Free Essay

Accreditation Task 1

In:

Submitted By tbducky
Words 1713
Pages 7
Accreditation Audit AFT2 Task 1
Executive Summary
Current Compliance Status

A. Compliance Status – Executive Summary
Nightingale Community Hospital’s is a healthcare facility with a vision to” be the hospital of choice for patients, employees, physicians, volunteers, and the community.” We also state our mission is to create a healing environment, with a passionate commitment to healthcare excellence. Creating this vision and staying true to the stated mission requires that we adhere to the requirements set forth by the Joint Commission. In preparing for the Joint Commission visit there are focus priority areas that will need to be addressed if Nightingale is going to be compliant. The specific focus area addressed in this summary is medication management.
There are three standards that come under the medication management area. The standards are listed in the table below along with their descriptions and summary of whether Nightingale Hospital has the documentation/data to be Joint Commission compliant for the given standard. Standard | Description | Joint Commission Compliance | MM.01.01.01 | The hospital plans its medication management processes. | MetNightingale PoliciesPatient Care Polices: 1. Medication Management, Patient Specific Information 2. Medication Administration | NPSG.03.04.01 | Label all medications, medication containers (for example, syringes, medicine cups, basins), or other solutions on and off the sterile field. | MetNightingale Hospital NPSG Data: * Average Hospital-Wide Medication Labeling of Containers over the last 12 months = 99.6%. | NPSG.03.05.01 | Reduce the likelihood of patient harm associated with the use of anticoagulant therapy. | Needs ImprovementAverage Adverse Drug Events related to Anticoagulation therapy per 1000 patients days over the last 12 months = 3.4. |

There is an identified risk for patients receiving anticoagulation therapy to have an adverse drug event. Over the course of the year there has been a decline in monthly events, but there will need to be improvement to not only meet the Joint Commission standard but to ultimately keep the patients we render care to safe from harm.
In the Joint Commission survey review from 2 years ago it was noted on standard PC.01.02.01 The hospital provides patient education and training based on each patient’s needs and abilities there was a finding (The Joint Commission E-dition, 2014). The reviewers noted that closed and open medical records in the hospital lacked sufficient evidence that the individual’s ability to learn prior to education was documented. “Studies have shown that insufficient adherence and a low level of patient knowledge about oral anticoagulant treatment are primary causes for complications (Hua, et al., 2011). The rationale for NPSG.03.05.01 states: “To achieve better patient outcomes, patient education is a vital component of an anticoagulation therapy program.” Nightingale will need to look at process improvement focusing on patient education when patients are receiving anticoagulation therapy.
A1. Plan for Compliance Nightingale has 13 months to establish and implement a corrective action plan to ensure 100% compliance with the Joint Commission standards. The table below addresses the elements of performance for NPSG.03.05.01 and whether Nightingale has sufficient documentation to meet the standard.

Standard NPSG.03.05.01Elements of Performance | Description | Joint Commission Compliance | 1 | Use only oral unit-dose products, prefilled syringes, or premixed infusion bags when these types of products are available.
Note: For pediatric patients, prefilled syringe products should be used only if specifically designed for children. | Not Met | 2 | Use approved protocols for the initiation and maintenance of anticoagulant therapy. | Met Patient Care Policy: Monitoring Anticoagulation. | 3 | Before starting a patient on warfarin, assess the patient’s baseline coagulation status; for all patients receiving warfarin therapy, use a current International Normalized Ratio (INR) to adjust this therapy. The baseline status and current INR are documented in the medical record.
Note: The patient’s baseline coagulation status can be assessed in a number of ways, including through a laboratory test or by identifying risk factors such as age, weight, bleeding tendency, and genetic factors. | MetPatient Care Policy: Monitoring Anticoagulation | 4 | Use authoritative resources to manage potential food and drug interactions for patients receiving warfarin. | MetPatient Care Policies: * Pharmacist Review of Medication Orders * Medication Administration | 5 | When heparin is administered intravenously and continuously, use programmable pumps in order to provide consistent and accurate dosing. | Not Met | 6 | A written policy addresses baseline and ongoing laboratory tests that are required for anticoagulants. | MetPatient Care Policy: Monitoring Anticoagulation | 7 | Provide education regarding anticoagulant therapy to prescribers, staff, patients, and families. Patient/family education includes the following:
- The importance of follow-up monitoring
- Compliance
- Drug-food interactions
- The potential for adverse drug reactions and interactions | Not Met | 8 | Evaluate anticoagulation safety practices, take action to improve practices, and measure the effectiveness of those actions in a time frame determined by the organization. | Not Met |

