...Running head: Cadbury Beverages, Inc.: Crush® Brand Cadbury Beverages, Inc.: Crush® Brand Shih Ming Chang Grand Canyon University MKT 450 July 24, 2011 1.) Three main participate in manufacturing and distribution of carbonated soft drinks in the United States: concentrated producers, bottlers, and retailers. The concentrated producers’ and bottlers’ responsibilities differ for regular and diet drinks. Bottlers are responsible of serving retail outlets, such as placing in-store displays, local advertising, and restocking, whereas concentrated producers are responsible of developing new products, national consumer advertising, promotion programs, and marketing research. There are approximately 40 concentrated producers in United States, but only top three (Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Dr. Pepper/7Up) account for 82% of industry sales. Whereas approximate 1000 bottlers in United States and they are either owned by concentrated manufactures or franchised. Franchised bottlers are usually given the exclusively rights for a certain territory, but they cannot sell a directly competitive brand. As far as retailers concerned, the main retail channels are supermarkets, vending machines, and fountain services. In fact, over 40% of the soft drink sales are sold in supermarkets which are claimed to be crucial in the company’s distribution net. 2.) During the period of 1985 to 1989, the total sales in the orange carbonated rinks’ category increased by 23.5%, from 102 million cases to 126 million...
Words: 940 - Pages: 4
...during the period 1985-1989 - Orange category p.8 - Relation between market share & market coverage p.11 - Relation between market share & advertising share p.13 - Brands positioning p.15 III- Cadbury competitive position in the US - Swot analysis p.16 IV- Crush Positioning p.18 V- Crush advertising & promotion program - Objectives & strategies p.18 - Advertising budget p.19 - Crush advertising budget p.20 VI- Crush Pro forma Income statement p.20 VII- Conclusion p.21 Sides p.22 INTRODUCTION Cadbury Beverages, Inc. is a beverages-manufacturing division of Cadbury Schweppes PLC. It was created in 1969 by a merger of Schweppes PLC (1783, London, the first world’s soft drink maker) and Cadbury (1830, Birmingham, a major British confectionery manufacturer). In 1989, the Cadbury Schweppes PLC was one of the world’s largest multinational companies and the world’s third largest soft drink marketer (behind Coca-Cola and PepsiCo), with worldwide sales of $4.6 billion, performed in 110 countries. Beverages accounted for 60 percent of company sales and 53 percent of its operating income. Additionally, at that time, Cadbury Beverages, Inc. was the fourth biggest soft drink marketer in the US (behind Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Dr.Pepper-7Up), with a carbonated soft drink market share of 3.4 percent, and the market leader in some specific soft drinks categories (see...
Words: 2906 - Pages: 12
...Summary * Problem Definition * Case Issue * Industry Analysis * Environmental Trends * Macro Factors * Competition and Competitors * Industry Trends * Customer Analysis * SWOT Analysis * Recommendations * Implementation Plan | 2334557881011 | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: History: The company was started in 1783 in London as the world’s first soft drink maker. In 1880s Schweppes expanded worldwide and in 1960s the company diversified into food products. In 1969 Schweppes merged with Cadbury which was a cocoa making business started in England in the 1830s. Year | Acquisition | 1986 | Canada Dry soft drink brands | 1989 | Certain soft drink brands and purchased Gini brand of Belgium. | 1989 | Crush brand from Procter & Gamble for $220 million. | Cadbury Beverages, Inc., a beverage division of Cadbury Schweppes PLC acquired the Procter & Gamble brands namely Crush, Hires and Sun-drop in the year 1989. They had to re launch those brands into the market because those products were paced out by their competitors. This case especially deals with the Crush brand(an orange drink). Kim Feil who joined the division in 1989 as a Senior Product Manager for managing the re launch of Crush soft drink brand. There had been a lot of discussions regarding the crush brand. After making a thorough industry review, competitors positioning and the image which Crush has on its customers mind the senior marketing executives at Cadbury Beverages, Inc decided to focus...
Words: 2621 - Pages: 11
...James Floyd 9/17/13 Mk: 4900 Cadbury Beverages, Inc: Crush Brand Case Analysis I will be doing a market analysis for crush by analyzing the company (Part 1), identifying the industry and competition (Part 2), and conclusions and recommendations (Part 3). Part 1: Company Analysis - Important Company Information To Note: - Cadbury Beverage, Inc. is the beverage division of Cadbury Schweppes PLC. (a major soft drink and confectioner marketer) - Sales of $4.6 billion in more than 110 countries - Cadbury Schweepes PLC is one of the world’s first soft drink maker - In 1989, Beverages accounted for 60% of company world wide sales and 53% of operating income. o Confectionery items accounted for 40% of worldwide sales and produced 47% of operating income. - Overall goal for managers on Crush brand: o Rejuvenate the bottling network for the brand, o Develop a base positioning, o Create a new advertising and promotion program. Part 2: Industry Analysis - Cadbury Schweppes 3rd largest soft drink marketer. - Cadbury Schweppes had some key acquisitions of companies. - In 1989, Proctor & Gamble bought Crush for $220 million. - Cadbury Schweppes has a 3.4% market share of the carbonated soft drink market. - 3 leaders o Coca-Cola o PepsiCo o Dr. Pepper/7Up - Americans consumed an estimated $43 billion in retail sales in 1989 - 3 Major participants...
