* It helps because the jurors feel safe because no one in the court including the accused know who they are so if the side against the accused their identities will be safe. It is bad though too because then there is no way of knowing if a juror has a personal connection to the case.
Page 81 * Proof that jurors are treated fairly:
-both the defence and the prosecution had input on who was in the jury
-the jurors are shown a picture of the accused to ensure that none of them knew the person.
-each juror votes anonymously and in private
-jurors have to save their judgment until the end of the trial until all the evidence has been read. * I don’t think that there is anything in the story that says the jurors can say what the sentence will be. They can help the case go one way or another but they can’t control the whole outcome. The accused is either not guilty or guilty.
Page 82 * By volunteering with an advocacy group I could help in individuals improve their life. Also I would be part of an organization that tries to influence the justice system and the government to make changes.

Page 83 * They both agree that punishing someone isn’t the only way to achieve justice. They also agree that harsher penalties and laws don’t work. They think that Canada is failing, and that the present system is not preventing crime in our country
Page 84 * Elders in our community serve as role models for youth, and could act as leaders and supporters. They could provide mentorship for young people and provide guidance and help out young people with their lives.
Page 85 * The aspects of my identity that I’d want the justice system to take into account would be personal things in my life. Such as my religion, race, culture, what sports/community activities that I’m involved in. * 1. How would you treat a repeat offender differently than a first