Free Essay

California Pizza Kitchen

In:

Submitted By rlafon3
Words 2274
Pages 10
ISDS 4160
Ross Lafont
Assignment 3
Disrupting Global Competition
In today’s world, we are extremely lucky with the way we can conduct business. Increased technology has led this planet to heights we thought we would never reach. Communication throughout the world is now as easy as pie. Not only do we have the telephone, but we also have email, scan, fax, and wire. All of these communication ways are cheap and it is China, not the United States that knows how to take advantage of this though low labor costs. This is why we do business in China these days. Globalization is the reason why we can outsource to China with great success.
China operates better than the United States. A main reason of this is that they have a clear-cut division between ownership and management. In some United States companies, there is confusion that exists right here. Management and ownership also share the same goals in China. Management and ownership are both doing their own individual job to create a marginal profit, we definitely could learn from the Chinese on how to do this.
Another man reason is that Chinese companies have not been outer-performing in the world markets as much in recent years. This is occurring because China’s marketplace has been changing. The government in China is very powerful. Many people see this as a bad thing in the United States, but in business perspective it is a good thing. The Chinese government can take control of an economic problem with its high intelligent individuals to offset something like a market crash.
Globalization is the reason there are so many opportunities in China. Knowledge, technology, mobile factors of production, and the ability to move all of these around interchangeable and efficiently has changed the marketplace and the world infinitely. For instance, it’s now possible to move everything around for Howard Weil to transfer its energy investment over the phone. This also can be done over the computer very easily. Business can be transferred from New Orleans to Shanghai if Howard Weil wanted to. This is the area where China makes a big profit margin because China knows how to utilize technology and communication with low costs to create a high return on investment.
One thing that is an issue in China it the exchange of knowledge, China is still trying to beat competitors in this aspect and take full control of the market.
The book lays out a blueprint with how business improves with globalization. The example highlighted in the book is about Pearl River Piano and how the first hire in the upgrade process was a U.S. expat. The main thing is that as the world becomes globalized, there needs to be an understanding that everyone does business differently. Even though that everyone in the world now can do business together, there still is a significant difference with how business if being done all around the world. If one can understand how business is done in a different part of the world, and that one can demonstrate how to do business in a different part of the world, they can be very successful. Most companies are not lucky enough to have an individual who knows how business operates in different part of the world. It is a very rare advantage to have since most people have only lived in country their entire life. Most companies hire people from other parts of the world to gain this advantage. How does that affect Howard Weil energy and oil investments? It means we must hire people in the countries in which we are trying to expand. But more importantly, it means we must hire those that not only have the legal expertise but also understand how business works in other countries. For instance, if Howard Weil is an emerging industry in Dubai but Dubai’s government is not like that of the United Sates, in the aspect of intervening to get a company running, we would have to hire someone from Dubai that understand how to do business there. Selecting the right country in this process is very vital. Dubai would be a lot harder to start a business in than China. This is just an example expressing how important it is to hire people from the sourcing country in order to be successful in the foreign market
Cost Innovation
If foreign companies other than China had a better marginal profit, than they would not be outsourcing as much. China’s marginal profit is actually the reason countries, like the United States, are outsourcing. China keeps its products quality the same or even better, while at the same time decreasing labor costs and productivity. This keeps China’s economy superior to everyone else’s. China adds value while decreasing cost. This creates a big profit and return on investment. Cost innovation comes into play here. Cost innovation means just as the term describes itself – how to be innovative within a cost structure, keep costs down, and keep marginal product the same. What if a country if able to provide high quality and the most supreme technology to the world market? This can only be done in countries like China, where they have learned that decreasing costs to run their business. China’s average income per person is lower than most other countries. This may seem bad to some people, but this is why China is so efficient. It’s relatively easy to look at from a supply/demand point of view. The vast amount of people in China also plays a role in this. There are not as many jobs available because there are so many people in China, which is the reason for wages being down relative to other countries.
The main aspect to draw from this is how effective cheap labor cost is. According to the book, China can hire one engineer to the United States hiring 5 engineers. This means that research will be cheaper. Howard Weil should definitely look at this because even though they are an investment company, they still need to hire engineers. Howard Weil hires engineers to do research analyst about how energy and oil wells are performing. Not only does this mean cheaper labor price but this also means cheaper product cost. This is key with research and development. While there are some advantages to hiring United States engineers, Howard Weil will have a mix of United States and Chinese engineers to do the data analyst. Howard Weil will like to hire more Chinese engineers to keep the labor costs down to create a greater profit margin.

