When we look at the terms of risk reduction and hazard control we get the terms of eliminating and reducing the issues. Where control of hazards seek to maintain instead of removing the process. The term that risk reduction is applied to is a complete understanding of the intent of the criterion to ty risk- reducing the probability of the events occurring. In the terms of the second and third definitions of risk because they include both the probability of the event and the severity of the harmful consequences. Risk reduction is a term that capture the fundamental concept that harmful events consist of the three phases.
Jensen, R. C. (2012). Risk-Reduction Methods: For Occupational Safety and Health (1st e

A physical model is one that thing would be (like if you were creating a model of say a building,

park, airplane or other large structure or area), sometimes it's actual size if it is small enough.

You build or have built that you can touch. Sometimes it is a miniature version of what the real.

What I mean by physical models is those that are meant to represent the physical world, as

opposed to – for example – biomechanical, or computers models.

Jensen, R. C. (2012). Risk-Reduction Methods: For Occupational Safety and Health (1st ed.).

Whenever you are planning or one have to deal with risk and hazards we should looking in to the

process from the beginning to the end. Where do we want to be at this point in the project as we

go through the forward-looking phrase and getting all hazard under control and identifying them

from top to bottom in a full lifecycle as they may occur. You have to have a plan in place to deal

with the hazard so that you can identify and take control of the hazard.

Jensen, R. C. (2012). Risk-Reduction Methods: For Occupational Safety and Health (1st ed.).

Difference between fault tree and event tree: 1) Fault trees lay out relationships among event

whereas event trees lay out sequences of events linked by conditional probabilities. 2) Event

trees can handle better notions of continuity (logical, temporal, and physical), whereas fault trees

are most powerful in identifying and simplifying failure scenarios. The major difference is how

the trees are laid out to get to there conclusions as to the step that will be followed in the process.

Jensen, R. C. (2012). Risk-Reduction Methods: For Occupational Safety and Health (1st ed.).

The word risk means that you are doing something and most likely are being exposed to

something dangerous. You can also expose someone else to the dangers if they are will you or

you told them to do something.

Risk is defined as a specific contingency or peril.(Goetsch 2015).

Risk can be defined as the probability and magnitude of harm resulting from exposure to

hazards. Risk assessment is a matter of characterizing-qualitatively, semi quantitatively, or

quantitatively- the probability and magnitude of harm. (Arnold 2012)

After reading all the definition, they give a clear picture of what each have to offer. They favor in

the category of health, monetary and safety itself. Definition 3 is the one that I will choose, it

matches the probability of what if and how high of low will the problem may be.

Goetsch, D. L. (2015). Basics of occupational safety (Second Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ:

Prentice Hall. Inline citations: (Goetsch, 2015, pp. 75 – 75)

Arnold, S., Charlton, M., Mansdorf, S. Z. Z., McCluskey, G., Milz, S., Nelson, D., … Rock, J.

(2012). Recognition, Evaluation, and Control of Workplace Health Hazards. (J. Haight, Ed.)

(2nd ed.). Des SusaPlaines, Ill: Manager Techanical.

Inline citations: (Arnold et al., 2012, pp. 29 – 29)

After reading the article “Perception of Earthquake Risk in Taiwan: Effects of Gender and Past

Earthquake Experience.” Based on the information presented in the article the effect that risk

perception has on the definition of risk. It is clear by the way that the author want the readers to

see that when women have a low tolerant for risk taken so they practice more safety precaution.

In this article men do not see the earthquake as a problem. With this in mind, once we have lived

through and type of disaster we look at them as one of the same. People do not look at the risk of

the disaster as they should and consider it as a high priority. But the author in this article see the

problem as a gender base issue. If the men had applied the same safety response that women did

then less risk would take place. This article fit in well with definition 1 it shows the probability

of the risk that the men take as it seem routine to them instead of an emergency Earthquakes are

real and how we react to them leads to life or death. The author give a great picture of want went

on and how the difference gender react to emergency situation when they arise.

Risk Analysis: An International Journal. Sep2012, Vol. 32 Issue 9, p1535-1546. 12p. 6 Charts.

Jensen, R. C. (2012). Risk-Reduction Methods: For Occupational Safety and Health (1st ed.).

United States: Wiley-Blackwell (an imprint of John Wiley & Sons Ltd).