Free Essay

Case of Missing Director

In:

Submitted By yueamit
Words 5263
Pages 22
TIMELINE OF KENMARK CASE

September 15, 1988
Kenmark first incorporated
Source:

Nov 3, 1997
Kenmark listed on the Second Board of the KLSE
Source:

Sept 3, 2001
Kenmark listed on the main Board of the KLSE
Source:

April 23, 2010
Hwang (Kenmark’s managing director) had notified that he had 53,363,092 shares or 29.93 per cent.
Source: Bernama, June 8

Chen Wen Ling (Kenmark’s executive director) had reduced its stake in Kenmark from 16.51% as at April 23 to 7.76% now. The combined stake of both the Taiwanese directors, Hwang and Chen, has dropped from 46% to 15.72% now.
Source: The Star, June 10

April 2010
MD's brother resigned as director due to health reason.
Source:

May 24, 2010
Hwang Ding Kuo@James Hwang said he was taken ill in China and was in a delirious state.
Source: Business times, June 2

May 25, 2010
James Hwang start cannot be contacted
Source:

May 27, 2010
The company’s audit committee meeting held but only two independent directors of the company were present to and discover that the other management representatives had resigned. The meeting could not be preceded.
Source:

EON Bank Berhad (EBB) has been notified of the situation and placed their security guard at the Kenmark’s premises at Port Klang. EBB will also be appointing a receiver over the assets of the company
Source:

May 28, 2010
Kenmark Paper Sdn Bhd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kenmark, received a letter from EBB’s solicitors, advising of the appointment of a receiver.
Source:

The workers, comprising 200 locals and the rest, foreigners mainly from Bangladesh and Myanmar, found themselves suddenly locked out when they reported for duty.
Source: The Edge, June 24

May 29, 2010
The independent directors, Zainabon Abu Bakar and Yeunh Wee Tiong, had gone to Kenmark’s premises at Port Klang and noted that the premises had been sealed and a security guard placed to secure the premises.
Source:

May 31st, 2010 (Monday)
Share price of Kenmark plunged 68%, as it had fallen 19 cents from 33 cents to 14 cents by 9.15 am and dropped another 3.5 cents to 10.5 cents due to the news that its managing director James Hwang chief was missing and it was late with its financial results.
Source:

Shares of furniture maker Kenmark Bhd were suspended at 10.10 a.m after they sank this morning
Source:

413 of its employees were locked out from its premises at Port Klang after EON Bank appointed receivers to seal up the plant to protect its interest.
Source: The Star, June 9

Dato’ Ishak Ismail (Ishak) got the call from Hwang in the night asked for help.
Source:

June 1st, 2010
Ishak acquired 30 million shares at 8 cents per piece or 16.83% stake in Kenmark through a trust for Ishak’s family, BHLB Trustee Bhd
Source:

June 2nd, 2010
Ishak acquired another 27.69 million shares 8 cents per piece or 15.53% of Kenmark, raising his stake to 32.36% through Unioncity Enterprise Ltd
Source:

James Hwang regained full consciousness but still weak to travel (based on his statement on June 2, 2010)
Source: Business Times, June 2

June 3rd, 2010
Kenmark announced to Bursa yesterday that it had appointed four directors – Datuk Abdul Gani Yusof (executive chairman), Ho Soo Woon (executive director) and Ahmed Azhar Abdullah and Woon Wai En (directors)
Source: Bernama, June 8

New directors held their first board meeting and visited the plant in Port Klang
Source: Business times

The two previous independent directors, Zainabon @ Zainab Binti Abu Bakar and Yeunh Wee Tiong had resigned.
Source: Business Times

June 4th, 2010
Trading on Kenmark’s shares resumed, the counter shot up to 26 cents, a 126% gain from its last traded price of 11.5 cents.@ 10.5 cents?
Source: Business Times, June 15

Taiwanese director, Chang Chin-Chuan (is still executive director, primarily in charge of the plant operations in Malaysia and Vietnam) and Chen Wen-Ling remains a non-executive @executive ? director had made contact with the company
Source:

A total of 133 local workers of financially troubled public-listed Kenmark Industries today filed claims amounting to RM1.4 million at the Labour Court in Port Klang.
Source: Businesss Times,

Kenmark held a media briefing in the afternoon pertaining to * The executive directors' meeting * James Hwang had informed the board that its Vietnam operations were under the control of the local authorities there * Had asked the Bursa Securities for an extension up to June 30, 2010 to submit the fourth quarter results for the financial period ended March 31, 2010 but denied as the application was submitted less than 15 days prior to the due date for submission of the fourth quarter results
Source:

June 7, 2010
Record of depositors on this date stated that, the shareholding of Hwang Ding Kuo@James Hwang was reduced to 14,193,792 Kenmark shares or 7.96 per cent.
Source: Bernama, June 8

Kenmark reported a net loss of RM146mil for 4th Quarter of 2010 versus a net loss of RM84,000 in the same corresponding period a year ago
Source: Bernama, June 9

Selangor Labour Department Director Fong Khei Por directed the workers who had been locked out since May 28, 2010 to return to work as the new management had decided to resume operation and the workers complied.
Sources: The Edge, June 24

June 8
Kenmark Industrial Co (M) Bhd. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Billion Dynamic Sdn. Bhd. had received notices from Export-Import Bank of Malaysia Bhd pursuant to Section 218 of the Companies Act, 1965, and dated June 4, 2010 for the sums of RM16,314,614.55 from Kenmark and RM44,922,695.72 from Billion Dynamic
Source: Bernama, June 8

