citing specific interventions for the IPV, is important to considers typical barriers for any interventions when analyzing diverse populations. Torres, 1991 explains how Latinas go back to their abusers more frequently than non-Latino White women and Dutton et al, 2000 states that they often prefer to stay with their abusers, because fears on economic independence, children custody but always expecting the partner will change one day. Perilla et al, 2001 for example, created a specific intervention stressing mechanisms for partners and children, explaining that in many cases comes from an inheritance of subjugations across centuries in US, but also in their countries of origins. Welland et al, 2007 describes these programs as sharing …show more content…
In healing the violence,
Welland et al, 2007 also looks for the acceptance of responsibility in behavior from the abusive male and point out consequences in entire family, the growing of empathy for injured partner, and techniques as anger management skills, working in self-esteem issues, a very common problem in the Latino Mexican community, for example. Concomitantly, national campaigns as
Herrero et al, 2017 recommends in an effort to empower women, as promoting more egalitarian societies through legislation and support programs for all victims of IPV. When promoting engagement in faith communities, prayer and commitment should help and work in decreasing
IPV with a protective impact in both genders, especially for those perpetrator´s women showing more marital happiness and couple satisfaction along with therapy intervention. Renzetti et al,
2017 examines the case of a significant interrelation between levels of religiosity and what the authors designated as introjected religious self-regulation, having a significant effect in males perpetrating of IPV identifying religiosity as a protective factor against violence. 3.-Feminism and the Economic Independence for Survivors of