...Is there a remedy to this issue? The first amendment gives everyone in America the freedom of speech. A big controversy today is whether or not the amendment should be altered. There are many different problems in this predicament that factor into different sides. I believe that even though there are downfalls to this amendment it should not be changed. Terrorists should not be given the same rights as anybody in America should be given, but I do believe that is where I would have to draw the line. I don’t believe that there would be a way to decipher which groups were unworthy of freedom of speech or not. Who would be the judge of whether or not the group was a hate group or not? What if someone did not like a group, or were to say that they were offended by it? Would that be a hate group too?...
Words: 419 - Pages: 2
...Gun control is one of the most talked about subjects in the United States; people have different views concerning this. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. “This law has raised a lot of commotion because of the mass shootings and how easy it is to get a gun.. There are many pros and cons to the second amendment, this law is beginning to tear the country apart because some people believe that the second amendment should be abolished, and others that say it shouldn’t be amended. The number of mass shootings in the United States has grown by a significant number....
Words: 517 - Pages: 3
...Pro removal of the second amendment The removal of the second amendment is a very controversial topic because most people can’t seem to agree on what laws should be put into place for firearms. Like you see here, we have pro and con on this matter but some things are arguable when it comes to this topic. For example, quite a few pro-gun activists believe that everyone should own a gun… including people with mental illnesses. Yes, everyone has a right to protect themselves but does everyone really need to have a gun? No, not everyone needs to own a firearm because that is how accidents happen. Last year during Obama’s tenure, he set a rule saying that people with mental illnesses, from anxiety to schizophrenia, could not purchase firearms....
Words: 533 - Pages: 3
...The first amendment of the U.S. Constitution is pretty simple. This essay will compare this amendment to other rights that other countries have. The first Amendment of the United States of America is this: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. This means to me that I basically have the right to believe any religion that I want to, and Congress can’t do anything about it. It also means that I have the right to speak freely, and use any kind of words and language that I want to, without punishment. Next, it means that I have the right to assemble into a large group of people peacefully, an example would...
Words: 983 - Pages: 4
...The 19th amendment was passed on August 18,1920.This amendment granted women the right to vote.Prior to this new reformation,women were seen as inferior and were limited to being housewives and focusing more on motherhood.Women were generally frowned upon if they tried to attain higher occupations such as: doctors, lawyers, and teachers.Needless to say, during these times women were deprived of many privileges that men had naturally;one of these depravities was the right to vote.Thanks to the 19th amendment,this is no longer. The 19th amendment has left a major imprint in American history.Though victorious,it was not an easy fight to gain this amendment.It was a fight of 70 years starting with women such as: Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth...
Words: 748 - Pages: 3
...The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Such language has created considerable debate regarding the Amendment's intended meaning. For example, some people believe that the Amendment's phrase "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" creates an individual constitutional right for citizens of the United States. Under this "individual right theory," the United States Constitution restricts legislative bodies from banning or prohibiting the owning of firearms, or at the very least, the Amendment indirectly states that getting rid of or restricting citizens who own these types of weapons is unconstitutional. On the other hand, some scholars believe that because of...
Words: 1465 - Pages: 6
...equal, but that wasn’t the case until the fourteenth amendment. The fourteenth amendment was passed and put into action by president Andrew Johnson on July 9, 1868. Passed soon after the civil war ended and all slaves were legally free. This amendment said all citizens of the U.S (born in the U.S) were of equal protection under the law. This amendment was especially directed at white southerners who were making life very hard for the newly freed slaves. The south was not happy for the most part and made many hurdles that made it hard to do things like vote. Many people who agreed with this amendment were called radical republicans, they were happy that it granted equal rights...
Words: 909 - Pages: 4
...Traditionalist reaction: I trust the Second Amendment ought not be encroached upon because of the way that a couple of awful individuals use weapons for mischief and not assurance. I jump at the chance to go chasing and shoot weapons for game with my child and a portion of the firearm strategies that have been set up by the vast majority of the Democratic party represent a danger to the Second Amendment You can have my weapons when you take them from my cool dead hands. The administration simply needs to take away our firearms to remove power from its residents. You can't confine magazine size to 10 rounds, imagine a scenario where 5 individuals break into my home. 10 rounds wouldn't be adequate. Weapons don't murder individuals, individuals...
