Free Essay

Company Law

In:

Submitted By zhymzhangyi123
Words 3692
Pages 15
1. Assessment Exemplar

Assessment Tasks

The table below summarises how each assessment exemplar task relates to coverage of the Outcomes detailed in the Unit specification. It also indicates the evidence, which should be retained for external moderation.

|Outcome |Suggested task |Suggested evidence to be retained |
|. | | |
|1. |Each candidate should write a report that|A written report that can be used by Charles Prospect to|
| |can be used by Charles Prospect to |give the required presentation to the client |
| |deliver his presentation to Bean & Co. |It should clearly describe the personality of a company |
| |The report will be assessed for the |separate from its owners and board |
| |demonstrated knowledge of the legal |It should also describe the process by which a company |
| |formation of a company, forms of |can be formed and registered |
| |corporate body and procedures for company|The different forms of corporate body that can be formed|
| |formation. Case Study 1 provides |should be clearly described |
| |background information for this. | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |Candidates should give written answers to|Answers should provide clear understanding of how a |
| |the three questions on company finance. |company’s financial arrangements can be understood |
|2. | |Shares |
| | |Raising finance |
| | |Restrictions and rules on a company when raising finance|
| | | |
| | | |
| | |Answers should include the roles of directors and the |
| | |company secretary |
| |Candidates should give written answers to|The activities associated with company meetings should |
| |the four questions on the management and |be effectively covered, (AGMs and EGMs) |
| |administration of a company. |The various types of resolutions should be defined |
|3. | | |
| | | |
| | |A written report covering insolvency should provide an |
| | |overview on voluntary and compulsory liquidation, |
| | |administration |
| |Candidates should demonstrate their |It should also describe the role of a liquidator |
| |knowledge of insolvency as a follow up | |
| |presentation for the repot based on the | |
| |case study for outcome 1 Case Study | |
|4. | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |

Conditions of Assessment

Outcome 1

Outcome 1 requires that a report of 800-1000 words be written under open-book conditions. (Around two hours should be allowed by candidates to write the report).

Time may be allocated for research, at the discretion of the Centre.

The report is based on a case study that should be shown to the candidates in advance.

To achieve this Outcome, candidates should achieve 70% of available marks.

Outcomes 2 & 3

Each of these Outcomes requires the candidate to answer a number of questions.

In Outcome 2 there are 3 questions. The questions aim to provide information to expand the scenario set in the case study and answers from Outcome 1. Each question carries equal marks. Answers will be extended responses. The assessment will be conducted as a single closed book examination which should take approximately 2 hours to complete.

In Outcome 3 there are 4 questions. The questions aim to provide information to expand the scenario set in the case study and answer to Outcome 1 and the answers to Outcome 2. Each question carries equal marks. Answers will be extended responses. The assessment will be conducted as a single closed book examination which should take approximately 2 hours to complete.

Each answer should be completed with a minimum of 150 words and a maximum of 200 words.

Candidates should be allowed two hours to complete these questions under closed-book conditions. Re-assessment is at the discretion of the Centre.

To achieve these Outcomes, candidates should achieve 70% of available marks.

Outcome 4

Requires that a report of 800-1000 words be written under open book conditions (around two hours should be allowed to write the report). The report for this outcome is the second of the two reports requested

Time may be allocated for research, at the discretion of the Centre.

Report should be completed in a minimum of 800 words and maximum of 1000 words.

To achieve this Outcome, candidates should achieve 70% of available marks.

| | |
|Assessment Task |2 |

| | |
|Outcome(s) Covered |2 |

Assessment Task Instructions

Outcome 2

You are required to demonstrate your knowledge of the capital and finance of a company.

Time allowed two hours. To be written under closed book controlled conditions.

Answer the following three questions:

1. Explain what shares are, and how ordinary shares differ from preference shares. Your answer should also include information on how and where they may be purchased.

2. Explain the various ways that a company can take out loans to raise capital. Pay particular attention to explaining how Debentures and Company Charges differ.

Your answer should clarify what the differences between secured and unsecured loans are.

3. Where may the rules that govern a company’s borrowing powers be found? Give an overview on the limitations that may be placed on the boards’ ability to raise capital.

Each answer should be completed with a minimum of 150 words and a maximum of 200 words.

To achieve this Outcome, candidates should attain 70% of the available marks.

| | |
|Assessment Task |3 |

| | |
|Outcome(s) Covered |3 |

Assessment Task Instructions

Outcome 3

You are required to demonstrate your knowledge of the management and administration of a company.

Time allowed two hours. To be written under closed-book controlled conditions.

Answer the following four questions.

1. Provide an outline of the duties of a director. Include in your answer details on how they are appointed, how their role as directors can be terminated and what their duties and powers entail.

2. Outline the qualifications necessary for a company secretary in a public company. Include in this how they are appointed and what their duties are. How does this compare for the company secretary of a private company?