Based on the review of current policies and guidelines, the following recommendations are suggested to better meet the National Patient Safety Goal for Anticoagulation safety. 1. Nightingale will define and implement an anticoagulant program that individualizes the care to each patient using consistent guidelines, standing orders and tools. This will be accomplished by a task force that includes representatives from: a. Patient safety b. Medical directors c. Clinical programs d. Quality e. Risk Management f. Nursing practice g. Pharmacy h. Health Information management i. Lab services
This task force will assess safety processes, identify best practice and facilitate standardization of protocols and processes (Nutescu, et al., 2013). 2. To reduce compounding and labeling errors, the hospital will use only oral unit dose products, pre-filled syringes, or pre-mixed infusion bags when these types of products are available. For pediatrics, pre-loaded syringe products should only be used if specifically designed for this purpose. This will be reviewed as needed by Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. 3. The current guideline for initiation and maintenance of anticoagulation therapy will be reviewed, updated and approved by the task force. j. Documented baseline INR will be documented in the medical record for patients on warfarin along with a current INR that will be used to adjust therapy. Compliance for documentation will be monitored quarterly. k. Update policy to include the notification of dietary services when patients are receiving warfarin to make sure food/drug interactions are avoided. l. Update policy to include a programmable infusion pump when heparin is administered intravenously and continuously. m. Update policy to reflect anticoagulation therapy educational needs of staff, patient, and families. i. Provide online accessible patient education fact sheets that address: 1. Warfarin anticoagulation and therapy 2. Warfarin eating plan fact sheet 3. Deep Vein Thrombosis and Embolism Fact Sheet 4. Fact sheets for the different medications used to treat blood clots caused by atrial fibrillation 5. Fact sheets will include follow-up monitoring, the importance of compliance, drug/food interactions and the potential for adverse drug reactions as appropriate. ii. Provide online accessible staff education fact sheets that address: 6. Medication guidelines and information sheets, including pediatric for: a. Disease states b. Novel oral anticoagulants c. Specific medication information iii. Face-to-face interaction to review and reinforce educational material (Nutescu, et al., 2013). 7. This will be documented in the chart and monitored on a quarterly basis. n. Standing order sets will be developed for adult and pediatric appropriate disease processes. iv. The goal is to have computerized provider order entry (CPOE) order sets. Research has shown that CPOE has positive effects on decreasing dosage errors. (Bresnick, 2014)

A2. Justification
A phrase from the Hippocratic Oath states “never do harm” which is first and foremost the goal as we are entrusted with the care of patients. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention states “It is estimated that there are 700,000 emergency department visits and 120,000 hospitalizations due to adverse drug events (ADEs).” The financial impact is staggering with an estimated $3.5 billion spent to cover the extra medical cost due to these events. (CDC -Medication Safety Program, 2014). In a study of anticoagulation-associated adverse drug events, “Anticoagulants are among the most common medications that cause ADEs in hospitalized patients” and it was concluded that most ADE’s among inpatients result from medication errors and so are potentially preventable (Piazza, et al., 2011).
The negative impact of adverse drug events related to anticoagulation therapy is enormous in terms of our patients’ health and adds financial cost to a healthcare industry already facing rising costs. Patient education and engagement play an important part in improved health for the population we serve. We also have an obligation as an organization to improve the quality of care for the patients we serve by providing consistent, efficient, evidence-based care. In delivering this type of care, we can continue to decrease the number of adverse drug event that occur within our hospital.

