It is fair that John and Jane conform to the laws. This is because they would be owning their obedience to their fellow citizens. All of whom obey the laws, even if some are specific to certain groups. The doctrine establishes the idea that each citizen owes it to their fellow citizen because doing so would further the advantages the entire populace receives. The fact that the two are citizens and enjoy the benefits of society, they too must obey the law so that these benefits can continue to be enjoyed; regardless of the loss or constraints liberties they are experiencing.
Mill’s Argument Mill is in favor of limited government, as such, I would assert the opinion that he would be against aspects of this law. However, the law in question is not what he would against. Rather, how the law is enforced and by what ways the law had come into being would be the issue. The concept of limited government established that liberty of an individual is allowed to flush and restrained as little as possible. It is even more restrained when one’s happiness is infringed upon. “For Mill, sort-term or even intermediate-term calculations of happiness were a wholly inadequate means of making moral judgments about human …show more content…
Education is not to teach, ‘but to fit the mind for learning from its own consciousness and observation’. The reasoning is: A good government cultivates moral education; moral education makes human beings moral, thinking people who do not merely act as machines and, in the long run makes people claim control over their own actions and inspires them to intensely seek the truth” (Cohen-Almagor, 2012,