Words: 969 - Pages: 4
...1. Is Cadbury a marketing-oriented firm? -I believe that Cadbury is more a selling-oriented firm than a marketing-oriented one. Still we can see some market-oriented factors in their procedures. I believe that Cadbury is a selling-oriented company since they follow the concept that holds that consumers and businesses, if left alone, will ordinarily not buy enough of the organization¡¦s products. The organization must, therefore, undertake an aggressive selling and promotion effort. Cadbury is part of an industry in which competitors are involved in which all the competitors are involved in extensive advertising and promotional activities. Consumers are bombarded with TV commercials, newspapers, ads, direct mail, and other activities. Also we can see the pattern of the selling concept, which is: Factory "žÂ± Products "žÂ± Selling & Promotion "žÂ± Profits through sales volume We can see how Cadbury follows this pattern. They first manufacture a product. Then they use intensive selling and promotion in order to generate profits throughout sales volume. Selling is preoccupied with the seller¡¦s needs to convert his product into cash. Marketing focuses in the idea of satisfying the needs of the customer by means of the product and the whole cluster of things associated with creating, delivering, and finally consuming it. Cadbury is not primarily focused in the consumer. They are focused in sales. In the soft drink business all of the competitors are focused in the cash...
Words: 1813 - Pages: 8
...period 1985-1989 - Orange category p.8 - Relation between market share & market coverage p.11 - Relation between market share & advertising share p.13 - Brands positioning p.15 III- Cadbury competitive position in the US - Swot analysis p.16 IV- Crush Positioning p.18 V- Crush advertising & promotion program - Objectives & strategies p.18 - Advertising budget p.19 - Crush advertising budget p.20 VI- Crush Pro forma Income statement p.20 VII- Conclusion p.21 Sides p.22 INTRODUCTION Cadbury Beverages, Inc. is a beverages-manufacturing division of Cadbury Schweppes PLC. It was created in 1969 by a merger of Schweppes PLC (1783, London, the first world’s soft drink maker) and Cadbury (1830, Birmingham, a major British confectionery manufacturer). In 1989, the Cadbury Schweppes PLC was one of the world’s largest multinational companies and the world’s third largest soft drink marketer (behind Coca-Cola and PepsiCo), with worldwide sales of $4.6 billion, performed in 110 countries. Beverages accounted for 60 percent of company sales and 53 percent of its operating income. Additionally, at that time, Cadbury Beverages, Inc. was the fourth biggest soft drink marketer in the US (behind Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Dr.Pepper-7Up), with a carbonated soft drink market share of 3.4 percent, and the market leader in some specific soft drinks categories...
Words: 2893 - Pages: 12
...Dayne Hopkins Mkt-251 Feb. 28th Cadbury Beverages, Inc 1. How would you characterize the carbonated soft drink in the United States? The carbonated soft drink in the U.S is the most popular drink of choice by a large margin. In America consumers drink more soda than tap water, at around 47 gallons per person every year and growing. It is not only the most popular but also a large part of the economy, as some of the biggest companies like Pepsico, Coca-Cola, and Dr Pepper/Seven-Up, who are a few of the majorly recognized companies in America, grow off of these sales 2. How would you describe the changes in the orange category during the period 1985 to 1989? What can be learned from these changes? At a glance the orange category seems to have grown in sales by around 20,000,000 cases sold, according to industry sales sold through supermarkets. Also according to market coverage of Orange Category competitors, Crush and Sunkist have decreased the amount of product put out and Mandarin orange slice, and Minute maid orange have both increased significantly by putting their products in markets where more orange drinks are sold. From what I can tell, the more dominant companies have taken over due to more resources and more money to advertise and move product around. 3. What is Cadbury Beverages relative competitive position in the US soft drink industry? In the orange category? In terms of top companies in the beverage world, Cadbury with 11 difference carbonated drinks...
