Behavioral blend:
You must have seen pattern of behavior because everyone has a specific personality. There are four basic personality types. These personality types are also known as temperaments, blend together to determine your personality. To help you understand why you often feel, think, and act the way you do, the expression “behavioral blend” is described in the DISC Personality Assessment. There are four types of behavior or temperaments D, I, S, and C that are blended to create a unique personality for every individual. Four Temperament model of human behavior as a template, four basic personality types that blend together to make up each unique individual, or the DISC personality model: D’s are dominant, directing and decisive; I’s are influence and inspiring; S’s are submissive and sensitive, and C’s are critical, cautious, and competent. There are two sections to the behavioral blend: what is expected of the person and who the person truly is. My expected blend is D/C and who I am is D/I/C.

Behavioral blend positive influences: Inspiring, Creative, Active, Original, Outgoing, Asserting, Competent, Devoted, Cautious, Inquisitive, Perceptive, Researching, Industrious and Spirited.
Behavioral blend negative influences: Controlling, Restless, Relentless, Reactive, Demanding, Impatient, Opinionated, Judgmental, Masked, Self-absorbed, Guarded, Unreceptive, Questioning, Aggressive

Discussion of my behavioral blend: “D”:- dominant, directing and decisive
. As a "D" I think or feel that individuals anticipate that me will be predominant, regulate, requesting, and decided. I accept that individuals need me to assume responsibility and achieve the errand nearby. I am surer than generally others. My dauntless and forward methodology off and on again causes issues, however I appear to recoup well and continue onward. I don't think individuals need me to stop or back up. Winning is extremely vital to me. Victory drives me to work harder than most however once in a while I work excessively hard for a really long time. I think individuals rely on upon me to demonstrate things might be carried out and I am stronger than the individuals who acknowledge rout.
I am such a firm and genuine person that I think individuals anticipate that me will be strong and valiant. I would rather not lose or let others down. I feel that an individual relies on upon me for direction and heading. In some cases I am not by any stretch of the imagination beyond any doubt of what to do yet I proceed with what I think is normal of me. I frequently settle on choice with half data which heads me to hazard at times. I don't prefer others to exploit me and I regularly think individuals are against me when they don't move speedier as I think they should move. I could be exceptionally combative or unstable once in a while. I think individuals anticipate that me will assume responsibility and settle on choices for them. I have exclusive requirement from myself as well as other people. I appear to fulfill more than most. I some of the time don't know I buckle down in light of the fact that individuals anticipate that me will do so or I truly don't know how to unwind or restless.
Interpersonal communication dependence on behavior blend:
Interpersonal Communication gives an adjusted scope of the examination looking at what impacts correspondence conduct. We accept that correspondence practices are affected by both nature and support, and we help an interactionist position. As opposed to becoming tied up with an either/or dualism, we accept that both science and what we take in impact correspondence. Thus, we discuss the commitments of both nature and support in our scope of interpersonal correspondence. Understanding the nature point of view is imperative for a few reasons. To start with, it’s vital to comprehend the common some piece of correspondence; that is, the partition that re-sides in the genes we inherited from our guardian and grandparents. These inherent characteristics make us special and permit us to have "unique" identities. Second, there are times when we have to work against what is characteristic to create the relational abilities that will permit us to have the connections we have to be joyful and fruitful. Case in point, in the event that its common for you to dependably contend and talk about other individuals' plans, there are going to be times when you have to work, against this regular correspondence propensity. Some individuals discover factious individuals to be hostile and even impolite. Truth be told some individuals may discover your style to be verbally combative. They may even feel just as you are generally ambushing them when this is not the situation. Our methodology to showing interpersonal correspondence is to give the accompanying assets, which help scholars to create their own particular methodologies to interpersonal correspondence that are perfect with their unique identities.
Now if am having “D” behavioral blend it means you expect from me to take your decision and give you direction so for a good interpersonal communication I have to do it. Other person involved in the communication should also have known what you think and what you feel related to others so he should have act accordingly to make a healthy interpersonal communication.

Enlarging the conversation:
Enlarging the conversation is a term that applies to the idea, expressed in reword, importance understanding and listening and talking or reacting from a point of view that is bigger than your own. It is shockingly troublesome to understand that other individuals truly comprehend things in a manner that is not quite the same as your understanding of the same things and that this distinction in understanding has the possibility to totally hinder any probability of common perception, clarity, agreement or accord.
In this manner the conversation must be enlarged to include the other's vision and comprehension. The equation for enlarging the conversation is: Identified Needs + Intentional Resourcing = Enlarging the Conversation. This includes asking comprehension widening inquiries and inspecting just as growing assets, and so on. Knowing the behavioral blend of both or all members in a conversation encourages recognizing what sorts of things to ask and what sort of assets to inspect to arrive at shared vision, cognizance and agreement or accord.

References: 1. Stewart, J. (1995) Bridges not walls: a book about interpersonal communication. New York. McGraw-Hill.

2. Carbonell, M. (2008). How to Solve the People Puzzle: Understanding Personality Patterns. Blue Ridge, GA: Uniquely You Resources.