Bibliography

(2014, July). Retrieved from Western Governor's University: https://cos.wgu.edu/courses/task-stream/AFT2
CDC -Medication Safety Program. (2014, July 27). Retrieved from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: http://www.cdc.gov/medicationsafety/basics.html
The Joint Commission E-dition. (2014, July 2). Retrieved from The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations[US]: https://e-dition.jcrinc.com/MainContent.aspx
Bresnick, J. (2014, January 22). Clinical Decision Support. Retrieved from EHR Intelligence: http://ehrintelligence.com/2014/01/22/clinical-decision-support-cpoe-get-thumbs-up-from-academics/
Hua, T., Vormfelde , S., Abu, A. M., Scnheider-Rudt, H., Sobotta, P., & Chenot, J. (2011, April 10). Practice nursed-based, individual and video-assisted patient education in oral anticoagulation--protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract, pp. 12-17.
Nutescu, E., Wittkowsky PharmD CACP FASHP FCCP, A. K., Burnett PharmD PhC, A., Merli MD FACP, M., Ansell, J. E., & Garcia MD, D. A. (2013). Delivery of Optimized Inpatient Anticoagulation Therapy. The Annals of Pharmacotherpay, 714-724. Retrieved from Medscape Multispecialty: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/804033_7
Piazza, G. M., Nguyen, T. N., Cios, D. P., Labreche, M. P., Hohlfelder, B., Fanikos, J. R., . . . Goldhaber, S. Z. (2011). Anticoagulation-associated adverse drug events. Am J Med, 1136-1142.
Simpson, J. (2014, January 7). LeadQual. Retrieved from Taking Advantage of the QDF (Query Deserves Freshness) Signal: http://www2.leadqual.com/blog/searchengineoptimization-seo/taking-advantage-of-qdf-signal/
Tylor, J. (2014). Chron. Retrieved from Chron.com: http://smallbusiness.chron.com/crm-software-can-benefit-small-business-139.html

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Accreditation Audit Task 1

...Accreditation Audit Task 1. A1. Communication, this is the key focus area that is evaluated in this summary. Communication is a key focus area of the joint commission audit and is also a key area in which Nightingale Community can make enhancements. Communications must be a two way free flow of information. The information exchanges occur between providers, staff, and patients or clients. This was an area that needed improvement was noted in the previous accreditation audit. Some noted prior issues from 2 years ago included patient and family education and information not being properly disseminated to the nursing staff. These are areas where we have targeted and currently meet. Some areas that we continue to work on are as follows. We currently need to address our time out policy. During the last year there were three months that Nightingale Community did poorly in this area. We must make sure that the time outs are not only conducted properly but more importantly documented in the patients chart. If the time out is not properly documented in the patients chart the organization will not receive credit, it will be as though it never occurred. We must make sure that all providers and clinical staff have appropriate training and training materials provided for the time out policy. We will continue to quantify our efforts monthly in this key area. We as an organization must make this goal monthly. Critical results are an issue of concern for the organization. Critical results...

Words: 1046 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Accreditation Audit Task 1

...Running Header: Task I 1 Task I Abigail M. Garcia Western Governor’s University: Accreditation Audit Running Header: Task I 2 Executive Summary Nightingale Community Hospital is committed to providing quality care and aims to be the first choice hospital for patients in the community. Four core values represent the passion Nightingale has for excellence: Safety, Community, Teamwork and Accountability. The goals of the hospital are to uphold an atmosphere of healing, promote the benefits of health, and to provide a compassionate experience for all. Overview In order to reach the aforementioned goals, values and commitments, Nightingale Community Hospital must be in compliance of regulatory agencies which outline specific, goaloriented sets of standards. The Joint Commission is one such agency that provides assistance and support to health care facilities to ensure that certain standards are met, education for implementing new standards and feedback of current healthcare practices as part of the accreditation process. According to Facts about Hospital Accreditation (2014), the “Joint Commission standards address the hospital’s performance in specific areas, and specify requirements to ensure that patient care is provided in a safe manner and in a secure environment (p. 1).” This agency uses a Priority Focus Process methodology to identify areas within healthcare organizations which have a significant impact on patient safety and quality of care. One of these...

