Back in Anger, by John Osborne. Appearing in the middle of the decade Osborne's drama initiated the cultural moment of the Angry Young Man. Precisely which young men were angry at this time and why are questions that lead back to this concept of the Cultural Revolution. Understanding Osborne's Jimmy Porter, the original Angry Young Man can take the researcher away from literary culture and deep into British popular culture. The cultural revolution of the 50s can be constituted with permissiveness, cosmopolitanism, new class attitudes and youth, each of which is manifested by distinctive artefacts such as cinema, popular music, the daily papers and other texts that surrounded the ordinary person on an ordinary working day. These four areas encompass the change in social attitudes and behaviour between the end of post-war austerity and the onset of world recession in the 1970s. By the end of this time, British society dressed differently, ate differently...

Words: 1474 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

12 Angry Men

...Definition Communication climateis the relative acceptance or rejection a group member feels based on the social and psychological tone of the relationships established among group members Two types of climate 1. In a supportive communication climate, group members feel their contributions are welcomed and valued 2.In a defensive communication climate, group members feel their contributions are neither welcomed nor valued For a group to establish a supportive communicationclimate, group members essentially must maximize their use of the six dimensions that promote a supportive communication climate and minimize their use of the six dimensions that promote a defensive communication climate 1. Description and evaluation focus on how group members take ownership of their verbal and nonverbal expressions Supportive: Descriptiondescribes her feelings and presents her viewpoints as her own Defensive: Evaluationpasses judgment, assigns blame, and interrogates group members 2. Problem orientation and control deal with how group members approach task accomplishment Supportive: Problem orientationfocuses on collaborating with group members by seeking a mutually defined and acceptable solution Defensive: Controlimposes a point of view on group members 3. Spontaneity and strategy center on the degree of openness that exists among group members Supportive: Spontaneityopenly expresses thoughts, feelings, or emotions upfront Defensive: Strategyshares thoughts, feelings...

Words: 441 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Twelve Angry Men

...Twelve Angry Men has lots of different characters in the story. Each character has a very unique costume that goes along with their personality. The style and color go along with their mood and character. The character costumes that I will give in depth details are the the 3rd juror, the 4th juror, and the 10th juror. The 3rd juror is the antagonist of the story. He believes that the boy is guilty no matter what and is not even willing to listen to both sides of the argument as well. In the story he is a businessman. He proudly states in the story that he started his business from nothing and ended up employing 34 people to his business. It is also revealed that he has a very bad relationship with his son. He thinks that the boy is guilty only because his son supposedly tried to kill him. He was also the last juror to change his mind to innocent, which in the end it shows he redeemed himself and started to become a better person. All of these details were shown to show the character of the 3rd character and why this character should get a black suit. Black is associated with evil, which this man in the story is probably the closest to evil. The man would also have very slick hair, giving him a very sharp and corrupt look. If big...

Words: 663 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

12 Angry Men Essay

...In the movie 12 Angry Men, twelve jurors are set to decide whether or not an eighteen year old boy should be served the death penalty. The men came into the room thinking that it was an obvious case. All of the men but one decided on voting guilty. Since there was one outcast, the group had no other choice but to listen to the individual’s opinions on why he believed the boy was not guilty. The visual was executed through different types of communications. There were different needs of control which allowed the gentlemen to gain a self-understanding and insight into each other. Also, the group was able to communicate in an organized manner by being interactional. Group communication was used in the movie because the subject was being spoken...

Words: 1705 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Truth In 12 Angry Men

...The world is very messed up today. Most newspapers and magazines are twisting the truth, writing the facts in a way that supports their point. Many people today don’t know how to find the truth, and so fall for the biased more likely twisted information written by the media. How do we separate the truth from the bias? The 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose is about 12 jurors who are deciding on if a boy who murdered his father is guilty or not. The jurors work hard in trying to find the truth, and in the process of examining the testimonies, someone is threatened and tempers flare. By examining Juror Eight’s questioning about the evidence, Juror Four’s open mindedness, and Juror Three and Juror Ten’s violent manners, we can clearly understand how...

Words: 989 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

...The main theme of the play Twelve Angry Men is given to the readers directly from Juror number 9 and Juror number 2, "It takes a great deal of courage to stand alone". Reginald Rose focuses his central message on the importance of standing up for what is right, even if tt means standing alone. For instance, Rose does not provide many details about the night that the crime was commited in. He only gives his readers limited facts on the crime, such as the knife that was used by the murder, the time of day that the crime was commited and some background of the suspect. This allows the readers to focus their attention on Juror numbe 8, as he stands alone, convincing the the others on doing whats right. In addition, Rose does not end Act...

Words: 282 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Reginald Rose's Twelve Furious Men

...The play 'Twelve Furious Men' by Reginald Rose contains numerous components that look at the usage of the American equity framework in 1957 and help shape the consultations of the case. Maybe the most critical component is the relationship. The most relationship. The play was roused by Rose's experience of jury administration The 12 "Irate Men" are the people that make up a trial jury for the reasons of listening to a lawful case and translating the certainties, lastly coming back with a decision of either liable or not blameworthy for the charged. The primary jury was comprised of neighborhood individuals why should expected know the respondent Members of the jury were to "say reality" (these days it is called "thinking toward a decision") By the fourteenth Century, the part of the jury at long last turned into that of judgment by confirmation By the fifteenth Century, trial by jury turned into the overwhelming method of determining legitimate issues, and it was not until hundreds of years after the fact that the jury accepted a more advanced part of settling on certainties on that which is heard in a court of law....

