Cinemas have changed drastically over the past one-hundred years, however, it did not change for the worse. In Susan Sontag’s short story, “A Century of Cinema,” she gives her point of view about the way the cinema has changed in negative ways. She states, “If cinephilia is dead, then movies are dead too . . . no matter how many movies, even very good ones, go on being made. If cinema can be resurrected, it will only be through the birth of a new kind of cine-love.” Susan believes that cinephilia in current days have decreased. I personally do not agree with Susan and her argument about cinephilia in modern times. I do agree with Sontag about cinephilia not being the same anymore, because it is not.
Cinephilia has changed throughout the years, and in more positive ways than negatives ways. Today, cinephilia is enabled by new media technologies of the digital revolution (“The New Cinephilia, Girish Shambu). Many cinephile’s today find most of their mediators on the Internet, unlike back then, during the time period Susan Sontag talks about in her essay, cinephile’s got their mediators through newspapers and through their peers. Sontag expresses how she feels about the movies in America culture. She explains that going to the movies has been a major part of American culture during the …show more content…
“The international box office brings in billions of dollars of revenue each year for the major Hollywood studios. In today's Hollywood, international ticket sales have a massive influence on the movies that get made and how they are marketed.” (Movies: A Connection to American Culture, Daniel J. Moore) This goes to show that billions of people are still going to the movies to see movies that they love and that they connect with. Daniel Moore also states that “Numerous movie moments and characters have connected with audiences all over the world.” (Movies: A Connection to American