...Gloria Tadino must take serious commitment to her job and come to terms with her past so she can move on with her life and Ms.Gloria shouldn’t involve her personal intentions or feelings in choosing the applicants because those applicants she eliminated unfairly might be better than those she picked. Conclusion: I conclude that she has bad attitude in their workplace, as a recruitment supervisor in human resources department it is must for her to analyze and evaluate the resumes and applications of the applicants based on the standard set by the company, she must choose applicants depending on their credibility and qualifications not on her personal interests,biases and feelings. Reccomendation: She must choose applicants depending on their credibility and qualifications not on her personal interests or feelings towards the person,she should consider the abilities of an individual and what could they contribute in the company because he/she might lose applicant that could possibly become big asset of the...
Words: 266 - Pages: 2
...Case 2: RUDY AND FRANKIE: Two Different Worlds What would you tell Frankie if he shares his thoughts with you? I would tell Frankie that nothing is permanent rich may become poor while poor may become rich and to become successful, it doesn’t necessarily need that you’re intelligent or with the highest honor, sometimes we need to be productive and wise. In Rudy's side he made his result of his decision he was not afraid to let go of his study because he used his own abilities that lead him to success. Contrast Effect Frankie is more intelligent than Rudy in Academics-Rudy should have focus in studying his lessons more than anything else But even he did not finished his college Rudy had been successful yet also with his life. He defeated Frankie which is graduated from college. Projection Rudy quit on his studies during second year - Rudy should have strive more, finds inspiration and be motivated in studying and because there he found a way to be satisfied and be successful in life even though he finished he became billionaire. Stereotyping Frankie could not believe that Rudy is richer than him - Frankie must not depend only in his profession to earn money; he should invest or start on his own business too. Case 1: State University Board of Regents: What am I Living For? Is there anything wrong with the action of the three personalities in this case? The three personalities who are Dr. H.C. Agao, Mr. Francisco Bundoc and his wife, Mrs. Bundoc have made wrong...
Words: 705 - Pages: 3
...Case 1. STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF REGENTS: What Am I Living For? Question: Is there anything wrong with the actions of the three personalities in this case? Elaborate your answer. After reading the case study and analyzing it, from my opinion I think yes there is anything wrong with the actions of the three personalities- Mr.Bondoc, his wife and Dr. Agao. For elaboration I will explain them one by one. Mr.Bondoc acted as the champion of the student’s cause therefore it’s his responsibility to fight for the own good of the students, the one who will voice out their stands and if possible disagree to the proposals that may greatly affect them like increasing of their tuition fee.It’s great that he has the attitude of convincing others in personal way for them to agree of opposing the proposals of Dr. Agao because of this they can stop his proposals. He must maintain and assure that he is doing his job and must not allow others to control him in bad way or stop him to do his obligation but stated on the case study his wife wished him to maintain good relationship with Dr.Agao which unfortunately leads him to suddenly accept his proposals. It showed that he let others dictate him what to do and failed to do his job. About the wife of Mr.Bondoc, she was carried away by the good actions showed by Dr. Agao without knowing his real intentions of befriending her. Shecan be easily manipulated like what Dr. Agao wanted her to do through doing special treatments...
Words: 674 - Pages: 3