Words: 773 - Pages: 4
...Cadubry Beverages Inc. Crush Brand #3 Company History * The company has the distincition of being the worlds first soft drink maker * It first started in London in 1783 where Jacob Schweppe sold artifical minderal water * After introducing many other products inclduing water, lemonade, gingerale, and food products they merged with Cadbury a major British candy maker in 1969 * 1989 one of largest multinational firms and ranked 457th in BusinessWeek’s Global 100 * in 1989 the company purchased Crush, Hires, and Sundrop soft drink brands from P&G for $220 Million * this is when our case takes places, the marketing excutives at Cadbury are left the with task of relaunching these brands and we will be focusing on crush * they also own brands such as schweppes, mott’s, Holland House, Hires, and many more * currently bevarges make up 60% of sales and confectionery items make up the rest * they are also the market leader is some of their categories such as Canda Dry leading in ginger ale maket, which accounts for 39% of Cadbury soft drink sales in U.S. * worldwide headquarters is in Stamford, Connecticut #5 Strengths * high brand: many of their current brands and ones they recently purchased have high * first soft drink maket: which gives them a trusting reputation * 3rd largest soft drink mareter: behind coke and pepsi Weaknesses * Due to decision that P&G made when the had owned Crush they stopped using bottling...
Words: 648 - Pages: 3
...Coca-Cola Company A. Case Abstract Coca Cola (www.cocacola.com) is a comprehensive business policy and strategic management case that includes the company’s fiscal year-end December 2006 financial statements, competitor information and more. The case time setting is the year 2007. Sufficient internal and external data are provided to enable students to evaluate current strategies and recommend a three-year strategic plan for the company. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, Coca Cola’s common stock is publicly-traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol KO. Coca Cola operates in over 200 nations around the world and sells carbonated and non carbonated beverages. Coca Cola’s line of non carbonated drinks includes: water, juice, and teas. The company has over 70,000 employees and is led by CEO Neville Isdell. The Coca-Cola Company’s (Coke’s) operating segments include 1) Africa, 2) East, South East Asia & Pacific Rim, 3) European Union, 4) Latin America, 5) North America, 6) North Asia, Eurasia, and the Middle East, and 7) bottling investments. Not all soft drink products/flavors of the company are available in all the operating groups. The Coca-Cola Company has two major rivals: PepsiCo and Cadbury Schweppes PLC. It’s interesting to note that PepsiCo has more that double the employees as Coca-Cola as listed in Exhibit 6. Groupe Danone competes to a lesser degree with C ...
Words: 1703 - Pages: 7
... Harrison at the Robins School of Business, University of Richmond. Copyright © Jeffrey S. Harrison. This case was written for the purpose of classroom discussion. It is not to be duplicated or cited in any form without the copyright holder’s express permission. For permission to reproduce or cite this case, contact Jeffrey S. Harrison (RCNcases@richmond.edu). In your message, state your name, affiliation and the intended use of the case. Permission for classroom use will be granted free of charge. Other cases are available at: http://robins.richmond.edu/centers/center-‐for-‐active-‐business-‐education/research/case-‐network.html Larry Young, President and CEO of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. (DPS) seemed to be on a roll. Named 2010 Beverage Executive of the Year by Beverage Industry Magazine, he led the company through three very difficult economic years since it separated from the London-based food and beverage giant Cadbury Schweppes. Reflecting on that time, he chuckled, “There couldn’t have been a worse year to go public.”1 Triggered by the collapse of mortgage-backed securities, the recession...
Words: 8571 - Pages: 35
...stand-alone, publicly traded company on the New York Stock Exchange as the result of a spin-off by Cadbury, plc that held the Cadbury Schweppes Americas Beverages business group of entities. As one of North America's leading refreshment beverage companies, DPS markets more than 50 brands of carbonated soft drinks, juices, teas, mixers, waters and other premium beverages. The company's strategy, brands and people have made it a strong, sustainable and profitable business. Dr Pepper and Snapple, the flagship brands of DPS, have origins that share Schweppes’s entrepreneurial spirit. Charles Alderton, a young pharmacist in Waco, Texas, invented Dr Pepper in 1885. It was served at the drug store where Alderton worked and the first Dr Pepper fans asked for a "Waco". The oldest soft drink in the United States, it was later named Dr Pepper, according to legend, after Dr. Charles Pepper, a friend of the drug store owner. Dr Pepper Snapple Group is a leading producer of flavored beverages in North America (Canada, United States, México) and the Caribbean. Their success is fueled by more than 50 brands that are synonymous with refreshment, fun and flavor. DPS has 6 of the top 10 non-cola soft drinks, and 9 of our 12 leading brands are No. 1 in their flavor categories. In addition to their flagship Dr Pepper and Snapple brands, their portfolio includes Sunkist Soda, 7UP, A&W, Canada Dry, Crush, Mott's, Squirt, Hawaiian Punch, Peñafiel, Clamato, Schweppes, Venom Energy, Rose's and Mr...
