Free Essay

Burning of Fossil Fuels

In:

Submitted By vinodkumar0607
Words 1695
Pages 7
BURNING OF FOSSIL FUELS

NAME:-

NAME OF PROFESSOR:-

DATE:-

BURNING OF FOSSIL FUELS

The burning of fossil fuels is the major contributor to human caused climate change. Once taken

out of the ground and burned , coal, oil and gas add to the amount of carbon cycling between the

atmosphere and the oceans, soil, rock and vegetation. On human time scales, this transfer is

irrevocable, once mined and burned, fossil carbon cannot be locked away safely underground

again in the form of new deposits of coal, oil and gas, or in the form of carbonate rock, for

millions of years. The transfer is also unsustainable: there is simply not enough “space” in

above-ground biological and geological systems to park safely the huge mass of carbon coming

out of the ground without carbon dioxide building up catastrophically in both the air and the

oceans.
At the most fundamental level, therefore, the climate solution revolves around initiating a new

pathway away from fossil fuel dependence. Industrialized societies locked in to fossil fuels need

to turn to structurally different, non-fossil energy, transport, agricultural and consumption

regimes within a few decades to minimize future dangers and costs. Infrastructure, trade, even

community structure will have to be reorganized, and state support shifted from fossil-fuelled

development toward popular movements constructing or defending low-carbon means of

livelihood and social life.

When fossil fuels are burned, essentially all of the carbon in the fuel chemically combines with the oxygen in the air to form carbon dioxide. About 1.5 percent of the carbon in fossil fuels is emitted in the form of carbon monoxide. Typical hydrocarbon fuels contain 75 to 90 percent carbon by weight. Thus, for every ton of fossil fuel burned, at least three-quarters of a ton of carbon enter the atmosphere in the form of carbon dioxide. (Energy Information Administration,
1993).
Since 1860, global annual emissions of fossil fuel carbon dioxide have increased from 0.1 billion metric tons to approximately 5.9 billion metric tons of carbon per year in 1988. The United
States is the world's largest source of energy-related carbon dioxide emissions, emitting 1.3 billion metric tons in 1990.
Also, 20 percent of the methane emissions and more than half of all sulfur emissions on an annual basis are derived from the production, distribution or use of fossil fuels.
Substantial reductions in vehicle tailpipe emissions were achieved during the '70s and '80s largely through catalytic converters and improvements in fuel efficiency. The reduced emissions yielded less of a net impact due to the increases in vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled.
Changes in demographics and employment patterns during the '70s and '80s resulted in increases in vehicle ownership and vehicle miles traveled that are higher that the growth rates in population. As a result, net emissions reduction from mobile sources generally have been lower than originally anticipated despite significant technological advances. (EPA Transportation
Control Measures Information Documents, March 1992).

But the main official approach to the climate crisis worldwide – building a single, liquid global

carbon market worth trillions of dollars – is likely to make climate change worse, not only

exacerbating its social impacts but also generating negative impacts of its own.

The two basic instruments of carbon markets are cap and trade and offsets. A country’s

emissions cap is imposed by government regulation. Each industrial installation is assigned the

right to emit a certain amount of greenhouse gas. It is then allowed to buy additional pollution

rights if it needs them to meet its emissions target or to sell any rights that it doesn’t need.

Cap and trade thus gives incentives to those polluting industries most locked into fossil fuel use,

where most change must occur, to delay structural change. Instead of embarking on a lower-

carbon historical pathway, such industries can instead buy bankable pollution permits. Further

slowing down the shifts needed, all cap and trade systems instituted to date have awarded large

numbers of free pollution rights to the worst polluters in order to gain their support for the

system, making cap and trade a “polluter earns” system. Adding the market price of these free

assets to customers electricity bills, many electricity generators receiving such government

donations have then gone on to invest their windfall profits in more fossil fuel capacity. In many

cases, fossil-fuelled corporations have also managed to get their government to hand over more

pollution rights than they actually need to meet their legally-mandated targets. In the European

Union, the main winners from carbon trading have been, in addition to energy traders and hedge

funds, electricity generators fuelled by coal and nuclear fission, while the biggest losers have

been consumers.

