University of Phoenix Material

Case Study Assignment

Assignment Overview

PREPARE A REPORT FOR THE CEO OF ACUSCAN ABOUT THE SITUATION DESCRIBED IN THE GEN 480 CRITICAL THINKING CASE STUDY. YOUR REPORT SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING TWO PARTS:
1. Part One: Respond to the specific questions on the worksheet that follows (100 points possible).
2. Part Two: Write an executive summary for the CEO of AcuScan. (100 points possible).

PART ONE:

USE THE CASE MATERIALS TO COMPLETE THIS ASSIGNMENT.

Analysis
1. Describe all assumptions seen in any of documents provided in the case study. For full credit, provide AT MINIMUM: four to six assumptions held by Kelly; six to nine assumptions held by Pat; two to three assumptions held by Cliff; two to three assumptions held by Chris.
a. Kelly- the Senior Engineer is perhaps the most realistic of the employees. The statement in the February 19, 2003 email explaining, “I can design one feature completely and make it work by August," is credible (UOP, 2003, p. 17). After all, the same email explains that programming involves much more than key strokes. It involves planning, testing and quality control (p. 17). In the previous February 19, 2003 email to Chris, Kelly explains how difficult it is for the programming staff to maintain existing services and find time for something new (p. 16). While programming staff was dramatically reduced in the year prior, Kelly’s belief might be partially fallacious. If the new project utilized the current programming code or design and need some refinements, it might be possible. In many ways, Kelly makes an appeal to pity, seeking exemption from the requests. Whereas Kelly does articulate the reality of engineering and programming, the processes involved and the timeline, Kelly believes that her meeting with Chris will also result in another argument. This belief