Free Essay

Bribery Scandal Siemans

In:

Submitted By craigslistcheapo
Words 418
Pages 2
Bribery Scandal
Case Summary
This case covers the scandal at Siemens AG in 2006, 2007 which consisted of employees bribing foreign officials. Siemens employees made slush funds specifically for the purpose of gaining an unfair advantage to win contracts. They also were accused of bribing officials of the labor board in return they would give support for Siemen’s policies. Siemens office in Germany was raided and an official investigation was started. In other countries they were investigated subsequently following the raid in Germany. The CEO resigned regardless of not being found responsible though the scandal was under his watch.

This scandal set off a chain reaction to questioning the other companies in competition and the laws in Germany made to deter this behavior. Labor representatives who had been possibly bribed held the board, which governed the laws. This created an element of people responsible of making sure this type of thing did not happen, by letting it happen for personal gain. All along critics of this type of management feared this to be a potential issue. This shed light upon the challenges that the new management would encounter after the scandal occurred.
In your opinion, is “bribing” unethical & illegal or just a cost of doing business? Discuss this in light of Siemens’ bribery scandal.

Bribing is unethical and it takes the level playing arena away from business and all that compete within it. Oligopolies and monopolies arise from this type of unfair business practice. The employees of Siemens felt they had done no wrong because they were simply helping the company and were not to gain anything personally. This group claimed that this type of behavior had been in place for quite a while and their management accepted as the norm.

Bribing is illegal and it is a cost of doing business in many industries. With regards to Siemens it had been a company culture that had become standard operation procedure. To gain a contract or win business companies had to have a superior product, bribe, or lose the business. In this situation the element of fair business was not achievable because the laws were not being abided by. So the only way to be competitive was to join the behavior. Advocating bribery as an answer to this type of issue is not a solution. Whistleblowing and advocating fair business practice within is always the best way. Siemens might have made money fro a while but lost in the long-term compared to doing business properly.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Question 3 Government Around the World Are Becoming Increasingly Sensitive to the Loss of Revenue Resulting from Multinational Companies Moving Into Other Jurisdictions, Most Particularly Tax Havens, to Lower Their

...Case study of Japanese bribe The case basically talks about the “bribe” in Japan by the Lockheed Aircraft Company. Mr. A Carl Kotchian is the president of the company. In 1970 they were saved from bankruptcy emergency government loan of $250 million. In order to save from financial disaster Lockheed is desperately looking to sell it air craft in major Japan airline. Eventually Kodama succeed in entering in to contract sell Lockheed aircraft in Japan with $9 million bribe to the Prime Minister Kukeo Tanaka and other government official, they knew that by paying the bribe they were sure that they will get the contract to sell their plane in All-Nippon Airline. Officials from private trading company advised about the bribe, but Mr. A Carl Kotchian says that it was the “Japanese Business Practice” in which local consultant is in more supportive to keep in with local “business practice” US investigate and found $22 million as bribe or secret payment but they mention it as “marketing cost in their books of account. Internal Revenue Codes states it as bribe which is directly paid to the officials and employees. But however it was not considered as bribe during that time for no us enact rules by US government. But due to guilt of bribe Mr. Kochian was resign with the pressure from board of directors and Kodama was arrested. Mainly there are three main stake holders; 1. Mr. A Carl Kotchian who was the president of Lockheed Air Craft Company who bribe different Japanese...

Words: 926 - Pages: 4