At the same time that it undermines effective climate policy, cap and trade has also given rise to

distribution problems that could flare into destructive international political conflict. The reason

is that cap and trade, like other market systems, requires that the commodity being bought and

sold come with ownership rights. In order to work, therefore, cap and trade needs to privatize the

earth’s carbon-cycling capacity-its physical, chemical and biological ability to regulate its own

climate and keep it stable. By awarding its worst-polluting companies huge blocks of

transferable pollution permits, Northern governments have unilaterally decided to give them

transferable property rights to a disproportionate chunk of this global capacity-which, under a

more equitable system, would be made available to everyone equally.

Further undermining both the climatic efficacy and the political sustainability of carbon markets

are carbon offsets – the other pillar of carbon trading. Offsets provide the industrialized North

with a flow of additional emissions licenses originating from projects designed to “compensate”

for its fossil fuel emissions.

Examples include forestry schemes, hydroelectric dams or pollution-reducing fuel switches.

Such projects – located mainly in the global South (particularly China, India, Korea and Brazil

within the Kyoto Protocol market) – must show that the carbon savings they achieve are a result

of the finance they derive by selling emissions permits to big polluters. Under the Kyoto

Protocol, such offset projects were devised partly as a compromise between the desire of

wealthier industries and states to delay reducing their own emissions and the desire of Southern

state negotiators for some financial benefit from the international climate regime. Unfortunately,

it cannot be either proved or disproved that offsets are distinct from business as usual, or

climatically equivalent to reducing emissions at source. As a result, no means exist for

preventing skillful and well-paid carbon accountants from fabricating huge numbers of pollution

rights for sale to Northern fossil fuel polluters by claiming that various conventional industrial

projects are “saving carbon.” Carbon offsets thus wind up on the whole increasing fossil fuel

emissions rather than compensating for them. Even worse, accounting procedures for offset

projects set up perverse incentives for credit seekers (including host governments, credit buyers

and consultant validators) to bring about “business as usual” scenarios that are the highest

emitting possible, since the greater the emissions without the project, the higher the supposed

carbon savings that can be achieved with it, and thus the higher payoffs that can be demanded.

These obstacles to verifiable offset accounting may in the end spell as much trouble for

economic stability as they do for efforts to curb climate change. If the carbon market grows into

the world’s largest market, as often predicted, with massive participation on the part of hedge

funds, energy traders, private equity funds and large global investment banks, the collapse of a

sub-prime carbon bubble could have consequences comparable to those of the current financial

crisis.

Despite having been defended as a way of financing “green” development, most carbon offset

credits are, in addition, generated by projects that in fact reinforce fossil fuel dependence in the

South. If Northern industrial buyers of offset credits tend to be large-scale corporate greenhouse

gas producers such as Shell, BHP-Billiton, EDF, Endesa, Mitsubishi, Cargill, Nippon Steel,

ABN Amro and Chevron, so, too, carbon credit sellers tend to be corporations strongly

committed to continued use of fossil fuels, such as South Africa’s Sasol, India’s Tata Group,

ITC, Birla, Reliance and Jindal, and Korea’s Hu-Chems Fine Chemical. It is such well-financed

companies-and not green innovators or local communities developing low-carbon ways of life-

that are best able to navigate the financial and bureaucratic requirements involved in registering

offsets for the Kyoto Protocol carbon market. These firms are thus able to use carbon trading not

as a way of propelling their countries away from fossil dependence, but, typically, as a means for

topping up finance for environmentally and socially-damaging projects to which they are already

committed and which are more often than not in sunset industry sectors. The principal economic

incentives offset trading provides are not for technological or social innovators to seek

transitions to low-carbon futures, but rather for carbon consultants and policymakers to find or

invent new “emissions reduction equivalents” that can be used to manufacture substantial blocks

of cheap carbon credits for sale to conventional industries or financial speculators. In shoring up

business as usual in this way, carbon trading thus works to the disadvantage of many Southern

communities whose land, water and air are usurped by the private sector for “climate reasons”.

