...proves to demonstrate sufficient results, the use of animal experimentation is still a controversial issue. Many people argue that it contradicts moral and ethical values because it makes innocent animals suffer or even die. As a result, social activists declare that animal testing must be forbidden on the legislative level, due to the negative consequences which it can cause on the health of animals. However, one cannot agree with the statement because animal testing is the essential condition of the scientific progress and innovation in the medical area. First of all, it must be stated that due to the use of animal testing, scientists managed to find treatment for some serious or even mortal human...
Words: 1420 - Pages: 6
...Against: * 1) Animal testing is not the same as human testing : Animal testing and human testing have different effects and results. The reaction of a drug in an animal’s body is quite different from the reaction in a human. * 2) Drug testing on animals causes stress, pain and sometimes death: Animal testing is cruel and sometimes it doesn’t even work. Some of the animals are not even properly anesthetized so, they feel sharp pains and usually die. One example of animal testing is called the Draize test in which the product tested is placed in the animal’s eyes resulting in blindness and death. Another example of animal testing is the LD50 in which huge amounts of a product are put into the animals’ stomachs until they die. In this process they suffer from vomiting, diarrhea, paralysis, convulsion and internal bleeding. * 3) Animal testing is morally wrong: Besides producing suffering and pain, animals being tested generate high levels of depression because of being inside of small cages. It’s a proven fact that most scientists that do animal testing feel guilt and sorrow although they should not become emotionally connected with the animals. * 4) Animal testing is very expensive: Animal testing costs over $136 billion dollars annually for the American public. Animals must be fed, housed, cared and treated with drugs. The tests are very expensive and they may be practiced more than once in short periods of time. * 5) There are many alternatives...
Words: 662 - Pages: 3
...opposite ends of the spectrum when it comes to research through animal testing. The opinions vary and the passion runs deep. Both sides have extremely intelligent people, such as doctors and scientists, that argue vehemently for their opinion. While both sides present equally convincing arguments, there are downsides to each and a compromise must be reached. Many people, such as Dr. Andre Menache, who has campaigned against animal testing for over thirty years, would argue that animal testing is cruel and simply not worth it. According to Menache, “if we rely on animals to predict human response, we will get the right answer only 33% of the time. This figure is based on the correlation between preclinical...
Words: 628 - Pages: 3
...through the animal testing done in laboratories with the purpose of ensuring a drug’s effectiveness for humans. Though many may argue that animals fully merit their own rights to not be tested on, it is not taken into account how often animals are the best option for bringing revolutionary discoveries, since the help testing for drug safety and providing accurate biological feedback for the development of medicine. Furthermore, it is through the information presented that a...
Words: 1207 - Pages: 5
...Animal testing is a cruel way of trying to find results for human advancement. It doesn't matter if the testing is for drugs, cosmetics, or toxicology, they are all harmful and cruel to animals. I think a new way of testing should be considered when trying to test new products. For example, the use of human volunteers perhaps. People who are sick with the illness could volunteer their bodies so scientists could experiment on them, so hopefully they could find a cure. There is also the argument that the reaction of a drug in an animal's body is quite different from the reaction in a human. Humans could react differently to certain diseases and medications that are tested on. If scientist test on a human and that drug works then we can be much more certain that it will work on other humans as well. Even though animal test may reduce some negative effects and may reduce human suffering it still isn't right on many accounts. Animal testing is an unfair and excruciating process that innocent animals have to endure. It's morally wrong to inflict pain on one species in order to help...
Words: 580 - Pages: 3
...Animal testing, an imperative and common procedure that has raised controversy regarding humanistic values, has been a long-lasting debated question in the scientific community. In the pursuit of scientific knowledge, animal testing has been undoubtedly essential: It has allowed for the development of new treatments and vaccines, and a better understanding of the human body. Without the sacrifices made in animal experimentation, medical, educational and commercial advancements could not be possible. For these reasons, it is evident that animals are a scientific necessity to the well-being of humanity, and should be used for experimentation. Animal testing refers to experimentation carried out on living animals for the purpose of research in basic...
Words: 754 - Pages: 4
...Animal testing, the hidden tests on bunnies, cats, dogs, hamsters and other friendly potential family pets. For decades, animal testing has become a routine practice for brands all though it costs billions of dollars every year. Well-known brands such as MAC, make-up forever, Benefit, Maybelline, Revlon and Marc Jacobs support animal cruelty and by buying products from these brands you are supporting the inhumane practices that these companies allow. I mean how could any sane person look at the savage experiments they conduct on unsuspecting, innocent animals and think that this is a moral thing to do? For the sake of make-up? Cosmetic testing is just animal cruelty, disguised by a label on a foundation bottle, I believe it must be discontinued....
