...Nontraditional Litigation Systems Business Law/LAW 531 May 25, 2012 The method of conveying, sustaining, and defending a lawsuit in a court of law is litigation or judicial dispute resolution (Cheeseman, 2010). Litigation is a time consuming and costly process. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is a response to the expenses of lawsuits and a popular means for resolve of cases prior to trial. ADR offers a less expensive way to resolve contract and commercial disputes while minimizing the business risks associated with traditional litigation. The litigation process is time consuming because of the different phases of the process. The first phase is the pretrial litigation process that involves pleadings, discovery, dismissals and pretrial judgments, and settlement conferences (Cheeseman, 2010). The trial phase involves jury selection, opening statements, the Plaintiff’s case, the Defendant’s case, rebuttal, closing arguments, jury instructions, jury deliberation, and entry of judgment. The appeal phase can begin once the court enters a final judgment. A trial is a more formal and a more slow process, more costly for parties involved, and judgments are enforceable by the court system. Litigation can be very time consuming and expensive for the defendant and plaintiff. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) offers a less formal and intimidating environment for the parties involved, a quicker method, and less expensive resolution for the organization. ADR involves an impartial third...
Words: 702 - Pages: 3
...Traditional Litigation System Comparisons and Contrasts With Nontraditional Forms of ADR Steven M. Merkes LAW, 531 September 25, 2012 Andrew Van Ness Traditional Litigation System Comparisons and Contrasts with Nontraditional Forms of ADR Law was intended and foreseen as a way to protect and prohibit people from against unwelcomed intervention from other people, organizations, and society. Law is also intended to stop people from participating or conducting themselves in objectionable actions. The United States legal system has a traditional litigation resolution form of law and a nontraditional judicial dispute resolution. The legal systems of traditional litigation resolution are suit, answer, discovery, trial, or jury. Nontraditional judicial dispute resolution or better known as alternative dispute resolution (ADR) forms are known as mediation, arbitration, negotiation, conciliation, and mini-trial. The paper will consider how the traditional court system and the nontraditional ADR alternatives compare and contrast within the U.S. legal system. Businesses are selecting alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods over traditional legal methods because of more regularity conditions, time, and larger expenses. The traditional litigation legal system is heard in a court of law, and the outcome is determined as winner or loser. The traditional litigation time line is very drawn out. It requires initiating a lawsuit, filing a complaint, waiting for court...
Words: 936 - Pages: 4
...Traditional and Nontraditional Litigation Systems Candace Gilliom Business Law/LAW 531 December 3, 2012 Professor Tom Reardon The method of conveying, sustaining, and defending a lawsuit in a court of law is litigation or judicial dispute resolution (Cheeseman, 2010). Litigation something that can be lengthy and time consuming. Alternative Dispute Resolution or ADR is something that was thought of to reduce the need for lawyers and also as a way to solve problems before a trial. ADR offers a less expensive way to resolve contract and commercial disputes while minimizing the business risks associated with traditional litigation. The litigation process is time consuming because of the different phases of the process. The first phase is the pretrial litigation process that involves pleadings, discovery, dismissals and pretrial judgments, and settlement conferences (Cheeseman, 2010). Trials usually consist of selecting a jury, the lawyers making their cases, closing the case and waiting for the jury to make a decision. This process can take months to years making it time consuming and expensive. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) offers a quicker and less expensive method of resolution for the organization. ADR lets a third party negotiate and come up with a resolution prior to a trial or in place of a trial. ADRs most common form is arbitration (Cheeseman, 2010). Parties chose a neutral third party to decide the dispute. Parties are often bound in advance to agree...
Words: 630 - Pages: 3
...Introduction: Courts today are backlogged by months and sometimes even years, as a result, it is now commonplace to use Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) to resolve these disputes. More agreements often contain mandatory arbitration provisions that are legally binding and enforceable. In addition, almost every court or administrative agency empowered to hear cases now requires mediation as part of the formal adjudication process (Spangler, 2003). Abstract: Arbitration plays a crucial role in commercial procurement. Ideally, solid contractual agreements would alleviate disputes between parties. In most cases, disputes result from the terms of the contract rather than the actual contract itself. Arbitration offers dispute resolution that eliminates the need for costly litigation and time-consuming disputes in the courtroom. This paper considers the role of arbitration in contracted procurement. Additionally, it considers alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as a whole as arbitration is a subset of ADR and will discuss their relative advantages and disadvantages in comparison with traditional litigation. The aged concept of arbitration has recently begun to reach tremendous levels of popularity in the acquisition realm. Dictionary.com defines arbitration as, “the hearing and determining of a dispute or the settling of differences between parties by a person or persons chosen or agreed to by them”. Solving disputes through arbitration...