REFERENCES

ESRL Web Team (14 January 2008). "Trends in carbon dioxide". Esrl.noaa.gov. Retrieved 2011-09-11.
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2010). "Climate Change Indicators in the United States". EPA. Figure 2. Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector, 1990–2005.
Archer, David (2009). "Atmospheric lifetime of fossil fuel carbon dioxide". Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 37. pp. 117–134.
Bader, N. and Bleichwitz, R. (2009). "Measuring urban greenhouse gas emissions: The challenge of comparability. ''S.A.P.I.EN.S.'' '''2''' (3)". Sapiens.revues.org. Retrieved 2011-09-11. IEA (2007). World energy outlook 2007 edition – China and India insights. International Energy Agency (IEA), Head of Communication and Information Office, 9 rue de la Fédération, 75739 Paris Cedex 15, France. p. 600.
Lerner & K. Lee Lerner, Brenda Wilmoth (2006). "Environmental issues: essential primary sources". Thomson Gale. Retrieved 11 September 2006.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Burning of Fossil Fuels

...BURNING OF FOSSIL FUELS NAME:- NAME OF PROFESSOR:- DATE:- BURNING OF FOSSIL FUELS The burning of fossil fuels is the major contributor to human caused climate change. Once taken out of the ground and burned , coal, oil and gas add to the amount of carbon cycling between the atmosphere and the oceans, soil, rock and vegetation. On human time scales, this transfer is irrevocable, once mined and burned, fossil carbon cannot be locked away safely underground again in the form of new deposits of coal, oil and gas, or in the form of carbonate rock, for millions of years. The transfer is also unsustainable: there is simply not enough “space” in above-ground biological and geological systems to park safely the huge mass of carbon coming out of the ground without carbon dioxide building up catastrophically in both the air and the oceans. At the most fundamental level, therefore, the climate solution revolves around initiating a new pathway away from fossil fuel dependence. Industrialized societies locked in to fossil fuels need to turn to structurally different, non-fossil energy, transport, agricultural and consumption regimes within a few decades to minimize future dangers and costs. Infrastructure, trade, even community structure will have to be reorganized, and state support shifted from fossil-fuelled development toward popular movements constructing or defending low-carbon means of livelihood and social...

Words: 1696 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Burning of Fossil Fuels

...one way of showing the outputs of every member in order to create great research with a knowledgeable content. The possible outcome of a research reflects the ability of every student on how to observe particular problem. The topic that we have chosen is burning of fossil fuels (effects, causes and prevention). It opens our hearts and minds on the possible effects or outcomes that may happen in our environment if these thing will continuously arise. The damaged has been done in several parts of the world. The only thing we must do is to initiate other ideas that may convert the effects of burning of fossil fuel into a suitable one. The next pages of this research will explain other alternative ways to get energy or electricity without using or burning fossil fuels. As we continue to understand these things in this world, let’s put in our mind first that the imbalance of our nature can affects great percentage of our life not just here in the present but also to the next generation to come. OBJECTIVES: Investigate the cause, and effects of burning of fossil fuels in the lives of human, animals and to the world. II. FOCUS QUESTION 1. What are the causes of burning of fossil fuels? 2. What are the effects of this in carbon dioxide cycle? 3. Why is it that the human being and animals are greatly affected in this problem? III. DATA COLLECTION AND...

Words: 1539 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

BP Oil Disaster

...Killing and polluting a massive proportion of the ecosystem. That is only a small portion of what fossil fuels can do to animals and plants. Alternative energy is the solution to the problem, and that is what should be used in the stead of fossil fuels. They should be used because the burning of fossil fuels damage the atmosphere, damage the...

Words: 2143 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Renewable Energy Presentation Outline

...purpose: to persuade the audience to support renewable energy Thesis: Renewable energy helps the environment and keeps people healthier than burning fossil fuels. Introduction: I. The United States is the leading consumers of fossil fuels. II. Renewable energy is energy harnessed from nature. Main points: I. The cost of oil is increasing at a very fast rate. a. The price of a barrel of crude oil has quadrupled in the past decade. b. The United States consumes 7.14 billion barrels of oil per year. c. About 57% of U.S. oil is imported from foreign countries. II. The burning of oil and other fossil fuels is harmful to the environment. d. Carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide are two harmful byproducts of burning fossil fuels. e. There are many health risks from breathing in the chemicals formed from burning fossil fuels. III. Renewable energy is much cheaper, more efficient, and cleaner to produce. f. Windmills are one of the cheapest forms of creating energy. g. The production of renewable energy seeks to harness the power of nature to convert into usable energy. h. There is no pollution formed from the creation of renewable energy. Review: I. The world’s fossil fuel supply is not infinite. II. The world is increasingly becoming more polluted from the burning of petroleum and oil. Bibliography Crude Oil FAQs. (2009, November 11). In Energy Information Administration. Retrieved 9:48 from http://tonto...