The book also goes into a variety of low costs, which is “different product lines at different product low prices.” It is very difficult in the United States to keep product lines in control. China emphasizes flexibility, which is what us at Howard Weil will adopt from China. Innovation is what spurs flexibility. The book supports this with the battery example. Nickel in a battery will die out in one country, as a Chinese company will buy out all of those batteries and then lower all prices in Nickel powered batteries. It is so simple, yet so smart. This is how Chinese show their flexibility along with innovation, which is what the United States needs to be better at.
Cost innovation can be acquired in a vast amount of different ways; however, the main way is to get profit margins up while limiting costs, specifically labor costs. This will then strive flexibility and innovation
Loose Bricks
The main point of this chapter talks about how to “redefine, reevaluate, and eventually react to your left flank.” Every business around the world is and will always be certain to some risks. It is very important to realize that risk your business is exposed to and try your best to minimize that risk and continue to work on creating a profit. Howard Weil is good at minimizing risks, since they are an investment company. Investment companies know all about risk. Even though Howard Weil is successful at limiting risk, many new risks will arise when the try to outsource to China. These risks could be potentially greater. There are two segments of the domestic firm that can be attacked by the Chinese firm – first, there is cost innovation that another similar company like Howard Weil could provide and therefore Howard Weil would not be able to turn a profit. The second segment is the ability to take control over other markets, where there has not been much competition. Howard Weil will be entering a different market and they must realize the other businesses in that market.
The other risk to worry about is “mindset and geographic prowess.” Lots of the Western countries demand lower prices compared to the United States. Similarly, China used to. China is able to take control of these markets with its customer service. China offers other companies its services at a good price compared to other Western Companies. These markets accept China’s prices.
The book also goes into how important customization is. Customization is vital for all businesses. Companies have to respond to individuals wanting customization of products being offered. If companies were to deny a request from an individual, this will hurt that company greatly in the long run. Actually, a deadweight demand loss results from this. Because a deadweight demand loss may result, a person will accept the customized product and be at risk of getting a low quality product. This may also result in a loss of brand loyalty. A customer may not accept the product at all. What happens is that the customer will not want to keep buying this certain product? Customization needs to happen in business to care for the customer’s needs and wants. This will help the customer be loyal to your brand. This will also help you minimize any potential deadweight loss.
The Chinese do not target “poor customers.” No one in the west actually focuses on the poor as being a target customer. This is interesting because there are many companies in the United States that will use the poor to their advantage when trying to sell a product. The main difference here is the amount of poor people in each country. Some of the countries have a higher percentage of poor people compared to other countries. This shifts whom you want to market your product to.
The Weak Link
Chinese companies have many different limitations. Not al of these limitations may be government related. According to the book, the management at the top of the chain in Chinese companies may cause some limitations. A lot of the companies in China are the new companies that are just starting out. Their main problem is cost innovation.
There are two issues that come with cost innovation. The first issue is the geographic location of the company. Different places have different population sizes. Since China is so big compared to other countries, it is very hard to break away from the pack with cost innovation. The main companies that are able to really stand out are the companies that have established themselves for over fifty years. This is why these young companies struggle so much. Any cost innovation that a young company comes up with, it is likely that the idea has already been thought of or may even already be established by an older, preexisting company
Supply is the other issue that cost innovation has to deal with. This should have been obvious because it is supply and demand that drives an economy. Like explained in the previous paragraph, it is hard for a new company to establish itself because there have been preexisting g companies established for a great amount of time already. As China’s population and economy grows, so does demand by customers. This demand is growing faster in China than it is anywhere else in the world. China’s businesses are having to supply at this increasing rate of demand. This is not an easy thing to do. Howard Weil is limited in what investment options it can offer. Before I say that, Howard Weil is limited to offering investment products. Howard Weil may want to consider offering investment options in addition to its oil and energy options. Howard Weil should look to offering investment options in different technology advancements.

