As is often found in life, a combination between two extremes is the best solution when trying to answer a problem. Hypothetically situation can sometimes be dealt with by using one type of strategy, however using pure strategies to absorb demand fluctuations, leaves little room to adapt for unpredictability and error. When we use two or more strategies used in a combination, or a mixed strategy, which is more widely used across the industry, we have a better chance at success.
With this in mind, I opted for a mixed strategy when seeking the optimal solution for my aggregate planning for the Bradford Manufacturing. I used a combination of the Stable Workforce and Level Strategy introduced in the textbook. Stable workforce is a strategy that allows for variable work hours. As a company you are able to vary the output by varying the number of hours worked through flexible work schedules or overtime. This ability to varying the number of work hours, will transfer to varying the quantity the company is able to produce.
The advantages of implementing this strategy provides workforce continuity and avoids many of the emotional and tangible costs of hiring and firing associated with the chase strategy. I opted to keep my workforce number constant and to utilize overtime towards the end of the year in preparation for the rush that would be experienced toward the Holiday season. In order to implement a new line of production, 6 employees would have to be added to the workforce. These new hires would come with exorbitant cost to hire and train, all coupled with the unpredictability of if they would be a good employee or not. If you were to go through with the hiring procedures, once the demand is lowered in the first Quarter of the New Year, you are overstaffed and must lay off employees. This comes with a price tag of its own. It seems all signs pointed to maintaining a