1-4
Brandon and Gabriella have been brought up in the same family and have equal treatment from their parents. They both have to work part time in order to pay for incidentals and both get receive financial assistance from their parents for college expenses. Therefore we can eliminate any notions that either argument was fuelled by a secondary or hidden agenda.
We can also see that they care about each other and they want to look out for the other.
On the one hand we have Brandon s “good and honest” work and he also points out that Gabriella’s participation in strip-o-grams negated the achievements of the feminist movement. With these notions in mind I assigned Brandon’s subjective morality as his organizational dominance. On the other Gabriella, points out the copious free time, good pay and win-win outcomes for all involved in her business. With these ideas in mind I assigned Gabriella’s organizational dominance as subjective resistance to the status quo.
By having a critical approach, both can be exploited but it depends on what the person thinks exploitation is. In this case neither Brandon nor Gabriella is exploited. Gabriella is making a choice to work as little as possible for as much money as possible in order to pursue her education on her terms. This reminds me of Anna Quindlen’s statement “Women have won the right to do as much as men do. They just haven’t won the right to do as little as men do.” Gabriella is making a choice to work as little as possible for as much money as possible in order to pursue her education on her terms. Gabriella has weighed the options of working a more traditional job such as Brandon’s or working as an adult entertainer. The option of choice in this scenario supports the feminist movement. Gabriella does not feel exploited, therefore she is not. Gabriella could consider the plight of women who do not want to be valued