Your Response
Since China is having a growing economy at a rapid rate, there cannot be companies reacting too late. Howard Weil will have to adopt China’s strategy of offering a variety of products to keep up with the increasing demand. The different investment options should come at a low price since Howard Weil will just be starting out. In my opinion, I always think it is better to start out a company by offering a low price comparable to competitors. We must still realize China’s characteristics in how business is conducted. Their needs to be the perfect team assembled for this expansion to work. There needs to be a mix of Chinese and American employees. The employees need to be loyal to one another and work together.
Conclusion
Howard Weil must fully understand how China operated with cost innovation. Low labor costs are they key. This will create cost innovation and flexibility. Once those two traits are established with Howard Weil, and then they can really start to see the success it plans on seeing with this expansion. Howard Weil will still have to understand the new risks associated with expanding into a new market, especially a big market like China. The risks must be minimized at all costs.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

California Pizza Kitchen Case

...California Pizza Kitchen Company Background: White-collar criminal defense attorneys Larry Flax and Rick Rosenfield in Beverly Hills, California created California Pizza Kitchen in 1985. Famously known for its hearth-baked barbecue-chicken pizza, the “designer pizza at off-the-rack prices” concept thrived. Over the last twenty years, the company has expanded into 213 locations in 28 states and 6 foreign countries. Although approximately 41% of the U.S. stores are located in California the business model has done well throughout all regions. California Pizza Kitchen derives its revenues from three sources: sales at company-owned stores, royalties from franchised restaurants, and royalties with a partnership with Kraft Foods to sell CPK-branded frozen pizzas in grocery stores. In 1996, CPK extended its brand with franchised ASAPS located in airports that offered a limited selection of pizzas and an assortment of “grab and go” sandwiches and salads. In 2000, CPK launched company owned ASAP locations as well. In 2007, CPK ceased development for any future ASAP locations to focus more on continued expansion of both domestic and international franchised locations. With the recent 10% share price decline, CPK is questioning whether this is an ideal time to repurchase shares and potentially leverage the company’s balance sheet with its prevailing line of credit. CPK is considering repurchasing shares and using debt financing to fund the strong expansion outlined for the company. In...

Words: 666 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

California Pizza Kitchen

...California Pizza Kitchen (CPK) was co-founded in 1985 in Beverly Hills, California by Rick Rosenfield and Larry Flax. Rosenfield and Flax both hold the title of Co-President, Co-CEO, and Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors for California Pizza Kitchen. Susan Collyns, Chief Financial Officer, currently leads the financial team at California Pizza Kitchen which is faced with reducing the corporate income-tax liability while balancing the goal of the management team to grow the business. California Pizza Kitchen is in the food industry business. California Pizza Kitchen is a casual dining restaurant chain that specializes in innovative and non-traditional pizzas. California Pizza Kitchen also provides various soups, salads, pasta, sandwiches, and desserts at higher quality for lower prices. California Pizza Kitchen is in 213 locations in 28 states (41% located in California). California Pizza Kitchen’s core patrons tend to have an average household income of $75,000 (survey results from 2005); creating less of an impact on patron’s dining habits during times of inflated gas and food prices. California Pizza Kitchen’s inventive menu was not the only draw-in for patrons, their below average check (usually around $13.30) was much lower than their competitors such as, The Cheesecake Factory, Olive Garden, P.F. Chang’s, Chili’s, Red Lobster, and Panera Bread to name a few. The California Pizza Kitchen chain was labeled by RBC Capital Markets as the “Price-Value-Experience” leader...

