ASCE
American Society of Civil Engineers

THE VISION FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING IN 2025

BASED ON THE SUMMIT ON THE FUTURE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING June 21 – 22, 2006

Prepared by the Task Committee to Plan a Summit on the The Future of the Civil Engineering Profession January 5, 2007 (Final draft prepared by TC)

Contents

Executive Summary ...................................................... 1 2006: Status, Concerns, and Opportunities in the Civil Engineering Profession ..................................... 3 Issues and Trends ................................................. 3 New Pressures....................................................... 4 Career Appeal........................................................ 5 Future Directions.................................................... 5 Why a Summit? ............................................................. 7 The Vision for Civil Engineering .................................. 9 Vision ..................................................................... 9 Profile of the 2025 Civil Engineer......................... 10 2025: The Civil Engineer’s World............................... 13 A Sustainable World ............................................ 14 Research and Development................................. 16 Managing Risk ..................................................... 18 Master Innovators and Integrators ....................... 19 Reform in the Preparation of Engineers ............... 20 What Next?........................................................................... 22 Acknowledgements..................................................... 26 Appendix A—Abbreviations ....................................... 27 Appendix B—Summit Participants ............................ 28

ii

Appendix C—Members of the Task Committee to Plan a Summit on the Future of the Civil Engineering Profession .............. 33 Appendix D—Process Used to Plan, Facilitate, and Follow-Up on the Summit............. 35 Appendix E —Summary of Survey ............................ 37 Appendix F—Annotated Bibliography ......................... 47 Appendix G—Vision: What It Is and Isn’t .................. 51 Appendix H—The Summit Program........................... 52 Appendix I —Keynote Presentations......................... 54 Appendix J—Breakout Reports: What Will/Could Be Different in 2025?............................... 86 Appendix K—Breakout Reports: Vision Ideas ........... 94 Appendix L—Notes ..................................................... 96

iii

Executive Summary
It is a great profession. There is the fascination of watching a figment of the imagination emerge through the aide of science to a plan on paper. Then it brings jobs and homes…it elevates the standards of living and adds to the comforts of life. That is the engineer’s high privilege. (Herbert Hoover, engineer, humanitarian, and 31st U.S. President) Civil engineering leaders gathered in June 2006 to articulate a global vision for civil engineering. A diverse group of civil engineering and other leaders, including international guests, gathered in June 2006 to actively participate in the Summit on the Future of Civil Engineering. Their purpose: articulate an aspirational global vision for the future of civil engineering addressing all levels and facets of the civil engineering community. Today’s status of civil engineering served as the Summit’s benchmark. Examples of current issues and trends noted at the Summit include the poor condition of the infrastructure in many nations, occurrence of corruption in the global engineering and construction industry, minimal involvement of civil engineers in the political process, the need to more fully embrace sustainability, the globalization of engineering practice, and the desire to attract the best and brightest to the profession. The civil engineer’s world of 2025 will be even more challenging than today. Summit participants see a very different world for civil engineers in 2025. An ever-increasing global population that continues to shift to urban areas will require widespread adoption of sustainability. Demands for energy, drinking water, clean air, safe waste disposal, and transportation will drive environmental protection and infrastructure development. Society will face increased threats from natural events, accidents, and perhaps other causes such as terrorism. Dealing with the preceding problems and opportunities will require intra-disciplinary, cross-disciplinary, and multidisciplinary collaboration on projects and in research and development. More advances in areas such as information technology, intelligent infrastructure, and digital simulation will be needed.

1

Informed by the preceding status of civil engineering and the challenges and opportunities facing it, the aspirational global vision developed as a result of the Summit is: In 2025, civil engineers will serve as master builders, environmental stewards, innovators and integrators, managers of risk and uncertainty, and leaders in shaping public policy. Entrusted by society to create a sustainable world and enhance the global quality of life, civil engineers serve competently, collaboratively, and ethically as master: • planners, designers, constructors, and operators of society’s economic and social engine, the built environment; stewards of the natural environment and its resources; innovators and integrators of ideas and technology across the public, private, and academic sectors; managers of risk and uncertainty caused by natural events, accidents, and other threats; and leaders in discussions and decisions shaping public environmental and infrastructure policy.

• • • •

Summit organizers and participants want the preceding vision to guide policies, plans, processes, and progress within the civil engineering community and beyond – and around the globe. The engineering community, especially the civil engineering community, is global and, as such, should share a common vision and work together to achieve it. Leaders of civil engineering organizations around the globe should move the civil engineering community toward the vision. Now that the Summit is complete, the vision articulated, and the report completed, leaders of civil engineering organizations around the globe should move the civil engineering community toward the vision. Active engagement on a variety of fronts related to the environment and infrastructure are required in response to the challenge laid before the profession.

