Premium Essay

A Response To Anna Quindlen's Homeless

Submitted By
Words 698
Pages 3
A Response to Anna Quindlen’s “Homeless” In the story “Homeless” by Anna Quindlen, she describes what she thinks of a home as. Quindlen met a woman who claimed to be passing through, but she knew that she had seen this woman more. She also talks about what she thinks a home is and I do not completely agree with what she thinks a home is. A person could have everything they want in a house, but if there is no love and support, then it is not a home. I do not know what it is like to be homeless, but I do know what it is like for a home to not feel like a home. I agree with Quindlen that home is where the heart is, it is a shame there are so many homeless people in the world, and that a home should be a stable place. It is nice to have a roof over my head and I appreciate everything I have, but all of that does not make a place a home. I do not believe that you are where you live, unlike Quindlen (191). Where you come from does not always make you who you are today. A person can come from a terrible home and may have struggles as a child but that does not mean they will grow up to be a terrible person. Home is where the heart is and if you have a good heart, you will make a good home whether it is when you are young or when you start a family.
One of the most common rules of life is to learn from your mistakes. Though how you were raised is not a …show more content…
Materialistic things will never make a house a home because they do not make you who you are. You have to be willing to learn from the mistakes you or the people around you have made in order to change who you are. I have never been in a situation where I found myself without a roof over my head, and for that I am grateful. Though I have struggled with many issues within my house making it not feel like a home, having a shelter is better than having

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Comparison Paper

...Belen Abraha  Professor Polnac  English composition I  April 29, 2014  The Comparison between Two Essays on Poverty “Homeless” by Anna Quindlen is a referential work that has a reflective focus on the cultural definition of home and people with no home in America while “The Hands of Poverty” by Jane Addams is a referential work that has a reflective focus on the dismaying conditions of poverty on the East End of London. Waskey states that “scientific definition of poverty includes both material and social conditions” like the hideous human need and suffering Addams witnessed at the East End and “poverty, scientifically defined, includes those resources whose absence will place a person or family into conditions of deprivation,” like not having a home as Quindlen elaborates (959). Quindlen states that having a home is not really about “having a shelter or having three square meals a day,” but it is about being an owner of a home in spite of its location or its size. She makes it clear that focusing on the details of not having a home can help us realize that homeless people are not “homeless” but they are people who have no home. On the other hand, Addams presents the impression she had of the Saturday sale of decaying vegetables and fruit for poor people. She points out that though the human hand is the most significant and the “oldest human tool,” she was disappointed by “the empty, pathetic, nerveless and work worn myriads of hands" she saw there. She...

Words: 1212 - Pages: 5