Words: 455 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Proposed Acquisitions of California Pizza Kitchen and Carts of Colorado by Pepsico

...The proposed acquisitions of California Pizza Kitchen and Carts of Colorado by Pepsico 1. Should PepsiCo buy California Pizza Kitchen? For both acquisitions it's more about what they add to PepsiCo, not what value PepsiCo adds to them Pros: - needs to acquire CPK to learn casual dining. That's where the growth is, and internal attempts to develop casual dining in Pizza Hut Cafe have failed. whether CPK is merely a passing yuppie fad, or if it is a long-term market segment doesn’t matter to PepsiCo if it merely wants to learn casual dining. - PepsiCo startups failing Cons: - possibly PepsiCo’s failure to develop a casual chain internally, along with the real differences between fast food and sit-down dining, will prevent it from succeeding. •New segment that PepsiCo doesn't know - Yuppie casual dining • $11 check, dinner on pizza dough - PepsiCo ignorant of key success factors •high level waiter service •PR not advertising key to marketing •capital cost $1 - $2m, sales $3m not $800k, $800k. •New untested concept - 25 restaurants, 8 states, $34m sales, $3/4m net income - may be a "fad" •only seven years old - may not stretch beyond Yuppiedom 2. Should they buy Carts of Colorado? Pros: - while CoC's $8m sales is very small for Pepsico, the real market size is the revenue from non-traditional PODs, and this is potentially enormous ($2 billion to PepsiCo alone) The real reason to own CoC is to preempt Coke and MacDonalds in the best locations...

Words: 757 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

California Pizza Kitchen

...William Upham Fin. 461 California Pizza Kitchen Brief Case Analysis “[R]estaurants don’t start out making money─ they build over time. So it’s really about having the capital and the staying power.” ─ Rick Rosenfield, Co-CEO of California Pizza Kitchen. Rosenfield, and longtime business partner Larry Flax, went from being defense attorneys to innovative pizza entrepreneurs. Their idea was to make “designer pizza at off-the-rack prices,” using unusual pizza toppings to create delicious combinations at low prices. California Pizza Kitchen began in 1985 in Beverly Hills, California and took off from there. The company went public in 2000, less than two decades after the opening of its first location, and by the end of the second quarter of 2007, the company had expanded to 213 locations in 28 states and 6 foreign countries. Even though the restaurant industry is constantly battling through macroeconomic changes, California Pizza Kitchen was able to minimize the effects of macroeconomic changes due to its strong business model and conservative financial policy, which created the staying power Rosenfield described. California Pizza Kitchen’s Chief Financial Officer, Susan Collyns, was about to announce near-record profits of over $6 million for the end of the second quarter of 2007. However, despite these strong results the share price had declined 10% during the month of June as a result of industry pressures and the Company was considering a share repurchase program that...

Words: 1421 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

California Pizza Kitchen

...California Pizza Kitchen November 16, 2013 ABSTRACT The purposes of this case study are to discuss the main issues of CPK (California Pizza Kitchen) and think critically to find solutions to the current situation. In order to achieve these purposes, we first analyze time frame of the CPK’s establishment and recent development to find the absolute advantages and disadvantages of CPK compared with its competitors. According to our calculation, we will discuss whether to use moderately levering up CPK’s equity. Finally, a more suitable and profitable model will be established to improve the competitiveness and market share percentage of CPK. Key words: time frame, stay power, levering up, and debt INTRODUCTION California Pizza Kitchen (CPK) was a casual dining restaurant that co-founded by Larry Flax and Rick Rosenfeld in 1985 in Beverly Hills. California. Larry Flax and Rick Rosenfeld both hold the title of co-present, co-CEO, and co-chairman of the Board of Directors for CPK. It is known for its health-baked barbeque-chicken pizza, the “designer pizza at off-at-the-rack prices” concept flourished. By 2007, the company expanded its chain to 213 locations in 28 states (about 41% in California) and 6 foreign countries. The casual dining model had won much brand awareness and brand loyalty with its family-friendly surrounding, excellent ingredients, and inventive offering. The current core customers of CPK had an average household income of $75,000 (results...

