Premium Essay

Comparing Brutus And Antony In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

Submitted By
Words 501
Pages 3
Words are our greatest weapon. Whatever we say can make a drastic change in any situation. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the future king is dead and the city of Rome need answers. Two speakers, two different messages, who will sway the people of Rome? Brutus and Antony are in battle of manipulation, and their weapons are there words. Despite Brutus speaking first, Antony delivers the most effective speech by contradicting Brutus, and using appeals to emotion to change the mindset and feelings of the audience. Though Antony, was able to completely manipulate the crowd, Brutus did sway them first. Since he was Caesar’s right-hand man, the people had more trust in him. To connect with them, he says “Not that I love Caesar less, but that I loves Rome more” (Shakespeare 3.11-12) appealing to the crowd’s love of Rome. They knew he was honorable, so in their eyes, if he had reasons to kill Caesar then those reasons most be …show more content…
He didn’t think that Antony could have used his words to his advantage. All while not go against Brutus directly, Antony is still contradicting him. In order to do this, he uses a lot of irony throughout his speech. For instance, he repeats the line, “Brutus is an honorable man” (Shakespeare 3.10), with more and more sarcasm each time. While stating this line repetitive, he reminds the crowd of all the good Caesar has done for the city and people of Rome. He was questioning and mocking Brutus and his reason for killing Caesar. As the crowd listens to Antony overturn all of Brutus’s arguments, he turning Brutus words against himself! Antony is trying to make the crowd think about who the true enemy is. How come honorable men, men who says they love their country and would do good for the better Rome, kill a man was basically doing the same as them? He’s using reverse psychology on them. This resulted to an inevitable flip in

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Julius Caesar Character Analysis

...Julius Caesar Character Analysis Written around the year 1599, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, was based on the Roman philosopher Plutarch’s biographies of the hoary Greek and Roman rulers, Julius Caesar, Octavius Brutus, and Marc Anthony. The role and personality of Julius Caesar in the written play was greatly determined in an indirect manner. Julius Caesar is immanently the disputed protagonist who remains a flat character throughout the play;  a self-aggrandizing character that is wished death upon. His constant demands and braggart remarks about himself gave him a very egotistical perception.  He was plotted against behind his back by people he called his friends, and was eventually stabbed to death on the Ides of March, or on the 15th of March, ironically, in front of the Theatre of Pompey. Julius Caesar often allowed his dignity to get in his way, which strongly made him look very preposterous and moronic. Caesar thought very highly of himself and had a very prominent perspective of himself. Subsequently defeating Pompey, a Roman politician and general, he boastfully returns back to Rome, being greeted by enjoying the show of pomp.  After being demanded by Caesar, Marc Antony responded to Caesar saying, “When Caesar says “Do this,” it is performed.”  (23.) Marc Antony generates the idea of Caesar being like a God; he’s treated like a deity and Marc follows all his commands and demands as if he’s a slave. Caesar is perceived as a very valiant...

Words: 1016 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Julius Caesar Analysis W/ Study Questions

...Julius Caesar full title  ·  The Tragedy of Julius Caesar author  · William Shakespeare type of work  · Play genre  · Tragic drama, historical drama language  · English time and place written  ·  1599, in London date of first publication  · Published in the First Folio of 1623, probably from the theater company’s official promptbook rather than from Shakespeare’s manuscript publisher  · Edward Blount and William Jaggard headed the group of five men who undertook the publication of Shakespeare’s First Folio narrator  · None climax  · Cassius’s death (V.iii), upon ordering his servant, Pindarus, to stab him, marks the point at which it becomes clear that the murdered Caesar has been avenged, and that Cassius, Brutus, and the other conspirators have lost in their attempt to keep Rome a republic rather than an empire. Ironically, the conspirators’ defeat is not yet as certain as Cassius believes, but his death helps bring about defeat for his side. protagonists  · Brutus and Cassius antagonists  · Antony and Octavius setting (time)  ·  44 b.c. setting (place)  · Ancient Rome, toward the end of the Roman republic point of view  · The play sustains no single point of view; however, the audience acquires the most insight into Brutus’s mind over the course of the action falling action  · Titinius’ realization that Cassius has died wrongly assuming defeat; Titinius’ suicide; Brutus’s discovery of the two corpses; the final struggle between Brutus’s men and the troops...

Words: 22331 - Pages: 90

Premium Essay

How Is Brutus A Tragic Hero

...In William Shakespeare's play ¨The Tragedy of Julius Caesar¨ a group of conspirators came together to plan assassinated Julius Caesar. Brutus was a tragic hero because he faced major challenges with his loyalty to his friends; loyalty to his country. His relationship with Caesar was strong, bit his love for Rome and the people of Rome was stronger. Noble Brutus is considered a tragic hero because he was destined for a downfall. At the end of the play he called victory too soon, and a little while after he did that he knew he was defeated so he committed suicide. Marcus Junius Brutus was Brutus ancestor. He was important because he fought for a democracy so that no one would rule. He would want the Senate to make decisions. Rather than a King....

