1. Billy never intended to kill Claggart. Is it fair to hold people responsible for the unforeseen consequences of their acts? Explain why or why not.
We must hold people responsible for the unforseen consequences of their acts. I believe people react to situations without considering the outcome. As a society, we want self gratification and do not think ahead about the consequences. In the case of Billy and Claggart, Billy will have to be held accountable. A murder was committed and you can't just ignore that and say he had a meltdown. With that being said, we would have to justify all of the senseless killings happening in Baltimore.
2. Write a short defense of Captain Vere’s decision to argue for Billy’s conviction. Next write a critique …show more content…
Following the law, Vere states that, “the punishment for striking a superior officer is death by hanging.” Regarding the decision, Billy must accept responsibility for his actions even though it was an accident. This is an unfortunate situation, but you must set a precedent or it will be chaos in the world if people are excused for their irrational actions or “accidents”.
3. Do you agree with Captain Vere the news of Billy’s acquittal could undermine military discipline throughout the British navy? Explain why or why not.
I believe the news could damage or weaken the military. The military as well as all businesses need to follow a strict code of ethics. Rules and regulations can not be broken based on situations. As I mentioned above, that would create complete disorder and confusion. On another note, the military is known for discipline, laws and rules.
4. Wouldn’t other British sailors understand that Billy Budd’s was an exceptional case? Explain why or why not.
They should understand that Budd's case was not exceptional. There can not be an exception to the rule especially when dealing with the military. In fact, when a person joins the military the main focus is discipline which Billy Budd lacked in this