Words: 2426 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Accreditation Audit Task 1

...3/11/2013 | | Memo | | | | To CEO From Elementary Division Manager Re Constructive Discharge Complaint Comments: Earlier this quarter a former employee voluntarily terminated their employment with our company but has since filed a claim against our company alleging that the employee’s rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, specifically constructive discharge, were violated. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was designed to protect the rights of employees within the workplace from instances of discrimination with relation to race, religion, sex, national origin and religion (Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964). With this law came about the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) whose responsibility it is to enforce the provisions within Title VII and provide oversight and guidance to employers and employees with regard to this law. The EEOC has sent us notification that this former employee has made a claim under the constructive discharge area of Title VII. Constructive discharge is an employment situation whereby the employee feels that due to changes their employer has made with regard to any Title VII covered entity; they have no option but to resign. This act is relevant to the claim in that the claim stated that the employee felt he had no alternative but to resign. The employee believed that with the company’s new policy reflecting work/shift changes he would not be able to observe the Holy days required by...

Words: 1763 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Infection Control Accreditation Task 1

...RAFT Task 1 Accreditation Case Study Name: Marissa D. Jose Instructor: Dr. Linda Joyce Gunn, CPHRM Course title: AFT2 Accreditation Audit Name of institution: Western Governor University Current Compliance Status for Infection Prevention and Control 1. Commission Standard: Infection Investigation/Identification Recently the hospital implements preventing spread of Infection. The hospital has a successful framework for controlling the spread of infection and/or outbreaks among patients/clients, employees, physician, volunteers, students, and visitors. Identification and managing infections at the time of a client’s admission to the hospital and throughout their stay are the critical aspects of the infection prevention and control program, in addition to subsequent renowned infection control practices while providing care. In the hospital’s admission process, there are numerous ways to investigate, control, and prevent infections in the hospital setting, decides what procedures, such as isolation, should be applied to an individual client; and maintains a record of incidents and corrective actions related to infections. This process includes taking the patient’s history of infection, previous hospitalization, current diagnosis, and presence of draining wound, among others. During the health screening process, the hospital also ensures that the patient gets help from the right staff. Immediately the patient...

Words: 2699 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Wgu Aft2 Accreditation Audit Task 1

...Jenny Windler Student ID: 000329547 Accreditation Audit (AFT2) Task 1 A. Compliance Status Nightingale Community Hospital is a complete and leading healthcare facility that believes in providing the best quality care to all of their patients. As part of Nightingale’s mission to put the patient first, the hospital must meet medication management standards set forth by the hospital and the Joint Commission. Medication management often involves the efforts of multiple services and disciplines. It is part of Nightingale’s policy that a patient’s information is accessible to a physician, pharmacist or nurse in the management of a patient’s medication. Nightingale Hospital has all the policies in place that the Joint Commission looks for to keep the hospital accredited. A1. Plan for Compliance In reviewing the safety of using medication associated with Anticoagulation Therapy, Nightingale Hospital needs some improvement. There was only one month out of the year that patients did not experience any adverse effects related to Anticoagulation Therapy. Numbers were high at the beginning of the year and tapered off by the end of the year, but Nightingale Hospital should be experiencing more months where there are no adverse events. In combination to the Joint Commission’s finding 2 years ago regarding the lack of documented evidence that the patient’s ability/readiness to learn, learning preference, or educational needs were assessed and documented in the file, we have much...

