Free Essay

Conflict in South Sudan

In:

Submitted By michaelkwami
Words 2913
Pages 12
Conflict in South Sudan.
South Sudan which is officially known as the ‘Republic of South Sudan’ is a landlocked country in eastern Africa with plains in the north and centre and highlands in the south, along the border with Uganda and Kenya. The White Nile, which flows north through the country is its major geographic feature and it supports agriculture as well as large wild animal populations. South Sudan is bordered by Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Sudan, and Uganda. The recent conflict in South Sudan after its independence has sparked up a lot of interest recently in the media. South Sudan came into being because of the struggle of its people and the commitment of international community to the peace agreement with Sudan. Already, the world’s newest country seems to be a failed state before it was born on July 9, 2011, despite its enormous natural resources and the determination of its people. This research therefore seeks to bring to the fore: the formation of South Sudan (history), reasons for its current conflict, as well as UN and AU interventions in the region.
History
As indicated above, it was actually part of Sudan until its independence. The Egyptians conquered it (Sudan) in 1874 and established the province of Equatoria. In 1885 however, the Islamic Mahdist revolutionaries entered the territory. Fortunately, the British troops who happened to be there helped defeat the invaders and thus took over Sudan in 1898. Britain and Egypt ruled the country in conjunction as ‘Anglo-Egyptian Sudan’. In the early 20th century, some Christian missionaries converted a large segment of the population and introduced English to the region. The result was a clearly defined line between the Arab north, the black African animists and Christians in the south. Egypt and Britain ruled Sudan until 1953, when Anglo-Egyptian granted Sudan self-government. Although series of war broke out in the country due to its separation, it was intensified in 1983 when President Gaafar Mohamed Nimeiri abrogated the treaty and declared all of Sudan a Muslim state, ruled by shariah (Islamic law). In response, the southern rebels formed the Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA) and fought the government for more than two decades. The government troops did not only unleash vicious massacres against civilians and the entire villages but also it provoked internecine violence between tribes and ethnic groups. A cease-fire was declared between the Sudanese government and the SPLA in July 2002. During peace talks, the government agreed to a power-sharing government for six years, to be followed by a referendum on self-determination for the south whiles there were fighting on both sides during the peace negotiations.
On Jan. 9, 2005, after three years of negotiations, a peace deal was reached between the southern rebels, led by John Garang of the SPLA, and the Khartoum government, ending Africa's longest-running civil war. Under the deal, roughly half of Sudan's oil wealth was given to the south, as well as nearly complete autonomy and the right to secede after six years. Nevertheless, two weeks after Garang was sworn in as first vice president as part of the power-sharing agreement, he was killed in a helicopter crash during bad weather. Rioting erupted in Khartoum, killing nearly 100 people. Garang's deputy, Salva Kiir, was quickly sworn in as the new vice president, and both north and south vowed that the peace agreement would hold.
In July 2009, an international tribunal at The Hague redefined the border of Sudan's oil-rich Abyei region, giving the North rights to the lucrative Heglig oil field, and the South retained rights to the larger oil field in Abyei.
In April 2010 elections, Salva Kiir, head of the Sudan People's Liberation Movement, was re-elected president of the semi-autonomous South, taking 93% of the vote. He opted not to run for national president, choosing instead to remain the leader of southern Sudan leaving no doubt that he supported independence.
In a historic seven-day secessionist referendum that began in southern Sudan on January 9, 2011, 98.8% of voters chose independence from the north. Sudan's president Omar al-Bashir accepted the results and said he would not seek re-election when his term expires in 2015.
The Bush administration negotiated the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement, which in addition to setting the date of the referendum also called for people in the contested region of Abyei to participate in the vote. That vote, however, has been delayed because a decision on what constitutes the residents of Abyei has not been reached. Tribal leaders in the region have made it clear that their loyalty lies with the south, but there has not been a date set for a vote in Abyei. Any declaration of affiliation with the south by Abyei could trigger an attack from the north. Abyei sits between northern and southern Sudan and has historically served as a bridge between the two. When voting began in southern Sudan, at least 23 people died in Abyei, confirming the speculation that the region continues to be a matter of contention. In May 2011, armed forces from Sudan seized control of Abyei, which the south Sudanese government called an act of war. More than 20,000 people fled and the United Nations sent an envoy to intervene.
In July 2011, after years of fighting, the Republic of South Sudan declared its independence and became Africa's 54th state. Thousands celebrated in the streets of South Sudan's capital, Juba when Mr Kiir, president of South Sudan, finally signed the interim constitution.
Reasons for Current Conflict in the Sudan