2

2006: Status, Concerns, and Opportunities in the Civil Engineering Profession
Unless we hasten, we shall be left behind. (Lucius Annaeus Seneca, Roman philosopher) Civil engineers are rightfully proud of their legacy. Over the past century, clean water supplies have extended general life expectancies more than any single medical innovation. Transportation systems serve as an economic and social engine. New bridges, blending strength and beauty, speed transport and bring communities closer together. Public and private construction, for which engineers provide the essential underpinnings of design and project oversight produces hundreds of thousands of jobs and drives community development. From the functional and beautiful Golden Gate Bridge in the U.S., Petronas Towers in Malaysia, and Pont du Gard in France to the largely hidden water supply and sanitary sewer systems, civil engineers have made their mark, day in and day out, in many aspects of the daily life of essentially everyone around the globe. Issues and Trends Proud of its legacy, the global civil engineering community cannot rest on its laurels. Public health, safety, and welfare require giving even more attention to infrastructure and the environment. Civil engineers know they cannot rest on their laurels. Current trends pose questions about the future of the profession. These questions address the role that civil engineers play, and could play, in society, in the ultimate integrity of the world’s infrastructure, and in the health of the natural environment. For many years, civil engineering leaders sounded the alarm about the lack of investment in maintaining and improving the infrastructure. Some of those shortcomings were tragically illustrated by the death and destruction caused by failures in which engineering designs, government funding, and the community oversight systems were all called into question. Civil engineers are painfully aware of the repercussions for public health, safety, and welfare when the infrastructure gets short shrift. 3

Civil engineers must be more active in the policy-creating and decision-making process.

Yet those same engineers also know that they could do better in speaking out in the social and political arena, and in becoming leaders in the policy-creating and decision-making process, so that the process is based on a sound technical foundation. Civil engineers know they must step up to the political and public service plate. The public has become increasingly aware that development need not come at the price of a compromised and depleted environment. Enlightened citizens see sustainability, not as an unattainable ideal, but as a practical goal. To answer that call, civil engineers realize that they must increasingly transform themselves from designers and builders to project life-cycle “sustainers.” Such broadened responsibilities, along with the increasing breadth, complexity, and rate of change of professional practice, all put greater emphasis not only on continuing education but also on what a basic civil engineering education must deliver up front. The body of knowledge necessary to effectively practice civil engineering at the professional level is beyond the scope of the traditional bachelor’s degree, even when coupled with the mandated early-career experience. Education must meld technical excellence with the ability to lead, influence, and integrate, preparing the engineer to weigh the diverse societal issues that shape the optimal approaches to planning, design, and construction. New Pressures

Pressures felt by the civil engineering profession include the role of software in design, commoditization of services, and impact of globalization.

Technology and market forces bring additional pressures on how civil engineers play out their roles. Knowledge-based civil engineering software increasingly shifts routine engineering tasks from the realm of the engineer to that of the technologist and technician. How will this trend play out in the years ahead? Will civil engineers move further into a systems role? Civil engineering risks becoming increasingly commoditized. Clients and owners may increasingly use low bid procurement—and thus the lowest innovation denominator— rather than qualifications-based selection and its opportunities to provide the best life-cycle options. And how will civil engineers in advanced nations react as the need to have project teams all in one place continues to shrink, and lower-cost engineers from rapidly expanding 4

technological workforces around the world vie for a piece of the global economic pie? Will economic forces make that pie expand, with more work for all engineers, or will barriers be proposed to slow the negative local employment impacts? How will civil engineers gain the needed knowledge of international business practices and cultural and linguistic issues and will they further address corruption in the global engineering and construction industry? In the future, some, now dominant countries may have a diminishing global role in engineering research and education and in application of new technology. Civil engineers can contribute to world stability. Civil engineers, because of their work with infrastructure and the environment, can contribute to world stability. Consider one example: Virtually every nation on earth is either facing, or within 20 years will face, some type of water supply challenge. That demand for this life-giving resource, coupled with the need to share it across national boundaries, could make for an explosive situation. The application of civil engineering knowledge and skills to enhance water supply and improve distribution could very well become one of civil engineering’s greatest challenges. Career Appeal The profession has struggled with appealing to young people as a desirable profession. All these issues represent critical tests for civil engineers, with new responsibilities looming for a new generation. For many years, the profession has wrestled with its career appeal to a diverse population of the best and brightest. How can precollege students learn more about the civil engineering opportunities for both helping mankind and building a fulfilling life for themselves at a competitive compensation? And when on-the-job assignments do not match the promise of stimulating work, how can management step in to help while still building the bottom line? Future Directions Civil engineers thus find themselves as keepers of an impressive legacy while raising concerns about future directions. They know they must take more risks. They know they must show more leadership. They know they must control their own destiny and not let events control them. The Summit on the Future of Civil Engineering in 2025 represented an ambitious step on the road to that new future. Participants asked: What will the civil engineering world be like 5

20 years from now? What aspirational role will civil engineers play in that radically transformed world? The visionary gauntlet has been thrown down. Clearly, looking ahead toward the unknown presents considerable risk. Future realities may not be captured and some aspects of the vision may prove to be a mirage. But the visionary gauntlet has been thrown. A diverse group of accomplished individuals gathered at the summit to look beyond today’s strategic issues—which were outlined here—to place their signposts for what the civil engineering profession should attain by 2025. The march toward those markers, and the enlightened struggles that will be needed to get there, are only just beginning. The global civil engineering profession has taken up the challenge.