Words: 535 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

12 Angry Men Research Paper

...How would you feel if you knew that one decision you make could decide someone’s fate? How would you make sure you make the right, just decision? How could you decide knowing you could end the life of an innocent victim or let a murderer go free? In the motion picture drama, 12 Angry Men, directed by Sidney Lumet, twelve men are given this responsibility of deciding a court case as the jury. The fate of the accused is in their hands. The twelve jurors who hold this power show their contradicting opinions and personalities early on, and are influential to the decision. In the beginning, the jury seems to have agreed that the boy is guilty, but Juror #8 stands alone in the 11 to 1 vote. He digs deeper into the evidence, bringing up points that prove possible innocence. This forces the jury to spend more time on...

Words: 1070 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Twelve Angry Men

...Twelve Angry Men 12 angry men is a production about a murder trial. A boy that could be looked on as guilty from the word go, is put up to the jury to decide his fait. The boy has a background of violence and crime and has been brought up in a slum. The jury is almost certain of the boys guilt. Every member of the jury votes guilty but ONE and so the jury is forced to sit it out and make a decision. We started off the production by choosing who the director would be. In the director we looked for someone that was a good actor himself so that he could speak from personal experience. Also we wanted someone that people could respect and would give thought to his ideas. The people we chose to be or directors were Craig and Bill we chose Craig because of his talent as an actor. Craig has been a good director so far, we decided that Craig would be the director for act I. act I is full of key scenes that need to be presented to the audience in a understanding way. Bill was also chosen for the director of act II, bill was chosen because of his potential. I think because in the class work we have done he has shown really good initiative. For example in a piece of improvisation work he had the idea that if they turned all the lights off their words would have more of an impact and it did it worked like charm. He also has a good imagination I could see this when he was telling me what he would do as director. We decided to choose the directors...

Words: 1791 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Marxism Approach

...couple to be reunited. What was shocking about the play was its social setting and the attitudes displayed by the characters, especially Jimmy. He is from a working-class family and, although he has a university degree, has turned his back on the sort of well- paid white-collar job that such an educational background would normally have led to in the fifties, working as a trader in the local market, running a sweet stall with his friend Cliff. He and Alison, with Cliff as a lodger, live in a dingy bed-sit in a large Midlands town. Alison herself is from the wealthy upper middle classes (her father is a retired Indian Army officer) and her family resent her marriage to Jimmy. It was in the late fifties that the term "Angry Young Man" was coined by the critics to describe not only writers such as Osborne, Kingsley Amis and John Braine, but also their characters such as Jimmy Porter and Amis's Lucky Jim, who were seen as the mouthpieces of their creators. Jimmy is, to borrow the title of a famous film of the...

Words: 828 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

12 Angry Man

...12 Angry Men (1957), or Twelve Angry Men (1957), is the gripping, penetrating, and engrossing examination of a diverse group of twelve jurors (all male, mostly middle-aged, white, and generally of middle-class status) who are uncomfortably brought together to deliberate after hearing the 'facts' in a seemingly open-and-shut murder trial case. They retire to a jury room to do their civic duty and serve up a just verdict for the indigent minority defendant (with a criminal record) whose life is in the balance. The film is a powerful indictment, denouncement and expose of the trial by jury system. The frightened, teenaged defendant is on trial, as well as the jury and the American judicial system with its purported sense of infallibility, fairness and lack of bias. Alternatively, the slow-boiling film could also be viewed as commentary on McCarthyism, Fascism, or Communism (threatening forces in the 50s). One of the film's posters described how the workings of the judicial process can be disastrous: "LIFE IS IN THEIR HANDS - DEATH IS ON THEIR MINDS! It EXPLODES Like 12 Sticks of Dynamite." This was live television-trained director Sidney Lumet's first feature film - a low-budget ($350,000) film shot in only 17 days from a screenplay by Reginald Rose, who based his script on his own teleplay of the same name. After the initial airing of the TV play in early 1954 on Studio One CBS-TV, co-producer/star Henry Fonda asked Rose in 1956 if the teleplay could be expanded to feature-film...

Words: 903 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Juror System In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

...If you were on death row, would you want a fair trial? Obviously, yes, I wouldn’t want anyone to die if there was reasonable doubt that they weren’t guilty. Reginald Rose’s purpose of writing twelve angry men was to show the pros and cons to the juror system and how effective it is. For example, in act three juror number five changed his vote to not guilty not because he believed that, but to have the trial finish quicker so he could get to his baseball game that he cared more about than a man’s life. Reading this part in the story, you can tell the ignorance of the character. The perfect example of how back then the jury system was ineffective. And to strike a question if it is still ineffective today. Within the last scene juror number...

Words: 272 - Pages: 2