The fortunes of these two countries remain deeply intertwined. Oil from the south runs through pipelines to refineries in the north and both sides badly need the revenue. The Sudanese capital, Khartoum, was the scene of significant protests in September, 2013 after the government, in an effort to compensate for the loss of oil revenue, stopped subsidizing gasoline, which nearly doubled in price. The recent fighting in South Sudan has again disrupted oil production there, with foreign workers fleeing the violent clashes in the oil-producing states of Unity and Upper Nile, shutting down facilities as they departed. Others have begun fleeing the country. According to the United Nations, 13,000 refugees have entered Kenya, more than 5,000 have fled to Ethiopia and nearly 3,000 have crossed the border into Sudan. Sudanese face successions of internal and external challenges to peace. Moreover, the two nations’ paths are inherently entangled given their collective history, current political and economic situations, and mutual dependence. In May 2011, violence erupted in the hotly disputed border area of Abyei, killing an unknown number of civilians and creating a humanitarian crisis through the displacement of an estimated 100,000 people. While Juba and Khartoum agreed to temporary security arrangements for Abyei, including the withdrawal of all forces, the deployment of Ethiopian peacekeepers, and the creation of a demilitarized zone under the auspices of a United Nations-approved security force, the long-term feasibility of these arrangements and status of Abyei are still unclear. In January 2012, South Sudan voluntarily shut down its oil production amid accusations that Sudan was stealing its oil. With tensions mounting in April 2012, violence between the north and south again flared along the border, this time over the Heglig oil installation. Through considerable international pressure, including resolutions by the African Union and United Nations, the international community helped to curb the confrontation and compel the reopening of negotiations.
What began as a power struggle between Dr Machar and President Salva Kiir has taken on overtones of a tribal conflict. The Dinka, to which Mr Kiir belongs, is pitted against the Nuer, from which Mr Machar hails.
The Dinka people are an ethnic group inhabiting the Bahr el Ghazal region of the Nile basin, Jonglei and parts of southern Kordufan and Upper Nile regions. They number around 4.5 million people according to the 2008 Sudan census, constituting about 18% of the population of the entire country, the largest ethnic tribe in South Sudan. Dinka are one of the branches of the River Lake who speak Nilotic languages, including the Nuer and Luo. They are believed to be the tallest people in Africa along with the Tutsi of Rwanda and have no centralised political authority, instead comprising many independent but interlinked clans. Some of those traditionally providing ritual chiefs, known as the "masters of the fishing spear" or beny bith, who provide leadership for the entire people and appear to be at least in part hereditary.
The Nuer people are a Nilotic ethnic group primarily inhabiting the Nile Valley. They are concentrated in South Sudan, with some representatives also found in south-western Ethiopia. They speak the Nuer language, which belongs to the Nilo-Saharan family. The natures of relations among the various southern Sudanese tribes were greatly affected in the 19th century by the intrusion of Ottomans, Arabs, and eventually the British. Some ethnic groups made their accommodation with the imperial attackers and others did not and in effect pitting one southern ethnic group against another in the context of foreign rule. The Dinka treated the resisting Nuer as hostile, and enmity developed between the two groups as a result of their differing relationships to the British. In 2006, the Nuer was the tribe that resisted disarmament most strongly. Members of the Nuer White Army, a group of armed youths often autonomous of tribal elders' authority, refused to lay down their weapons, which led Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) soldiers to confiscate Nuer cattle, destroying their economy.
These two groups (Dinka and Nuer) have a history of economic and political rivalry, and of bloody confrontation. In 1991, after a power struggle among the southern rebels, Mr Machar broke away from John Garang and Mr Kiir, the leader and his deputy, respectively, of the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (S.P.L.A.) and Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (S.P.L.M.), and allied his Nuer militia with the North. In March, Dr Machar criticized Mr Kiir’s authoritarian leadership; he also announced that he would challenge Mr Kiir for the S.P.L.M.’s chairmanship and run for president in 2015. Mr Kiir fired Mr Machar as vice president in July, accelerating the collapse of the fragile government’s tribal balance of power. Mr Kiir’s critics in the South argue that he has driven out the reformers in his party and is surrounding himself instead with loyalists from his home area and former aides of President Omar al-Bashir of Sudan. Mr Kiir has made some compromises with Khartoum over sharing oil revenues and the status of the contested border region of Abyei. He might argue this was to stabilize South Sudan’s relationship with Sudan, but others say he has granted too much. Since fighting broke out in Juba on 15th December, nearly 500,000 people have now fled their homes. Mass killings have been reported in the media. 75,000 people have sought refuge at various UN compounds across the country, where they are camped in makeshift and congested conditions, putting them at serious risk of disease outbreaks. South Sudan is increasingly reliant on emergency aid, with the number of people in need of food aid doubling from 2011 to 2012. The country needs urgent support to respond to the humanitarian crisis now and be able to provide enough food, water and essential services to its people over the coming years. Insecurity and targeted attacks on aid workers like the UN and AU continue to make it extremely difficult to deliver aid to all who need it. Better protection of civilians, a cessation of hostilities and a committed peace process are immediately needed. It is still not clear exactly what triggered this crisis. The government insists it was an attempted coup whiles others suspect a minor clash between rival security forces at a time of tense political negotiations, may have provoked President Kiir to pounce on his rivals. This is tantamount to undermine South Sudan's attempts to build a strong comprehensive democracy.