3. Outline the purpose of AGMs and EGMs. How often are they held and what is their purpose?

4. Define the difference between a motion and a resolution during the procedure at a company meeting and explain the differences between ordinary, extraordinary and special resolutions.

Each answer should be completed with a minimum of 100 words and a maximum of 150 words.

To achieve this Outcome, candidates should attain 70% of the available marks.

| | |
|Assessment Task |4 |

| | |
|Outcome(s) Covered |4 |

Assessment Task Instructions

Outcome 4

You are required to demonstrate your knowledge of the ways in which insolvency may be dealt with.

To be written and generated under open-book conditions.

Following the presentation given by your boss using your report from Outcome 1, the client has asked your boss to provide answers to how a company that is insolvent may be dealt with.

Your boss asked you to produce this in the information (Case Study) and specifically requires you to define what constitutes insolvency in a company and how they will be dealt with. Pay particular attention to your explanation of Liquidation, (voluntary and compulsory), and Administration.

The report should be completed in a minimum of 800 words and maximum of 1000 words.

To achieve this Outcome, candidates should attain 70% of the available marks.

| | |
|Assessment Task |2 |
| | |
|Outcome(s) Covered |2 |

Suggested Solution and Making an Assessment Decision

1 The share is the interest of the shareholder in the company measured by a sum of money, for the purpose of liability in the first place, and of interest in the second, but also consisting of a series of mutual covenants entered into by all the shareholders.

(s14 Companies Act 1985)

The main features of a share are:

• right to dividends declared on the shares • generally, right to vote at general meetings • on liquidation, right to receive assets dependent on class of shares • obligation to subscribe capital to nominal value of share • right to transfer (in accordance with articles of association)

Ordinary shares are governed by rules (above). Usually companies will only have this class of share, which is the equity of the company.

Preference shares give the holder entitlement to a preferential dividend. They may also give other rights such as preferential voting rights or repayment of capital in priority to other shares, or winding up.

Shares can be purchased through a bank or stockbroker. Increasingly, people buy shares online. (Shares in a private company can be bought via company secretary.

2 A company can raise money. On occasions, the managing director may have ability/authority to raise money for the company but, more usually, the board of directors authorise money issues. A company can take a loan and issues shares. Debentures (sometimes likened to a company mortgage) can be issued to raise loan capital.

Debentures and shares have similarities. They are both collectively termed securities and dealings on the Stock Exchange are carried out in the same way. However, a debenture holder is a creditor of the company (shareholder is a member).

A company can purchase its own debentures and issue them at a discount. Loans can be fixed – security for the loan fixed to a company asset, or floating.

3 The Articles of Association should be referred to when researching the rules governing a company’s borrowing power. Finance raising issues will be an item for a Company General meeting.

It is up to lenders to investigate, whether or not directors have the power to borrow. If directors are acting outwith their authority they will be said to be acting ‘ultra vires’ (ie outwith their powers). A loan made in this situation may not be recoverable.

| | |
|Assessment Task |3 |
| | |
|Outcome(s) Covered |3 |

Suggested Solution and Making an Assessment Decision

1) In company law, directors owe their duties to the providers of capital, ie shareholders. This is a traditional view with Section 309 of the Companies Act 1985 providing that:

• The matters to which the directors of a company are to have regard in the performance of their functions include the interests of the company’s employees in general as well as the interests of its members. • Accordingly, the duty imposed by this section on the directors of a company is owed by them to the company (and the company alone) and is enforceable in the same way as any other fiduciary duty owed to a company by its directors.

Directors have two main types of duty:

a) Professional – the Articles of Association requires that two directors are named. They are appointed by the voting rights of shareholders. They can be removed from the board of directors by an ordinary resolution in a general meeting. (This power to shareholders is usually subject to restrictions eg weighted voting provision and quorum provisions.)

Directors may also leave the company at the normal end of a contract, retirement, resignation and disqualification.

b) Fiduciary – the need for trust and acting in the best interests of the company.

2) Company Secretaries are the chief administrative officers of the company. A company secretary is appointed by those who form the company and details of the appointment must be submitted to the Registrar of Companies.

Duties include:

• preparation and keeping of minutes of board and general meetings • dealing with share transfers and issuing share and debenture certificates • payment of dividends • sending notices of meetings, copies of accounts etc • preparation of annual returns • preparation of returns required by government and other official bodies

There are no mandatory qualifications for a company secretary in a private company. There is a mandatory requirement in a public company. According to s286 of the Companies Act 1985 directors of public companies must take all reasonable steps to ensure that the secretary or each joint secretary of the company is a person with the requisite knowledge and experience and who:

• was a company secretary before • member of prescribed professional body • qualified in UK as a barrister or advocate • by virtue of another position held appears to be capable of discharging the functions of the secretary

3) In the AGM business would normally include election/retirement of directors, presentation of accounts, declaration of dividends, shareholders questions, pay and benefits for directors. The AGM is held annually. Failure to have an AGM may lead to lapse of directors appointments.