Words: 2100 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

California Pizza Kitchen

...founded California Pizza Kitchen in 1985 in Beverly Hills, California. California Pizza Kitchen is a casual dining, full service restaurant concept that specializes in gourmet pizzas with unique topping combinations. At the end of the second quarter of 2007 they operated 213 locations in 28 states and in 6 foreign countries. The company derives its revenue from three sources: sales at company-owned restaurants, royalties from franchised restaurant, and royalties from a partnership with Kraft Foods to sell California Pizza Kitchen branded frozen pizzas in grocery stores. Although the restaurant industry was going through some difficulties California Pizza Kitchen was really successful, and the quarterly profit was over $6 million, quite a record for the firm. Management believed that its success was due to its dedication to guest satisfaction and menu innovation and sustainable culture of service. A creative menu with high-quality ingredients was a top priority at California Pizza Kitchen. In addition to creating its inventive menu, California Pizza Kitchen had an average check of $13.3, which was below the one of many of its upscale dining casual peers. Also California Pizza Kitchen spent 1% of its sales on advertising, far less than the 3% or 4% spent by the competitors (for instance Olive Garden or Chilli’s Red Lobster) management felt that its attention to the clients and the innovative menus resulted in free but more valuable word of mouth marketing. California Pizza Kitchen...

Words: 3341 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

California Pizza Kitchen

...Introduction California Pizza Kitchen (CPK) is a restaurants services company that operates a casual dining chain, with a particular focus on the premium pizza segment. In 1985 the California Pizza Kitchen was created by Rick Rosenfield and Larry Flax in Beverly Hills, California.Rosenfield and Flax both hold the title of Co-President, Co-CEO, and Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors for California Pizza Kitchen. The company is headquartered in Los Angeles, with 213 retail locations in the US and abroad. The operating profit of the company was $22 million during fiscal year 2007, a decrease of 28.3% compared with 2006. The net profit was $15million, a decrease of 29.5% compared with 2006. California Pizza Kitchen derived its revenues from three sources: sales at company owned restaurants, royalties, from franchised restaurants, and royalties from a partnership with Kraft Foods to sell CPK-branded frozen pizza in grocery stores. California Pizza Kitchen is in the food industry business. California Pizza Kitchen is a casual dining restaurant chain that specializes in innovative and non-traditional pizzas. California Pizza Kitchen also provides various soups, salads, pasta, sandwiches, and desserts at higher quality for lower prices. California Pizza Kitchen is in 213 locations in 28 states (41% located in California). California Pizza Kitchen’s core patrons tend to have an average household income of $75,000 (survey results from 2005); creating less of an impact...

Words: 2704 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

California Pizza Kitchen

...California Pizza Kitchen Enoch Li & Dong Yi Yuan Table of Contents Introduction2 Question #12-3 Question #23 Question #3 4 Question #44 Conclusion 5 Appendix A ...……………………………………………………………………………………..6 Introduction California Pizza Kitchen (CPK) is an innovative cuisine restaurant that serves pizzas, pastas, soups, sandwiches, and desserts in California since 1985. This casual dining restaurant, led by their chief financial officer Susan Collyns, brought appealing results for CPK’s second quarter in 2007. CPK has 200+ locations opened in different states and international franchises in foreign countries. Their main source of income comes from sales, royalties from franchised restaurants and Kraft foods. However, despite impressive results, CPK’s share price dropped by 10 percent. The company now needs to take amends in different decisions such as repurchasing shares or taking other factors into account to increase the range of obtaining new customers. 1. In what ways can Susan Collyns facilitate the success of CPK? We see that there are couple potential ways for Susan to facilitate CPK’s success. Firstly, we know that CPK is very successful overseas with different locations opened internally. Thus, we suggest that they should continue their expansion to make CPK’s name known globally. With this idea in mind, we also noticed that they barely invested any of its sales on advertisement compared to other casual dining competitors. Advertisement by using...

Words: 1079 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

California Pizza Kitchen

...Introduction California Pizza Kitchen (CPK) was founded by Rick Rosenfield and Larry Flax in 1985 in Beverly Hills, California. With the concept of “designer pizza at off-the-rack price” and their inventive food, CPK soon stood out in the casual dining companies and has grown into an international giant in the next two decades. The company had 213 branches located in America and other 6 foreign countries in the middle of 2007. In the first quarter of 2007, CPK achieved 4.7% increase in store sales (Exh. 4), which is a superb performance compared with his competitors. The company remained consistency in the 2nd quarter and earned a 16% increase in revenue. Owing to the strong performance of the first two quarters, CPK decided to open 16 to 18 branches in the second half of 2007, and a capital expenditure of $85 million is required for the expected expanding plan. Susan Collyns, the Chief Financial Officer of the company, needs to make decisions to find an optimal capital structure for CPK. Before 2007, CPK was a company with zero debt. To benefit from the debt financing, CPK decided to level up the leverage by carrying out a shares repurchasing plan. The first part of the report will analyse the effect of the repurchase plan through the changes in return on equity (ROE), cost of capital and share price and emphasize how debt add value to the company. The recommendations on the capital structures will be made based on the analysis. The second part will discuss the effect on CPK’s...