UN and AU intervention in South Sudan.
In operation within South Sudan is the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) which was established on 8 July, 2011 by the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1996 and comprises 5,884 civilian, 5,508 military and 376 police personnel well far below the capacity required for the enormity of the task at hand, as can clearly be seen from the images of the humanitarian crisis in the offing. The Security Council for an initial period of one year, mandated UNMISS to consolidate peace and security, and to help establish the conditions for development with a view to strengthening the capacity of the Government of the Republic of South Sudan to govern effectively, democratically and to establish good relations with neighbours, ensuring peace and security to its citizens.
The UNMISS has started taking actions in order to resolve the instability in the region by taking the following steps; i. Humanitarian Efforts. Due to the ongoing fighting and instability that has made humanitarian access a serious challenge throughout much of South Sudan, and in spite of security risks and the logistical difficulty of reaching many vulnerable populations, UN humanitarian agencies and their partners have launched a multi-sector aid response that has reached nearly 158,000 displaced South Sudanese so far. The World Food Program (WFP), for example, is currently providing much-needed food assistance to tens of thousands of displaced South Sudanese civilians both on and off UN bases, and is working to screen children who are vulnerable to severe malnutrition. For its part, the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) is providing clean water to the displaced and constructing latrines at UNMISS bases sheltering them in order to prevent the spread of disease. UNICEF has also provided essential medical supplies to support emergency health programs in areas of the country affected by fighting, and is working with the World Health Organization (WHO) to vaccinate children at displacement camps against measles and polio. Meanwhile, the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) has been working to provide shelter and other critical relief items to South Sudanese civilians who have been forced to flee their homes, including blankets, plastic sheeting, kitchen equipment, mosquito nets, and soap. ii. Promotion of stability in South Sudan. The U.S. has deployed five military advisors to support UNMISS in strategic planning to prevent further violence in the region. UNMISS stationed UN police in 10 state capitals and 23 counties and established 15 permanent company-operating bases in all states but one. With UNMISS and U.S. support, South Sudan has seen the number of civilian casualties decrease since independence. UNMISS is also developing South Sudan’s security institutions and policies, preparing them to eventually function independently. iii. Training the Police Force. UNMISS is providing training and technical support for South Sudanese law enforcement, having instructed nearly 3,500 police officers and 35 prison managers. To enhance transparency and accountability, the mission developed a screening and registration process for officers, and to date has registered over 49,000 officers in an electronic database. iv. Supporting the disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration program (DDR). Through DDR, ex-combatants voluntarily surrender their weapons and receive rehabilitation, counselling, and skills-training. With UNMISS support, these efforts have resulted in the collection of 10,400 weapons and the demobilization of 12,525 combatants. Specifically, UNMISS monitors DDR to ensure that all weapons are collected voluntarily. UNMISS also observes the progress of SPLA’s Action Plan to remove all child soldiers from its ranks.
Also the African Union Peace and Security Council decided on 24 October 2012 to give a six-week delay to Khartoum and Juba to strike a deal on Abyei where there is a dispute in the oil producing region, on the basis of a proposal made by an African panel mediating between the two countries. The Council also decided to hold the referendum in October 2013 and to refer its decision seeking the support of UN Security Council if the two parties fail to reach a deal during the 6 weeks.
The African Union’s Peace and Security Council met at the Heads of State level, on the South Sudanese crisis and decided to establish a Commission under the AU to investigate the human rights violations and other abuses committed, and make recommendations on ways and means to ensure accountability, reconciliation and healing among all South Sudanese communities.
Inferring from the above causes of the conflict in South Sudan, there seems to be mistrust among the leaders, who are key players (President Salva Kiir a Dinka who is accusing Dr Riek Machar his former vice a Nuer, now rebel leader of plotting a coup and the latter also accusing the former of being dictatorial) to this political and tribal conflict. In light of this, the peaceful talks already going on in Ethiopia's capital, Addis Ababa, should be followed with actions by Kiir, to release the 11 political leaders from the camp of Machar who states that, he is ready to sit to resolve the conflict after his request has been granted. Also, Mr Kiir despite his principles to bring justice to his suspected traitors, should emulate the African hero Nelson Mandela, who just passed away and as well, a strong constitution for democracy should be established to ensure that there is an agreement between these two major tribes.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