Words: 1070 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Wgu Aft2 Raft2 (Accreditation Audit) Mba Graduate Programe - Complete Course All 4 Tasks

...WGU AFT2 RAFT2 (Accreditation Audit) MBA Graduate Programe - Complete Course All 4 Tasks http://www.homeworkminutes.com/question/view/41054/AFT2-RAFT2-Accreditation-Audit-WGU-MBA-Graduate-Program-Complete-Course AFT2 Accreditation Audit Task 1 1. The purpose of this executive summary is to outline the current status of compliance of the organization for the priority focus area of communication, namely the standard UP.01.01.01 which is named the “Conduct a Pre-procedure Verification Process” as noted by the Joint Commission standards. A.2. The primary area of focus I chose to review was the communication aspect. I feel that communication is vital in any business, especially health care. Clear communication improves patient care and the quality of care. This is evident when time is taken to verify a patient or a procedure. When things go wrong due to misidentification of a patient, not only does that cost time and money for the patient as well as the extra burden of having that wrong fixed, but it also costs the hospitals too. Their costs are increased by trying to fix the issue and then legal issues to follow. The best way to avoid any mistake and/or injury is to adopt a more vigorous verification system. AFT2 Accreditation Audit Task 2 A.1. An unexpected occurrence that involves serious bodily or psychological harm including death or the risk leading to these is known as a sentinel event. (Sentinel event, 2013) A.2. Several people were...

Words: 982 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Accreditation Audit Task 4

...Running head: ACCREDITATION AUDIT- TASK 4 COMPLAINCE STATUS Joint Commission clearly explained that a Periodic Performance Review is as an assessment tool designed to help in assisting the healthcare organization contributes greatly in the improvement and monitoring performance all through the year. The periodic performance focuses more on the measures that has to do with patients safety and care and at same time given the facility for unremitting standards fulfillment. NCH is 100% compliance with most standards of Joint Commission in the following area; Emergency Management, Human resources, Infection Prevention and Control, Performance Improvement, Right and Responsibilities of the Individuals, Transplant Safety. During the inspection at the facility, the hospital was found to be non- compliant in this listed areas; Environment of Care, Leadership, Life Safety, universal protocol, Medication Management, Medical Staff, National Patient Safety Goals, Nursing, Record of Care, Treatment and Services, and provision of care During the PPR, the hospital was found with an increase cluster in the hallways, it is a fire hazard and a safety issue. The nurses are not familiar with verbal order procedures, using the range of orders that received and the abbreviations that are prohibited in the documents. From the trend, there are areas at which the hospital needs to implement proper education and audit. An action plan needs to be implemented by the administration to address the fallout...

Words: 3108 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Free

...WORK STATEMENT Table of Contents 1 OVERVIEW 1 2 CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS 1 2.1 Objectives Fulfillment 1 2.1.1 Business Objectives 1 2.1.2 Technical Objectives 2 2.1.3 Management Objectives 3 2.2 Assumptions and Constraints 3 2.2.1 Access Control 4 2.2.2 Authentication 4 2.2.3 HSPD-12 Personnel Security Clearances 4 2.2.4 Non-Disclosure Agreements 5 2.2.5 Accessibility 5 2.2.6 Data 5 2.2.7 Confidentiality, Security, and Privacy 5 2.3 Tasks/Sub-Tasks to Be Performed Related to Initiating the Service 6 2.3.1 Task 1: 6 2.3.2 Task 2: 7 2.4 Period of Performance 7 3 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT OF THE DELIVERED SERVICES 8 3.1 Modifications to Service Level Agreements 8 3.2 Changes to Key Performance Measures. 8 3.3 Quality Assurance Evaluation 8 3.4 Government Roles and Responsibilities. 9 3.4.1 Contracting Officer (CO) 9 3.4.2 Contract Specialist 9 3.4.3 Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR) 10 3.4.4 Other Key Government Personnel 10 3.5 Contractor Roles and Responsibilities 10 4 METHODS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE 11 5 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS 11 5.1 Required Policies and Regulations for GSA Contracts 11 5.2 GSA Security Compliance Requirements 13 5.3 Certification and Accreditation (C&A) Activities 13 5.3.1 Certification...