Kenmark’s shares were suspended by Bursa Malaysia at 9 a.m due to pending clarification from the company as to why it posted such a shocking set of financial results with a net loss of RM146mil for the fourth quarter ended March 31, 2010. The company blamed lower revenue, higher cost of sales, provisions for doubtful debts and impairment of assets by certain subsidiaries for the huge losses
Source: Bernama, June 9

Hwang announced that his equity stake in Kenmark had shrunk from 29% to 7.96%
Source:

june 9 -11 ishak sold the share two times
Source:

June 9, 2010
Ishak disposed a total of 58.69 million Kenmark shares, representing a 32.29% stake in the company
Sources: The Edge, June 15

Kenmark clarified to Bursa that the amount owing from debtors as per its balance sheet on March 31, 2010. The amount before and after the doubtful debt provisioning was RM222mil and RM162mil respectively. A sum of RM69mil has been set aside for doubtful debts.
Source: The Star, June 10

June 15, 2010
Ishak ceased being a substantial shareholder
Source: The Edge, July 7

Kenmark’s shares fell 2.5 cents to 10.5 cents at 9.37 a.m with 11.86 million shares traded.
Source: The Edge, June 15

Bursa Malaysia ask formally Kenmark regarding who are the new major shareholder
Source: The Edge, July 7

June 22nd, 2010
The electricity supply to the factory was disconnected by TNB
Source: The Edge, June 24

July 6, 2010
-------------------------------------------------
James Hwang has surfaced in a UK newspaper, Evening Telegraph said “I have never closed down the operations in the UK and I have no intention to close down the operations in the UK”
-------------------------------------------------
Source: Business Times, July 10, 2010
-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
July 16, 2010
-------------------------------------------------
Kenmark response to Bursa Malaysia that it did not know regarding new major shareholder
-------------------------------------------------
Source: The Edge, July 7
-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
Dec 31, 2010 (9 a.m)
-------------------------------------------------
Delisting of the entire issued and paid-up share capital of KENMARK from the Official List of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad
-------------------------------------------------
Source: Bernama News, December 28
-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

10.07.2010
KENMARK Industrial Co (M) Bhd (7030) said it could not quantify the full impact of the expected losses arising from the winding-up proceeding served by Export-Import Bank of Malaysia Bhd (Exim Bank) for non-payment of loans (appoint PWC). However, the immediate effect would be the loss on use of the credit facilities from the banks and a writedown on the cost of investment in the subsidiary to be wound up amounting to RM130 million.

Meanwhile, Kenmark has also defaulted on the banking facilities from RHB Bank Bhd. It has an unsecured credit facility of RM3 million from RHB and an outstanding amount of RM2.16 million as of June 14. This together with other defaults will have a material finan-cial and operational impact on the group, it told Bursa Malaysia.
Source: Business Times

July 6
James Hwang has surfaced in a UK newspaper, Evening Telegraph, where he was quoted to have said that his company would continue production of televisions. In an article dated July 6, Hwang had said: “I have never closed down the operations in the UK and I have no intention to close down the operations in the UK. The company is not subject to a winding-up order and no creditor has filed such an order. The company will continue production of televisions at Corby (in Northamptonshire, East Midlands, England).’’ The company, based in Longeroft Way at the Eurohub in Corby, was reported to have laid off its temporary workers and closed its TV factory to all but the office staff.
Source : The Star, July 10, 2010.

9 a.m., Friday, 31 December 2010
Delisting of the entire issued and paid-up share capital of KENMARK from the Official List of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad
Source : Bernama News, dec 28

Based on announcements to Bursa Malaysia, BHLB Trustee Bhd, a trust for Ishak’s family, scooped up 30 million shares or 16.83% stake in Kenmark on Tuesday(june 1st). A day later(june 2nd), he used another vehicle, Unioncity Enterprise Ltd to acquire 27 million shares or 15.53% of Kenmark, raising his stake to 32.36%, just shy of the trigger point for a mandatory general offer.
Based on Kenmark’s share price over the two days of the acquisition, it can be assumed that he had acquired the shares at not more than 8 sen apiece. When trading on Kenmark’s shares resumed on Friday, the counter shot up to 26 sen, a 126% gain from its last traded price of 11.5 sen. This means Ishak could be sitting on a paper gain of some RM10mil.
Domino effect
On Wednesday, after Hwang had “disappeared”, the factory in Malaysia was shut down.
Some suppliers, spooked by the developments, were believed to have taken back their supplies.

June 1st (Tuesday) drop in share price due missing MD source : bernama business, june 15 ishak first bought on june 1st

june 4th ishak bought stake at 32 %- This should explain the heavy selling of the shares on May 31 to June 2 by several brokerages in the country and the buyer could well be Datuk Ishak Ismail, who now directly and indirectly controls 32% stake in Kenmark

june 9 -11 ishak sold the share two times

Ishak ceased being a substantial shareholder by June 15 and Bursa Malaysia had formally asked Kenmark for the identity of the new controlling shareholder. In its reply on June 16, Kenmark said that it did not know and that it had requested Bursa Malaysia Depository for the latest record of depositors. The source said Kenmark was aware that the declaration must be made to Bursa Malaysia within three trading days and that it had missed the deadline. "Yes, we have been queried by Bursa Malaysia. But, honestly, I have no idea who the substantial shareholders are," said the source. Soos; the edge july 7

BHLB Trustee owned 30 million shares, or 16.83 per cent, in Kenmark as at June 2, filings to the stock exchange show. "A representative of BHLB for a discretionary trust for the family of Ishak has verbally confirmed to the company that the trust on June 10 acquired one million Kenmark shares and on June 11 disposed of a total of 31 million Kenmark shares," Kenmark said in a statement yesterday. Ishak, when asked about the share sale by Business Times, merely answered with a question himself: "Are you sure?" –bt, june 15