6

Why a Summit?
Never doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world. It is the only thing that ever has. (Margaret Mead, anthropologist) Leaders gathered at the summit to articulate a global vision for civil engineering. The Summit on the Future of Civil Engineering was convened in response to the status of, concerns with, and opportunities for the civil engineering profession as described, for example, in the previous chapter. A highly-varied group of civil engineers, engineers from other disciplines, architects, educators, association and society executives, and other leaders, including participants from eight countries other than the U.S.,7 attended. All gathered in Landsdowne, Virginia from June 21 to 23, 2006 to participate in the Summit. The Summit’s purpose was to articulate an aspirational global vision for the future of civil engineering addressing all levels and facets of the civil engineering community, that is, professional (licensed) civil engineers, non-licensed civil engineers, technologists and technicians. The Summit’s goal reflects the organizers’ and the participants’ preference of choice over chance. Statesman William Jennings Bryan highlighted those options when he said: “Destiny is not a matter of chance; it is a matter of choice.”1 Broadly speaking, there are only two futures for civil engineering around the globe; the one the profession creates for itself or, in the void, the one others create for civil engineering. Civil engineers came to the Summit to choose their profession’s future. This report presents thoughts of leaders who participated in the highly-interactive Summit. The purpose of this report is to outline the highlyinteractive process used during the Summit and more importantly, to present, in detail, the Summit’s results. The report’s primary audience is any individual or organization that can help to achieve the vision that resulted from the Summit, as presented later in this report. The Summit on the Future of Civil Engineering in 2025 proved to be a stimulating, uplifting, collaborative, and creative experience for participants. Breakout groups generated wideranging discussions and post-Summit synthesis of the ideas that were generated yielded the final vision.

7

The civil engineering community is global and should share a common vision.

As valuable as that may be, the Summit is intended to be just the beginning of an on-going influencing process. Summit organizers, and probably the vast majority of participants, want the global vision, as presented in this report, to guide policies, plans, processes, and progress within the global civil engineering community. This vision can exert influence within civil engineering around the globe and possibly within other engineering disciplines and other professions. The civil engineering community is global and, as such, could and perhaps should share a common vision.

8

The Vision for Civil Engineering
Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat. (Theodore Roosevelt, 26th U.S. President) Vision The Summit produced a series of aspirational visions stimulated by participant views of the world of 2025. The resulting global aspirational vision is: In 2025, civil engineers will serve as master builders, environmental stewards, innovators and integrators, managers of risk and uncertainty, and leaders in shaping public policy. Entrusted by society to create a sustainable world and enhance the global quality of life, civil engineers serve competently, collaboratively, and ethically as master: • planners, designers, constructors, and operators of society’s economic and social engine, the built environment; stewards of the natural environment and its resources; innovators and integrators of ideas and technology across the public, private, and academic sectors; managers of risk and uncertainty caused by natural events, accidents, and other threats; and leaders in discussions and decisions shaping public environmental and infrastructure policy.

• • • •

As used in the vision, “master” means to possess widelyrecognized and valued knowledge and skills and other attributes acquired as a result of education, experience, and achievement. Individuals, within a profession, who have these characteristics are willing and able to serve society by orchestrating solutions to 9

society’s most pressing current needs while helping to create a more viable future. Profile of the 2025 Civil Engineer The Summit addressed this question: What could civil engineers be doing in 2025? Addressing this second question naturally led to describing the profile of the 2025 civil engineer, that is, the attributes possessed or exhibited by the individual civil engineer of 2025 consistent with the preceding aspirational vision for the profession. Personal attributes-knowledge, skills, and attitudes—must expand to meet the challenges of 2025. Attributes may be defined as desirable knowledge, skills, and attitudes. As used here, knowledge is largely cognitive and consists of theories, principles, and fundamentals. Examples are geometry, calculus, vectors, momentum, friction, stress and strain, fluid mechanics, energy, continuity, and variability. In contrast, skills refer to the ability to do tasks. Examples are using a spreadsheet; continuous learning; problem solving; critical, global, integrative/system, and creative thinking; teamwork; communication; and self-assessment. Formal education is the primary source of knowledge as defined here, whereas skills are developed via formal education, focused training, and certain on-the-job experiences. Attitudes reflect an individual’s values and determine how he or she “sees” the world, not in terms of sight, but in terms of perceiving, interpreting, and approaching. Examples of attitudes conducive to effective professional practice are commitment, curiosity, honesty, integrity, objectivity, optimism, sensitivity, thoroughness, and tolerance. The Summit identified many and varied attributes, organized into the preceding knowledge, skills, and attitudes categories. The results are presented here. The civil engineer is knowledgeable. He or she understands the theories, principles, and/or fundamentals of: • • • Mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, mechanics, and materials which are the foundation of engineering Design of structures, facilities, and systems Risk/uncertainty such as risk identification, data-based and knowledge-based types, and probability and statistics 10