Words: 7425 - Pages: 30

Premium Essay

Understanding Nist 800‐37  Fisma Requirements 

............................................................................................ 3  I. The Role of NIST in FISMA Compliance ................................................................................. 3  II. NIST Risk Management Framework for FISMA ..................................................................... 4  III. Application Security and FISMA .......................................................................................... 5  IV. NIST SP 800‐37 and FISMA .................................................................................................. 6  V. How Veracode Can Help ...................................................................................................... 7  VI. NIST SP 800‐37 Tasks & Veracode Solutions ....................................................................... 8  VII. Summary and Conclusions ............................................................................................... 10  About Veracode .................................................................................................................... 11                                      © 2008 Veracode, Inc.  2        Overview  The Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 ("FISMA", 44 U.S.C. §  3541, et seq.) is a United States federal law enacted in 2002 as Title III of the E‐ Government Act of 2002 (Pub.L. 107‐347, 116 Stat. 2899). The Act is meant to  bolster computer and network security within the Federal Government and ...

Words: 2451 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Course Outline

...information security management programs, information assurance certification programs, and security ethics. Watch the following video for an introduction to this course: Competencies This course provides guidance to help you demonstrate the following 3 competencies: Competency 427.3.2: Controls and Countermeasures The graduate evaluates security threats and identifies and applies security controls based on analyses and industry standards and best practices. Competency 427.3.3: Security Audits The graduate evaluates the practice of defining and implementing a security audit and conducts an information security audit using industry best practices. Competency 427.3.4: Certifications and Accreditations The graduate identifies and discusses the Information Assurance certification and accreditation (C&A) process. Course Mentor Assistance As you prepare to successfully demonstrate competency in this subject, remember that course mentors stand ready to help you reach your educational goals. As subject matter experts, mentors enjoy and take pride in helping...

Words: 4354 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Aft Task 3

...Accreditation Audit: AFT Task 3 Western Governor’s University Abstract AFT Task 3 allows the examination of data from a patient while hospitalized at Nightingale Hospital and utilizes a tracer methodology to identify trends, patterns, and pertinent problems for healthcare improvement. We plan to develop a corrective action plan to address the organization’s improvement while maintaining compliance from a Joint Commission standard. Accreditation Audit: AFT Task 3 Nightingale Hospital is preparing to devise a mock tracer methodology to assess the organizations’ current compliance with Joint Commission Standards. A tracer methodology follows a patient through the course of care and evaluates all aspects of care (Joint Commission E-dition, 2014). This method allows a quick overview of a patient through the flow of a system in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the process flow. Our mock tracer patient is a sixty seven year old female whom recently underwent an open total abdominal hysterectomy secondary to menorrhagia and uterine fibroids. The patient presented back to the emergency room one week postoperatively with complaints of a subjective fever of 100.2 degrees Fahrenheit and incisional drainage described as yellowish-green in color. A CT scan of her abdomen was performed in the emergency room and revealed a peri-umbilical abscess. The surgical team was consulted and an incision and drainage of the abscess was performed. Infectious disease physicians determined...

Words: 528 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Is4680 Lab 4

...1) The DoD Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process (DIACAP) is the United States Department of Defense (DoD) process to ensure that risk management is applied on Information Systems from an enterprise view. DIACAP is a DoD-wide standard set of activities, tasks and process for the certification and accreditation of a DoD information system that will maintain the Information Assurance posture throughout the system's life cycle. The Department of Defense Information Technology Security Certification and Accreditation Process (DITSCAP) is a process defined by the United States Department of Defense (DOD) for managing risk. DoD Instruction (DODI) 5200.40 establishes a standard DOD-wide process with a set of activities, general tasks and a management structure to certify and accredit an Automated Information System (AIS) that will maintain the Information Assurance (IA) posture of the Defense Information Infrastructure (DII) throughout the system's life cycle. DITSCAP applies to the acquisition, operation and sustainment of any DOD system that collects, stores, transmits, or processes unclassified or classified information since December 1997. 2) The Director of Central Intelligence Directive (DCID) 6/3 establishes the security policy and procedures for storing, processing, and communicating classified intelligence data in information systems. To achieve compliance with DCID 6/3, agencies must ensure that information is safeguarded at all times and that...