An EGM can be called by directors, members request, two or more members holding 10% of share capital, a court, resigning auditors or a public company where there is serious loss of capital. Most companies will try to avoid having an EGM, the preferred option being to let the business wait until the next AGM.

4) A motion is an issue. Decisions have to be made regarding a motion and, once made, become a resolution. Extraordinary resolutions are passed by a majority of at least 75% of those voting at and EGM. Notice of intention must have been given 14 days before meeting.

A special resolution is one passed by a majority of at least 75% of those voting and passed at a general meeting of which notice, of 21 days, has been given specifying the intention to propose the resolution. An ordinary resolution is not defined by an Act. It is simply one passed by a majority of these voting

| | |
|Assessment Task |4 |
| | |
|Outcome(s) Covered |4 |

Suggested Solution and Making an Assessment Decision

There are two types of ‘winding up’.

Compulsory winding up (Section 122(1) of the Insolvency Act 1986 sets out the grounds of compulsory winding up).

They include: • company has by special resolution resolved that the company would be wound up by the court • company is a public company which has registered but has not received a certificate to do business after one year (s 117 of the Companies Act) • members are reduced below two • company unable to pay debts

Voluntary liquidation starts in the following ways: • company resolves to be wound-up by special resolution • company resolves by extraordinary resolution to be wound-up on the basis that it cannot by reason of its liabilities continue in business • a fixed period has been settled for the duration of the company and the fixed period has now passed

Notice of any resolution is published, in appropriate newspaper, within 14 days (s85 (1) of the Insolvency Act 1986).

In a voluntary wind-up, the winding up commences on the date that the resolution is passed. A proposal for a voluntary arrangement may be made by a company’s directors, liquidator or administrator. Since 1985 it has been possible for the court on the application of a company, its directors or creditors to make an administration order in respect of a company where the company is unable to pay its debts. There then follows a period when no enforcement proceedings can be brought against the company and no hire purchase or leasing contract or reservation of title provision can be enforced against it.

At the end of administration, the company may be restored to full health, or there will be a good inventory of assets – this might not have happened on a winding-up or voluntary arrangement.

In short: In a liquidation situation a liquidator, who is specially qualified, takes power from directors and takes over the running of the company to convert assets into cash. There is a priority list when paying off company debts.

Administration is a process whereby an attempt is made to save the company by appointing an administrator. The court can appoint an administrator if a request is made by the directors, a creditor or the company itself.

|Unit Assessment: Candidate’s Assessment Record |
| |
|DE5H 35: Company Law: An Introduction |
| |
|Class | |Group | |
|Candidate Name | |Candidate ID | |
|Outcome 2 |
|Evidence Requirements |Record of Performance |
| |Satisfactory/ |Comments |
| |Unsatisfactory | |
|Assessment Task 2 | | |
|Question 1 | | |
|Define a share; asset in the company capital, share of profit or loss | | |
|(dividend), right to influence company with a vote. | | |
| Ordinary shares; all shares are ordinary unless defined otherwise, they share | | |
|profits equally, (win or lose), can attend meetings and vote on company matters| | |
|Preference shares; attract preferential treatment, fixed rate dividend, receive| | |
|their dividends first before ordinary shareholders. If company makes loss | | |
|payment of preference shares is a debt. | | |
|Shares in public company purchased on stock market. | | |
|Shares in private company purchased via company secretary. | | |
|Question 2 | | |
|COMPANY CAN RAISE MONEY BUT USUALLY NEEDS AUTHORITY OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS, | | |
|SOMETIMES MANAGING DIRECTOR HAS AUTHORITY TO BORROW ON HIS/HER OWN, NOT USUALLY| | |
|A SINGLE DIRECTOR. | | |
|DEBENTURES ARE LIKE A COMPANY MORTGAGE, LISTED WITH COMPANY REGISTER, BOUGHT | | |
|AND SOLD ON STOCK MARKET, CAN BUY INTO SHARE OR DEBENTURES ON STOCK MARKET, | | |
|HOLDERS ARE THEN CREDITORS OF COMPANY, INTEREST MUST BE PAID EVEN IF NO PROFIT.| | |
|COMPANY CHARGES (SECURITIES IN SCOTLAND), LIKE STRAIGHT FORWARD LOANS, | | |
|REGISTERED AT COMPANIES HOUSE | | |
|Fixed; where security for the loan is attached to a particular asset, lender | | |
|can claim this asset if the company defaults, company cannot use or deal with | | |
|asset without permission of lender. | | |
|Floating; is not attached to property unless invoked, no need for lenders | | |
|permission to use or deal with assets, used for ‘liquid’ assets. | | |
|Secured / unsecured loans; preferential rates of interest can sometimes be | | |
|obtained if a company asset is used as collateral against the loan. Defaulting | | |
|on the loan means the lender can sell the asset to pay off the debt. If an | | |
|asset is used the loan is ‘secured’ against it. Unsecured loans are not | | |
|protected this way. | | |
|Question 3 | | |
|The rules that govern how the company can raise finance can be found in the | | |
|Articles of association. | | |
|In addition, other powers to raise finance can be agreed at Company General | | |
|Meeting. | | |
|Lenders must ensure that the directors have the power to borrow otherwise the | | |
|loan may not be recoverable. | | |
|If directors act outwith their power and it is not recoverable, it becomes | | |
|known as ‘ultra vires’ | | |
|(Enter S or U in the box to indicate whether performance in the relevant aspect of the assessment is satisfactory or unsatisfactory. |
|The comment column can be used to highlight any re-assessment that may be needed.) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|Assessor’s signature: |Date: |