South Sudan Conflict and Peace Building Strategies

...AFRICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY i SOUTH SUDAN CONFLICT AND PEACE BUILDING STRATEGIES 4 Introduction 4 Causes of the conflict 5 Challenges to peace 5 Who should be held accountable for peace? 6 Measures to restore peace 7 Conclusion 10 REFERENCE 11 SOUTH SUDAN CONFLICT AND PEACE BUILDING STRATEGIES Introduction Daniel (2013) in his research on the state fallen apart, he states that, the first civil war, from 1955 to 1972, was between the Sudanese government and southern rebels who demanded greater autonomy for southern Sudan. The war ended with the 1972 Addis Ababa Agreement, which granted significant regional autonomy to southern Sudan on internal issues. After decades of brutal civil war that left two and a half million dead, the devastated and vastly underdeveloped southern part of Sudan secured independence in 2011. Since independence, South Sudan has been handicapped by the competing interests of powerful political actors and the factions and interests they represent. Annah (2013) states that in early July 2013, along with three other friends of South Sudan, Enough’s Founding Director wrote to South Sudan’s President Salva Kiir, warning that stated that, after almost nine years of self-rule, the government is still failing to meet the basic needs of its people. Despite claims that vast sums have been expended on investment in infrastructure, there is very little to show in the way of roads, medical services, and education for millions of South Sudanese who greeted the prospect...