Words: 844 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Harold Bloom

...Bloom’s Classic Critical Views W i l l ia m Sha k e Sp e a r e Bloom's Classic Critical Views alfred, lord Tennyson Benjamin Franklin The Brontës Charles Dickens edgar allan poe Geoffrey Chaucer George eliot George Gordon, lord Byron henry David Thoreau herman melville Jane austen John Donne and the metaphysical poets John milton Jonathan Swift mark Twain mary Shelley Nathaniel hawthorne Oscar Wilde percy Shelley ralph Waldo emerson robert Browning Samuel Taylor Coleridge Stephen Crane Walt Whitman William Blake William Shakespeare William Wordsworth Bloom’s Classic Critical Views W i l l ia m Sha k e Sp e a r e Edited and with an Introduction by Sterling professor of the humanities Yale University harold Bloom Bloom’s Classic Critical Views: William Shakespeare Copyright © 2010 Infobase Publishing Introduction © 2010 by Harold Bloom All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher. For more information contact: Bloom’s Literary Criticism An imprint of Infobase Publishing 132 West 31st Street New York NY 10001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data William Shakespeare / edited and with an introduction by Harold Bloom : Neil Heims, volume editor. p. cm. — (Bloom’s classic critical views) Includes bibliographical references...

Words: 239932 - Pages: 960

Free Essay

Weir Allison

...A STUDY OF FULVIA by Allison Jean Weir A thesis submitted to the Department of Classics In conformity with the requirements for The degree of Master of Arts Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada December 2007 copyright © Allison Jean Weir 2007 Abstract Who was Fulvia? Was she the politically aggressive and dominating wife of Mark Antony as Cicero and Plutarch describe her? Or was she a loyal mother and wife, as Asconius and Appian suggest? These contrasting accounts in the ancient sources warrant further investigation. This thesis seeks to explore the nature of Fulvia’s role in history to the extent that the evidence permits. Fulvia is most famous for her activities during Antony’s consulship (44 BC) and his brother Lucius Antonius’ struggle against C. Octavian in the Perusine War (41-40 BC). But there is a discrepancy among the authors as to what extent she was actually involved. Cicero, Octavian and Antony, who were all key players in events, provide their own particular versions of what occurred. Later authors, such as Appian and Dio, may have been influenced by these earlier, hostile accounts of Fulvia. This is the first study in English to make use of all the available evidence, both literary and material, pertaining to Fulvia. Modern scholarship has a tendency to concentrate almost exclusively on events towards the end of Fulvia’s life, in particular the Perusine War, about which the evidence is much more abundant in later sources such as Appian and...

Words: 50344 - Pages: 202

Free Essay

A Rationale Behind a History Scheme of Work

...Introduction Creating an effective scheme of work, less than a term into a teaching career, was certainly daunting. Given the complexities of planning for a single lesson – taking into account a long and growing list of factors ‘from provision to pupils with SEN’ to the ‘literacy objective’ that considerably lengthen every written plan – the hurdles to overcome when planning for an 8-week scheme would surely but multiply. While the freedom at my fingertips was invigorating, there was the gnawing sense that failure to grasp the key issues involved would lead to the teacher’s greatest fear – wasted lessons; wasted lessons after which the class would struggle to maintain a respect for the teacher. Furthermore, it would be the waste of an outstanding opportunity. As commentators to the publication Teaching History have repeatedly stressed, the new History National Curriculum for Key Stage 3 offers teachers a ‘glorious flexibility’ to throw out the straight-jacket of centralised requirements beholden to political overlords (Dawson 2008, 18). Instead, led by a relit passion for their discipline, teachers are able to respond to the very specific needs of their school and construct personalised routes towards a variety of objectives. For some commentators, the National Curriculum Key Concepts and their accompanying levels represent the vestiges of an ancien regime of central control that prevent true pupil ownership developing (see Knight 2008). However, a determination to facilitate...

Words: 9792 - Pages: 40

Free Essay

Essay

...Essays Essays Part II. 2, 2.] Part II. 2, 2.] Essays The Project Gutenberg EBook of Essays, by Ralph Waldo Emerson This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net Title: Essays Author: Ralph Waldo Emerson Editor: Edna H. L. Turpin Release Date: September 4, 2005 [EBook #16643] Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ESSAYS *** 1 Essays Produced by Curtis A. Weyant , Sankar Viswanathan and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net ESSAYS BY RALPH WALDO EMERSON Merrill's English Texts SELECTED AND EDITED, WITH INTRODUCTION AND NOTES, BY EDNA H.L. TURPIN, AUTHOR OF "STORIES FROM AMERICAN HISTORY," "CLASSIC FABLES," "FAMOUS PAINTERS," ETC. NEW YORK CHARLES E. MERRILL CO. 1907 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION LIFE OF EMERSON CRITICAL OPINIONS CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF PRINCIPAL WORKS THE AMERICAN SCHOLAR COMPENSATION SELF RELIANCE FRIENDSHIP HEROISM MANNERS GIFTS NATURE SHAKESPEARE; OR, THE POET PRUDENCE CIRCLES NOTES PUBLISHERS' NOTE Merrill's English Texts 2 Essays 3 This series of books will include in complete editions those masterpieces of English Literature that are best adapted for the use of schools and colleges. The editors of the several volumes will...

Words: 97797 - Pages: 392