Kenmark said Ishak on June 9 had disposed a total of 58.69 million Kenmark shares, representing a 32.29% stake in the company. Ishak's equity in Kenmark was held under British Virgin Islands-registered Unioncity Enterprises Ltd, which hived off some 27.69 million shares or 15.53% in the company, and the remainder via BHLB Trustee Bhd for a discretionary trust for his family.sos.the edge. June 15

"It was only yesterday (Tuesday, ) I regained full consciousness but am still weak to travel," he said.
Souce : bt
In a statement sent to Bursa Malaysia through the company's secretary yesterday, Hwang Ding Kuo@James Hwang said he was taken ill in China on May 24 and was in a delirious state.
Source: bt
"It was only yesterday (Tuesday) I regained full consciousness but am still weak to travel," he said. said the company in a statement to Bursa Malaysia on Wednesday, June 2. Kenmark has hogged the headlines this week after its share price plunged 68%, or 22 sen, to 10.5 sen on Monday as its managing director James Hwang had become “uncontactable’’ since last Tuesday(june 1st) only to “resurface’’ on Wednesday(june 2nd) when he clarified via an email that he had fallen ill and unconscious.

Over on the stock market, Kenmark's shares were suspended at 4.43pm yesterday and they will remain so indefinitely, according to Bursa Malaysia. Before the suspension, its shares were among the most active when it almost doubled to 11.5 sen from 6 sen previously. Since news broke that Hwang went missing, Kenmark lost as much as RM140 million in stock market value in a matter of days while more than 400 of its workers were uncertain about their future. in April 2010, the MD's brother also resigned as director due to health reason.
Kenmark’s troubles began when Hwang disappeared and news of his disappearances triggered massive selling of the stock which plunged 68% on May 31. On the same day, 413 of its employees were locked out from its premises at Port Klang after EON Bank appointed receivers to seal up the plant to protect its interest.sos-the star, june 9
KUALA LUMPUR, May 31 — Shares of furniture maker Kenmark Bhd were suspended after they sank this morning as news that its managing director went absent without leave spread in the market.
In a response to a query from Bursa Malaysia, Kenmark said only two independent directors of the company were present during the company’s audit committee meeting on May 27, thursday to discuss the company’s fourth quarter results and that managing director James Hwang, a Taiwanese, has not been contactable since last Tuesday. only to discover that the other management representatives had resigned. committee meeting could not proceed as there was no representation from the management, and the fourth quarter results that was to be discussed was not made available. independent directors subsequently tried to contact the MD on his mobile phone but were unsuccessful. to contact the Hwang and the other executive directors at the company’s Taiwan office via the telephone and fax also failed. had fallen 19 sen to 14 sen by 9.15am and dropped another 3.5 sen before being suspended at 10.10 am. Trading in the shares will resume tomorrow
The independent directors, Zainabon Abu Bakar and Yeunh Wee Tiong, had on the morning of May 29 gone to Kenmark’s premises at Port Klang. There, they noted that the premises had been sealed and a security guard placed to secure the premises.
Former Kenmark executives informed the independent directors that EON Bank Berhad (EBB) has been notified of the situation and EBB had, on May 27, placed their security guard at the premises. EBB will also be appointing a receiver over the assets of the company
Kenmark Paper Sdn Bhd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kenmark, received a letter today from EBB’s solicitors, dated May 28, advising of the appointment of a receiver.
Kenmark’s website states that the company was incorporated on Sept 15, 1988 and was listed on the Second Board of the KLSE on Nov 3, 1997, before transferring to the Main Board on Sept 3, 2001.
Kenmark announced to Bursa that UHY Diong had been appointed as the Special Auditor to undertake an investigation into the financials of the company to identify any potential irregularities. Kenmark also announced to Bursa yesterday(june 3rd, Thursday) that it had appointed four directors – Datuk Abdul Gani Yusof (executive chairman), Ho Soo Woon (executive director) and Ahmed Azhar Abdullah and Woon Wai En (directors). The two independent directors, Zainabon @ Zainab Binti Abu Bakar and Yeunh Wee Tiong, resigned yesterday
Yesterday(june 3rd, Thursday), the four new directors held their first board meeting and visited the plant in Port Klang. The company’s external secretary, Leong Oi Wah, said the board meeting lasted about two hours and specific issues were discussed.
The other Taiwanese director, Chang Chin-Chuan, is still executive director, primarily in charge of the plant operations in Malaysia and Vietnam, while Chen Wen-Ling remains a non-executive director. “Both (Chan and Chen) of them have made contact with the company today(june 4th, Friday),’’ Kenmark said. A total of 133 local workers of financially troubled public-listed Kenmark Industries today filed claims amounting to RM1.4 million at the Labour Court in Port Klang. The claims were for termination benefits, compensation in lieu of notice and unused leave, said Malaysian Trades Union Congress (MTUC) vice-president A. Balasubramaniam, who helped with the case.
Source: bt
The company’s stock, which has been suspended twice this week (on Monday at 10.5 sen and yesterday at 11.5 sen) reopens for trading today
It said on Friday, June 4 the board of directors held a media briefing in the afternoon pertaining to the executive directors' meeting earlier in the day. The meeting was about the business operations of Kenmark Paper in Port Klang. Kenmark also clarified at the press conference that its managing director James Hwang had informed the board that its Vietnam operations were under the control of the local authorities there. "The local authorities were requested to take control of the operating premises to safeguard the assets when some looting occurred during the absence of senior management staff," it said.
In a separate statement, the directors said they had asked the Bursa Securities for an extension up to June 30, 2010 to submit the fourth quarter results for the financial period ended March 31, 2010. "Bursa Securities has reverted that they are unable to consider the application as the application was submitted less than 15 days prior to the due date for submission of the fourth quarter results,"
KUALA LUMPUR, June 8 (Bernama) -- Kenmark Industrial Co (M) Bhd and its wholly-owned subsidiary Billion Dynamic Sdn Bhd have received notices from Export-Import Bank of Malaysia Bhd. The notices were pursuant to Section 218 of the Companies Act, 1965, and dated June 4, 2010, from the bank for the sums of RM16,314,614.55 from Kenmark and RM44,922,695.72 from Billion Dynamic. "The receipt of the notice for Billion Dynamic is due and owing to the bank pursuant to a line of revolving post-shipment supplier credit facility of RM40,000,000 granted to Billion Dynamic by the bank," Kenmark said in a filing to Bursa Malaysia Tuesday.
In a separate statement, Kenmark said that based on the record of depositors dated June 7, 2010, the shareholding of Hwang Ding Kuo@James Hwang was 14,193,792 Kenmark shares or 7.96 per cent. Hwang on April 23, 2010, had notified that he had 53,363,092 shares or 29.93 per cent. The statement was made in response to Bursa Malaysia's query. sos: bernama, june 8
Kenmark also announced in another statement that it had appointed Ho Soo Woon, who currently owns a management consultancy business, as executive director from June 3, 2010.
Sos: bernama june 8
Kenmark’s shares were suspended by Bursa Malaysia at 9am yesterday (june 8)pending clarification from the company as to why it posted such a shocking set of financial results with a net loss of RM146mil for the fourth quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Sos: bernama june 9
The new directors were also hauled up by both Bursa and the Securities Commission to explain the huge losses. By yesterday (june 8)evening, Kenmark made all the necessary announcements and it must have furnished enough information for Bursa to allow its shares to resume trading today.
Sos: bernama june 9
Its shares were last traded at 27 sen. “We met the authorities yesterday(june 8) and explained the situation. They understand that we are new and they have been very helpful. We need to regularise and work on a new plan to move forward,’’ Kenmark executive chairman Datuk Abd Gani Yusof said- Sos: bernama june 9
Kenmark on Monday (june 7) reported a net loss of RM146mil for 4Q10 versus a net loss of RM84,000 in the same corresponding period a year ago. The company blamed lower revenue, higher cost of sales, provisions for doubtful debts and impairment of assets by certain subsidiaries for the huge losses. Sos: bernama 9
Hwang also surprised the market further on Tuesday (june 8)by announcing that his equity stake in Kenmark had shrunk from 29% to 7.96%
Yesterday(june9,wed) Kenmark said its other Taiwanese shareholder, Chen Wen-Ling had also reduced its stake in Kenmark from 16.51% as at April 23 to 7.76% now. The combined stake of both the Taiwanese directors, Hwang and Chen, has dropped from 46% to 15.72% now. Datuk Ishak Ismail is the single largest shareholder with direct and indirect stake of 32%.sos: the star, june 10
Kenmark in a statement to Bursa clarified yesterday(june 9) that the amount owing from debtors as per its balance sheet on March 31, 2010. The amount before and after the doubtful debt provisioning was RM222mil and RM162mil respectively. A sum of RM69mil has been set aside for doubtful debts.sos- the star, june 10

