Death penalty is a punishment for person to put to death by government. There are 103 countries who have abolished death penalty. In Tang Dynasty in China, the death penalty has already been abolished which the first-time human abolished death penalty. Most of the countries don’t use death penalty on teenagers. This essay will argue that death penalty should be abolished because it gives the court the possibility to release the innocent person; there is the race discriminant in using the death penalty; the death penalty is incompatible with human rights and there are other ways.
Death penalty kills the possibility for citizens who are innocent to release. No matter how the times progress, misjudgment will always exist. Even though the proportion will be lower, the innocent case won’t be avoided. It is unfair for an innocent person alternative the criminal to sentence the death penalty without any remedy opportunities. In 1992, Cameron Todd Willinghai …show more content…
The death penalty is incompatible with human rights and there are other ways. We can’t decide whether a life is alive or death because it is the same as the murder. Human’s guilty should be punished in a more serious way. Michael Hayworth said that whichever the way to look at death penalty, killing another person is not humane. And when you are going to kill another person, it is vengeful and cruel. Actually, there has some other ways to deal with this problem. Now, Oregon law currently provides a possible sentence for the crime of aggravated murder: life imprisonment with the possibility (not a guarantee) of parole after serving a minimum of 30 years. The criminal is guilty and he must to pay for it. Life imprisonment create another possibility for the criminal. The criminal still needs repent for a long time, but after the confession for at least 30 years, he still has the possibility to become a good