|Unit Assessment: Candidate’s Assessment Record |
| |
|DE5H 35: Company Law: An Introduction |
| |
|Class | |Group | |
|Candidate Name | |Candidate ID | |
|Outcome 3 |
|Evidence Requirements |Record of Performance |
| |Satisfactory/ |Comments |
| |Unsatisfactory | |
|Assessment Task 3 | | |
|Question 1 | | |
|Directors’ duties are of two types, fiduciary and professional | | |
|Fiduciary; underlines the position of trust and need to act in best interests | | |
|of company | | |
|Professional; must use care and skill and not act negligently in the duties of | | |
|a director | | |
|When company starts at least two directors will be named in the Articles of | | |
|Association | | |
|Thereafter, normal method of appointment for directors is by the voting rights | | |
|of the shareholders | | |
|The Companies Act 1985 contains details on how a director may be removed from | | |
|their position by voting | | |
|Other reasons for termination of a director’s contract include; normal end of | | |
|contract, retirement, resignation on their own part, disqualification. | | |
|Question 2 | | |
|Qualifications for Company Secy in a Public company include; previous | | |
|experience as a company secretary (three out of last five years), | | |
|lawyer/solicitor/advocate, member of specific professional institution, can | | |
|prove equivalent level of expertise | | |
|The company secretary is an employee of the company but can also be a director | | |
|(not allowed to be the only one) | | |
|The company secretary in a private company does not need to be qualified in | | |
|this way. | | |
|Question 3 | | |
|AGMS NORMALLY INCLUDE IN THEIR AGENDA; ELECTION/RETIREMENT OF DIRECTORS, | | |
|DECLARATION OF DIVIDENDS, PRESENTATION OF THE ACCOUNTS, SHAREHOLDERS ABILITY TO| | |
|QUESTION DIRECTORS, REPORT OF PAY AND BENEFITS TO DIRECTORS AND REQUEST FOR | | |
|SHAREHOLDERS APPROVAL | | |
|AGMs are normally held annually | | |
|EGMs are extraordinary meetings that can be convened by the directors if they | | |
|wish to discuss certain issues that can’t wait till the next AGM. Shareholders | | |
|who hold one-tenth or more votes can force the directors to hold an EGM | | |
|Question 4 | | |
|MOTIONS ARE THE ISSUES ON WHICH DECISIONS HAVE TO BE MADE. ONCE PASSED THEY | | |
|BECOME RESOLUTIONS. | | |
|Ordinary resolutions require 50% of the vote (most common resolution) | | |
|Extraordinary resolutions require 75% of the vote | | |
|Special resolutions also require 75% but 21 days notice of the resolution must | | |
|be given | | |
|(Enter S or U in the box to indicate whether performance in the relevant aspect of the assessment is satisfactory or unsatisfactory. |
|The comment column can be used to highlight any re-assessment that may be needed.) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|Assessor’s signature: |Date: |

|Unit Assessment: Candidate’s Assessment Record |
| |
|DH1E 04: Company Law: An Introduction |
| |
|Class | |Group | |
|Candidate Name | |Candidate ID | |
|Outcome 4 |
|Evidence Requirements |Record of Performance |
| |Satisfactory/ |Comments |
| |Unsatisfactory | |
|Assessment Task 4 | | |
|The report should outline the following areas and underline that: | | |
|Insolvency of a company is established when it cannot meet its debts and | | |
|liabilities because it has insufficient assets. | | |
|There are three main courses of action: Voluntary liquidation, Compulsory | | |
|liquidation, Administration | | |
|Voluntary: Ref Companies Act 1985 company can resolve that it cannot continue, | | |
|must pass a resolution, co secy posts notice in London Gazette | | |
|Compulsory: a court order forces company to wind up. Reasons given can be found| | |
|in the Insolvency Act 1986, include that the company has asked for this, it is | | |
|a public company and has not been issued with a trading certificate after 12 | | |
|months, has not started trading after 12 months of receiving certificate, | | |
|membership fallen below two, company unable to pay debts | | |
|Administration: is a process whereby an administrator is appointed to try and | | |
|save the company. They can be appointed by the court when asked by the | | |
|directors, a creditor or by the company itself | | |
|A liquidator who is specially qualified takes power from the directors and the | | |
|running of the company to convert the assets into cash. The liquidator then | | |
|pays the debts off using a defined set of priorities. | | |
|(Enter S or U in the box to indicate whether performance in the relevant aspect of the assessment is satisfactory or unsatisfactory. |
|The comment column can be used to highlight any re-assessment that may be needed.) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|Assessor’s signature: |Date: |

