Premium Essay

Arguments Against Animal Testing

Submitted By
Words 1420
Pages 6
For a long time, scientists used a reliable method to check the effects of new medical treatments on the biological system of humans. Though the method proves to demonstrate sufficient results, the use of animal experimentation is still a controversial issue. Many people argue that it contradicts moral and ethical values because it makes innocent animals suffer or even die. As a result, social activists declare that animal testing must be forbidden on the legislative level, due to the negative consequences which it can cause on the health of animals. However, one cannot agree with the statement because animal testing is the essential condition of the scientific progress and innovation in the medical area. First of all, it must be stated that due to the use of animal testing, scientists managed to find treatment for some serious or even mortal human …show more content…
More than 97 percent of all research is conducted on mice, fish, and insects (Cook). To compare the number of animals used in the research to the number of the animals consumed with food, the number of the chickens consumed per year in the United States exceeds the number of the animals used in animal testing in the last century (Rowan). With all factors considered, it is necessary to note that animal testing is positive when it outweighs the risks and damages caused by the suffering of animals as the result of animal testing. While medical research is without the doubt one of the fields in which benefits outweigh the damages, not all industries in which animal research is used are the same (Blakemore). For example, animal testing should be limited in the cosmetic industry, which can perfectly work based on the existing save ingredients that are no tested on

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Animal Testing

...through the animal testing done in laboratories with the purpose of ensuring a drug’s effectiveness for humans. Though many may argue that animals fully merit their own rights to not be tested on, it is not taken into account how often animals are the best option for bringing revolutionary discoveries, since the help testing for drug safety and providing accurate biological feedback for the development of medicine. Furthermore, it is through the information presented that a...

Words: 1207 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Animal Testing

...opposite ends of the spectrum when it comes to research through animal testing. The opinions vary and the passion runs deep. Both sides have extremely intelligent people, such as doctors and scientists, that argue vehemently for their opinion. While both sides present equally convincing arguments, there are downsides to each and a compromise must be reached. Many people, such as Dr. Andre Menache, who has campaigned against animal testing for over thirty years, would argue that animal testing is cruel and simply not worth it. According to Menache, “if we rely on animals to predict human response, we will get the right answer only 33% of the time. This figure is based on the correlation between preclinical...

Words: 628 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Animal Testing

...Every year, over 25 million animals are used to conduct experiments for scientific and commercial research. Testing on animals have developed safe products for human use, which includes medical treatment, medicine, cosmetic, and skin care. Experimenting on them has enabled us to advance our approach to creating and innovating commercial and scientific products. People forget that the animals also benefit from these experiments. Others argue that it is inhumane and now that we have alternative options due to today’s technology, we should not be using animals anymore. Machines can replace the use of animals as well as prevent mistreatment of them. Opponents also claim that animals are different from humans which makes results irrelevant and therefore people...

Words: 462 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

For and Against Arguments Animal Testing

...Against: * 1) Animal testing is not the same as human testing : Animal testing and human testing have different effects and results. The reaction of a drug in an animal’s body is quite different from the reaction in a human. * 2) Drug testing on animals causes stress, pain and sometimes death: Animal testing is cruel and sometimes it doesn’t even work. Some of the animals are not even properly anesthetized so, they feel sharp pains and usually die. One example of animal testing is called the Draize test in which the product tested is placed in the animal’s eyes resulting in blindness and death. Another example of animal testing is the LD50 in which huge amounts of a product are put into the animals’ stomachs until they die. In this process they suffer from vomiting, diarrhea, paralysis, convulsion and internal bleeding. * 3) Animal testing is morally wrong: Besides producing suffering and pain, animals being tested generate high levels of depression because of being inside of small cages. It’s a proven fact that most scientists that do animal testing feel guilt and sorrow although they should not become emotionally connected with the animals. * 4) Animal testing is very expensive: Animal testing costs over $136 billion dollars annually for the American public. Animals must be fed, housed, cared and treated with drugs. The tests are very expensive and they may be practiced more than once in short periods of time. * 5) There are many alternatives...

