...I. Finley in his paper The Trojan War chstizes Blengen’s claims that an organized king or power was the rival the brought Troy to its knees and states that the edidence to make such a definitive exist not. The difference in analasis comes about due to differences in interpretation of the data. Blengen sees the different weapons, and bodies in the street along with other evidence and concludes that barbarions wouldn’t have been able to destroy such a powerful state as quickly as the remains suggest and conclude that a military power was the source of Troy’s defete. Finley on the other hand does not attempt to discredit the remains found, but sees Bengen’s conclusion as being based more so on inference rather than in refutable facts. “Professor Blegen's 'the tradition of the expedition against Troy must have a basis of historical fact' are acts of faith not binding on the historian;” (The Journal of Hellenic Studies, pg 4). Such conclusions may seem plasuable but may...
Words: 590 - Pages: 3