Words: 1699 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Foreign Aid and South Sudan

...countries and/or communities? South Sudan South Sudan separated from Sudan and gained its independence in 2011.  This world's newest country has the third-largest oil reserves in Sub-Saharan Africa and yet it has one of the world's poorest population --- 50.6% of a population of, approximately 11 million people, is living below the national poverty line.  From 2006 to 2010, South Sudan received approximately one billion US dollars from foreign aid and a total of $1.4 billion US dollars one year after its independence.   Sharing an oil-rich border with North Sudan, 98% of the government's budget relies on its oil revenue,    What is the role of foreign aid in South Sudan? Foreign aid agencies have contributed billions of dollars during the period when South Sudan is signing the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and after its independence in 2011 (Ajak, Larson, & Pritchett, 2013).  This money didn’t go directly to South Sudan's government. But it funded almost everything including water, food, security training, drugs, textbooks and a range of other services.  Also, 4/5 of health care in South Sudan is provided by outside groups. Services and funding are provided by a number of national and international NGOs and the United Nations (UN) agencies that operate in the region.  Many foreign aid programs, such as the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), also have been working on assisting South Sudan's long-term development such...

Words: 2074 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

2015 Berkeley Mun Spd Topic

...Adam Yankelevits Robert Purviance ! ! ! ! ! Table of Contents South Sudan Topic Background Past International Involvement and Attempted Solutions Case Studies 1 | Sudan 2 | China Questions to Consider Works Cited Palestinian Refugees Topic Background Past International Involvement and Attempted Solutions Case Studies 1 | United States 2 | Jordan Questions to Consider Works Cited ! ! 2 2 3 4 4 5 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 9 10 11 ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! South Sudan Topic Background It has been slightly over three years since this fledgling nation seceded from Sudan in July 2011. Now the country is fraught with a major political upheaval, a debilitating famine, a declining economy, and an impending civil war ripe with ethnic tension. The South Sudanese political and social schism erupted after President Salva Kiir began to crackdown on the supporters of his rival, former Vice President Riek Machard. Mr. Machard attempted a coup to overthrow the President shortly after Mr. Kiir dismissed the entirety of his government due to suspicion that they were plotting to overthrow his regime. The conflict boiled over and turned violent between the feuding army factions on December 15th 2013. The political struggle between these two factions quickly escalated into a full-scale ethnic conflict and has created a violent schism within the country. Mr. Kiir identifies with the Dinka ethnic group, South Sudan’s majority, whereas Mr. Machard is a member of the less populous Nuer...

Words: 3086 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Colonialism and South Sudan

...Colonialism’s Link to the Creation of South Sudan COM/156 January 27, 2012 Any nation’s history has a continuous influence on its development. For many countries, their development has been affected by colonialism, when the land was governed by another entity. The importance of colonial history was evident in Sudan in January, 2011 when a referendum asked voters of southern Sudan to decide between separating from Sudan and maintaining a unified Sudan. Nearly 99 percent of eligible voters cast their ballot for independence thereby ending the 55 year existence of the largest nation in African (Hanzich, 2011). An extremely diverse country in which governmental decisions have favored the Arab population of the North, Sudan’s existence has been marked by strife. For all but 12 years, Sudan has been torn apart by civil wars. Since the colonial period ended, Sudan’s central government could not use violence, oppression, or peace agreements to minimize colonialism’s impact and establish a sense of unity in the country. Thus, the creation of South Sudan stems from colonization which confined opposing factions within one political boundary and created a history of civil war. The artificial political boundaries established by Sudan’s colonial powers—Egypt and Great Britain—brought together diversity for which Sudan’s central government could not build unity. Building cohesion has been difficult because colonial powers determined a country’s borders “according to colonial...

