Called the rescue "the most can not help themselves," the community to "maintain the basic living needs," Comprehensive Social Security Assistance Scheme, has been described as poor manufacturing system ﹝ Note 1 ﹞. Amount of aid to subsist indicators defined in the poor people or families living in extreme poverty level to maintain the edge, so that recipients can not participate in the social life of ordinary people ﹝ Note 2 ﹞. CSSA concept of poverty is more accused about the poor into a personal problem, completely ignore the social structure and the inequitable distribution of resources for poor manufacturing ﹝ Note 3 ﹞. Civil society while exposing enable the applicant to lose dignity censorship ﹝ Note 4 ﹞, so recipients suffering from social welfare label in an interview. CSSA system whereby communicated to everyone in the community should actively work to improve the lives of moral responsibility, with a strong labor control ﹝ Note 5 ﹞ means.

With the serious deterioration of the unemployment problem in recent years, the CSSA once again become the object of public attention, is accused of manufacturing "unemployed" in a disastrous system. Through the media, the government review of the CSSA system master the entire agenda, provoking a social concern, "CSSA nurtures lazy" phenomenon of moral panic. Last December the government published "CSSA Review Report", which most of the recommendations, including the reduction of three or more family CSSA standard rates, the majority of special needs allowances canceled, forcing the unemployed CSSA recipients participate in community work, etc. , will be awarded by the mainstream media in the midst of applause.

The purpose of this paper is to examine the local press media on the image of the construction of CSSA recipients, specifically, this article hopes to answer the following questions: the way the local press media discourse CSSA recipients, whether implied some important themes? These themes projected image out of CSSA recipients is how? CSSA recipients as well as for the general public ﹝ readers ﹞ actions will likely subject? What is the relationship with different social systems and social structures? Is to discuss the promotion of human rights or the repression of labor?