Contribution 3-nestle’s spokesman

Hello every one, I am the Nestlé’s spokesman, in response to the parents and baby milk action spokesman, I still argue about your statement as ‘multi-national corporations who like Nestle, are actively unethical in their business intentions and practice, displaying little or no corporate social responsibility.’

Admittedly, the promotion of infant formula in third world country has brought health problem to children in that country, however, we have made great effort to change the situation and to comply with the WHO code, the criticism to nestle should be stop. Since I have made too much discussion about how nestle is an ethical corporation with high CSR consciousness now I want to give another example — The Body Shop.

The Body Shop International PLC is a global cosmetics company launched in 1976, which was predicated on ethical principles and the values of environmental sustainability, it can be seen as one of the first companies to prohibit the use of ingredients tested on animals, the Body Shop also pioneered Community Trade agreements with countries in the developing world. The company is also attributed for shaping ethical consumerism in the way it has produced and retailed its various consumer products. Here I want to give some real cases of Body Shop to support my argument.

Opposition to Animal Testing

From the outset, The Body Shop has maintained and publicly declared that it does not test its cosmetic products on animals, nor does it commission others to do so on its behalf, as it considered the practice to be unethical. Indeed, this sentiment became a central facet of the organization’s philosophy and one that set it apart from its main industry competitors. It is also a policy that has served to define the organisation in terms of its ethical stance and one that has been reaffirmed in many of the