Premium Essay

A Midwife's Tale Analysis

Submitted By
Words 164
Pages 1
torian who comments on Martha Ballard’s life in the documentary A Midwife’s Tale, says at one point “Without documents there is no history.” This statement begs some questions. How do historians know what happened in the past? What kinds of evidence do they use to make their arguments about American history? Is Ulrich correct? These are the issues that will be handled in this paper utilizing two written works; A Midwife's Tale and the work of James Deetz and Edwin Dethlefsen on Death's Head, Cherub, Urn and Willow.
The statement from Ulrich that without record there is no history is false. Documentation has been utilized to tell verifiable occasions by they are not generally solid. Ulrich's editorial is now and again, by need, approximate,

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

A Midwife's Tale Analysis

...A Midwife’s Tale The American Revolution affected the lives of many people, including those living ordinary lives on the Maine frontier. Martha Ballard was a midwife during the years following the American Revolution. Through studying Martha Ballard’s recorded thoughts on life and her surroundings, she provides a description of the daily life of those living on the Maine frontier during this time. Citizens during this time period were greatly influenced by their jobs, concerns, religion, gender differences, customs, and changes after the American Revolution. Living in Maine after the American Revolution brought frontier land disputes, troubles in connecting with the outside world, and declines in deference. According to Martha Ballard’s...

Words: 1574 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Book Review of a Midwife's Tale: the Life of Martha Ballard

...Ulrich, Laurel Thatcher, A Midwife’s Tale, The Life of Martha Ballard, Based on Her Diary, 1785-1812, (New York, Vintage Books, A Division of Random House, INC., 1990). Reviewed by: Amanda Doran A Midwife’s Tale: The Life of Martha Ballard was written by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich. Ulrich was born and raised in the Rocky Mountain West and moved to New England in 1960 where she has resided ever since. Laurel is the author of many articles, essays and books including The Age of Homespun (2001) and Goodwives (1982). Her articles and essays were written on early American history. Laurel’s book, A Midwife’s Tale, won her the Pulitzer Prize for History in 1991. She also assisted with a documentary production of her book which aired on PBS. Her work can also be found on the award-winning website, dohistory.org (Ulrich, 1990). In the eighteenth century women didn’t play a role in politics or hold any high position in their community which was worth noting. Because of this, the lives of these women are left somewhat a mystery. Ulrich uses the diary of Martha Ballard, a midwife who practiced in Hallowell, Maine, along with other documents such as: prison logs, newspapers, court documents, and town records to bring to life the lives of late eighteenth century women. Ulrich’s purpose for this book is simple, she shows the day to day lives of women in the late eighteenth century and how they played a crucial role in their society. Ulrich organizes her book into chronological chapters providing...

Words: 1838 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Theaetetus

...360 BC THEAETETUS by Plato translated by Benjamin Jowett THEAETETUS PERSONS OF THE DIALOGUE: SOCRATES; THEODORUS; THEAETETUS Euclid and Terpsion meet in front of Euclid's house in Megara; they enter the house, and the dialogue is read to them by a servant. Euclid. Have you only just arrived from the country, Terpsion? Terpsion. No, I came some time ago: and I have been in the Agora looking for you, and wondering that I could not find you. Euc. But I was not in the city. Terp. Where then? Euc. As I was going down to the harbour, I met Theaetetus-he was being carried up to Athens from the army at Corinth. Terp. Was he alive or dead? Euc. He was scarcely alive, for he has been badly wounded; but he was suffering even more from the sickness which has broken out in the army. Terp. The dysentery, you mean? Euc. Yes. Terp. Alas! what a loss he will be! Euc. Yes, Terpsion, he is a noble fellow; only to-day I heard some people highly praising his behaviour in this very battle. Terp. No wonder; I should rather be surprised at hearing anything else of him. But why did he go on, instead of stopping at Megara? Euc. He wanted to get home: although I entreated and advised him to remain he would not listen to me; so I set him on his way, and turned back, and then I remembered what Socrates had said of him, and thought how remarkably this...

Words: 31418 - Pages: 126