The hypothesis will often predict how one form of human behavior influences another. 3 hypothesis
How do poor people affects our economy?
If everyone has the same financial status, that means everyone will also have more or less the same propensity to consume which means the market will be structured accordingly. Believe it or not, but a lot of products will actually disappear, many industries will close down, and those people will be out of work - that will cause a drop in their income and cause inequality.

People will refuse to do certain jobs- jobs they do not like, find boring, or consider below dignity. If those services are in demand by the society (street sweeping, grave digging for example) and there are too few people doing the job, then wages will soar. People will end up paying more for these services.

High wages mean large labour costs to the entrepreneur. Except industries which are purely technologically driven, other industries will face a crunch of entrepreneurs as people will figure out that working as an employee has larger returns. But then, more employees will mean reduction in wages, and entrepreneurship will get a boost. The market will adjust till an equilibrium is reached. At this equilibrium, there will be employees as well as entrepreneurs, and normally, both do not belong to the same financial class.
On the other hand, poor people also affect the economy by requiring subsidies, thus causing governments to spend and sometimes spend so much that they incur deficits. They stimulate considerable research, funding of internal security, and are also known to cause great upheavals in the economy and the society if the going gets too tough - the French Revolution can be a broad example. null hypothesis “poor peope does not affect our economy.
Alternative hypothesis
“higher number of uneducated people means higher number of unemployed .

How does Poverty impact Overweight and Obesity? one of the common myths that exists is that all or virtually all low-income people are far more likely to be obese. In addition, there is evidence that where there are gaps between high- and low-income groups, they have been closing with time as those with higher incomes become more obese.

Back in 2012, in the New York Times, Gina Kolata wrote that “there is no relationship between the type of food being sold in a neighborhood and obesity among its children and adolescents.” She quotes Kelly Brownell, director of Yale’s Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, as saying, “if you are looking for what you hope will change obesity, healthy food access is probably just wishful thinking.” More recently, in Slate, Heather Tirado Gilligan cites peer-reviewed research to conclude: “[M]ore fresh food closer to home likely does nothing for folks at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder. Obesity levels don’t drop when low-income city neighborhoods have or get grocery stores.”
That said, I worry about this counter-argument’s implications. If healthy food is available and affordable, and if obese, low-income consumers aren’t choosing it, it becomes very, very easy to blame the overweight victim in this scenario. In a country that places a big rhetorical premium on individual responsibility, we tend to not only do a lot of blaming the victim—we also seem to kind of enjoy it.
A recent piece by Tracie McMillan in National Geographic, entitled “The New Face of Hunger,” suggests how quickly (and viciously) blame can be leveled when it comes to personal food choices. In this lavishly illustrated piece we encounter families living in decent homes and owning nice appliances, Nike Airs, and cell phones—and they all eat terribly. They consume greasy chicken gizzards, hot dogs, chicken nuggets, and tater tots. Judging from the pictures and videos, most people profiled are overweight. With the exception of a family foraging for food, the eating scenes in this article are grim.
Null Hypothesis
“low-income people are far more likely to be obese “
Alternative hypothesis
“Poverty is one of the causes of Overweight and Obesity”

How does race and gender affect our socialization? Some people think that race demotes your personality and characteristics. Also, gender also demotes you because a lot of men in this day and age still think they are more important than women. Life is all about tolerating people. And respect.
Realistically, race and gender has to affect our socialization. People feel comfortable with other people who are similar to them. Whether it be because we speak the same language, or use the same public restroom, there is usually a sense of calm in a more homogeneous group than there is in a mixed group.

As children, we separate by gender once we hit school, which is this giant mecca of socialization. It carries over through adolescence and continues on through adulthood. Granted we don't separate anymore, but we do treat each other differently, at least in polite society. The way men are with their male friends is often different than the way they act in mixed company.

We compartmentalize things, and sort of make the opposite gender, and different races seem way more mysterious than they are. I can sit here and pretend that my gender and ethnicity (cause I don't buy into the contrived race concept I have never seen a Black person, or a White person...people are more different shades of brown and tan...), don't affect, but they do. I'm a Latin female, and I see the world through the eyes of a Latin female.

That being said, that's how everyone see the world, through their own eyes, and bottom line is, their ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic background, preference, education level, all affect our socialization.
However The Bible does not even use the word race in reference to people,14 but it does describe all human beings as being of “one blood” (Acts 17:26). This of course emphasizes that we are all related, as all humans are descendants of the first man, Adam (1 Corinthians 15:45),15 who was created in the image of God (Genesis 1:26–27).
Null Hypothesis
“Socialization does not choose any Races or Gender “
Alternative Hypothesis
“Race and gender makes a better socialization.”