Words: 645 - Pages: 3
...Animal Testing Horrifying images come to mind when people discuss animal testing: mutations, glow-in-the-dark hair, and death. Since the debate began, those who oppose animal testing often propose alternative methods to replace animals. Activists suggest methods such as in vitro or computer programs. Regardless of these new advances, persisting facts endure proving animals to be useful in multiple scenarios, and animal testing to be ethical despite common belief. Animal testing has proved its usefulness in the past century in numerous ways. Credit is due to animals for the treatment to diabetes, organ transplants, and the polio vaccination (Myers). In fact, the past century attributes every stride in medical advancement to animal experimentation....
Words: 741 - Pages: 3
...BoWen Zuo Dr. Danielle Bray English 1101 2 March 2015 Pharmaceuticals Should Not Be Tested on Animals Various pharmaceutical companies claim that testing of their products on animals is indispensable because they require a complete living organism in the process of developing pharmaceutical products. Scientific evidences have proven that humans and animals differ with regard to metabolism, physiology, and anatomy (Portaluppi 101). Further evidences point to different reactions to pharmaceuticals and chemicals among animals sourced from different species (van der Worp et al). Consequently, it is impractical to predict the possibility of humans reacting in a similar manner to pharmaceutical products as animals. A study...
Words: 1257 - Pages: 6
...Dogs, cats, mice, and other small rodents risk their lives around the world in order to help us. Taking small animals and holding them down while injecting chemical substances into their eyes and body is humane? Animals have no say in what we can do to them. The animals go through severe suffrage for our needs. There are many negative outcomes of animal testing, but there are alternatives we could be using instead of living creatures. Animals should not be used for the testing of products. What is animal testing? Animal testing is the testing in which humans practice medical procedures on animals. Cosmetics and bath products are usually tested on the animals, and are the most common tests. These experiments can lead to death, and severe injuries....
Words: 752 - Pages: 4
...ever wanted to know what happens when bad people do bad animal testing on your pets and animals. Animal testing was started at ( 384 to 322 BC) and ( 304 to 258 BC). That was really a long time when animal testing first start. But today I am here to tell you why I am against animal testing from happening today in your local city or town. I think animal testing should be illegal because in a video that I saw at http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/animal-testing-101/They were hurting the animals and removing the brains of a little mouse that was still alive in the process. Would of you make sure that the mouse did not feel anything happening when it was dead. The first thing why animal testing is bad is because they can make the animal suffer when they get them out of the cage that they are in. I think that they should not making the animals suffer because what happen it was you who was suffering. The second thing is that when they abuse the animal when they get they out of the cage that they live in when they are tested. When the people take they out the animal is scared because the animal does not know where they are at....
Words: 670 - Pages: 3
...Animal testing is using animals in experiments for educational, commercial or for the purpose of research. For centuries, animal testing have been used in scientific and medical research. Each individual look upon animals in a different way; some consider animals as their mates while others consider animals to be their subordinates which can be used for their own good. Numerous medical research centers use a variety of animals as testing subjects. During animal experimentations, some animals are experimented on to check the reliability of some medication while others are used to gather information about human behaviors in specific conditions. It is also used in testing of medications, medical strategies, consumer products and military weapons....
Words: 590 - Pages: 3
...Every year, over 25 million animals are used to conduct experiments for scientific and commercial research. Testing on animals have developed safe products for human use, which includes medical treatment, medicine, cosmetic, and skin care. Experimenting on them has enabled us to advance our approach to creating and innovating commercial and scientific products. People forget that the animals also benefit from these experiments. Others argue that it is inhumane and now that we have alternative options due to today’s technology, we should not be using animals anymore. Machines can replace the use of animals as well as prevent mistreatment of them. Opponents also claim that animals are different from humans which makes results irrelevant and therefore people...
Words: 462 - Pages: 2
...Cheyenne Lozano Ms. Hopper EH10, R1 10 Mar. 2016 Animal Testing Many people think that animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Others think that it’s necessary in the medical field and will help advance medicine. It has helped with many medical discoveries, but it does have it’s flaws and hiccups that undermine it’s overall value. Though it still has some strong points, animal testing should be limited because animals are not suitable replacements for human drug testing, animal testing doesn’t produce accurate results, and there are many other reliable alternatives to it. Animals are not suitable replacements for human drug testing. The human body is extremely complex. Humans differ from animals anatomically, genetically, and metabolically...
Words: 784 - Pages: 4
...through animal testing (“Animal”). A main argument of animal testing is that they are so genetically similar to us that it’s appropriate to use animals instead of humans. Chimpanzees share ninety-nine percent of DNA with humans along with mice being ninety-eight percent similar genetically to humans, too. In recent research, it was discovered that ninety-five percent of the animals used in research are not protected under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) (“Animal”). Though AWA covers some animals, it excludes the very ones preferred for animal testing: birds, mice, rats, and cold-blooded animals like reptiles and most fish. It is said that in 2010, under AWA, 1,134,693 animals were covered, but that the other twenty-five million used for testing were not. Animal testing in the past may have lead to ground breaking medical discoveries, but as it stands today, animal testing is...
Words: 824 - Pages: 4