• The civil engineer is knowledgeable about technical and professional, as well as socio-economic, topics. • • • •

Sustainability including social, economic, and physical dimensions Public policy and administration including elements such as the political process, laws and regulations, funding mechanisms Business basics such as legal forms of ownership, profit, income statements and balance sheets, decision or engineering economics, and marketing Social sciences including economics, history, and sociology Ethical behavior including client confidentiality, codes of ethics within and outside of engineering societies, anti-corruption and the differences between legal requirements and ethical expectations, and the profession’s responsibility to hold paramount public health, safety, and welfare

The civil engineer is skillful. He or she knows how to: The civil engineer possesses many and varied skills. • • • • • • Apply basic engineering tools such as statistical analysis, computer models, design codes and standards, and project monitoring methods Learn about, assess, and master new technology to enhance individual and organizational effectiveness and efficiency Communicate with technical and non-technical audiences, convincingly and with passion, via listening, speaking, writing, mathematics, and visuals Collaborate on intra-disciplinary, cross-disciplinary, and multi-disciplinary traditional and virtual teams8 Manage tasks, projects, and programs so as to provide expected deliverables while satisfying budget, schedule, and other constraints Lead by formulating and articulating environmental, infrastructure, and other improvements and build consensus by practicing inclusiveness, empathy, compassion, persuasiveness, patience, and critical thinking

11

The civil engineer embraces a range of attitudes that supplement knowledge and skills and facilitating effective professional practice within industry, education, and government.

The civil engineer embraces attitudes conducive to effective professional practice. He or she exhibits: • • • Creativity and entrepreneurship that leads to proactive identification of possibilities and opportunities and taking action to develop them Commitment to ethics, personal and organizational goals, and worthy teams and organizations Curiosity which is a basis for continued learning, fresh approaches, development of new technology or innovative applications of existing technology, and new endeavors Honesty and integrity, that is, telling the truth and keeping one’s word. Optimism in the face of challenges and setbacks recognizing the power inherent in vision, commitment, planning, persistence, flexibility, and teamwork Respect for and tolerance of the rights, values, views, property, possessions, and sensitivities of others Thoroughness and self-discipline in keeping with the public health, safety, and welfare implications of most engineering projects and the high-degree of interdependence within project teams and between such teams and their stakeholders

• • • •

Many of the preceding attributes are shared with other professions. Civil engineering’s uniqueness is revealed in how the attributes enable the profession to do what it does and, more importantly, to become what it wants to be. This is inherent in the global aspirational vision.

12

2025: The Civil Engineer’s World
In a time of drastic change, it is the learners who inherit the future. The learned usually find themselves equipped to live in a world that no longer exists. (Eric Hoffer, self-taught philosopher) Civil engineers can determine the roles they will play in the world of 2025. The Summit generated many and varied ideas as a result of discussing the civil engineer’s world of 2025. More specifically, the breakout groups addressed these two questions: • • What will be different in the world of 2025? What could civil engineers be doing in that different world?

The answer to the first question defines the stage on which civil engineers will perform two decades from now. The second question’s answer defines roles civil engineers could play. While civil engineers will not be able to greatly influence the stage, they can determine the acts in which they will appear and the roles they will play. Consistent with the vision, a 2025 scenario was developed. Using Summit results and a pre-Summit ASCE member survey regarding aspirations and visions for civil engineering in 2025, the following scenario was developed. Imagine the year is 2025. At the 2nd World Civil Engineering Societies Triennial Symposium in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, engineers from industry, education and government met to continue the collaboration started six years ago in Oporto, Portugal. At the conclusion of deliberations, conference organizers submitted the following reports regarding the status of the sustainability of the world, research and development, risk management, innovation and integration, and reform in the preparation of engineers.