KUALA LUMPUR: Shares of embattled Kenmark Industrial Co (M) Bhd came under pressure on Tuesday, June 15 after Datuk Ishak Ismail ceased to be a substantial shareholder of the company. At 9.37am, Kenmark fell 2.5 sen to 10.5 sen with 11.86 million shares traded.sos- the edge, june 15

As early as June 1, Kenmark was trading as low as 3.5 sen a share, after it emerged that its chief was missing and it was late with its financial results. But by June 4, Kenmark was trading at 26 sen a share, powered by news that Ishak had bought a 32 per cent stake.- sos- bt,june 15

Kenmark MD’s stake in company down to 3.96% by botzone » Fri Jun 18, 2010 9:28 am
Dated: Friday June 18, 2010
Source: The Star

PETALING JAYA: Kenmark Industrial Co (M) Bhd managing director James Hwang’s stake in the troubled company had been cut down to 3.96%, or seven million shares as at June 16, the company told Bursa Malaysia yesterday. This compared to 8.4% on June 7, and 29.9% on April 23. There was no news with regards to Kenmark’s new controlling shareholder. This has become an issue after Datuk Ishak Ismail made his quick exit earlier in the week.

Shares in Kenmark closed one sen lower at a two-week low 9 sen yesterday with 25 million shares transacted yesterday. Meanwhile, director Chen Wen-Ling’s shareholding in Kenmark, based on record of depositors as at June 16, remained at 13.83 million shares, or 7.76%, which was the same amount as last disclosed on June 9. On Wednesday, Kenmark told the exchange that it did not have the identity of its new controlling shareholder after Ishak ceased to be a substantial shareholder. It was later revealed that Ishak had sold off his entire 32% stake in the company he first bought on June 1
In an unpredented move, the Securities Commission on Wednesday (june16) obtained an ex parte injunction to block Ishak from dealing with the RM10.2mil worth of proceeds he got from the sale of his shares in the company.sos 0the star, june 18

Kenmark gets letter of demand for RM50m loan by botzone » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:18 am
Dated: Kenmark gets letter of demand
Source: The Star

PETALING JAYA: Furniture maker Kenmark Industrial Co (M) Bhd has received a letter of demand from Messrs Zul Rafique & Partners acting for CapOne Bhd and Malaysian Trustees Bhd (MTB) for a sum of RM50.98mil. The sum included both the principal sum (of RM50mil) and interest accrued from an unsecured term loan facility originally issued by EON Bank Bhd and purchased by CapOne and MTB, Kenmark said in a filing with Bursa Malaysia yesterday.