Words: 2406 - Pages: 10
...UOP Professor Richard Rice Traditional and Non-Traditional Litigation Determining the ideal methodology for resolving a business dispute can be a challenge for business. One hires an attorney and files a lawsuit requiring the other to hire an attorney and defend the lawsuit. As the number of court cases filed grows each year and the cost of litigation increases. More organizations are looking for efficient ways to settle business disputes. Many forms of traditional litigation exist in the legal system; the forms exist in the context of suit, answer, discovery, trial or jury. In addition a variety exist in the non-traditional Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) aspect of the legal system, the nontraditional or Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) aspect of the legal system forms exist in the context of as mediation, arbitration, conciliation, mini-trial, and negotiation. After reading this paper one will find a comparison and a contrast of the traditional litigation system with the non-traditional forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). This paper will also examine the risks that businesses and other organizations encounter when dealing with traditional litigation and where might an ADR be a more appropriate measure in order for business managers to reduce those risks. Traditional litigation is the process of bringing, maintaining, and defending a lawsuit in a Court of Law (Cheeseman, 2010). Litigation...
Words: 878 - Pages: 4
...Nontraditional Litigation Paper University of Phoenix Business Law LAW 531 December 17, 2012 Traditional and Nontraditional Litigation Paper Issues happen in organizations everyday as well as in the personal lives of the citizens of the United States. Issues considered severe enough result in going through the court systems in which the plaintiff and defendant can argue about what happened and who is right and who is wrong. However, there are more than on way of settling disputes; there is the traditional litigation process and the nontraditional litigation process. Each process is effective just as each process is vulnerable as well. The following passages will explain the differences each process goes through, the advantages and disadvantages each process has as well as the nontraditional forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Traditional Litigation Traditional litigation consists of the defendant and plaintiff settling their differences in a court of law. The trial can be done with only a judge making the final decision or those involved can call for a trial by jury. In this case a selected jury will be the determining factor in the case. Each party has the choice of using an attorney or going on alone and doing by themselves. Court procedures will follow formal rules as well as civil, local, state and federal laws. Nontraditional Litigation Nontraditional litigation is better known as an ADR and according to Bondi (2010) “does not burden litigants...
Words: 783 - Pages: 4
...procedures. Courtroom processing’s including a commencement of actions including a trial, all of which are administrated by detailed and formal rules of civil procedure. A trial in the traditional litigation system Nontraditional Litigation System The alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is another method to resolving disputes other than the traditional litigation system. Different forms of ADR exist to include arbitration, negotiation, and mediation hence all of which work to resolving disputes. The most common form of ADR is arbitration which can be compared to and contrasted to the traditional litigation system. Arbitration consists of parties using an impartial third party known as an arbitrator to listen to and decide upon issues up for dispute. Examples of issues that may require a third party to resolve a dispute include issues pertaining to labor union agreements, leases, franchise agreements, and other commercial contracts that may include arbitration clauses. When an arbitration clause does not exit, disputing parties can enter into a submission agreement consisting of the submission of the dispute to arbitration once a dispute is raised. Negotiation is considered the simplest form of ADR as it involves parties engaging in negotiations as a method to resolving disputes. Negotiation consists of parties reaching a voluntary settlement through the process of negotiations. Negotiations can take place at different times...