Words: 292 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Alternatives Energy Sources Are Needed Before Our Planet Dies

...Burning fossil fuels such as oil and coal are changing the climate and making thousands of Americans sick. Coal burning power plants are poisoning the air and water. “Fossil fuels account for more than 80% of US global warming” (Jon Van, 1988). Burning fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide in the air, creating a greenhouse effect that traps heat in the atmosphere making the Earth heat up. “Each year, an average of 24,000 Americans die as a result of pollution from coal burning power plants” (Greepeace, 2010). Mercury and other toxic compounds are being released into the air and eater. Acid rain caused mostly by coal burning costs $10 billion a year in crop damages (Jon Van, 1988). Oil is the most used form of energy and accounts for 38% of the global energy source. 30% of carbon dioxide emissions in the air is caused by oil burning (MSc, 2003). Oil spills such as the BP Deep water Horizon leaked thousands of gallons of crude oil in the sea, contaminating water, beaches, wetlands, and destroying sea life. BP was burning oil from the surface, which released poisonous gasses into the air causing people to get sick. Sea life has also been heavily impacted and the full effects of the damage to the eco-system will not be known for years. People have an obligation to find and use alternative energy sources. We need to stop putting people, animals, and the environment in danger. With the continued use of coal and oil, we are heating up our plant, depleting and destroying our land...

Words: 516 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Go Green

...alternatives for fossil fuels. Drilling for oil within our country may seem easier and less expensive, however it is a short term solution; we must not rely or assume that fossil fuels are an unlimited resource. We must consider alternatives for fuel and energy while recognizing the effects of pollution on the ozone layer. As we explore different types of renewable energy resources, we must be sure that they are safe on the environment and safe to use in homes or automobiles. Another aspect to consider is the availability of the resource. We do not want to waste time exploring resources which are not going to be readily available or resources that will diminish. The need for fossil fuels in the near future is still a necessity until a transformation can be made to an alternative source. There will always be a demand for fossil fuels, the goal is to reduce to use of fossil fuels as the burning of these fuels emits pollution into our atmosphere. The advantages of fossil fuels are that they are already readily available and distributed worldwide, which is very convenient. You can get gasoline and oil at any gas station and even some grocery stores, across the entire United States. Another advantage of fossil fuels is that they are easy to use as the burning of these fuels is what generates electricity. There are disadvantages of using fossil fuels such as the pollution caused by the burning of these fuels for one. Another disadvantage of fossil fuels is the dependency...

Words: 626 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

World

...Thesis: Renewable energy helps the environment and keeps people healthier than burning fossil fuels. Introduction: I. The United States is the leading consumers of fossil fuels. II. Renewable energy is energy harnessed from nature. Main points: I. The cost of oil is increasing at a very fast rate. a. The price of a barrel of crude oil has quadrupled in the past decade. b. The United States consumes 7.14 billion barrels of oil per year. c. About 57% of U.S. oil is imported from foreign countries. II. The burning of oil and other fossil fuels is harmful to the environment. d. Carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide are two harmful byproducts of burning fossil fuels. e. There are many health risks from breathing in the chemicals formed from burning fossil fuels. III. Renewable energy is much cheaper, more efficient, and cleaner to produce. f. Windmills are one of the cheapest forms of creating energy. g. The production of renewable energy seeks to harness the power of nature to convert into usable energy. h. There is no pollution formed from the creation of renewable energy. Review: I. The world’s fossil fuel supply is not infinite. II. The world is increasingly becoming more polluted from the burning of petroleum and oil. Bibliography Crude Oil FAQs. (2009, November 11). In Energy Information Administration. Retrieved 9:48 from http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/ask/crudeoil_faqs.asp#foreign_oil Crude Oil Prices...