“The outstanding sum is payable within 14 days from the date of the letter,” it said, adding that the letter was dated June 18, 2010. It said the default was triggered as a result of the issuance of three letters of demand dated May 12, 2010 by Messrs Zulpadli & Eham for and on behalf of Export-Import Bank of Malaysia Bhd.

Kenmark workers in a quandary by botzone » Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:01 pm
Dated: Thursday, 24 June 2010 15:36
Source: The Edge

KLANG: More than 400 workers of Kenmark Industrial Co (M) Bhd, a public listed company, are in a quandary as they have no work to do and are worried about not being paid their salaries at the end of the month. However, the Malaysian Trades Union Congress (MTUC) has advised the workers to continue reporting for duty while it seeks clarification from the Labour Department. MTUC vice-president A Balasubramaniam on Thursday, June 24 told Bernama that the congress would assist the workers and continue to protect their interests. He said that during his visit to the factory in Port Klang on Thursday, the workers expressed concern about their future and were worried that their dues would not be paid by the management.

Two days ago(tue, june 22), the electricity supply to the factory was disconnected by TENAGA NASIONAL BHD []. The workers, comprising 200 locals and the rest, foreigners mainly from Bangladesh and Myanmar, found themselves suddenly locked out when they reported for duty on May 28. However, on June 7, Selangor Labour Department Director Fong Khei Por directed them to return to work as the new management had decided to resume operation and the workers complied.sos-the edge june 24

Dated: Friday, 09 July 2010 09:11
Source: The Edge
By: Joseph Chin

KUALA LUMPUR: Share price of KENMARK INDUSTRIAL CO. (M) BHD slipped in early trade on Friday, July 9 after Bursa Malaysia Securities Bhd commenced enforcement proceedings against the company, its managing director and executive director. At 9.05am, it was down one sen to 9.5 sen. It was the most active with 4.76 million shares done. The benchmark FBM KLCI advanced 0.19 point to 1,316.22. Turnover was 13.84 million shares valued at RM8.75 million.

On Thursday(july 8), Bursa Securities said it had commenced enforcement proceedings against Kenmark, MD Hwang Ding Kuo @ James Hwang and ED Chang Chin-Chuan for various breaches of disclosure requirements under the Listing Requirements. Kenmark and the two directors have been served with a notice to show cause by Bursa Securities to make representations to Bursa Securities in respect of various alleged breaches of the LR. Kenmark and the two directors have been served with a notice to show cause by Bursa Securities to make representations to Bursa in respect of various alleged breaches of the LR arising from, amongst others, various disclosures made by Kenmark including the announcements on May 31, June 1 and 4, 2010. “Due process is, therefore, accorded to Kenmark and the directors prior to making a decision on the alleged breaches and Bursa will impose appropriate sanctions should a finding of breach be made,” it said.
Sos: the edge , july 9

Separately, the company also announced that the court had fixed July 20 for case management in respect of a winding-up petition by Export-Import Bank of Malaysia Bhd in relation to a claim for RM16.31mil. Kenmark also said the same bank’s claim of RM44.92mil against one of Kenmark’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, Billion Dynamic Sdn Bhd, was slated for case management on Aug 4. It said the legal suits would have a financial and operational impact on the company. “The company will seek advice from its solicitors to defend the action,” Kenmark said. The star, july 9

Time is not a luxury it has. Bursa has given Kenmark till June 8 to submit the results, failing which the trading of shares will be suspended.
Analysts expect the group’s showing in the fourth quarter to be “less impressive” as orders from the European markets have been soft due to the economic slowdown.

In view of the above, the trading in the above Company's shares will be suspended with effect from 9.00 a.m., Monday, 9 August 2010 until further notice.
Sos: listing circular date aug 2

please be advised that the suspension of trading will continue until further notice.sos-listing circular, sept 2

Kindly be advised that the entire issued and paid-up share capital of KENMARK will be removed from the Official List of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad with effect from 9.00 a.m., Friday, 31 December 2010, pursuant to paragraph 16.11(2)(d) of the Listing Requirements.sos: listing circular dated dec 28

Kenmark Industrial Co (M) Bhd's share price took a huge beating, falling by 22.5 sen to 10.5 sen after it responded to Bursa Malaysia’s unusual market query on Monday(may 31st) morning.
Bursa publicly remands Tanjung Offshore and Kenmark
Friday, 04 March 2011 01:06

Bursa Securities Malaysia Bhd has publicly reprimanded Tanjung Offshore Bhd and Kenmark Industrial Co (M) Bhd for various breaches of the Main Market Listing Requirements (LR).
Tanjung Offshore had breached the LR in respect of its unaudited results announcement dated Feb 23, 2010 which failed to take into account the adjustments arising from under recognition of revenue and post-acquisition profit, in respect of the company's subsidiaries which was due to the company's oversight.
Meanwhile, furniture maker Kenmark has been in trouble since 2010 when two directors from Taiwan, Managing Director James Hwang and Executive Director Chang Chin-Chuan, could not be contacted. This later resulted in the independent directors announcing that the company could not meet the deadline for its quarterly results.
Kenmark Industrial Co (M) Bhd has been removed from the official list of Bursa Malaysia on Dec 31, 2010.
-------------------------------------------------
Meanwhile, Kenmark Paper Sdn Bhd, a wholly-owned subsidiary has today received from EON Bank Berhad’s solicitors their letter dated 28 May 2010 advising of appointment of receiver. Bursa Malaysia Securities Bhd today (march 3) publicly reprimanded Kenmark Industrial Co. (M) Bhd and eight of its directors for breach of listing requirements. Three of the eight directors were also fined RM2.5 million. Sos: bernama , mac 3