Words: 1651 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

South Sudan

...Sudan and South Sudan’s Merging Conflicts Africa Report N°223 | 29 January 2015 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 brussels@crisisgroup.org Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I.  II.  Introduction ..................................................................................................................... South Kordofan – the Epicentre of Sudan’s Conflicts ..................................................... A.  The Government’s “Hot Dry Season” Campaign ....................................................... B.  The Sudan Revolutionary Front ................................................................................ III.  Internal Nuer Conflict in Unity State ............................................................................... A.  Historic Disunity ........................................................................................................ B.  Bul Nuer Rising .......................................................................................................... 1  2  2  4  7  7  8  IV.  Merging Conflicts in Sudan and South Sudan ......................................................

Words: 20903 - Pages: 84

Free Essay

The Colonial Period: the Root Cause of the Politically Unstable State of the Sudan

...The Root Cause of the Politically Unstable State of the Sudan Introduction Between the 1870s and 1900, Africa faced a process of European aggression, invasion, and eventual conquest and colonization. The European imperialist push to take over Africa was driven by the industrial revolution and the hopes of becoming a world power. After two world wars, countries that had previously been colonized agitated for independence, and eventually colonial powers withdrew their administrators from Africa. For each African state, becoming independent meant something far more than simply gaining back territory. For some, it was the beginning of a stable government, a local economy and a cultural comeback. For others such as the Sudan, it was the start of tragic consequences driven by political conflicts and civil wars. Through the process of decolonization that began, African leaders worked to shape the character of their postcolonial state, usually either against the continued European cultural and political predominance, while others worked with European powers in order to maintain an economically and politically stable state. As the success of each nation and region of Africa widely varied after their independence, their progress also varied. Unfortunately, some are still struggling to overcome these crucial instabilities preventing them from being at peace within their own state, and internationally. By examining Sudan and the decades leading up to its current political, social...

Words: 3381 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Duraduris

...returning to their homes following the end of fighting in Sudan’s Blue Nile state between the Sudanese army and fighters allied to Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM), the dominant force in newly independent South Sudan. (Photo: REUTERS/Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah, September 2011) Internal displacement in Africa Burundi p. 41; Central African Republic p. 42; Chad p. 43; Côte d’Ivoire p. 44; Democratic Republic of the Congo p. 45; Ethiopia p. 46; Kenya p. 47; Liberia p. 48; Niger p. 48; Nigeria p. 49; Senegal p. 50; Somalia p. 50; South Sudan p. 51; Sudan p. 52; Uganda p. 53; Zimbabwe p. 54 In 2011, IDMC monitored internal displacement in 21 subSaharan African countries. There were an estimated 9.7 million IDPs in these countries, representing over a third of the world’s total internally displaced population. Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Somalia continued to be the countries with the largest internally displaced populations in Africa. The number of IDPs in Africa in 2011 was down from 11.1 million a year earlier, continuing a sustained downward trend since 2004 when there were over 13 million. Violent struggles between groups vying for access to natural resources, land and political representation and power were among the root causes of most of these displacements. These struggles were manifested either by armed conflicts pitting governments and their armed forces against armed opposition groups, or by inter-communal violence. While governments or...

Words: 13852 - Pages: 56

Free Essay

Sudan

...Conflict and the Environment The African Union Mission in Sudan (AMIS) military escort for UNEP fieldwork near El Geneina, Western Darfur. Intense competition over declining natural resources is one of the underlying causes of the ongoing conflict. SUDAN POST-CONFLICT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Conflict and the Environment 4.1 Introduction and assessment activities 2. an overview of the role of natural resources in the instigation and continuation of historical and current conflicts, listing the major resources of concern and focusing specifically on conflicts involving rangelands and rain-fed agricultural land; and 3. a brief environmental impact assessment of the various conflicts, evaluating the direct and indirect impacts of conflict on Sudan’s environment. Chronic environmental problems are covered in other chapters, though it should be noted that at the local level, the boundary between chronic and conflict-related environmental issues is often unclear. Assessment activities The assessment of conflict-related issues was an integral part of fieldwork throughout the country. In addition, UNEP carried out a number of specific activities, including: Introduction Sudan has been wracked by civil war and regional strife for most of the past fifty years, and at the time of finalizing this report, in June 2007, a major conflict rages on in Darfur. At the same time, Sudan suffers from a number of severe environmental problems, both within and outside current and historical conflict-affected...