Words: 297 - Pages: 2
...Everything that is mentioned in the 13th amendment makes sense minus this one part that says “except as a punishment for crime.” Basically that says you can punish or criminal with slavery, and that exists in the US and we do it all over the country all the time. It is called prison labor. We are kind of familiar with the idea. Prisoners making license plates is the classic example. But that is the tip of the iceberg. Across the country convicts do work in carpentry, swing, mining, packaging, fire fighting, telemarketing, fish farming, and artisanal cheese-making. The last example is why this is back in the news. Whole food took some flak for selling felon made cheese and at pretty hefty markup. According to the Civil Liberties Union, this...
Words: 663 - Pages: 3
...The Debate regardless of whether the Fourteenth Amendment makes appropriate with respect to the states the majority of the insurances of the Bill of Rights is a standout amongst the most imperative contentions including translation of the United States Constitution. David W. Neuberger (2009) in his content states," Through a lawful teaching known as joining, the Supreme Court decided that the due procedure condition of the Fourteenth Amendment made a few arrangements of the Bill of rights pertinent to the states"(p.34). Not the greater part of the insurances of the Bill of Rights have been incorporated into the Fourteenth Amendment. The majority of the real arrangements relate to the states and additionally the national government. Critical...
Words: 259 - Pages: 2
...Introduced by James Madison, the tenth amendment of the Bill of Rights states “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” In modern language this means that the federal government only has those powers granted to it by the Constitution and that any power not listed is left to the states or the people. The federal government collects taxes, regulates interstate business, declares war, etc. The other powers left to the states are not specified, but the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that family relations, intrastate business, local law enforcement, etc. are included in those powers. The tenth amendment was put into the Bill of Rights on September 5, 1789. Prior to the Revolutionary War, the American people were taken advantage of by the British government. The government had too much power and interfered in the people’s lives. Because of this the founding fathers felt the need to limit the government’s power over the people. They also added the amendment so there would not be a power struggle between the federal government and the state governments. Two state representatives...
Words: 780 - Pages: 4
...The formation of the United States Constitution was stupendous for our countries history. The Individual liberties, rights and characteristics that identify the United States among the rest of the world. These rights and freedoms drafted out in the Constitution aimed to protect each residents equally and fairly. On July 28, 1868, the Fourteenth Amendment became part of the United States Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment gave a renewed sense of desire and vision to people that were oppressed. The Fourteenth Amendment was viewed as the foundation for reinventing America to its status of greatness and affluence. The fourteenth Amendment provided for equal protection under the law regardless of race, religion, sexual preference, sex and...
Words: 389 - Pages: 2
...When our constitution was constructed, the writers kept in mind the needs of the individuals at the time. The third amendment, which is part of the bill of rights, is an example of this. This amendment arose in direct accordance to previous conflict with Great Britain. In the time of the Revolutionary War, colonists were forced to accommodate British soldiers in their homes and were mandated to provide food and clothing for these unwanted guests. These british soldiers were allowed to take over a private residence, according to British government. These soldiers often took advantage of these citizens. This all occurred because the british did not have bases in the colonies, so they welcomed themselves into colonists homes. With this intrusion...
Words: 419 - Pages: 2
...After our 2017 presidential election, I can say that both the 1st and 14th Amendments are at risk. The 14th Amendment states, “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges of immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”. Individuals who live here but are not American citizens still contribute to our nation. They are still citizens of their communities but are still being deported without any say. When they are taken to court, it is up to the judge to decide whether the person can stay or is taken back to their original country. Now with our new president, there is so much judgment towards these ‘illegals’ and are looked at as inferior. There are Republicans who are trying to do away with the 14th Amendment because there are children who were born in the U.S. whose parents arrived here illegally. Since immigration is a rising topic many government officials are...
Words: 688 - Pages: 3
...Through this action, amendments can be added. The bill will then either be passed on to the House through majority vote or will no longer be no more. When the Senate or House pass the bill, the bill will be given to various chambers within and will go through the committee action and floor action again and they will also be given the opportunity to either make the bill remain the way it is, change it, or reject the bill. For this bill to pass the house and senate needs to have similar views on the bill. When the bill is changed drastically in both the house and senate, a conference committee will then be held to figure out the differences of the bill between the house and senate. This committee will try to make a solution to where both the house and senate will agree...
Words: 735 - Pages: 3