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

University Art Museum

...The University Art Museum Case Analysis Suzana Duran MNGT 372 Professor Quimei Xu I. Relevant Facts/Background The Art Museum is a building on the university premises that is providing a place for the art collection of a university. The building was given to the university by an alumnus around 1929. The wealthy son of the university's first president served as the museum's unpaid director until his death. He brought a few extra collections to the museum during his service, and while serving as unpaid director, none of the collections was ever shown to anybody except a few members of the university's art history faculty. The university practically gave the position to amateur art supporter, Miss Kirkoff, after the director’s death. She used museum for academic purposes for the university alumni only. Miss Kirkoff cataloged the collections and carried out new gifts. The museum was remodeled to include an auditorium, library, and classrooms. The University Art Museum’s director, Miss. Kirkoff resigned after almost 50 years of working there. In September of 1998 new directorship has been passed on. New director used museum as community resource by which he meant that is open to everyone not just to the students at the university. That was the big problem for the students and the faculty at the University Art Museum. Classes and exhibitions lost interest with the students, and the last director was let go after three years of service. II. Problem Definition-Issues The...

Words: 1104 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Delima

...1.0 INTRODUCTION Based on case study A Delima, students are required to identify issued based on certain topics. Before that, we are required to present our ideas and evaluate plans and strategies to overcome problems by applying relevant techniques during our class. In this case relate to the concept of true and fair view of Financial Statement and focused on skills and attitudes of people in an organization. Moreover, this case make us understand and shows accountant should comply with the Malaysia Financial Reporting Standard (MFRS) and International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) respectively to show the reliability of Financial Statement. Besides, we are able to know the importance of corporate governance in the business world. A part from that, we are notice about the principle of separation of ownership and management in the company relating to the director’s fiduciary duty to the company. Plus, we need to recognize the code of ethics for Company Secretary. Last but not least, we should consider other aspects in this case to reflect the best recommendation to achieve the effectiveness and efficiency of the business management. 2.0 OVERVIEW OF THE CASE A Delima case is about family businesses that are set up by Encik Zayed and Puan Hashimah. It conducted trading and supplying related products including manpower supplies to the oil and gas industries. Later in 2004, due to encouraging business growth, the enterprise was incorporated as Delima Enterprise Sdn...

Words: 3017 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Company Law

...Fact of the Case This suit regarding damages for breach of fiduciary duty where plaintiff claimed against the first defendant and 3 others who holding director position in Kesang Corporation Bhd ('KCB') for transfering a property owned by him to a third party without his concern. The property is an apartment in Tanjung Tuan Port Dickson which was bought from a company known as Tanjung Tuan Resort Development Sdn Bhd which then transferred to KCB and then to third parties. The plaintiff's claims against the second, third and fourth defendants have previously been withdrawn. Plaintiff claimed against the first defendant for damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director of the plaintiff's company. The trial of the case began on 21 March 2005. While the present case of trial still ongoing, Plaintiff applied to obtain a leave of Bankruptcy to proceed against the first defendant pursuant to Bankruptcy Act 1967 on 23 January 2007 who had hear adjudged as bankrupt on 11 July 2005.The case call up for continued hearing on 30 March 2007. The first defendant counsel inform the court that he had applied to the Director General of Insolvency for sanction pursuant to s 38(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act to defend the action and to retain Messrs David Lingam & Co as his solicitors and Mr. David Lingam as his counsel. On 13 September 2007, Encik Zahari who represented the Director General of Insolvency and Encik Sadacharam Raman as amicus curiae applied for an adjournment for sanction...

Words: 3577 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Fraud

...these corporate scandals; and third, it is to recommend the possible actions and preventive measures to curb these scandals. 1. Introduction In the recent years, the public and business community have been surprised with the exposure of many corporate scandals and accounting fraud by the managers of the company. It disappoints many stakeholders as after the financial crisis in 1997, many efforts have been initiated and implemented to strengthen the business control and foundation of the company. One of the important lessons learned from the financial crisis in 1997 is the weaknesses in the governance of the company such as too much power is given to a single person in managing the company, weak internal control and poor work of the directors that leads to the failure of the company. Due to this, a total regulatory and governance were embarked all over the world. Just to name a few, in the US, the Sarbanese Oxley Act was established, while in the UK the Code of Corporate Governance was extensively revised to stop all these corporate diseases from spreading and becoming a cancer for the global business community. However, all this effort has seemed fruitless as after the heavy debate and discussion and huge struggle by the regulator and market administrator, these corporate scandals are still returning but with more scaring facts. 1.1 What do we mean by Fraud and Misconduct • Fraud is a broad concept that generally refers to “any intentional act committed to secure...

Words: 3562 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

To Kill a Mockingbird ( Adaptation Perspective)

...showing a family known as “the Finches” experience and face the trials of living in a small Alabaman Town called Maycomb. The book itself was written by Harper Lee, a Pulitzer Prize winning novelist. When the novel was turned to a movie, there were many challenges that the director had to face while turning this classic novel into life. The director Robert Mulligan had to make sure the movie itself is an excellent adaptation of the book within the restrictions of creating a movie such as time limit, audience restrictions, money, and making sure to not replicate the entire book. This is why a book is better in an aspect as there are not as many restrictions to when creating a book compared to a movie. The film and the novel itself has many similarities and differences, however it is upon whether or not the film is a successful adaptation and portrays the theme of racial injustice. This film is a reasonable adaptation as it demonstrates the message of the film using the same context as the book and brings the characters to life in a creative way. There is great screenplay and dialogue amongst the characters which allows the audience to understand the movie thoroughly. However, there are key components which are missing from the novel that pay resemblance to the message that could’ve made this movie more outstanding in relation to racism. In order for the film to be an effective adaptation, it must have the same storyline, good development of characters, and portray the same message as...

