Candler V.Persaud Case Study

Candler v. Persaud Case Study
In order for physicians to get clinical surgery privileges to perform certain procedures in the realm of their practices, they have to obtain adequate abilities and experiences. There must be a combination of knowledge in theory and experience earned during practical situations. Without a clear confirmation of such combination of theory and practical knowledge, physicians are not in a safe position to perform any procedures. In the hospital setting, physicians must receive the clinical surgery privileges from hospital to perform any procedure there. It is incumbent to hospital to make sure all due diligence is followed by the physician. The hospital must check and cross check the qualifications of the physician. The hospital must take this responsibility seriously to ensure once physicians granted the privileges to perform their duty on the premises of the facility. Having all that taking care of, then the hospital will trust the qualifications of the physician and issued the clinical privileges to perform procedures. Granting these privileges can cause the hospital to later deal with competency challenges.
Credentialing Issues in the Case
All surgeons are licensed professionals in the medical field who have accomplished their educational requirements, practical trainings, and have successfully met all the criteria of a governing body before granting the privileges and the right to practice medicine in their field of expertise. Surgeons must have the required training and education in order to carry out their duties as professional surgeons. Beside the theory and practical knowledge, obtaining a professional license is necessary element to the process of becoming qualified to practice surgical procedures. Being a surgeon requires so much, but it does not mean that a surgeon can operate on