Words: 4204 - Pages: 17
...PROJECT REPORT On MARKETING STRATEGIES OF COCA COLA Submitted By – Name : Pinak Paul MANAV RACHNA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am sincerely thankful to Miss Kanupriya (Project Faculty Guide), under whose guidance I have successfully completed this project and time spent with her had been a great learning experience. I think her constant encouragement, warm responses and for filling every gap with valuable ideas has made this project successful. She made it possible for me to put all my theoretical knowledge to work out on the topic: “MARKETING STRATEGIES OF COCA COLA. A mammoth project of this nature calls for intellectual nourishment, professional help and encouragement from many people. We are highly thankful to all of them for their help and encouragement. We wish to acknowledge our great debt to all of them whose ideas and contribution influenced me to complete the project work. TABLE OF CONTENT 1. TITLE PAGE 2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 3. INTRODUCTION 4. INDUSTRY PROFILE 5. COMPANY PROFILE 6. PORTER'S FIVE FORCES 7. PEST ANALYSIS 8. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES & METHODOLOGY 9. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 10. PRIMARY FINDINGS & ANALYSIS 11. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION 12. BIBLIOGRAPHY 13. ANNEXURE INTRODUCTION This project is focused on studying the various marketing strategies of Coca-Cola and the scenario of Indian soft drink industry in the 1990’s. Coca-Cola Co., the global soft...
Words: 13697 - Pages: 55
...America, Africa, Asia, Latin America, and Europe, Eurasia and the Middle East. The company adopted their strategies of success using the following strategic priorities: A. Accelerated carbonated soft-drink growth, led by Coca Cola B. selectively broaden the family of beverage brands to drive profitable growths C. grow system profitability and capability together with our bottling partners. D. Direct investments to highest potential areas across markets. E. Drive efficiency and cost effectiveness everywhere. In 2003 Coca-Cola Company products comprised of about 10% of total worldwide sales of non-alcoholic beverage products. The company's' primary competitor in many countries is PepsiCo. Other significant competitors include Nestle S.A., Cadbury Schweppes plc, Groupe Danone, and Kraft Foods Inc., among others. The remaining portion will evaluate the performance and give an investment outlook of the Coca-Cola Co using market and ratio analysis. Market Position of Coca...
Words: 1614 - Pages: 7
...Chapter: 1 Introduction: The recent wave of business scandal and ethical lapses have heightened people, press, and investor security of companies, creating demand for a corporate culture of integrity driven performance and a new corporate transparency. Management and boards now feel compelled to ensure that proper governance processes are in place to protect corporate reputation, brand image and share holder value. According to Pricewaterhouse Cooper’s 8th Annual global CEO survey (Dec 2004), 50% of retail industry CEOs believe that there is a strong relationship among all elements of GRC (governance, risk and compliance) and that effective governance can be a value driver and a benefit versus a cost, to their companies. Effective corporate governance requires management and board involvement, accountability, embracing the processes, compliance, and structure required to direct and manage the affairs of a corporation. Its overall goal is to ensure the financial viability to the enterprise and enhance share holder value. For the retail and customer industry, globalization, which entails multinational operations, various financial reporting systems, and complex supply chain with wholesalers, distributors, and multiple types of retailers, not to mention multiple brand portfolios, and various types of outlets, provides significant rationales for management and boards to develop an effective GRC program. Successful corporate governance depends largely on trade-off among the various...
Words: 15491 - Pages: 62
...`A Report ON Foreign Investment In The FMCG Sector "There was a time, not long ago FMCG was on the go, Other sectors were mere midgets, Growth was in the double digits. Alas, all of that's in the past! The growth today is not so fast. There are reasons, that's for sure. Nowadays sales tax is more And durables are selling better, The weather surely could be wetter. My job is just to set the stage Describe the current sorry age. Adi, of course, will paint the scene And tell us why the times are lean." Mr. Nadir Godrej Executive summary The Indian FMCG sector is the fourth largest sector in the economy with a total market size in excess of US$ 13.1 billion. It has a strong MNC presence and is characterized by a well-established distribution network, intense competition between the organized and unorganized segments and low operational cost. Availability of key raw materials, cheaper labor costs and presence across the entire value chain gives India a competitive advantage. The FMCG market is set to treble from US$ 11.6 billion in 2003 to US$ 33.4 billion in 2015. Penetration level as well as per capita consumption in most product categories like jams, toothpaste, skin care, hair wash etc. Burgeoning Indian population, particularly...
Words: 8510 - Pages: 35