Words: 662 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Animal Testing

...Cheyenne Lozano Ms. Hopper EH10, R1 10 Mar. 2016 Animal Testing Many people think that animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Others think that it’s necessary in the medical field and will help advance medicine. It has helped with many medical discoveries, but it does have it’s flaws and hiccups that undermine it’s overall value. Though it still has some strong points, animal testing should be limited because animals are not suitable replacements for human drug testing, animal testing doesn’t produce accurate results, and there are many other reliable alternatives to it. Animals are not suitable replacements for human drug testing. The human body is extremely complex. Humans differ from animals anatomically, genetically, and metabolically...

Words: 784 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Animal Testing

...through animal testing (“Animal”). A main argument of animal testing is that they are so genetically similar to us that it’s appropriate to use animals instead of humans. Chimpanzees share ninety-nine percent of DNA with humans along with mice being ninety-eight percent similar genetically to humans, too. In recent research, it was discovered that ninety-five percent of the animals used in research are not protected under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) (“Animal”). Though AWA covers some animals, it excludes the very ones preferred for animal testing: birds, mice, rats, and cold-blooded animals like reptiles and most fish. It is said that in 2010, under AWA, 1,134,693 animals were covered, but that the other twenty-five million used for testing were not. Animal testing in the past may have lead to ground breaking medical discoveries, but as it stands today, animal testing is...

Words: 824 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Animal Testing

...Animal testing is a cruel way of trying to find results for human advancement. It doesn't matter if the testing is for drugs, cosmetics, or toxicology, they are all harmful and cruel to animals. I think a new way of testing should be considered when trying to test new products. For example, the use of human volunteers perhaps. People who are sick with the illness could volunteer their bodies so scientists could experiment on them, so hopefully they could find a cure. There is also the argument that the reaction of a drug in an animal's body is quite different from the reaction in a human. Humans could react differently to certain diseases and medications that are tested on. If scientist test on a human and that drug works then we can be much more certain that it will work on other humans as well. Even though animal test may reduce some negative effects and may reduce human suffering it still isn't right on many accounts. Animal testing is an unfair and excruciating process that innocent animals have to endure. It's morally wrong to inflict pain on one species in order to help...

Words: 580 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Animal Testing

...A very touchy subject on whether or not animals should be tested on. More than 100 million animals are killed from testing in the U.S alone.  That’s about 273.973  animals a day that die from getting tested for biological,medical, and cosmetic reasons. But why is this a thing, perhaps humans wouldn’t want anything bad happening to them and only to an innocent animal.  Just think of your animals at home, they are scared  going to the vet, let alone in a cage their whole life and getting nothing but tests. There are many reasons as to why this vicious act should be stopped immediately.      You’re  hurting an animal. That should be enough reasoning to stop. What gives you the right to test on confused scared animals. Some people believe...

Words: 477 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Animal Testing

...Animal testing research paper Throughout history animals have been unfairly tested on. As early as 384 Bc animal testing has occurred (Hajar). In 1980 Henry Spira, an animal rights activist, took an ad out in the New York Times with the slogan “How many rabbits does Revlon blind for beauty's sake?” That is what started the campaign to stop animal testing. Animals are tested on to make products such as shampoo, makeup, and sunscreen. When you test on animals 50% of the animals that get tested die during the study. The ones who survive are later killed. The main animals that are tested on are monkeys, rats, mice, lizards, guinea pigs and baboons but are not limited to those animals. Animal testing should be banned because it is unnecessary and cruel to animals. Different procedures are done to animals that are painful and would be considered animal abuse in any other situation. To test products and chemicals on animals there are many procedures that are done. One procedure is vivisection, which is the act of cutting or experimenting with live animals or putting harsh chemicals on the animals. Another procedure that is done is a Draize test. A Draize test involves dripping substances in rabbit or other animals eyes causing pain and in serious cases blindness. These procedures should be stopped because it is hurting live creatures and is cruel to...

Words: 561 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Animal Testing

...Dogs, cats, mice, and other small rodents risk their lives around the world in order to help us. Taking small animals and holding them down while injecting chemical substances into their eyes and body is humane? Animals have no say in what we can do to them. The animals go through severe suffrage for our needs. There are many negative outcomes of animal testing, but there are alternatives we could be using instead of living creatures. Animals should not be used for the testing of products. What is animal testing? Animal testing is the testing in which humans practice medical procedures on animals. Cosmetics and bath products are usually tested on the animals, and are the most common tests. These experiments can lead to death, and severe injuries....

