Premium Essay

Contrasting Theorists

In:

Submitted By rsullyreyes
Words 639
Pages 3
Contrasting Theorists- Piaget, Vygotsky and Erikson

Piaget, Vygotsky and Erikson all had great impact on the research of how the human mind develops. Personally I believe that Jensen would agree with both Piaget and Erikson theories because they both tie to his four stages of development and Gladwell would agree with the three. Nonetheless, I believe that all, Jensen, Erikson, Vygotsky, and Gladwell would agree with Jean Piaget that “ the principle goal of education in the schools should be creating men and women who are capable of doing new things, not simply repeating what other generations have done.”

Piaget’s theory of cognitive development focused on children’s intellectual development, the nature of thought and how it developed. He believed in self-initiated discovery and learning by doing. According to Piaget, “ children sort the knowledge they acquire through their experienced and interactions into groupings known as schemas”(Cherry, n.d.). He also believed that learning occurred through 4 different stages, sensorimotor stage, preoperational stage, concrete operations stage, and formal operations stage (Boeree, 2006). He believed that in order for learning to happen, students must interact with their environment in a new way and apply their previous schema to their interaction. I work with middle school students so they like learning from their own mistakes. I’ve learned that at middle school age, students do not want to be told what to do and that they learn best from their own mistakes. I also teach math so the only way students can learn a new math concept is by doing it more than once.

Vygotsky, unlike Piaget, believed that learning happens through social interactions. He believed that a child’s potential for full cognitive development depended on a “zone of proximal development” (ZPD), which is reached when a child is engaged in

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Conspiracy Theory

...Conspiracy theory Protective sense of human-beings naturally help observe others’ action whether it is hostile or not. A person, who is suspicious of persecutory actions from others around him for some or no reason due to excessive protective sense, is said to be jealous. When this sense goes even further, it becomes a disease. In medicine, it’s called paranoia. This is one type of schizophrenia. Paranoia leads one to reach quick conclusion about why a bad thing has happened to him, accuse the suspect easily and overlook one’s easy conclusion. This disease is common in any society. Personal analysis is much better and healthier and therefore less prone to this disease while paranoia at the level of society is more common as it is more prone. Psychologists say that this has to do with the fact that individuals are directly responsible for consequences of his action while no one is held responsible for actions of society as a whole. Society is much more susceptible to paranoia and is easy to escalate it once infected. In other words, society holds much stronger conviction in order to find the person guilty of causing bad things got them. It’s very common for social paranoia to be directed towards people with different nationality, religion and beliefs, and different social strata. Its symptoms manifest in accusation and suspicion. Victims of social paranoia tend to be accused of having supernatural power and association with witches, and of plotting evil conspiracy. This delusion...

Words: 1910 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Cognitive Development

...Introduction It cannot be disputed that there indeed lies an ocean of difference between that of an adult and a child. The difference transcends beyond age, size, gender, weight, and other obvious physical attributes. The matter of importance lies in the difference in terms of the grasp of understanding as between the two since the ability of one to comprehend greatly influences the person that the child ought to become in the future. As rightfully said, it is the things you do in the present that shape your future. Basic premises of cognitive development theory It is properly established that the field of cognitive development primarily tackles the mental faculties of individuals in the pursuit of understanding their mental undertakings. It goes as far as the extent of realizing and assessing their mental abilities in order to aid the individual concerned in making used of his mental faculties to the fullest extent for his own benefit so that such individual can achieve its maximum potential. The study of cognitive development covers a wide array of endeavors in the form of theoretical and actual practice applications. It is theoretical and practical in the aspect of concept understanding and problem solving wherein a child is placed in a situation to determine if projected theories based on studies are effective and efficient given the predicament of the child concerned. (Bjorklund, 2004) Cognitive development also covers the study of the thinking process, language...

Words: 1830 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Motivation

...I need to criticise the theories?" - I guess this should form part of the compare and contrast element "Can I use both process or both content theories?" - you can choose any theory you like "I used Maslow but now remember that you said not to. Is this OK?" - yes - but make sure you are critical of Maslow as most(all?) theorists are "I haven't got enough to fill the word limit" - you probably need to go into more detail then. Make sure you have answered all the parts of the question I would like to use a piece of evidence for a certain example within one of the theories and have found a previous example used within a book. Would this be okay to use the example given? Obviously it would be rewritten in my own words and included in my referencing. Hi, regarding the issue of comparing and contrasting: Both ways are possible, and both have their advantages and disadvantages. Explaining each theory in detail befor comparing and contrasting them may be easier to understand for the reader, but you have to make sure that you avoid repeating yourself later on. This problem does not occur when you explain the theory through comparing and contrasting, but here you have to be careful not to...