13

A Sustainable World Civil engineers have helped raise global expectations for sustainability and for environmental stewardship. The global civil engineering profession has increasingly recognized the reality of shrinking resources, the desire for sustainable practices and design, and the need for social equity in the consumption of resources. Civil engineers have helped raise global expectations for sustainability and for environmental stewardship. The profession has led world acceptance of green design and has been at the forefront in making environmental considerations part of life-cycle and cost-benefit analyses. Civil engineers have urged clients to use new, environmentallyfriendly technologies to improve the quality of life in urban environments. Designs routinely incorporated recycling, either by using recycled materials, or by making project components recyclable at the end of their useful life. New processes, less harmful to the environment, have been implemented, and most new construction is based on green- and smart-building technologies. Many new buildings actually produce more energy that they consume. On the demographic front, the world is well on its way to a population exceeding ten billion people in 2050. Today, people occupy more space on the planet than they did 30 years ago, and they are straining the earth’s environment, particularly the needs for energy, fresh water, clean air, and safe waste disposal. Over the past 30 years, gradual global warming has profoundly impacted the more than half of the world’s population that lives within 50 miles of coastal areas. These areas have become much harsher places to live because of sea level rise, increased storm activity, and greater susceptibility to flooding. Growing population, shrinking resources, and climate change have led to sustainability and have put sustainability at the forefront of issues requiring global attention. The shift of people from rural to urban areas increasingly strained the overburdened infrastructure. Shifting demographics and population growth continue to strain the overburdened infrastructure. The shift of people moving from rural areas to cities and ex-urban areas has accelerated causing increased population density around the world. In the developed world, infrastructure is aging, and maintenance or replacement has not kept pace with its deterioration. In the developing world, the need for new infrastructure outstrips society’s ability to put it in place. Influenced by civil engineering leadership, people now better understand the crucial link between infrastructure and quality of life, which has caused a major public policy shift in favor of

14

improved infrastructure infrastructure construction.

maintenance

and

accelerated

Twenty-five years after promulgation of the Millennium Development Goals, some progress has been made, but the goals remain for the most part un-met against a backdrop of increasingly urgent global demand for environmental security and restoration. Improved understanding of the environment and the acceptance of broadly shared environmental values have led to an increased understanding that global environmental problems must be solved with global solutions. Nations unwilling to accept these values face worldwide pressure to conform to global norms for sustainability to improve the quality of life around the world. Demands for sustainable energy, fresh water, clean air, and safe waste disposal drive global infrastructure development. Demands for sustainable energy, fresh water, clean air, and safe waste disposal drive infrastructure development on a global scale. Constrained resources and growing energy demands have led to the need for prioritizing energy resources and for use of alternative fuels. The use of clean coal along with carbon sequestration; nuclear energy; and renewable sources such as wind, solar, waves, and geothermal have made it possible to meet growing demands. In addition, increased urbanization has led to greatly increased use of mass transit and much less reliance on personal automobiles, which has greatly reduced demands for fossil fuels. Most vehicles now use fuel cell technology or renewable resources such as ethanol. The need for fresh water continues to be a global issue. Rapid urbanization in developing countries has made it a challenge to meet ever-growing demands for clean water. Improved water purification methods, desalination technologies, and increasing use of closed-loop systems have helped meet needs. There is growing use of gray-water systems, and a changing philosophy to purify water at the point-of-use in decentralized systems, which has reduced the need to treat large quantities of water to drinking water standards when only a small fraction is taken internally by humans. This has also led to energy savings for water treatment. The principles of sustainability have also driven demands for safe waste disposal and for increased recycling and re-use to make substantial reductions in the waste stream. Advances in nuclear technology have changed the requirements for disposal of highly radioactive nuclear waste. Life-cycle design philosophies have taken hold resulting in nearly zero net waste 15

Life cycle design philosophies have been widely adopted

and great savings in energy consumed for waste disposal. Virtually everything is recycled and re-used. As a result of leadership and collaboration, the gaps between advanced, developing, and underdeveloped nations have been reduced. New global standards for sustainable design, promulgated by non-government organizations (NGOs), have been implemented to meet the global demand for sustainability, overtaking the ability of any one country to maintain its own unique standards. Adoption of these international standards and best practices for sustainability has been facilitated by a growing awareness of liability concerns on a global scale. Increasingly, drivers for individual projects address regional and global issues as well as local issues because of converging environmental outlooks in the global community, and the need for the sustainability and project integrity. One key to stability in the world is better equalizing of the standard of living. Ahead of plan, leadership and collaboration with major stakeholders around the world have closed the gap between advanced, developing, and underdeveloped nations. Innovative approaches have resulted in infrastructure addition, removal, repair, or replacment based on the changed societal requirments. Engineers are recognized as leaders, teachers, and learners in a wide range of environmental and infrastructure topics. Infrastructure financing routinely involves life-cycle costing analysis with public debate as to tradeoffs for different issues. Research and Development Civil engineers provide critical guidance for determining public policy and defining the research agenda. Facing daunting issues following multiple global natural and manmade disasters in the first decade of the 21st century and the seeming lack of data pertaining to design, maintenance, and lessons learned, an international commission was established to define a strategic direction for global investment in research and development. Civil engineers have led the shift from a remedial to preventive approach. The profession has defined a balanced view in driving the research agenda, spearheading intra-disciplinary, crossdisciplinary, and multi-disciplinary collaboration in prioritizing basic research needs on national and global levels. Civil engineers provide critical technical guidance in defining public policy throughout the government and global commissions.