| |
|Unit Assessment: Class Checklist |
| |
|DE5H 35: Company Law: An Introduction |
| |
|Class | |Group | |
| |
| |Candidate |Candidate |Candidate |Outcomes |Overall Achievement* |
| |Surname |Forename |ID |1, 2, 3 and 4 | |
|1 | | | | |P F |
|2 | | | | |P F |
|3 | | | | |P F |
|4 | | | | |P F |
|5 | | | | |P F |
|6 | | | | |P F |
|7 | | | | |P F |
|8 | | | | |P F |
|9 | | | | |P F |
|10 | | | | |P F |
|11 | | | | |P F |
|12 | | | | |P F |
|13 | | | | |P F |
|14 | | | | |P F |
|15 | | | | |P F |
|16 | | | | |P F |
|17 | | | | |P F |
|18 | | | | |P F |
|19 | | | | |P F |
|20 | | | | |P F |
|21 | | | | |P F |
|22 | | | | |P F |
|23 | | | | |P F |
|24 | | | | |P F |
|25 | | | | |P F |

* Mark as appropriate

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Company Law

...INTRODUCTION Company law has now put on a broad scope as a result of global economic and technological advancement in this era thus touching on a number of disciplines. Issues pertaining to the company and its administration has been clearly spelled out in the Companies Act 1963 (Act 179) of Ghana. Company law (or the law of business associations) is the field of law concerning companies and other business organizations. This includes corporations, partnerships and other associations which usually carry on some form of economic or charitable activity. The most prominent kind of company, usually referred to as a "corporation", is a "juristic person", i.e. it has separate legal personality, and those who invest money into the business have limited liability for any losses the company makes, governed by corporate law. The largest companies are usually publicly listed on stock exchanges around the world. Even single individuals, also known as sole traders may incorporate themselves and limit their liability in order to carry on a business. All different forms of companies depend on the particular law of the particular country in which they reside. MEMBERS MEETINGS AND RESOLUTIONS Members of a company are, according to section 30 of the Companies Act are; (1) The subscribers to the Regulations shall be deemed to be members of the company and on its registration shall be entered as members in the register of members referred to in section 32 of this Code (Section 30 (1)). ...

Words: 1080 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Company Law

...Discuss the procedure to incorporate a public company in Malaysia. The law relating to incorporation of a company in Malaysia is governed by the Malaysian Companies Act, 1965. As per the act any company doing business or wishing to do business in Malaysia must register with the Companies Commission of Malaysia (CCM) under the Companies Act 1965. To incorporate a company, a person must apply the application of search name. A name search must be conducted to determine whether the proposed name of the company is available. Refer to Government Gazette No. 716 dated 30 January 1997, Gazette (Amendment) dated 11 October 2001, Guidelines For Naming A Company and Guidelines For Application Of A Company Name. The steps involved are completion and submission of Form 13A CA (Request For Availability Of Name) to SSM and Payment of a RM30.00 fee for each name applied. Where the proposed company’s name is approved by SSM, it shall be reserved for three months from the date of approval. A person must lodgment of incorporation documents. Incorporation Documents must be submitted to SSM within 3 months from the date of approval of the company’s name by SSM, failure of which a fresh application for a name search must be done. An original of the Memorandum and Article of association shall each be stamped at RM100.00. Stamps are affixed at the Inland Revenue Board’s stamp office. The first directors and secretaries shall be named in the Memorandum and...

Words: 599 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Company Law Issues

...(a) Facts: Due to the global financial crisis, the business of Bling Bling Pty Ltd has declined and the company is in the process of insolvent and under the care of a liquidator. The liquidator has rejected Sue’s claim to the securities, which includes a substantial block of shares that were fully paid, and debentures for further substantial sum secured by charge over all company’s assets. Issue: Whether Sue can enforce her charge [security interest] against Bling Bling Pty Ltd ? Relevant case: 
Under corporate law, there is a rule of separate legal entity explained in the case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd. Once a company is incorporated, there will be a distinction between private and company’s debts and assets, a company can contract with its members and a company can be liable in tort to a member. As seen in the final decision in the famous case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd, “…once the company is legally incorporated it must be treated like any other independent person with rights and liabilities appropriate to itself…” Application: In this case, because of there is no fraud so the company is a separate legal entity. The debenture given by the company is valid, thus, Ms. Sue should succeed in her claim against the company in her capacity as a secured creditor with priority payment for company’s debt owed to her. (b) Fact: Ms. Sue sold her company and took out an insurance policy in her name to cover the goods against fire and theft. After burglars broke...