Words: 360 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Aft2 Task 2

...Accreditation  Audit:  AFT2  task  2         1     Accreditation  Audit:  AFT2  Task  2         Confidential—For internal use only to support performance improvement activities. This information is provided within the confidentiality protections of state statute. It is not to be distributed outside the quality assurance, performance improvement, peer review process.     Accreditation  Audit:  AFT2  task  2       2     Analysis of Key Components RCA:  Child  Abduction   Please  note  that  the  root  cause  analysis  and  action  plan  must  show  evidence  of  an  analysis   within  the  key  components  as  outlined  on  the  root  cause  analysis  matrix  for  the  specific   type  of  event.  An  area  on  the  matrix  that  may  not  have  an  identified  process  breakdown   should  still  be  summarized  to  determine  that  the  component  was  evaluated.     Brief  description  of  event   Briefly  summarize  the  circumstances  surrounding  the  occurrence  including  the  patient   outcome  (e.g.,  death,  loss  of  function).     A  3-­‐year-­‐old  female  pediatric  patient...

Words: 3407 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Diacap

...Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process (DIACAP) (a) Subchapter III of Chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, “Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) of 2002” (b) DoD Directive 8500.01E, “Information Assurance (IA),” October 24, 2002 (c) DoD Directive 8100.1, “Global Information Grid (GIG) Overarching Policy,” September 19, 2002 (d) DoD Instruction 8500.2, “Information Assurance (IA) Implementation,” February 6, 2003 (e) through (ab), see Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE This Instruction: 1.1. Implements References (a), (b), (c), and (d) by establishing the DIACAP for authorizing the operation of DoD Information Systems (ISs). 1.2. Cancels DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5200.40; DoD 8510.1-M; and ASD(NII)/DoD CIO memorandum, “Interim Department of Defense (DoD) Information Assurance (IA) Certification and Accreditation (C&A) Process Guidance” (References (e), (f), and (g)). 1.3. Establishes or continues the following positions, panels, and working groups to implement the DIACAP: the Senior Information Assurance Officer (SIAO), the Principal Accrediting Authority (PAA), the Defense Information Systems Network (DISN)/Global Information Grid (GIG) Flag Panel, the IA Senior Leadership (IASL), the Defense (previously DISN) IA Security Accreditation Working Group (DSAWG), and the DIACAP Technical Advisory Group (TAG). 1.4. Establishes a C&A process to manage the implementation of IA capabilities and services and provide visibility of accreditation decisions regarding the operation...

Words: 16882 - Pages: 68

Premium Essay

Joint Commission

...The Joint Commission is a nonprofit organization that certifies more than 18,000 health care organization and programs throughout the world. Founded in 1951, the Joint Commission provides a national symbol of quality for health care as well as analyzes each organization’s commitment to meeting high quality performance standards. The Joint commission focuses on accrediting Acute Care Hospitals, ambulatory, behavior health, long term care, health care facilities, clinical laboratories, health care networks and hospice. Numerous of accreditation organization is also taking place within the United States, but the Joint commission remains the largest The Joint commission accredits 20,000 organization” which” one third are Hospitals. The joint commission is assigned a special task to improve health care by evaluating health care of organization as well as encouraging health organizations to provide safe and effective care at the highest level. The Joint Commission believes that the only way to improve the quality of health care is to join together with other stakeholders and evaluate each health care organization. The Stakeholder consists of 29 broad members of commissioner and cooperate members such as the American Hospital Association, and the American Medical Association. In this paper I will analyzes key topics such as the Joint Commission source and its scope of authority, the structure of the Joint commission and how its responsibilities. The Joint Commission Structure ...

Words: 1282 - Pages: 6