16

Civil engineering has helped define the nanoscience, nanotechnology, and biotechnology research agenda.

At the turn of the century, a major challenge in the area of risk assessment of technological innovation lay in validation of results where the body of knowledge was minimal at best. A protocol established over the last decade, which embraces the practice of conducting clinical trials, has led to breakthrough advances in research for application in the manmade and natural environments. In addition, the methodology calls for greater transparency and sharing of information with the public sector. Civil engineering quickly moved to the forefront to define the research agenda for nanoscience, nanotechnology, and biotechnology applications in the 2025 infrastructure environment. Engineers recognized that nanoscience and nanotech products are the vehicles for major technological innovation across a spectrum of products affecting virtually every industry sector. Civil engineers from across industry, academia, and government worked on the development of instrumentation, metrology, and standards to realize a robust nanomanufacturing capability. This permitted the physical dimensions, properties, and functionality of the materials, processes, tools, systems, and products that constituted nanomanufacturing to be measured and characterized. This in turn enabled production to be controlled, predicted, and scaled to meet market needs.

The profession’s advancements in information technology and data management have improved the design, construction, and maintenance of facilities.

In 2025, the civil engineering enterprise is focused on fasttrack development and deployment of technologies. Steps taken by the profession over the past two decades in the areas of information technology and data management, have significantly improved how facilities are designed, engineered, built, and maintained. Civil engineers and the profession are now within the “tornado of the learning curve” focused on using application to drive technology. That being said, research now shows that technology improvements today may enable applications not yet identified. Civil engineers have reversed the image of being risk averse to new technology, instead relying on and leveraging realtime access to living databases, sensors, diagnostic tools, and other advanced technologies to ensure informed decisions are made. Highly-integrated planning and construction tools, supported by four-dimensional databases, have been enabled by significant research investment in expanded computing capability. Data flows freely and is available at all times, 17

representing current conditions. Latent defects are addressed early in the design, and flowed back into the parent database. Intelligent infrastructure (e.g., embedded sensors, real-time onboard diagnostics) have led to this transformation of rapidly advancing and adapting high-value technologies in the material fixed “pre-preg”9 and design phases. Real-time monitoring, sensing, data acquisition, storage, and modeling, has greatly enhanced prediction time leading to informed decisions. Robotics, emulating the human factors, provide another greater dimension for non-human intervention in high-risk areas of infrastructure. Intelligent sensors have put productivity at an all-time high. Smart chip technologies enhance materials tracking, speed construction, and reduce costs. Wearable computing devices facilitate communication among onsite engineers, workers, and inspectors and provide access to remote documents, and resources across global divides. Managing Risk The effort to manage and mitigate risk is led by civil engineers. The world of 2025 presents a high-risk environment, with the ongoing threat of large-scale natural disasters and possible acts of terrorism. Civil engineers are at the forefront in developing appropriate approaches and designs to managing and mitigating risk, realizing that high reward can come from highrisk solutions. Project-specific risk decisions are made at multiple levels as engineers become leaders of enterprise risk management, with some carrying the title of Chief Risk Officer. Risk is clearly a major driver of innovation, as engineers evaluate what new materials, processes, and designs might be used while weighing the potential for failure—balancing risk versus reward. Engineers reduce risk and, therefore, liability exposure by building living models of major structures that incorporate untried technologies, investigating in a flexible way the long-term performance. To aid the process, governments have instituted faster turn-around times for new regulations, permitting ever accelerating innovation. The application of global, performance-based codes and standards has become widespread in enhancing the world’s infrastructure, and civil engineers have been at the forefront in developing such guidelines. To address heightened threats and threat variability from place to place, the global codes and 18

Civil engineers have been in the forefront in developing and applying global, performancebased codes and standards.

standards have become risk-based, thereby more readily addressing local conditions. Natural and terrorist threats continue to change as world conditions evolve, and developers of codes and standards have become more proficient and proactive in adapting standards accordingly. In addressing the variations of local risk, engineers are also educating society on the limitations of new technology so that educated decisions can be made on adapting the way infrastructure is constructed while also managing expectations. However, such realistic management of expectations has not degraded the standard of care. Multi-national corporations are now major drivers of global environmental standards. Large, multi-national corporations have continued to expand and become major economic forces on a global scale. The total revenues of these corporations exceed the GDP of many nations, and the interrelated nature of their global production and supply network has given them great influence over environmental norms and standards across nations. These multi-national corporations are now major drivers of global environmental standards, and the opportunity for promoting tougher standards in all countries has grown. Economic forces help drive such environmental improvement, but less stringent environmental standards still prevail in some lesser developed countries. Local compliance issues also remain a challenge. Master Innovators and Integrators In the civil engineering profession, project delivery has become an increasingly complex and diverse process. Twentyfive years ago, an owner often hired a design professional to develop a detailed design that was given to a contractor who transformed it into a finished product. The design team of 2025 includes a multitude of participants, many of whom are not in the engineering profession, but in related areas of management, environmental sciences, social sciences, legal, planning, geographic and other disciplines. Likewise, the contractor’s team no longer comprises a few trades, but dozens of trades that are specialized in particular areas coming together in a managed process to complete the constructed project. Civil engineers lead in adapting and integrating new technologies into design and construction. As the master innovators and integrators, civil engineers are the leaders that help develop and implement new technologies to create appropriate competitive advantages. Civil engineers are educated, trained, and well-equipped to be at the forefront of adapting and integrating these new technologies into both the design and construction areas. Civil engineers recognize that a narrowly focused perspective of the construction 19