Words: 1530 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Company Law

...Questions B.Com. (III) Company Law Session 2012-13 (Short Answer Type Questions) (i) What do you mean by ‘Lifting of Corporate veil’? (ii) What is the difference between a Private company and Public company? (iii) Explain the procedure for converting a Private Ltd. company into a Public Ltd. company. (iv)Distinguish between transfer and transmission of shares. (v) What do you mean by the term ‘Charge’? (vi) Define Minutes. (vii) Explain the statutory provisions relating to quorum for different kinds of company meetings. (Long Answer Type Questions) Unit-I 1. Define the term ‘Company’. What are its characteristics? 2. Who is a Promoter? Discuss his legal position in relation to a company which he promotes. Also discuss the rights and liabilities of promoters. 3. What is Memorandum of Assoiation ? Set out various clauses which must be incorporated in the company’s memorandum. Also discuss the procedure for changing the object clause. 4. What is Prospectus? What are its contents? Also discuss the consequences of mis-statement in prospectus. Unit-II 5. What is a Share? Describe the various types of shares that can be issued by a company. 6. Define a Member. How can membership be acquired? Discuss the rights and liabilities of a member. 7. How are the Shares in a company transferred? Can the board of directors refuse to register transfer of shares? Whar is the remedy open to the transferee in such a case? 8. The Companies Act has prescribed limitation...

Words: 381 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Company Law

...corporate governance practice as well as other perspectives of corporate governance. We also hope to introduce to students some of the more pertinent issues and trends in this field. As part of our ‘E-learning week’, there will be online lectures for students to view. Students will also be expected to do some independent study and research into the topic, which will form the base for the mid-term written assignment. At the end of the e-learning sessions, students should have a working understanding of: • What is meant by ‘corporate governance’; • Key milestones in the development of corporate governance in Singapore; • The regulatory framework for corporate governance in Singapore; • The interaction between Company Law and corporate governance; • Key regulatory mechanisms for Corporate Governance in Singapore; and • The provisions and operation of the Singapore Code of Corporate Governance 2012 Readings Many articles have been posted to help you along with writing the essay but you are required to be discerning and make your own selection of which articles to read. You may also do your own research to supplement the articles. Matters for study and independent research / discussion 1. What do you understand by the term ‘Corporate Governance’ and what are its...

Words: 398 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Company Law

...in Public Law: Challenges and Perspectives, Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 13th to 14 December 2011, Shah Alam, Malaysia. ABSTRACT In Newton v Birmingham Small Arms Co (1906), the English court made it clear that the rights of auditors cannot be abridged nor restricted by any regulations of the company. This is to ensure that the auditors’ rights are secured. The rights are unqualified and this will enable auditors to discharge their role and duties effectively. Additionally, the Companies Act 1965 (CA) gives substantive powers to enable auditors to carry out their duties effectively. This is because if their hands are tied, they will not be able to uncover any wrongdoings by the company’s management. In fact, any one who obstructs their duties, is in breach of the CA. Auditors have a right of access at all reasonable times to the accounting records and other records, including registers of the company. Moreover, the CA provides that auditors enjoy qualified privilege in certain circumstances. Thus, this study investigates imperative issues on the office of auditors concerning rights, powers and privilege. This is to strengthen the role and duties of auditors to bring about a more meaningful existence of auditors. In doing so, this study will explore the necessary reforms that should be made on the issues concerning the office of auditors. Auditors’ office and powers should not be taken lightly. Nevertheless, the provisions in ‘the Companies Act’, Banking...

Words: 5159 - Pages: 21

Premium Essay

Company Law

...MEANING, CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPES OF A COMPANY STRUCTURE 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.0 Objective Introduction Meaning of Company Characteristics of a Company Distinction between Company and Partnership Types of Company Summary Keywords Self Assessment Questions Suggested Readings OBJECTIVE After reading this lesson, you should be able to: (a) (b) (c) 1.1 Define a company and explain its features. Make a distribution between company and partnership firm. Explain the various types of companies. INTRODUCTION Industrial has revolution led to the emergence of large scale business organizations. These organization require big investments and the risk involved is very high. Limited resources and unlimited liability of partners are two important limitations of partnerships of partnerships in undertaking big business. Joint Stock Company form of business organization has become extremely popular as it provides a solution to (1) overcome the limitations of partnership business. The Multinational companies like Coca-Cola and, General Motors have their investors and customers spread throughout the world. The giant Indian Companies may include the names like Reliance, Talco Bajaj Auto, Infosys Technologies, Hindustan Lever Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., and Larsen and Tubro etc. 1.2 MEANING OF COMPANY Section 3 (1) (i) of the Companies Act, 1956 defines a company as “a company formed and registered under this Act or an existing company”. Section 3(1) (ii) Of the act states...