Words: 1905 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Grace Jones Research Paper

...experience with an awful experience, though she decided not to stay restrained and allowed everyone to hear what she had to go through. The article written about Grace Jones’ experience was written by CNN News. The article mainly focused on what Grace Jones had to say, since she came out and admitted what had happened. The name of the director who has sexually harassed Jones was omitted, for unstated reasons. The director has not yet revealed himself and it is still wondered internationally who committed such a petty harassment. Jones mainly focused on the events that occurred during her traumatizing, stating that being able to act in a rude demeanor is...

Words: 513 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Commumications

...|Improbable Plot Casts Unflattering Light on SNC-Lavalin | | | | |In October of 2012, one of Canada’s largest engineering |merger of two Montreal-based engineering firms in 1991. SNC | |companies, which was also one of the world’s five largest, hired |was established by Arthur Surveyer in 1911 while Lavalin’s | |a new CEO in what looked like the next chapter of an ongoing |precursor company was crated by two engineers in 1936. Bernard| |attempt to put a series of revelations about unethical and |Lamarre was named President and CEO in 1962, and still led | |potentially illegal dealings around the world behind them. While|Lavalin when the merger happened. During the late 1980s it was| |the company had fired some key people who were connected with the|Mr. Lamarre’s projects that a young Riadh Ben Aissa worked | |scandals, there were those who publicly mused that the reported |on—and the two of them became know as the “firemen” for their | |unethical and illegal dealings weren’t just the work of a rogue |abilities to handle complicated situations successfully. | |international VP, Riadh Ben Aissa, but that Mr. Ben Aissa’s way | | |of doing business was well-understood...

Words: 1297 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Crocker Vs Pleasant Case

...The Case of Crocker v. Pleasant Ashley H. O’Dell MTS 120 Mortuary Law Carl Sandburg College The case of John Crocker vs. Richard Pleasant is about a family suing West Palm Beach Office Richard Pleasant, The City of West Palm Beach, West Palm Beach. The case was heard by Circuit Judge Moses Baker of West Palm Beach. The case goes as follows….Jay Crocker’s body was found on fire by rescue workers in an alley in West Palm Beach on December 5, 1995. He remained unidentified for three days when a hotel clerk contacted the police telling them that the person who checked into a room there had not returned since the body was found burning. He speculated that the body could be the guest who hadn’t been seen since he checked in on December...

Words: 1789 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Finm024 Corperate Governance Case Study

...Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance (FINM024) Assessment 1 – Case Study Aim: The case study aims at testing students’ understanding of the role of corporate governance in today’s business, how to establish good corporate governance practices, how to maintain an effective internal control system and assess control risk, and how to protect the organisation against fraud. Instructions: Students are required to read the case carefully before attempting the questions. All sources used must be cited using the ‘Harvard Referencing Guide’ in order to avoid plagiarism. Students MUST structure their answers as required. Please try to avoid language and grammatical mistakes, writing incorrect answers, and writing more than what is needed. Please read the questions carefully before answering them. Academic Honesty: Plagiarism will not be tolerated and could lead to your failure, so please make sure to use your own words in answering the case and to cite all the sources used. Please refer to Harvard Referencing guide to understand how to properly cite the sources used. Deadline and Submission: The deadline for submission is 10th April, 2015. All submissions have to be via Turnitin on NILE. Any submissions via email will be automatically discarded without prior notice. Students are only allowed to submit their assignment once, so no draft submissions will be accepted. Late submissions will not be accepted. If there are circumstances beyond the student’s control that deprive...

Words: 2336 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Bridging the Two Worlds

...CEO in what looked like the next chapter of an ongoing attempt to put a series of revelations about unethical and potentially illegal dealings around the world behind them. While the company had fired some key people who were connected with the scandals, there were those who publicly mused that the reported unethical and illegal dealings weren’t just the work of a rogue international VP, Riadh Ben Aissa, but that Mr. Ben Aissa’s way of doing business was well-understood within SNC. While Mr. Ban Aissa was detained in jail in Switzerland on suspicion of paying bribes in order to get contracts in North Africa, including Libya, the new CEO, Robert Card, stated that sorting out the payments scandal would be the job of the company’s Board of Directors and his job would be to reassure investors by growing the business. At that time, investor concerns had caused the stock price to fall to $35 from $60 18 months earlier. Over the past three years the company had reported strong financial results. In 2010, SNC-Lavalin’s revenues had been $6.0 billion and profit reached a record $477 million. In 2011, revenues had grown to $7.2 billion but profit declined to $379 million, partly as a result of the pullout from Libya, but still the second highest in company history. In 2012, the revenues were again trending up with an expected total of over $8 billion and profit of around $300 million. The creation of a Canadian champion SNC-Lavalin was a 101-year old Montrealbased company with offices in...