project is no longer valid. The focus must be multi-faceted, multi-disciplined, and holistic. Civil engineers are also the leaders in developing and implementing appropriate continuing education that encompasses the master builder/integrator concept. The team and integrator attributes are a part of the continuing education curriculum. Many improvements in project management, especially involving virtual teams, are attributed to civil engineers. As master innovators and integrators, the real-time exchange of ideas between engineers and other professionals has facilitated great team work in decentralized work environments. In those locations where cyberspace is still not available, the provision of wireless hand-held, voice-activated devices has kept engineers connected. Projects are now staffed and managed as if the project team were its own company. This has greatly cured the “curse of the matrix” as well as clarified, unambiguosly, the role, responsibilty, and accountability for each team member. Some have reported that the focus on the project outcome, not which discipline was in charge, has led to dramatic changes. The civil engineer, as a master integrator, facilitated this improvement. Reform in the Preparation of Engineers The widely-accepted body of knowledge is now the basis for the formal education and pre-licensure experience of civil engineers. Led by civil engineers, the global engineering profession has implemented broad changes to the academic prerequisites to professional practice. Today, those seeking admission to the professional practice of engineering must demonstrate that they have fulfilled the appropriate body of knowledge through education and experience. The process of change to gain acceptance of the body of knowledge concept took over 20 years, but is now common practice over much of the globe. Civil engineering education and early experience have been reformed. Part of this change was driven by the recognition that academia and industry need to cooperate and partner in the delivery of baccalaureate, post-baccalaureate, and lifelong learning educational activities. Industry has aggressively brought real-world issues into university classrooms and has implemented broad steps to ensure continuing professional development of engineers throughout their careers. The academic-industrial partnership has enabled formal education to keep pace with new technologies and rapidly-changing current practices.

20

Civil engineers are widely recognized as opportunity identifiers and problem solvers.

The sea change in engineering education, both formal and on-the-job, has transformed civil engineering into a “learning profession,” further enhancing its image as a problem-defining and problem-solving profession in the eyes of the public. This enhanced reputation as a learning profession that identifies opportunities and addresses major problems has been cited as a key reason why great numbers of young people are making civil engineering their career of choice. Civil engineering’s outreach to help build capacity in the developing world has “put a human face” on the profession, which in turn has attracted more women, minorities, and people interested in social justice to the ranks of civil engineers. Because of this influx of new faces, the civil engineering profession today mirrors the population it serves. In addition to requiring body of knowledge fulfillment for entry into professional practice, the civil engineering profession has led the way in recognizing specialty certification as a means of demonstrating competency in specialized areas of civil engineering. Over the past 20 years, specialty certification has become widely recognized, both within and outside the profession, as a measure of proficiency in a technical field. As a result of both board certification, and reform in the preparation of civil engineers, the public perception of civil engineers as knowledgeable professionals has steadily improved. Civil engineers have also been at the forefront of curbing corruption in the construction industry worldwide. Engineering ethics is one of the cornerstones and academia and industry have fostered lifelong learning in this key area.

Civil engineering professionals led the way, within engineering, in specialty certification.

21

What Next?
When we build, let it not be for present use alone. Let it be such work as our descendants will thank us for. (John Ruskin, philosopher) The vision presented in this report is intended to inspire the global civil engineering community. The aspirational vision presented in this report represents a beginning—the springboard to launch a sustainable, influential process so that the vision for civil engineering in 2025 can be attained. The Summit’s sole goal was to define this aspirational vision; it was not to create the roadmap on how to achieve it. That map-making begins now—with you. If we are to succeed, we must rally everyone in the engineering community to help move this process forward. Now that the vision has been set, leaders have a benchmark to guide their policies, plans, processes, and progress on a broad and diverse front, within and outside the engineering community. After all, simply publishing the vision for the future will accomplish little. In moving forward, leaders in the civil engineering community should recognize that: • • A variety of partners must be engaged, and opportunities for collaboration and action identified. The international engineering community must also be engaged to maximize the reaches of the vision to the global civil engineering community. The public and policy-makers must be engaged so that the profession serves society to the fullest. The education and training of future civil engineers and the continued development of today’s civil engineers must include and go beyond the required technical competencies.

