Blake Hurst and Elliot Coleman are two professional farmers who have contrasting opinions about the organic industry. David Biello is more skilled in the field of journalism and science therefore, when comparing the three authors Biello would have less of an impact on his readers than Hurst or Coleman. The debate over organic and conventional farming revolve over the question of, what is safe and healthy for our world and lifestyle. Cultivation has been changing from generation to generation. Farming has had its adjustments that deemed as necessary for our environment to continue circulating and providing for our society. Organic farming is also known as, “Real Food”. Real food is basically all the fruits and vegetables that are processed without the use of any chemical boost.
Hurst has been working in the farming industry for more than thirty years and with that he gains the trust of the audience and explains why only cultivating organically would be nearly impossible. “But he expects me to farm like my grandfather, and not incidentally, I suppose, to live like him as well” (Hurst …show more content…
In order to begin a whole new farming style, people would have to learn how to properly farm. With there being no fast food restaurants, hypothetically speaking, or easy food access then not only will the poverty rates increase but also hunger and homeless rates will drastically increase. It is best if farmers practice how to cultivate organically and have conventional farming. My values do not change based on my food preference. I am not being an ignorant nor saying that the way industries are treating animals is respectable but it is nearly impossible to live in a world where all food is organic and every individual is getting fed. Conventional farming is an opportunity for lower and middle class families to have a full meal everyday. Everyone eats based on their economic status and their own