Words: 1289 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Eads Case Study

...European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company (EADS) Case Study On March 8, 2004 John Summers, Head of supply management strategy at EADS, a company based in Europe, got the assignment from the Procurement Directors Board (PDB) to make suggestions for improving the company’s supplier evaluation system. The proposal was to be presented at the PDB meeting the following month. John’s Suggestions for Improvement: John knew that the current supplier evaluation system had worked smoothly for more than 4 years and was well implemented. However, he was not sure whether EADS was really measuring all important dimensions of the supplier value in order to achieve new competitive advantages in the relevant markets. If you were in the position of John Summers, which general problems and weaknesses of EADS could you identify? 2. If you were in the position of John Summers, which specific problems could you identify in EADS’ current supplier evaluation system? 3. If you were in the position of John Summers, how would you define supplier value in the light of EADS’ supply strategy and its market environment? 4. John Summers has prepared a list of suggestions for improvement for the PDB meeting. As some items on the agenda were discussed longer than expected at the PDB meeting, John only has 10 minutes instead of 30 minutes to present his suggestions. So, if you were in John’s position, which 3 next steps would you present first? Why? Negotiation power of...

Words: 391 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Boards

...IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CORPORATE BOARDS The primary purpose of for-profit companies is to maximize the return on shareholder’s investment. In instances where ownership of a company and control of said company are separate, shareholders employ directors as the primary monitoring mechanism. In other words, the role of corporate boards is to monitor executive management to make sure that they manage the company in a way that maximizes shareholder value by managing the company with their best interests in mind. The scandals of Enron, Tyco International, WorldCom, and others cost investors billions of dollars and shook investor confidence in the nation’s stock markets. The global economy plunged into a recession in 2008 partly because large banks took unprecedented risks and overleveraged themselves when they invested in collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and credit default swaps - the repayment of which was only possible if the housing market continued to increase in value. As a result of the high profile corporate scandals at the beginning of the millennium and the economic recession, experts are beginning to explore new ways to improve the effectiveness of corporate boards. According to Nicola Faith Sharpe, Associate Professor of Law at The University of Illinois College of Law, “history has shown that the scholarly and regulatory focus on board composition and structure is a dangerously incomplete solution to the problems that have caused recent corporate failures...

Words: 1109 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Aft 2 Task 2

...| Accreditation Audit: AFT Task Two | Stephanie Clements | | | Western Governor’s University | | Sentinel Event A sentinel event is defined by The Joint Commission as an unexpected occurrence involving death or serious physical or psychological injury, or the risk thereof (Joint Commission, 2015). The event described in the case study is a sentinel event resulting in the abduction of a child. The event begins when a child is admitted to the preop unit for outpatient surgery with her mother. The child’s mother leaves the facility during the procedure, giving instructions for the nurse to call the mother if the procedure was quicker than expected. After the procedure, the child is discharged home by the recovery room staff with her estranged father who does not have custody of the child. The child is recovered by law enforcement in the care of the father, but the potential harm and psychological damage ensued categorizes these happenings as a sentinel event. Personnel/ Personnel Issues There were several people involved in this sentinel event at Nightingale Community Hospital. Here, they are listed along with their roles and any issues involving them in this event: Person | Role in the event | Barriers | Registrar, Katie Jessup | Responsible for initial intake information and consent to treat. | Followed process as outlined. Knowledge of potential information gaps and custodial issues with children could provoke further questioning. Lack of awareness...

Words: 1742 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

A Boeing 777

...CNN) -- A Boeing 777, one of the world's most reliable types of airliners, is missing, and no one knows why. Was it a bomb? Mechanical failure? A hijacking gone awry? Pilots and others in the aviation community are deeply disturbed by the mystery surrounding Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. It disappeared Saturday en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing over the Gulf of Thailand, somewhere between Malaysia and Vietnam. It's hard to believe that such huge questions remain four days after the Boeing 777-200ER went missing, carrying 227 passengers and 12 crew members. A revelation Tuesday set off a fresh wave of speculation. Radar tracking detected the plane hundreds of miles off course, traveling in the opposite direction from its original destination, a senior Malaysian Air Force official told CNN. The aircraft had stopped sending identifying transponder codes before it disappeared, the official said. The new details marked a dramatic twist in the investigation. But some reports have quoted other Malaysian authorities offering conflicting information, with some denying the military official's claim. What can cause an airplane to disappear? Search underway for missing Flight 370 Authorities 'puzzled' by missing flight Search area for missing plane widens The situation is so unprecedented that experts have been careful in speculating about possible explanations. Here are four scenarios they're talking about, and the related facts: 1. Scenario: Mechanical failure? Fact: The...

Words: 1691 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Flat Cargo Berhad

...Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………..1-2 Issues………………………………………………………………………………………………2 The Discovery of Fraud……………………………………………………………………..…..3-4 Corporate Governance of FCB……………………………………………………………………5 Auditor Dilemma……………………………………………………………………….……….5-7 Using the Fraud Triangle Model to analyze the situation in Flat Cargo Berhad……………..…8-9 Who is responsible in the fraud of Flat Cargo Berhad ……………………………………..…10-11 Prevention Measures for Fraud ……………………………………………………………….12-13 Detection Measures for Fraud…………………………………………………………...……14-15 Recommendation…………………………………………………………………….……….16-17 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………...……….18-19 References………………………………………………………………………………………..19 Introduction The case is related to one company known as Flat Cargo Berhad (FCB), FCB was one of the largest air freight companies in Malaysia which servicing several government linked companies including Freight Malaysia Berhad. FCB is a listed company and was registered as an investment holding company with several subsidiaries. Among its subsidiaries are FC Spare Sdn Bhd, Cargo Management Sdn Bhd, FCB (SPV) Ltd, Cargo Air Services Sdn Bhd and FC Air Ltd. FCB started its operations in 1997 with two aircrafts: a Boeing 737-200F and a Cessna Grand Caravan. FCB’s major shareholder in 1997 had been Bangor Berhad, which was part of a diversified international family owned conglomerate, the Miri Group. On September 2001 the company was listed in Bursa Malaysia. The...

Words: 5971 - Pages: 24