Words: 114302 - Pages: 458

Premium Essay

Company Law

...person; and ❖ the sole purpose of the company was to obtain the benefit of limited liability. Macaura v Northern Assurance: Where a member transfers property to his company, he loses any proprietary interest in the property. [A company owns property distinct from the property of its members.] LIFTING the corporate veil Incorporation for a fraudulent/improper purpose ❖ Gilford Motor v Horne: If the company was formed for the primary purpose of avoiding existing contractual obligations, the corporate veil is lifted. ➢ *H resigned from his position as managing director of GM. ➢ *H started a business under his name which competed with GM. ➢ *H discovered that the former service agreement provided that he would not, at any time, solicit customers of GM. ➢ *A company was incorporated in the name of H’s wife, which then conducted the business. ➢ *Although H was not a shareholder of the company, he conducted its affairs. ➢ *The company sent circulars to GM’s customers, seeking their business. ➢ The company was formed for the purpose of avoiding existing contractual obligations ( it was a “mere cloak or sham” used as a device ( corporate veil was lifted. Agency relationship of holding company & subsidiary ❖ Adams v Cape Industries: Subsidiary companies will be treated as separate legal entities. ➢ *C, holding company, set up subsidiaries in US specifically to evade US product liability laws. ➢ Holding company was not present in the US even though...

Words: 752 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Company Law

...partner, so Mr. Salomon business into a limited company. Then according to the company law, set up a company to be at least 7 shareholders holding at further 1 share each. So, Mr. Salomon gave himself a shares, also gave him a share of his wife and five children. Mr. Salomon company 20007 shares, but he holds 20001 shares, and his family members each have a share. With the passage of time, Mr. Salomon's company faces the difficulty. In order to raise funds, and also the company, Mr. Salomon sold its own debt to Benedick. To raise the money but can't let company to prevent more problems, because the money is used for business. Creditors discovered the money just can be used to repay the debt creditors holding it, it's considered a secured creditor. This event will be brought to the court or the Supreme Court. They all think that creditors cannot recover their entire debt contract with the company, so not with Mr. Salomon. After a series of the appeals, it is considered by Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd is a company, with separate legal personality qualification, so also can’t say Mr. Salomon owned by the company. The company and Mr. Salomon have two legal persons in the law. So it is has the right to enter into a contract. The principle in Salomon are a company must be an independent legal person, but from other members or shareholders. The principle of Salomon must also know the veil of incorporation of the company. If a company will formally merge, courts usually don’t see the...

Words: 1005 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Company Law

...Umunna represent the law in Singapore? To determine whether the decision in Island Export Finance Ltd (IEF Ltd) v Umunna represent the law in Singapore, the application of the common and statutory law will be used. Upon applying the right principles, the decision will represent Singapore law. Resignation to take up a corporate opportunity Singapore law states that the court held a director breached of his duty by taking up the opportunity if he resigns from a company to take up a corporate opportunity without the company’s permission where (i) the resignation was prompted or influenced by a desire to acquire the opportunity sought by the company or (ii) it was the director’s position with the company rather than a new initiative that led the director to the opportunity which the director later acquired. Intention for resignation A director will be held in breach of duty if his main intention of resignation is to take up the opportunity. Based on the facts, Umunna resigned due to his dissatisfaction with IEF. Hence, U was held not in breach of his fiduciary duty. This aligned with Singapore law as seen from Personal Automation Mart [PAM] v Tan Swe Sang where Tan resigns to take advantage of the contract sought by PAM and the court held that Tan had breached her fiduciary duties. Definition of corporate opportunity and source of information Singapore law defines a corporate opportunity as a business opportunity which the company is considering or...

Words: 1718 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Company Law

...Law: For companies registered after 1 July 1998, there are two choices; do not register a corporate constitution and allow the replaceable rules to automatically apply; or create a specific corporate constitution which will automatically displace the replaceable rules in their entirety or in part (if so stated expressly) . If both the contract and constitution are dependent on each other, then even if the constitution is amended so as to permit dismissal of the director, he can still claim damages arising out of breach of the contract this is evident in the case Carrier Australasia Ltd v Hunt (1939) 61 CLR 534. Hunt sued Carrier for wrongful dismissal and the Supreme Court held that although the company had power to alter its articles it was liable for damages for breach of contract. The constitution does not create a legal relationship between the company and outsiders, and therefore cannot be enforced by an outsider against the company, evidence of this is shown in Eley v Positive Government Security Life Assurance Co (1875) 1 Ex D 20. The corporate constitution could only be enforced by a member if it affected their member status. As the constitution status as company solicitor did not affect him as a member of the company, he could not take action to enforce the constitution to allow him to continue as the company solicitor. Application: Even though a special resolution conforming to all the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 was passed by shareholders removing...