• •

Forging a long-term action plan to achieve the vision will require input and cooperation from a diverse group of leaders and organizations. Individual leaders within the civil engineering community must build awareness and excitement for achieving the vision. Additionally, civil engineering organizations have to create momentum toward the attainment of the vision within 22

their organizations. Specific opportunities to present the vision for 2025 at board meetings, annual conferences, and the like must be identified and pursued. Organizations need to share knowledge and work together to make measurable progress toward the vision. For example, within the U.S., ASCE, the American Association of Engineering Societies, the American Council of Engineering Companies, and others might collaborate, holding joint workshops or conferences that focus on how to accomplish the vision for the civil engineering profession. Partnering with sister organizations such as the American Institute of Architects, the American Planning Association, and others will also maximize the success in meeting the goals for civil engineering. In addition to technical and professional organizations, client-related organizations must also be engaged. Finally, civil engineers must also obtain input from the public—the primary beneficiaries of civil engineering services. Such efforts among individuals and organizations around the world will be key to the achievement of our vision. Today’s civil engineers will need to transform themselves to meet the challenges of tomorrow. They must stay abreast of changing technologies, market trends, and business developments. Moreover, they must cultivate the new technologies, direct the market, and develop new business practices to lead the transformation into tomorrow. Educating future civil engineers is also an essential component of the vision for the civil engineering profession in 2025. Fulfilling the vision requires an expanded set of knowledge, skills, and attitudes, highlighting the need for curricula reform today to develop that knowledge and those skills and attitudes needed in 2025. Colleges and universities must examine their curricula as they relates to the future civil engineer so advancement toward the vision can be realized. In the U.S., ABET, Inc would be a targeted partner in this area. Civil engineers must commit to meeting milestones in achieving the vision. Several aspects of the vision relate to the civil engineer’s interaction with the public. Civil engineers aim to be—and be perceived as—trusted advisors to the public and policy-makers regarding infrastructure. To accomplish this, civil engineers must show the public how their services daily touch the public and improve lives. In particular, the civil engineering community must begin to seek opportunities to influence more lives in more areas of world with our services. Now is the time to develop workable and economically feasible solutions to the world’s

23

infrastructure needs. The public must be engaged in this continuing process to raise the quality of infrastructure. U.S. civil engineers can be catalysts in sharing the vision with the global civil engineering community. The surest path to success is the integration of knowledge from civil engineers within a broad range of economies, cultures and circumstances. Conferences conducted by international engineering groups, such as the World Federation of Engineering Organizations, are excellent vehicles for obtaining concurrence and determining a direction for the international civil engineering profession of 2025. Collective, long-term actions to help achieve the vision might include: A more robust educational path for civil engineers that prepares them for leadership and provides the multifaceted non-technical skills to serve on projects affecting the public good. A more clearly defined organizational structure for the engineering team, where the licensed civil engineer takes on the role of master program/project integrator. More civil engineers involved in public policy forums where future directions for society are developed and where civil engineers can gain the public’s trust. More civil engineers elected to public office where they can directly influence infrastructure and sustainability policy and legislation. A greater level of collaboration and communication among civil engineers and those non-engineer stakeholders, seeking to balance a sustainable environment with needed infrastructure. Increased research and development to mitigate the effects of natural disasters, with civil engineers playing a leading role in devising and implementing the innovations. Greater education and training of engineers in ethics and a greater emphasis on ethics in global engineering practice, allowing engineers to serve as role models. We hope that through these first sketches of possible action, you, the reader, will begin to contemplate how you, your organizations, and your countries can begin planning and implementing the next steps to making this vision a reality. This will be no small task. However, a united civil engineering 24

community can start the hard work that will ultimately fulfill that promise.

25

Acknowledgements
ASCE gratefully acknowledges the supporters of the Summit on the Future of Civil Engineering without whom this gathering would not have been possible. They are: ASCE gratefully acknowledges the support of many individuals and organizations that made the summit possible. • • • • • • • • • • • • Stephen D. Bechtel, Jr. AECOM ASCE Foundation B & E Jackson & Associates The Charles Pankow Foundation CH2M HILL DuPont Fluor Corporation Judith Nitsch Engineering, Inc. The Port Authority of New York/New Jersey University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana Whitney, Bailey, Cox & Magnani, LLC

Similarly, the efforts of Co-Chairs Stephen D. Bechtel, Jr., Ph.D., Hon.M.ASCE, Chairman Emeritus of the Bechtel Corporation and Patricia Galloway, Ph.D., PE, F.ASCE, PastPresident of ASCE, CEO, The Nielsen-Wurster Group, Inc. are appreciated.

26