Premium Essay

A Case Comment on Sardara Singh & Anr. V. Sardara Singh & Ors. (1990) 4 Scc 90

In:

Submitted By shrunjal
Words 2556
Pages 11
BACKGROUND OF THE CASE

The matter at hand came before the Honorable Supreme Court of India in the form of a Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, 1950 from the decision of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana. This case has had a serpentine history, beginning from the institution of a suit in 1965 in the lower court, going in appeal to the Division Court, from there in second appeal to the Single Judge of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana who referred it to the Division Bench of the High Court, and then finally being disposed by the Honorable Supreme Court of India in 1990.

The case assumes importance as it relates to some very important questions of law, which were finally put to rest by this judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court of India. This matter deals with the question of the jurisdiction of the civil courts in matters of Land Revenue. The other question that has been deliberated upon in this matter is as regards to the nature of Section 85 and Section 86 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887. These Sections being analogous to Rule 84, 85, and 86 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 have been interpreted in light of the interpretation afforded to these Rules of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908.

FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE MATTER

At the heart of the dispute was the allegation that Sardara Singh had been appointed as the substitute Lambaradar on 8th November, 1957 for District Ferozpur replacing the previous substitute, Hardit Singh (the original Lambardar being Narain Singh, who had undertaken liability for the land revenue which was in arrears). It was alleged that despite collection of the amount by Sardara, the same had not been deposited with the Government Treasury; consequently he was prosecuted under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in relation to the amount in arrears. However, he was acquitted by the

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Court Observation

...was told the judge did not have a docket for that day. A docket is defined as a calendar of cases awaiting action in a court. Jurisdiction is what gives the courts the power to hear and apply the law to certain types of cases. District Court has original jurisdiction for the following actions; all Traffic and Ordinance violations, all criminal misdemeanors, preliminary exams on felonies, small claims suits, civil lawsuits (amounts up to $25,000), and all contract disputes between tenants and landlords. When I arrived there were a lot of people waiting and I noticed signs posted on the court room doors that stated "Do not to enter until your name is called". Although I know court rooms are generally open to the public, I did not want to be intrusive so I waited patiently in the Traffic/Cashier line hoping someone would be able to assist me. Soon, someone escorted me into the court room. I looked around and tried to get familiar with the surrounding seeing as how this was my first time being in a court room. I quickly learned that the docket schedule to be heard were criminal and traffic cases. There were a few people waiting on the bench-seats, some by themselves and others with their attorneys and a few people sitting in the jury box with dark blue jail uniforms on. I took my seat, adjusted my eyes and ears, and began to feverishly take notes.The case to be heard by the judge was People V. Ms. X. Ms. X was a small girl with long blonde and pink hair, hardly someone you would expect...

Words: 540 - Pages: 3