The policy of affirmative action should be abolished in the Unites States as this practice is not making good to US society on its policy against discrimination. It is in effect violating what it is supposed to protect and could lead to other worse consequences like creating crippling effect upon minority groups because of its obvious message of inferiority , reverse racism , lowering standards of accountability hence rewarding race instead of hard work , showing that the people hired through affirmative action can lead to unqualified workers , leading to create a true `color blind` society , condescending to minorities about their need for affirmative action , demeaning the achievement of minorities , by attributing their success due to affirmative action and not hard work . Affirmative action has a crippling effect upon minority groups because of its obvious message of inferiority. Affirmative action assumes that minority groups are of inferiority quality and hence they should be taken care of and they should not be allowed to compete in the market place. It is actually unfair to these minorities because it has actually described them as being unable to fend for themselves within the business /work environment. Not only that it is demeaning to minorities but it also unfair to white males that rely on their skill rather then their color . Therefore, further sustaining the policy is simply an act lack of common sense and realization on how it is to live in free economy where best must come out as a result of one’s freedom to interact.

America is said to be the land of opportunities where there is freedom to compete and to excel and reach one’s potential. The reward of such freedom to excel to one’s own could only come from a system that encourages initiative and freedom to move or go into a career path where each one is being led to and that that path must be one that challenges individual’s competitive spirit and not cuddles some minorities, who are assumed and declared inferior before the fights. Another argument in support of this paper’s thesis is that affirmative action is a reverse racism but it still racism. While the concept of affirmative action apparently aims to reduce racism by mandating that females and /or non-whites be given preference in employment hiring and college admission, the same is actually producing racism in reverse and therefore defeating the purpose for which it was set up as policy. It is therefore an often obvious discrimination against whites and /or males, often against white males since choosing their opposites, meaning the females and /or non-whites, is automatically not choosing the first. To require something that must be done before applying a criterion other than color or sex is point-blank discrimination which does not need much thought. It may be argued that discrimination takes the attitude of pre-judgment without the benefits of hearing the other viewpoints.

PROS AND CONS Several justifications can be offered for affirmative action. Because, by definition, affirmative action involves working to assist society’s less-advantaged members, one reason to promote affirmative action policies is to remedy the effects of past discrimination. This remedial justification of affirmative action recognizes that wrongs have been committed in the past and acknowledges a moral obligation to set things right. Opponents of affirmative action do not contest the moral obligation to remediate past harm. Their objection to remedial policies is frequently centered on the claim that specific affirmative action policies will not help those who have in fact been harmed, but will sweep too broadly and provide benefits to those who do not deserve them. Sometimes opponents of affirmative action argue that the harm to be remediated did not occur, or if it did occur—as in the case of racial discrimination in the United States—the harm has dissipated so that remedial measures are no longer necessary. Another important justification for affirmative action is the so-called diversity rationale. Advocates for the diversity rationale argue that society as a whole benefits when affirmative action is used to maintain diverse schools, workplaces, and businesses. According to this argument, people from different backgrounds, cultures, and genders bring complementary skills that collectively enrich the places where they work and learn. Some affirmative action opponents reject the diversity argument outright. They claim there is no inherent social benefit to diverse work-places or schools. Others accept the assertion that diversity is a social benefit, but express doubt over whether racial or gender characteristics provide a meaningful basis on which to assess diversity’s social benefit. This latter claim is related to what is arguably the most important objection to affirmative action. Opponents of affirmative action argue that it is wrong to allocate social benefits on the basis of immutable characteristics, such as race or gender. They claim that affirmative action is itself a form of racial/gender discrimination that discriminate against white males, contrary to historic forms of discrimination that were targeted against women and people of color. Thus the charge is often made that affirmative action is in fact “reverse discrimination.” Supporters of affirmative action argue that the claim that affirmative action is discriminatory is overly formalistic. Although admitting that affirmative action does discriminate in a technical sense, supporters claim affirmative action is morally justified because its goal is not to harm the white majority, but to provide social justice for those who have been deprived of opportunity in the past.

Read more: http://www.mightystudents.com/essay/Affirmative.Action.WorkPlace.59182#ixzz0tVjiLlIK
Morgan Hamilton offers expert advice and great tips regarding all aspects concerning lifestyles. Learn more at http://www.lifestylesinfoguide.com/general-information/lifestyles/an-insight-into-affirmative-action-program.html * Affirmative Action - PROS AND CONS, THE ORIGINS OF, LEGAL TREATMENT OF, POLITICAL AND SOCIAL DEBATES, THE FUTURE http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/articles/pages/5916/Affirmative-Action.html#ixzz0tQ3mBiKn