Words: 9962 - Pages: 40

Free Essay

Bloodletting in South Sudan

...Bloodletting in South Sudan Ong The most effective way to look at the crisis in South Sudan is through the lens of neoliberalism. By addressing the ways in which growing global concerns for social justice interact with both education and the global economy, we can better understand the root of the conflict, and thus ways in which the Sudanese may be helped. It is imperative that global entities and institutions focus on educating peacemakers and policy makers about the underlying causes of the bloodletting in South Sudan. Such an education requires both moral lessons and technical training. A typical de-briefing on the situation would be insufficient, as it would focus solely on definite events and overlook the humanistic concerns and cultural values which could provide significant insight into the root of the conflict. The current situation in South Sudan is an illustration of how crucial such education is to our future. In the past, an increased focus on moral and humanitarian education has proven effective in hindering war—for example in the United States, white southerners initially sustained white civilization with a romantic and ethnocentric nationalism that celebrated aristocratic origins, social Darwinism, and slavery. Education and the promotion of liberal ideas were central to eventually shaping a democratic and more tolerant nation. Likewise, education is essential as it may allow the humanitarian parties in South Sudan and neighboring nations to shift...

Words: 457 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Genocide in Sudan

...ABSTRACT For over two decades, civil war has raged in Sudan. The government of Sudan which consists of a majority of Muslims has focused the war on the Africans of Darfur region of Sudan. These Africans have had the control of some of the most fertile grazing lands and oil reserves in all of Sudan. Unfortunately over the past two decades, persistent droughts have forced the Arabs to migrate to more arable land, though having strained their relations with the Africans[1]. When the Arabs and the Africans started coexisting, fights broke out between them over lands and the Arabs became violent. Massacres and rebellions were a commonplace scenario between both the sides. The situation worsened when Sudan government sided with the Arabs and the government and military groups of Janjaweed(“devils on horsebacks”) began fighting the insurgents and the citizens of Darfur. It dint take very long for this to turn into genocide, also known as ethnic cleansing. The cleansing stopped focusing just on citizens and insurgents and started targeting certain ethnicities such as the Africans and the Christians. INTRODUCTION On the 10th anniversary of the genocide in Rwanda, another human catastrophe is rapidly accelerating despite full knowledge of the United Nations and Western democracies. In April, a U.N. team investigating human rights abuses in the far western Darfur region of Sudan found “disturbing patterns of massive human rights violations in Darfur, many of which...

Words: 5356 - Pages: 22

Premium Essay

Genocide In South Africa Essay

...Sudanese Armed Forces. The Janjaweed help in the massacre, slaughtering hundreds like pigs. Bodies strewn about, lying in ditches as their family cries over them. Hundreds of men covered in soot and soil, coughing and sputtering, climbing out of oil holes and caves for little to no pay. This is Sudan (About Sudan). Over the years Sudan has steadily gone down the drain. Lead by the twice indicted president Omar al-Bashir, it has been plagued by genocide and war. Around 1955 the people of Sudan became fed up with the government and demanded...

Words: 1766 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Current Events In Sudan Research Paper

...Sudan: An overview of current events and regional impact Overview: Sudan is situated in northeast Africa, bordering the Red Sea. To its north is Egypt, and Libya. To Sudan’s west is Chad, to the south, South Sudan, and to the east, Eritrea, and Ethiopia. Sudan has a population of over 35,000,000 people, while South Sudan is populated by over 11,000,000 people. Sudan is a predominantly Sunni Muslim country while South Sudan is mostly Christian animists. The dominant languages are English and Arabic, as well as a myriad of tribal dialects. Sudan’s government is based on Islamic Sharia law, and the south is a constitutional republic. South Sudan expends 10.3 percent of its GDP on the military. Statistics on Sudan’s military expenditure is unavailable,...

