Active homosexuality is not a legitimate alternative lifestyle to heterosexual monogamy. Homosexual “marriage” and adoption should not be sanctioned by the state.

This is because Marriage is a two-in-one flesh communion of persons that is consummated and actualized by acts which are reproductive in type, whether or not they are reproductive in effect (or are motivated by a desire to reproduce).
Reproductive acts are unique in that they belong to a class of acts by which children come into being/are made.
They are the ONLY class of acts by which children come into being as participants in an organic community or family established through the parent’s marriage
Marriage is naturally ordered to the good of procreation as well as to the good of spouse unity. Unity is possible because of men and women, in reproductive-type acts, become a single reproductive principle.
In marital acts of a male and female the bodies of persons who unite biologically are not reduced to the status of mere instruments because The end, goal, and intelligible point of sexual union is the good of marriage itself.
Therefore, Homosexuality is not an alternative lifestyle to heterosexual monogamy.

Homosexual marriage should not be sanctioned by the state because it alters the nature of marriage and the founding of a family.
This occurs as the nature of marriage turns into simply a long-term erotic relationship.
Once same-sex marriage is recognized, it severs “marriage” from its purpose of procreation – in which case there is no reason why only two should marry.
And If anti-discrimination laws are extended to include sexual orientation, then it follows that we, as those you stand for the sanctity of marriage, could be met with affirmative action from professed homosexuals. These laws are not a mere instrumental change, but a radical change that mobilizes an entire social justice,