Words: 4214 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Solution California Pizza Kitchen

...UNIVERSITY OF OREGON INVESTMENT GROUP February 26th, 2010 Consumer Goods California Pizza Kitchen BUY Stock Data Price (52 weeks) Symbol/Exchange Beta Shares Outstanding Average daily volume (3 month average) Current market cap Current Price Dividend Dividend Yield Valuation (per share) DCF Analysis Comparables Analysis Target Price Current Price Summary Financials Revenue Operating Cash Flow Net Income 662M 2009A 44.6M 2009A 4.6M 2009A 9.41 – 17.44 CPKI / NYSE 1.25 24,183,000 400,876 365,975,000 $15.07 $0.00 0% $15.18 $17.73 $16.46 $15.07 BUSINESS OVERVIEW California Pizza Kitchen was founded in 1985 by Rick Rosenfield and Larry Flax in Beverly Hills, California. Twenty years later, California Pizza kitchen operates over 250 restaurants around the world and is still run by its initial founders. The largest portion of CPK’s restaurants are still located throughout California, however they are now located in dozens of states as well as internationally in Asia, North America and the Middle East. Almost all of California Pizza Kitchens revenues come from company owned full Covering Analyst: Ari Siegel Email: Asiegel@uoregon.edu The University of Oregon Investment Group (UOIG) is a student run organization whose purpose is strictly educational. Member students are not certified or licensed to give investment advice or analyze securities, nor do they purport to be. Members of UOIG may have clerked, interned or held various employment positions with firms held in UOIG’s...

Words: 5881 - Pages: 24

Premium Essay

California Pizza Kitchen Case

...Introduction to California Pizza Kitchen California Pizza Kitchen is known worldwide for its high quality menu and ingredients, with budget friendly prices. They collect their revenues from three different sources. Sales from company owned restaurants, royalties from franchised restaurants and royalties from a partnership with Kraft to sell CPK branded frozen pizza in grocery stores. CPK has a "dedication to guest satisfaction and menu innovation and sustainable culture of service." CPK has the lowest average bill cost of any other casual dining restaurant, of $13.30 per guest. Their menu has very few choices, but the choices that are offered are of high quality and nothing less. Their goal is to extend their franchises to Mexico and South Korea in the coming years being as in the last five years they were capable of increasing total businesses up 38% so a small extension would be of no issue for them. In 1997 they also introduced the idea of an ASAP option. The ASAP options offers guests the most popular items on the menu, pre-made and ready to grab and go. With society becoming more and more fast paced, the ASAP option has been growing steadily. Upcoming decisions for the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) In recent years restaurants in North America have been seeing a large increase in prices of cost of goods sold (COGS), labour and commodities. In 2007 President Bush increased the minimum wage in the United States from $5.15 to $7.25 which was a large increase that...

Words: 1393 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

California Pizza Kitchen Case

...California Pizza Kitchen Case FIN 4385 Eric Lundberg Kelly Deeds Kevin Pope Drew Williams Summary of California Pizza Kitchen Recapitalization Proposal * Brief history of CPK (p.3) * Reasons for CPK’s success (p.3) * Ways to facilitate the success of CPK (p.3-4) * Anticipated effect of changing the capital structure on return on equity (p.4) * Anticipated effect of changing the capital structure on cost of capital (p.5) * Expected number of shares of CPK that can be repurchased (p.6-7) * Anticipated effect of changing the capital structure on CPK’s stock price (p.6-7) * Our recommendation (p.7) In order to explore whether or not California Pizza Kitchen should change their capital structure, we must first look at the brief history of the firm to get a better idea of the corporate culture and the firm’s appetite for risk. California Pizza Kitchen started in 1985 and they have been rather successful given that 95% of all restaurants fail in the first two years. They did not fail and even went public in 2000. In fact, as of the end of the second quarter of 2007, CPK has 213 locations in 28 states and 6 foreign countries (Shumadine). The success of California Pizza Kitchen can be attributed to many factors. First, CPK diversifies its revenue streams. Instead of relying on the main business of operating company owned stores for revenue, they also receive revenues from royalties from franchised locations and royalties from Kraft for selling...