Words: 440 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Company Law

...1. Easy Groceries Pty Ltd: the Company Issue The issue here is Easy Groceries Pty Ltd is liable for the debts incurred as a separate legal entity to its directors and shareholders? Or will its directors be personally liable for its debts? Law Upon incorporation, a company becomes a separate legal entity from its directors and members (s119). It can sue and be sued, acquire assets and debts, and enter into contracts in its own name. Its existence can lasts a lifetime as well. The Doctrine of Separate Legal Entity also known as “corporate veil” entails that the Directors of a Company have no personal liability while its Shareholders are only liable up to the amount they paid for their shares. In Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd Case, Mr. Salomon was the majority shareholder and a secured creditor of the company. Upon winding up, the liquidators argued that Mr. Salomon must not be considered as a secured creditor since he was in control of the company itself. But the Court’s decision recognized Mr. Salomon as a secured creditor since the company has a separate legal personality from the directors and shareholder upon its registration and it has nothing to do with Mr. Salomon being a secured creditor. Application Applying s119 corporations act, Easy Groceries Pty Ltd is a separate legal entity from its directors and shareholders, meaning that Easy Groceries Pty Ltd as a company itself is liable for the debts that occurred. Conclusion As an own legal entity...

Words: 2658 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Company Law

...‘Directors duties occupy a strange position in company law. They must be sufficiently strong so as to keep directors in line but sufficiently weak to allow directors to take risks. It is no wonder the courts can’t enforce them properly.’ Do you agree with the above statement? By any measure the 2006 Act is a momentous and monumental piece of legislation. The largest statute ever enacted by the Westminster Parliament, it has engineered the modernisation, consolidation and codification of the vast panoply of UK company law. The Act subsumed the compendious 1985 Companies Act, and the Companies Act 1989.The modernisation of UK company law necessitated reform, redrafting and reorganisation in many fields. The law relating to directors’ duties received particular attention. Indeed, it is submitted that the reforms made in the context of the law on directors’ duties constitute some of the most important and valuable innovations incorporated in the new Act. Under s.171 CA 2006 a director must act in accordance with the company’s constitution and only exercise powers for the purposes for which they are conferred. This was formerly known in the case law as the proper purpose rule. In the case of Hogg v Cramphorn Ltd the principle found was that it was not enough that the directors issued the shares in the honest belief that it was in the best interest of the company. Hence the power must have been exercised for its proper purpose. In Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd the Supreme...

Words: 1754 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Company Law

...they have been the victim of wrongdoing by those in a ‘majority’……….…………………...Pg 7 & 8 References………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….Pg 9 & 10 Introduction of the Case of Foss v. Harbottle The Victoria Park Company is a company had been established during September 1835. This company is to establish a residential area for the prosperous business and professional families to stay. This estate will be established to the east of Wilmslow Road. Richard Foss and Edward Starkie are the minority shareholders. A bill was lodged by 2 shareholders of the company that incorporated by Art of Parliament, on their own and the other shareholders’ behalf. In the case they claim that fraudulent transactions misapplying the company’s assets did by 3 bankruptcy directors, a solicitor, proprietor and architect, and take some unqualified people to put in board of director to make it full and a company without clerk or office, in this situation the proprietors has no rights to take out the property from the hand of defendant directors. Observations were made on this point of case is that the trust between the company and company promoters had arises. Void transaction is not necessarily to be created by the possible of avoiding a transaction. A company can select to apply the transaction later and hold the directors bound by them. If the act is given the power that authorized the transaction on mortgage then they can be confirmed. Although this act is the act beyond the power...

Words: 3041 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Company Law

...The Companies Act 2006 ( CA2006) was implement on 1st of October 2009. The Act contains an extensive code of company for United Kingdom and altered most of the aspect of the law in relation to companies. Furthermore, plenty of provisions for public and private had been introduced. Moreover the long term of investment and shareholder engagement has been enhanced. Sole Trader is owned or run a private corporation by one person who can control over decision making. Moreover the owner entitled to receive an all the profits. The drawbacks are unlimited risk for example the owner is entitled to pay off the debenture and damage of his business. It also has finance limited to resources of an individual. Partnership is consists of two or more individual and equally liable for the debts incurred by the business. It can share expensive resources and risks together. Moreover, undertake heavy workload. There would be a problem if the partnership changes. Limited Liability Partnership is a general partner which was introduced by The Limited Libility Partnership Act 2000. It is a separate legal personality and hybrid. Do not need to apply Partnership law. Partners are not directly responsible for debts. Limited Liability Company is a separate legal entity personality with limited liability. Has potential to acess winder range of funding. The disadvantages are accounting arrangement made public. It may be an illusion for small company. Company limited by Shares have ability to increase...

Words: 312 - Pages: 2