Alternate Dispute Resolution Clause University of Phoenix developed learning team to help individuals work together as a collaborated unit to gain intellectual advantages. However, when individuals come together to implement and complete tasks and objectives, occasionally, problems and issues could arise. For instance, if the team develops a binding learning team charter, which each team member must agree to the charter’s terms and is responsible for completing his or her part of a task or assignment within a certain timeframe for the team’s editor to compile each member’s part into a single paper or presentation. When any team member fails to uphold his or her ability to complete the assignment, an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) must come into action. The ADR enables team members to implement the process of using mediation process with a mediator, who listens to both sides of the issue, and makes a fair decision based on the binding information in the learning team charter (Jennings, 2006). However, the charter is binding, in which an arbitrator has the deciding factor or binding in a way that each member must agree on the outcome in the mediation process. If a team member do not post his or her assignments when designated, or if do not complete the assignment in any case, the team will vote on a resolution to solve the problem with an appropriate course of action. Whereby, which person’s name possibly removed from the assignment with no credit on the assignment as well as that person’s name excluded from the learning team’s log, which his or her participation lacked. This deciding factor based upon the collaboration between the team members using one person as the mediator, who also has voting power. However, if the team has an even number of members, the at-fault or non-participating member will not be able to vote in the mediation process.