Words: 752 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Animal Testing

...ever wanted to know what happens when bad people do bad animal testing on your pets and animals. Animal testing was started at ( 384 to 322 BC) and ( 304 to 258 BC). That was really a long time when animal testing first start. But today I am here to tell you why I am against animal testing from happening today in your local city or town. I think animal testing should be illegal because in a video that I saw at http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/animal-testing-101/They were hurting the animals and removing the brains of a little mouse that was still alive in the process. Would of you make sure that the mouse did not feel anything happening when it was dead. The first thing why animal testing is bad is because they can make the animal suffer when they get them out of the cage that they are in. I think that they should not making the animals suffer because what happen it was you who was suffering. The second thing is that when they abuse the animal when they get they out of the cage that they live in when they are tested. When the people take they out the animal is scared because the animal does not know where they are at....

Words: 670 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Animal Testing

...Animal testing is using animals in experiments for educational, commercial or for the purpose of research. For centuries, animal testing have been used in scientific and medical research. Each individual look upon animals in a different way; some consider animals as their mates while others consider animals to be their subordinates which can be used for their own good. Numerous medical research centers use a variety of animals as testing subjects. During animal experimentations, some animals are experimented on to check the reliability of some medication while others are used to gather information about human behaviors in specific conditions. It is also used in testing of medications, medical strategies, consumer products and military weapons....

Words: 590 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Animal Testing

...help us get better rather than make us worse. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the united states for scientific and commercial testing. Animals have been used for developing medical treatments, determining the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, along with other biomedical, commercial, and healthcare uses. The research and testing on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 B.C. Animal testing has enabled the development of many life-saving treatments for both humans and animals. There is no alternative method for researching. But it is inhumane and cruel to experiment on animals. Animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results. Proponents claim that animals are appropriate research subjects because they are similar to humans in many ways. 99% of a chimpanzee’s DNA is shared with human beings and mice are 98% genetically similar to us humans. Us mammals descend from common ancestors, and have the same set of organs. Proponents also argue that when it comes...

Words: 426 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Position Paper on Animal Testing

...Should Animals testing be banned? English 112 02/19/2013 Should Animals testing be banned? Pharmaceutical industry has been able to do wonders in terms of expanding the life span of humans. This has been only possible by the careful and successful experimentation of different medicines on animals as they have rendered results for treatment needed for diseases among humans. Considering the experimentation for medicines on animals, it has been noted that an opposing party has debated whether the experimentation is unethical. There are a number of arguments which have been posed against and in defense of the animal testing. In the context of the debate, the position being disputed is that animal testing is beneficial for humans, despite being unethical, because it can help conduct different types of tests, and translate onto human lives. In order to present a justification to this position, following arguments have been posed by considering both sides of the picture: Animals are notably the best way to test medications as prior studies and empirical results have shown. With the aid of different animals including chimpanzees, baboons, ants, rats and other species of the animal kingdom, it has become possible for the scientists to find cures. These cures are not just limited to the transmissible diseases but also for influenzas and infections. It is of great interest that the heart of a baboon and other species of monkeys are rather similar to that of humans...

Words: 1494 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Animal Testing: Pros and Cons

...Animal Testing Introduction The application of animals to test a large number of products from household compounds and cosmetics to Pharmaceutical products has been considered to be a normal strategy for many years. Laboratory animals are generally used in three primary fields: biomedical research, product security evaluation and education. (Animal Experiments) It has been estimated that approximately, 20 million animals are being used for testing and are killed annually; about 15 million of them are used to test for medication and five million for other products. Reports have been generated to indicate that about 10 percent of these animals are not being administered with painkillers. The supporters of animal rights are pressurizing government agencies to inflict severe regulations on animal research. However, such emerging criticisms of painful experimentation on animals are coupled with an increasing concern over the cost it would have on the limitation of scientific progress. (Of Cures and Creatures Great and Small) Around the world, animals are utilized to test products ranging from shampoo to new cancer drugs. Each and every medication used by humans is first tested on the animals. Animals were also applied to develop anesthetics to ease human ailments and suffering during surgery. (Animal Experiments) Currently, questions have been raised about the ethics surround animal testing. As a result several regulations have been put in place to evaluate and control the...

Words: 3584 - Pages: 15