Words: 2880 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

California Pizza Kitchen Risk Analysis

...California Pizza Kitchen Risk Analysis         Based on information provided in the case, we estimated the Weighted Average Cost of Capital for California Pizza Kitchen to be: 9.64% = (1-32.50%)*6%+9.64%*643,773)/643,773         California Pizza Kitchen is an unlevered company that has no debts in the capital structure of the company, and whose sole source of financing is equity. With a return on equity of 10.1% in 2006, CPK earned a return greater than its cost of capital, but did not benefit from financial leverage. Below we will illustrate how levered cost of capital may be a cheaper alternative for CPK.         Increases of debts in the capital structure of the company will impact different key variables that the company leverage status would change from unlevered company to the levered company, because before these new issuance of debts, CPK had no debts in the capital structure of the company. In assessing the effect of leverage on the cost of capital, we estimated the Weighted Average Cost of Capital for a leverage of 10% debt to be: 9.26% = (1-32.50%)*6%*22,589+(4.2%+.82*6.4%)*628,516/(22,589+628,516)         A leverage of 10% debt would change the unlevered beta 0.85 of CPK to levered beta of 0.82. The decrease in beta would reduce the cost of equity for CPK to 9.45%, because an increase of 10% debt in the capital structure of the company would reduce the risk of the equity investors.         A leverage of 20% debt would decrease the Weighted Average Cost of Capital...

Words: 493 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Pepsico Case

...acquisition of Carts of Colorado and California Pizza Kitchen. The acquisition of these restaurants would expand PepsiCo’s restaurant business, but PepsiCo must consider how each deal will affect the scope of the firm and potential synergies in each deal before making a decision to acquire these firms or not. There are several potential synergies in the Carts of Colorado (COC) deal. Specifically, there are operational synergies and financial synergies, along with a little strategic synergy. There is operational synergy because acquiring COC would create economies of scope. There could be shared resources or activities because PepsiCo could sell items, or at least similar items, from their other restaurants on these food carts. There is some strategic synergy in this deal because making this deal would mean entering a new market, the food cart industry, to extend market power. Even though food carts are also fast food, it is in a new segment that PepsiCo has not yet experienced. Financial synergies are also evident in this deal with COC because since they nearly tripled its income in one period, they could be a valuable asset. By investing in it, PepsiCo will be able to gain much revenue and capital from a new source. For California Pizza Kitchen, there are operational, strategic, and financial synergies. In terms of operational synergies, there are economies of scope because there are shared activities and items, like different kinds of pizza. There are strategic synergies...

Words: 548 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Teachings Note California Pizza Kitchen

...CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN Teaching Note Synopsis and Objectives This case examines the question of financial leverage at California Pizza Kitchen (CPK) in July 2007. With a highly profitable business and an aversion to debt, CPK management is considering a debt-financed stock buyback program. The case is intended to provide an introduction to the Modigliani-Miller capital structure irrelevance propositions and the concept of debt tax shields. With the background of a pizza company, the case provides an engaging context to discuss the “pizza graphs” that are commonly used in corporate finance curriculum to illustrate the wealth effects of capital structure decisions. The case serves to motivate the following teaching objectives: • Introduce the Modigliani-Miller intuition of capital structure irrelevance; • Establish how the cost of equity is affected by capital structure decisions by defining financial risk and introducing the levered-beta capital asset pricing model (CAPM) equation; • Discuss interest tax deductibility and the valuation tax shields; • Explore the importance of debt capacity in a growing business. Suggestion for Advance Assignment to Students Students may consider the following study questions: 1. In what ways can Susan Collyns facilitate the success of CPK? 2. Using the scenarios in case Exhibit 9, what role does leverage play in affecting the return on equity (ROE) for CPK? What about the cost of...

Words: 2393 - Pages: 10