The Affordable Care Act (President Obama 2009) and the Health Security Act (President Clinton 1993) legislation has similar attempts and dissimilarities. Both administrations bottom line of health care were to close the gap of the uninsured. The difference stood with the involvement of government and the Affordable Care Act was placed into law and the Health Security Act was not. Contrarily, the Obama administration in 2010 revamped Clinton’s Health Care Act that was sold to the general public. This essay will compare and contrast Affordable Health Care with Health Reform plan, discuss the pros and cons of Affordable, and my recommendation on improvement on legislation.
The two major legislative for The Affordable Care Act and The Health Security Act stood at non-existent after the Republican Party were faced with both Health Care Reforms. The support of the public were also absent. Campaigns were second highhandedly uses to persuade the public that both Acts were blatantly coercing citizens, complex, more spending with lower quality service and more government. The Clinton administration pressed to start the kickoff of an 100 day goal, made by the president to sell the reform proposal that was not ready for Capitol Hill. Moreover, the Health Security Act, was upheld by Hilary Clinton, that was unsuccessful executing the unite of the Democratic Party, which caused absence of union that led to the downfall of the bill. The method used by the Obama administration proceeded over by the House and the Senate Democratic majority. This administration worked attentively hard receiving backing from Democratic parties, and the votes from senators to pass this bill.
Both Health Care reform bills are somewhat close to another in similarity. The content of both bills necessitate Americans with Health Care coverage and subsidized policies to the under