Words: 807 - Pages: 4
...dispute resolution (ADR) (Cheeseman, 2010). Most cases will never go to trial, so understanding alternative methods of dispute resolution is just as important as understanding the traditional litigation system. In this paper I will compare and contrast the traditional litigation with ADR identifying the risks different organizations encounter when dealing with traditional litigation. Additionally, I will determine where ADR might be a more appropriate measure to reduce those risks. Cheeseman (2010) defines litigation as “the process of bringing, maintaining, and defending a lawsuit” (p. 35). Before the trial, there is pretrial litigation, which consists of several phases (pleadings, discovery, dismissals, pretrial judgments, and settlement conference). Dealing with the court system the businesses and other organizations often encounter the risks of spending too much time and money as well as disruption of business operations. To avoid or reduce those risks the business managers use different forms of ADR in contract and commercial disputes (Erickson & Bowen, 2005/2006). “Arbitration, negotiation, mediation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding, and using a judicial referee” are the forms of ADR (Cheeseman, 2010, p. 43). There are essential differences between traditional litigation and ADR. First of all, in the courtroom the third party is presented by a judge (a nonjury trial) or jury (a jury trial) to decide an award. Unlike the trial, some forms of ADR do not involve...
Words: 754 - Pages: 4
...Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Clause University Of Phoenix LAW-531PR Business Law Alternative Dispute Resolution Clause When working in team conflicts are inevitable but determine how to resolve them is vital. The Alternative Dispute Resolution Clause (ADR) is an alternative to solve internal conflicts in an organization, avoiding going to court, thus resulting in savings of money and time to the organization. We will work on this occasion the ADR based on student teamwork. We will determine the possible scenarios of conflict and provisions to work them. In commercial litigation, the normal business operations of the parties are often disrupted. To avoid or reduce these problems, businesses are increasingly turning to methods of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and other aids to resolving disputes. The most common form of ADR is arbitration. Other forms of ADR are negotiation, mediation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding, and using a judicial referee (Cheeseman, 2010). The controversies can arise as a result of the following factors: team members do not attend meetings (absenteeism), non participation in team discussions, not presenting a task deadline, disrespectful and unethical behavior such as plagiarism, comment offensive, inappropriate language and lack of respect for diversity team. The team will determine a prudent time to resolve the conflict; an example might be a 24-hour period. If the period is not sufficient enters the ADR function through the negotiation...
Words: 373 - Pages: 2
...concentrate on building the retail sales. The personnel presently responsible for the online products merchandising will be moved to other mission critical positions in the organization or terminated (University of Phoenix, 2010). In the Legal Issues in the Reduction of Workforce Simulation (2010), the human resource manager is required to assess the performance and skill levels for each of the five individuals presently working in the online department and layoff three of the five employees in a reduction in force (RIF). Karen Schanfield (2008) wrote that a company needs to develop a plan before proceeding with a RIF by identifying the task or goal that needs to be accomplished, choose the jobs that are not mission critical that can be eliminated, and deciding what structure is needed to reach the organizations goals. Fast Serve needs to proceed carefully to avoid incurring employee retaliation lawsuits, legal defense costs, conflicts and other liabilities by inadvertently implying a form of discrimination in the employee terminations. The company’s management must carefully consider any possible impact of conflict upon the organization; develop appropriate alternative dispute resolutions (ADR) process to use, initiate a strategic plan that has metrics to measure the effectiveness of the organizations ADR and make sure the company has the correct tools available at their disposal to survive the RIF....
Words: 3098 - Pages: 13
...Traditional and Nontraditional Litigation Chauncey Davis LAW/531 June 18, 2011 Alfred Green Traditional and Nontraditional Litigation Litigation can be a lengthy and expensive process that must align with procedural guidelines set forth by local, state, and federal laws. According to Cheeseman (2010), litigation defines as “a process of bringing, maintaining, and defending a lawsuit” (p. 34). A manager or leader in an organization must concede that at some point he or she will have to file a suit against someone or someone will file a suit against his or her company. Depending on the complexity and nature of the case, someone wishing to file a suit can either use the traditional litigation system or nontraditional forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods. The traditional system and ADR both provide advantages and disadvantages for which this author will compare and contrast them to identify the pros and cons. In the United States, the traditional litigation system involves the courts resolving disputes by following the procedural steps of the civil court system. The system is adversarial and requires attorneys (for plaintiffs and defendants) to represent their clients zealously in accordance with the laws and Canons of Professional Responsibility (Barron, n.d.). The plaintiff has the burden of proving his or her case by the preponderance of the evidence, whereas the jury will serve as the finder of fact to determine if the plaintiff has met...
