Applying Laura Nash’s model in to this case allows us to see how both Charlie Sheen and his former boss Chuck Lorre acted wrong during this scandal. One of the goals of this model is to acknowledge how the situation occurred in the first place. Chuck Lorre knew of Sheen’s past behavior and the problems he was having while he was working for him. Lorre put up with these situations for a long time but it was not until Charlie crossed the line by insulting him that he fired him. It seems wrong that Lorre canceled Charlie’s contract right after this incident and not before when he had similar bad behavior. This model also examines whom could their decision injure. Charlie Sheen and his decision to act immorally outside of his workplace affected his fellow actor because the remaining episodes got cancelled and they could not get paid either. Lorre also punished the rest of the cast by stopping the production of the remaining episodes. The Front-Page-of-the-Newspaper Test would require Chuck Lorre and Charlie Sheen to envision how their acts and decisions would be described by a reporter in a newspaper. Charlie Sheen’s act of making bad comments about his former boss was an unethical thing to do. Charlie Sheen has been targeted by the media due to his immoral behaviors a countless amount of times. Nevertheless, he does not seem to matter about his chaotic personal life being on the spotlight. On the other hand, Chuck Lorre who knew all along about Charlie’s life problems and how it was affecting his performance at work did not stop the problem before it affected the rest of the cast. Lorre also looked bad by not trying to stop these before and then later finally doing it. The Wall Street Journal Model is another model for solving ethical dilemmas and consists of three questions. The first question examines if the individual is in compliance with the law. Chuck Lorre