Words: 260 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Global Warming Projections and Fossil Fuel Use

...Global Warming Projections and Fossil Fuel Use By _______ Date: Course: Econ - 382 The belief that global warming has been caused by fossil fuels is a safe assumption simply because of the link that the two share. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas that is released when fossil fuels are burnt. Every time a car gets started or coal gets burnt there is carbon dioxide released into the air and it becomes a part of the atmosphere. When this happens energy gets trapped in the atmosphere and that energy causes more heat to remain inside the earth than escape. As the heat is stuck inside the earth the temperature starts to raise slowly a slow rise that has led scientists to believe that global warming exists. The warming of the globe is steady, but its effects could be drastic enough to cause the world to undergo a great deal of change. Everything from the sea levels to the ice caps to even the weather can be affected by global warming and it can cause problems of both extremes, which could damage the earth beyond repair. The key aspect of all of this is that human activity is directly involved in just how much fossil fuels impact global warming and how it can have a larger impact on the earth and its temperature of a very small impact on it (“Climate Change Basics” 1). It can be safe to assume that there is a change in our climate which is referred to as global warming. The cause of this change has been under a great deal of debate...

Words: 1850 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Fossil Fuels

...The Burning of Fossil Fuels GS104-Intro to Environmental Science Steven Wimberly February 05, 2013 Fossil fuels are a very important part of our society today. Natural gas, Coal, and oil are the world’s primary and most important source of energy. “90% of the energy we use in this country [USA] comes from fossil fuels.” (http://www.ucsusa.org) Unfortunately, there are costs of using these fossil fuels to run our society. Some costs are obvious such as the cost of labor, equipment and supplies needed to extract, refine and transport the fossil fuels. These costs are taken care of in electricity bills, in the price of gasoline for automobiles and other governmental and company funding. There are many other costs that are less obvious. These costs are the effects fossil fuels have on our environment and on human health. Air pollution caused by the burning of coal and oil as well as dust in mines is causing problems for human health. The environment is suffering from acid rain, global warming and water and air pollution. Many times, the costs go unpaid for and unnoticed. It is imperative that we as a society take responsibility and strive to reduce the negative effects of fossil fuels on our environment. The global warming is a major environmental issue that is caused by the use of fossil fuels. When fossil fuels are burned, carbon dioxide is emitted. It captures heat in the earth’s atmosphere. What is happening is that the more carbon dioxide emitted the warmer the...

Words: 723 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

G Warming

...million years. As oceans warm and glaciers melt, land and cities along coasts may be flooded. Heat and drought may cause forests to die and food crops to fail. Global warming will affect weather everywhere, plants and animals everywhere, people everywhere; humans are warming the earth's atmosphere by burning fuels, cutting down forest, and by taking part in other activities that release certain heat trapping gases into the air. One major cause of global warming is the use of fossil fuels. Fossil fuels like coal, oil, and natural gas that were formed from the remains of plant material deposited during the earth's carboniferous period. We have known for only a few thousand years that coal, oil, and natural gas can be burned to provide energy. It was not until the mid-1800s, however, that we began to burn very large quantities of these fossil fuels. The worldwide consumption of fossil fuel has increased dramatically. The world now burns at least five billion tons of fossil fuel each year. As this carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels enters the atmosphere, some of it is taken up by photosynthesizing plants, and the oceans absorb some. But because we are burning so much fossil fuel at such a rapid rate, we are putting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere much faster than these natural processes are taking it out. There is no longer a balance between the amount of carbon dioxide being added to the air and the amount of carbon dioxide being removed. As a result, the concentration of...

Words: 326 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Discuss David Bellamys Statment on Whether Climate Change Is Influenced by Humans or a Natural Event

...Mostly I agree with the statement that climate change has nothing to do with fossil fuels, despite there being some contradictable evidence. There are also some reasons why David Bellamy’s statement could be wrong. There have been many times in history where the world’s co2 has been from 3 to 10 times higher that it is now, however the climate itself hadn’t changed greatly, so why is the co2 so important nowadays? One of the reasons for this could be that the ipcc has been in charge of climate change reports since 1988 and although there are many scientists on the team the organisation itself is controlled by politics rather than the science, thus creating a manipulated result. Leading from this if climate change (global warming) wasn’t such a big scare, the public would give less money towards ‘stopping it’ and research leaving a large amount of people unemployed. This would mean the public body is being misled and the complete matter is over exaggerated to suit the government. Furthermore the world’s climate has always been changing with little to no help from human influence. This has been proven through both the little ice age and the medieval warm period. The little ice age happened between the 1500 and 1800 where global temperature dropped to an average of around -0.8 degrees. During this time around 1780 industrialisation began in England, leaving London burning a substantial amount of fossil fuels and yet the temperature didn’t increase properly till around the 1800. This...