Words: 491 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Alienation and Anomie

...Comparison and Contrast of Theories of Karl Marx, Max Weber and Émile Durkheim. While influence on modern social science can be traced to many revolutionary figures, perhaps none had greater influence on modern social science than three social theorists/sociologists, Karl Marx and Émile Durkheim who have been known as principle architects of modern social science. Although modern theory of sociology was founded by Max Webber and Émile Durkheim, Karl Marx has had a profound impact on the evolution of modern sociology. Each of the three figures contributed to sociology in many ways through different approaches to social class and inequality. Many might argue that there are similarities between these sociologists’ theories and that they examined ideas that were similar; however, they all came to different conclusions. Karl Marx was influenced by political economists who believed that the cost of production was determined by the amount of labor. Along with these and other influences, Karl Marx approached social problems and inequalities through his theory of alienation, which focuses on separation of things that naturally belong together. Marx’s theory further describes estrangement of individuals from their human nature as results a society divided into social classes. Karl Marx argued that class is decided by ownership or non-ownership of production. He also saw class as having connection to the means of production while Max weber’s idea of alienation is based on the concept...

Words: 504 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

9/11 Conspiracy Theory

...This we read the article Popular and Official Responses to 9/11 in Germany and The United States written by scholar Peter Knight. The article critically analyzes the conspiracy theories that emerged in American society years after the tragic events of 9/11. Knight’s main assertion through out the article, is that 9/11 conspiracy theories have more in common with the official reports of the events of 9/11 than many people would assume. He does this my showing comparing and contrasting the two accounts, highlighting the similarities in their narratives. Firstly, the author supports his claim by showing how they both reinforce an essentialist framework of thinking. Firstly, there was a rejection of any blame or accountability, as president Bush...

Words: 1645 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Week 4 Paper

...Personality Analysis PSY/ 405 April 29, 2013 Dave Brueshoff Personality Analysis In this paper I will compare and contrast dispositional, humanistic and existential theories of personality. I will also give the basic underlying assumptions of each of these approaches to personality and analyze the characteristics to each of these theories. I will also explain the interpersonal relational aspects that are associated with these theories. According to aboutpsychology.com Humanistic theories of personality stress the basic goodness of human beings and the need to achieve one's full potential. Learn more about some of the major humanistic theories of personality. Comparing and Contrasting When looking at the humanistic and existential theories of personality these theories the individual on a holistic sense. Humanistic and existential theories and dispositional theories are all similar because they all search for an understanding the importance of behavior based on the individuals personal perception of life. All these theories focus on conscious decision making, free will and abilities. According to Abraham Maslow he looked at the humanistic approach to personality as taking full advantage of opportunities available to them and explores new ideas that would improve their life. Maslow also believed that there are many opportunities to people but first they have to be self-actualized. Maslow referred to these qualities in those who are self-actualized, as B-values (Feist...

Words: 1295 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Sexual Anthropology: Nnlt vs. Feminist Revisionists

...SEXUAL ANRTHOPOLOGY: NNLT VS. FEMINIST REVISIONISTS June 2014 In The Sexual Person by authors Todd A. Salzman and Michael G. Lawler (Sawler), we are presented with multiple views on humans and the sexual being. Exposure to traditionalist, Natural Law Theorists, Revisionists, and Sawler’s own perspectives, widens the understanding of the Christian view on sexual acts while providing multiple perspectives that help question the interpretation behind the moral laws. Compare and contrasting the Natural Law Theorists and Feminist Revisionists, I will explore their perspectives on sexual anthropology and conclude with my own interpretation of the sexual human. Beginning with the New Natural Law Theorists (NNLT), their main perspective behind the sexual person is mostly thread within the principles of the physical being while almost completely disregarding the “emotional” or personal human. The NNLT follows the specific natural law, which reflects the human inclination towards reproduction and preservation as a species, much like that of the animal kingdom. The only difference, however, is that humans have the ability to become united through the act of procreation. The NNLT choses to focus on the generic natural law, choosing to emphasize the importance of the biological and natural meanings of a sexual act, rather than the specific natural law, which chooses to emphasize on the personal and relational meanings of the sexual act. The NNLT prioritizes the biological over the...

Words: 804 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Sociology of Karl Marx

...INSTITUTION: University of Botswana FACULTY: Faculty of Education DEPARTMENT: Department of Primary Education PROGRAMME: Bachelor of Education Primary COURSE: Sociology of Religion COURSE CODE: TRS 315 Assignment: identify either Karl Marxx or Max Weber and compare his ideas with any other theorist who expressed his/her views on religion. Names: Oabona Moses Sello ID #: 201204434 Due date: April 15 2014 Introduction This essay intends to explicitly compare Karl Marx and Emile David Durkheim ideas on religion from a sociological and functionalist perspective. Functionalists’ belief that religion is beneficial for both the community and its members e.g. it unifies the society which in turn gives each individual member a source of support when they need it. It will begin with their brief historical backgrounds, definition of religion as well as their similarities and differences in studying it. Karl Marx Marx was born in Prussia on May 5, 1818. He began exploring sociopolitical theories at university among the Young Hegelians. He became a journalist, and his socialist writings would get him expelled from Germany and France. In 1848, he published The Communist Manifesto with Friedrich Engels and was exiled to London, where he wrote the first volume of Das Kapital and lived the remainder of his life (Engels, 1869). Marx is considered as one of the founders of economic history and sociology. Emile Durkheim According to Jones (1986) “David Emile Durkheim was born in...

