The AICF and the West Hill College advertisements display the main information about two different colleges with the same purpose, which is to attract students and parents. Both ads imply that there is no need to spend more money in college than what is truly needed. The AICF advertisement shows how there are a variety of colleges that have more opportunities for people that do not speak English as their first language. That may be very appealing for people that have trouble understanding certain topics in English. Thus, the college is gaining a certain rate of advantage over other institutions because it has a wider and broader variety of opportunities for native people or people whose first language is not English. On the other hand the West Hill College add has a different perspective. Such add instead, implies that there are a number of colleges that are not as expensive and are also very good. This may be appealing for the public because the economy is currently unstable and for that matter, people are often concerned with how their money can be better spent. Nonetheless, both advertisements collectively imply that there are other details one should take into account when choosing a college. Although the different approaches for each add are different, they both have the same purpose, which is catching the eye of the people with money problems and with language barriers. One can infer, from both the West Hill College and the AICF, that both schools are looking for a way to make public few of their benefits in order to gain more clients, and hence more money. As Reeves said, with low funding there are less numbers and with low numbers there is no college. As a result, colleges accept almost anyone in order to have a high rate of population in the school. Otherwise, the college itself would not even exist. Also, this add from AICF relates back to Reeves’ ideas of cultural diversity because persons that do not speak English as their first language would rather learn their masters or majors it in their mother language. The article that really caught my attention was Lagemann’s. His view of how a vocation is found and what exactly constitutes is really impressive. I was really astounded by how I could relate to his opinions and ideas. As Lgemann said, a vocation goes beyond what you want to work in, it also includes who you are and what you want to do. Many people waste their time in college because they do not realize how lucky they are to have a starting point for their vocational skills start to get developed. I can now say that I really understand that my vocation can get stronger with the passing of time and that being in college and having and idea of what I want to do with my life will help me grasp what my vocation is as I go through college.