Words: 947 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Stem Cells

...The Changing Climate 1. “Earth’s climate has always been changing; it is the rate of change that is of current concern to scientists.” With reference to Figure 1, and other evidence which you have come across, discuss the validity of this statement. Firstly, global climate change is defined as “a change in the long-term weather patterns that characterize the regions of the world.” From Figure 1, we can see that the Earth’s climate has always been changing (at least temperature-wise), as evidenced by the large fluctuations in temperature as shown in the graph, starting from 150000 years ago. Figure 1 [IMAGE]As shown in the graph, the average global temperature dropped for around 15000 years, and then started to increase sharply for around 10000 years, after which it dropped at remained relatively constant, although it continued to fluctuate by around 1-2oC. The average temperature then dropped sharply around 80000 years ago, and then rose again, followed by another 35000 years or so of relative constant temperature. After that, the temperature dropped steadily until around 15000 years ago, after which it began to rise sharply, with only a small decrease in the rate of increase in the past 2000 years. Hence, from figure 1 alone, we can see that the rate of change in the Earth’s global average temperature has been increasing over the past 15000 years, and even though the rate of change decreased somewhat during the past 5000 years or so, the worldwide...

Words: 2621 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Policy Ananysis Process

...complex and broad to summarize it in several sentences. Some people believe that environmental policy refers only to human relationships to nature; they understand that much environmental policy deals with human health concerns (Kraft & Furlong, 2009, p.341). Putting environmental policy even at a broader context, it can be defined as government actions that affect environmental quality and the use of natural resources (Kraft & Furlong, 2009, p.342). There is no doubt that environmental issues are global issues. Entire world is facing important environmental problems that need to be addressed at both state level and collaborative international level. United States alone is “the largest single emitter of carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels” (www.cia.gov). Besides that air pollution in the United States resulting in acid rains; water pollution from runoff of pesticides and...

Words: 1675 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Enviroment Essay

...Environment The biggest threat to our environment is global warming and there are many theories as to what causes it. Scientists have concerns that over the past 250 years, man-kind has been artificially raising the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at an ever-increasing rate, mostly by burning fossil fuels. Over the last century the burning of fossil fuels like coal and oil has increased the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). This happens because the coal or oil burning process combines carbon with oxygen in the air to make CO2. To a lesser extent, the clearing of land for agriculture, industry, and other human activities have increased concentrations as well. https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=clear+land+&FORM=HDRSC2 https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=clear+land+&FORM=HDRSC2 While many people blame fossil fuels as a cause to global warming, there is also illegal clearing of lands for developing agriculture companies that cause tropical deforestation and global warming. According to Wikipedia, tropical deforestation is clearance or clearing and removal of a forest or stand of trees where the land is thereafter converted to a non-forest use. Developing agriculture companies demand overseas trees and other supplies such as; wood products, beef, palm oil, and soy. The global demand for beef requires large areas of fields to raise cattle. These demands lead to tropical deforestations because companies clear about 35% percent of...

Words: 1957 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Fossil Fuel Risks

...Fossil Fuel Risks Worldwide dependency on fossil fuel and increased consumption in the 20th century has resulted in a negative impact on the earth’s atmosphere and presents many risks to society. The consumption or burning of oil emits carbon dioxide while burning coal releases nitrous oxide. The emitted carbon dioxide is “considered to be the largest contributing factor to the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. (McLamb, 2011) Other risks to society include air pollution, water pollution, solid waste, and human illness. (essortment.com) Humans can suffer in many ways as a result of the consumption of fossil fuels. Coal miners can develop black lung disease while others can suffer from asthma or other respiratory diseases as a result of exposure to the air pollution from fossil fuels. (uscusa.org) The United States’ dependency on oil not only creates the environmental and health issues mentioned previously, it gives us the problem of integrating national security with our need for oil. We have been faced with protecting the oil of foreign nations to reassure our ongoing supply. An example of this was the Persian Gulf War. (uscusa.org) Greenhouse gases contribute to the effects of global warming. These effects are evident in countries around the world. For example, “in the Antarctica, warmer temperatures may result in more rapid ice melting which increases sea level and compromises the composition of surrounding waters.” (essortment.com) “During...

Words: 517 - Pages: 3