Words: 1605 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Sudan: a Failed State

...price of oil is high bringing upon economic growth that can be invested to do numerous excellent things to a country. The cash flow going into an underprivileged state like Sudan should be invested towards infrastructure, education, and businesses to develop and improve living conditions to their populace. However, Sudan has become a failed state due to three decades of oil exploration that lead to conflict for political power, famine, and violence. In 1978, large discoveries of oil are found in Southern Sudan that initiated trouble between the North and South. In addition, President Numeiri launches the Islamic Sharia Law in Sudan, and develops the Unity State for oil exploration in the South without Southern representation. Moreover, he removes the native inhabitants of the Unity State which leads to outrage in Southern Sudan. As a result, the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) is created, and a civil war breaks out involving the North central government and South. The civil war is just the beginning of the endless clashes for political power in Sudan. The discovery of oil causes famine and hunger throughout Sudan and affects about three million civilians by March 2001. The central government led by President Al-Bashir engineers famine on areas by Oil reserves and plants to the people. Since Sudan regulation of environmental safety is low, the oil companies contaminate the soil and water that result in deepening environmental scarcity. Therefore, agriculture is affected...

Words: 516 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

South Sudan Negotiation and Mediation

...From 2005-14, South Sudan was effectively a one-party state. Disagreements and compromises within the ruling elite had to be worked out under the umbrella of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM), which from 2005 onwards, began making an uncertain transition from a guerrilla movement to a political party with state power 15 November, 2013—While officially opening the new offices of the SPLM Secretariat in Juba, Kiir announces that he is dissolving all political structures of the SPLM, which include the highest executive organ, the Political Bureau and the National Liberation Council (NLC). He explains that the structures have lapsed because the National Convention has not met to elect new membership within their five-year lifespan. He says that only the office of the Chairman and the Secretariat will continue to function. 6 December—A group of senior SPLM politicians sacked by Kiir holds a press conference at the new premises of the SPLM Secretariat while Kiir is on an official visit to Paris. Machar leads the group, which includes Rebecca Nyandeng (wife of the late John Garang), Pagan Amum Okiech, Deng Alor Kuol, Alfred Ladu Gore, Oyay Deng Ajak, Majak D’Agoot Atem, Madut Biar Yel, Gier Chuang Aluong, Peter Adwok Nyaba, Chol Tong Mayay, Taban Deng Gai, Ezekiel Gatkouth Lul, John Luk Jok, Kosti Manibe Ngai, and Cirino Hiteng Ofuho. They call on Kiir to hold a meeting of the SPLM Political Bureau—which he has reportedly declined to do since the March meeting—to discuss...

Words: 3109 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Comparing the Economic Development of Sudan and Libya

...Economics 211 Comparing the Economic Development of Sudan and Libya Professor George Hartner March 20, 2014 University of Regina In comparing the economic growth of developing countries, in this case Sudan and Libya, it is important to understand the variables impacting the growth of the two nations. These variables include social conflict, corruption within the institutions, transportation issues and the commodities in which their economies are structured around. Social conflict has had a great impact on both of the nation’s economic prosperity as well as their infrastructure. As well, corruption has greatly impacts the availability of financial resources for the citizens of either nation. In this comparison of nations, I will argue that Libya is more economically developed and has more economic potential than Sudan. The commodities in Libya offer a future of wealth for the nation and the potential for immediate growth economically and socially. Social conflict and civil war has affected and continues to affect many nations around the globe. Sudan is a nation which has been involved in decades of civil war and as a result has left the nation struggling to survive, leaving almost no basic infrastructure to create order within the nation. They were left without schools, a functioning government or financial institutions. From this, many problems have arisen. Groups such as the Lebanese Hezzbollah terrorist sect have set...

Words: 1639 - Pages: 7