Affirmative action with regards to marriage.
Name:
Institution:
Date:

A lot of people today have used affirmative action as a way of obtaining special privileges by calling them “rights” – particularly, “equal rights”. Affirmative quotas have notably been seen in local political campaigns through demands that the scope of marriage should be adjusted to suit different conditions in marriage including same sex marriage, interracial marriages and single parenting. When goals in affirmative action are not met, the burden of showing evidence that there was no discrimination against women and minorities lies with the employers in a job recruiting exercise for example. The people who advocate for these “rights” don’t have the burden of proof to elaborately show there was no discrimination in the exercise whatsoever. In many countries, minorities have always outperformed the majority even when there was no way of discriminating against them. Marriage has ever been recognized as the binding of a man and woman since. A vast range of laws have, however, come up in regard to marriage. All arising from disparities resultant from the union of man and woman. These disparities, however, arise naturally and affirmative policies should be developed for people who engage in behaviors that occur naturally and are inevitable. Research reveals that it is normal for differences between people of the same sex to occur, thus, everyone need laws that protect them whatsoever the case. Families led by a single parent have been on the rise. Single parenting can result from several phenomenon including death of a partner, one partner being jailed or due to a divorce. They often fall into poverty because these single parents are the sole breadwinners of the family. It does not make a point that these single parents are lazy, their salary, which might not be appealing