Words: 830 - Pages: 4
...FocusOn China Hotel Market Outlook Issue 2 - 2011 Produced in Conjunction with the China National Tourism Hotel Association Contributors Lily Ng Executive Vice President Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels, China lily.ng@ap.jll.com +86 21 6133 5550 Hans Galland Senior Vice President Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels, China hans.galland@ap.jll.com +86 10 5922 1352 Shuo Qi Analyst Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels, China shuo.qi@ap.jll.com +86 10 5922 1353 Glossary: City abbreviations BJ - Beijing DG - Dongguan CC - Changchun GZ - Guangzhou CS - Changsha GL - Guilin CD - Chengdu HZ - Hangzhou CQ - Chongqing HB - Harbin DL - Dalian HF - Hefei ADR OCC RevPAR GDP FDI CBD REITS FEIMCs UNWTO CIRC CSRC CBRC Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels, the first and leading global hotel investment services firm, is uniquely positioned to provide the depth and breadth of advice required by hotel investor and operator clients, through a robust and integrated local network. In 2010, Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels provided sale, purchase and financing advice on $4.1 billion worth of transactions globally. In addition, advisory and valuation services were provided on over 1,000 assignments. The global team comprises over 225 hotel specialists, operating from 39 offices in 20 countries. The firm's advice is supported by a dedicated global research team, which produced 70 publications in 2010 in addition to client research. Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels' services span the hospitality spectrum; from luxury single...
Words: 2572 - Pages: 11
...Question A: The IPO process is characterized by information asymmetries. Explain these asymmetries may be reduced through the book-building process. According to Sherman (2002), the IPO process is characterized by the information asymmetries as there are two types of information asymmetries existing among the IPO issuer and the investors. First, the issuing firms are well aware about the conditions and situations of their own business as compared to the investors. Second, the investors are well aware about the firm’s outside factors as compared to the issuer. Sherman (2002) noted that the IPO process provides more information to certain investors and provides less information to the other investors. The initial public offering prospectus focuses on past information and performance where as the market price offerings on ballpark figure concerning the future performance. The investors such as the institutional investors get estimates and information from certain analysis such as the Wall Street Analysis where as the retail investors get no estimates and information. According to Sherman (2002), these information asymmetries may be reduced through the book building process. The book building process consists of three steps. In the first step, the investment bank chooses the investors who will be encouraged to evaluate the issue and possibly they purchase the issue. In the second step, the investors evaluate the issue and inform the investment bank about their demand for the...
Words: 2090 - Pages: 9
...Corporate Compliance Plan University of Phoenix LAW 521 William Eshelman February 19, 2012 Riordan Corporate Compliance Plan “The low end of the range without an effective program can be higher than the high end of the range with an effective program” (Youngberg, 1998). Statements such as this are exactly why a comprehensive compliance plan should be in place for any successful organization. Financial penalties are implemented for lack of compliance plans. There are various methods and calculations used to determine the amount of these fines. These penalties are lowered and can even be offset in some cases with a good compliance plan in place. Instituting a corporate compliance plan is also a viable tax deductible. To address Riordan’s possible liabilities, we must be sure of its ability to implement the plan in opposed to the risks of the violation. It could prove more difficult and cost ineffective if it is difficult to adhere to the plan. To implement a compliance plan effectively, an internal audit is necessary. Some points to consider during this audit are: a. Size of our organization b. Involvement of board directors and execs c. Company resources available to implement this plan This proposed plan is for all employees. Compliance with the program starts with the officers and directors of Riordan. All employees of Riordan are expected to follow the set standards. The administration of Riordan is no exception to the set standards. This compliance plan...
Words: 1343 - Pages: 6
...tend to be expensive to the expense of the client. The litigation process is difficult and time consuming. For example, one trial may take a week, a month, or in severe cases clients are on trial for years. Many of these cases may become very public. For example, by mentioning the name Casey Anthony or Amanda Knox most people will know which case one is speaking of. These cases received tons publicity, such as, magazine articles, news shows, television shows, etc. In both cases they went through traditional litigation. There are several risks that businesses and other organizations may encounter when dealing with traditional proceedings. Attorneys and clients need to have a clear understanding of the case and financial cost. Business managers may encounter negative publicity toward their businesses. This negative look could not only affect them during the court case but also have a negative impact on the business after the case has reached a verdict. On the other hand, “methods of...
Words: 645 - Pages: 3