Words: 2099 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

This Is It

...acknowledging that men were considered the bold hunters at the beginning of time, to then recognizing conventional middle class men as the breadwinners, hyper-male attributes that are attached to masculinity can be further understood. Thus, social roles play a significant part in motivating such stereotypes and concepts. Hegemonic masculinity, argued as the most common, also enables men to disregard their complexities and accept such expectations. This hegemony enables a division of labor, resulting in contrasting power relations between females and males. However, recognizing that femininity and masculinity are not just simple opposites further proves the notion that there is no pattern within masculinity. Connell provides extensive research and debates that offer evidence of men experiencing conflicting ideals and principles during their adulthood, as well as different cultures and their diverse ideals of masculinity. I particularly enjoyed the debates brought by the feminist theorists and the gay community. These critical comparisons enabled us to further comprehend masculinity concepts and flawed ideas, such as those brought forward by pop psychologists, who only offered simplified views on men issues. Yet I do agree that masculinity does thrive on nostalgia, as stated by pop psychologists, for many masculine social roles constantly pay respect to their historical patterns of behavior. I also believe Connell offered great examples for gender research, by shedding light on how...

Words: 305 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Karl Marx vs Emile Durkheim: a Comparison

...Germany and France. In 1848, he published The Communist Manifesto with Friedrich Engels and was exiled to London, where he wrote the first volume of Das Kapital and lived the remainder of his life (Engels, 1869). Marx is considered as one of the founders of economic history and sociology. Emile Durkheim According to Jones (1986) “David Emile Durkheim was born in France, on April 15, 1857 and raised in a Jewish family with his father as a rabbi. Emile was, thus destined for the rabbinate, and a part of his early education was spent in a rabbinical school” (p.12). Durkheim is considered the father of modern sociology and well known for his work on Division of Labour in 1912. Definition of Religion Both Marx and Durkheim have rather contrasting definitions of what religion is with the former describing it basically as the opium of the masses whilst the latter sees it as a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say, things set apart and forbidden, beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called church and all those who adhere to them (Bois, 1916). According to Litchmann (1968) in (Kessel, 1983) Marx...

Words: 2029 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Ambient Rhetoric Essay

...In Ambient Rhetoric: The Attunements of Rhetorical Being (2013), associate professor of English at Purdue University, Thomas Rickert, states that “an ambient age calls [humankind] to rethink much of [their] rhetorical theory and practice, indeed, calls [humankind] to understand rhetoric as ambient” (3), acknowledging that rhetoric is no longer just centered upon its basic dichotomy of subject and object but rather extends outward to include material and informational environment which can change one’s understanding of how human beings and the world are. Therefore, Rickert is trying to persuade that human beings and the world are embedded together and are part of each other. An American literary theorist, Kenneth Duva Burke defines rhetoric as “a symbolic means of inducing cooperation in beings that by nature respond to symbols” (Leggett), maintaining that by using symbols, things such as statues or documents that represent or stand for something else by way of resemblance or association are what persuade cooperation. Burke believed that persuasion is more in relation to identification through symbolism. For example, Martin Luther King chose to speak at the Lincoln Memorial because he knew he could make the connection in that ambience through the use of symbolism to reinforce identification with his message. Although some assert that rhetoric is ideological in the sense that one’s...

Words: 393 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Jean Piaget Research Paper

...Jean Piaget was a Swiss scientist, as well as one of the most significant researchers in developmental psychology. He is also “the central theorist in the constructivist approach to thinking” (Swartz et al, 2011). Piaget was mostly interested in how people “come to know” and believed that one of the most distinctive aspects between human and animal thought, is the face that humans are able to do “abstract symbolic reasoning” and animals are not (Huitt & Hummel, 2003). He worked in an IQ testing laboratory and this lead him to become interested in getting to know how children learn to think. Piaget then determined that younger children tended to answer questions asked more qualitatively than those older than them, not because they were “dumber”, but rather because they had a different way of thinking (Huitt & Hummel, 2003). Piaget had a...

Words: 858 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Nursing Metaparadigm Analysis

...Metaparadigm of concepts and propositions The nursing metaparadigm basic concepts comprise of human being, environment, health, and nursing. The relational propositions involve the relationship between the following concepts: human being and health; health and environment; nursing and human being; and human being, health, and environment (Fawcett, 1984; Fawcett & DeSanto-Madeya, 2013). Leventhal et al explained the human being and health concept through The CSM as “Patients are active. Patients take in and interpret information and cope with whatever problems arise” and “People seek information to label or define their body states and they use symptoms, or body states, to define labels” (Leventhal et al., 1980, pp.15). The theorists also clarified the concepts of health and environment as “The influence of social and cultural factors on self-regulation is depicted in the CSM that is social and cultural factors are depicted as shaping individuals’ representations of their health conditions” (Leventhal, Brissette, & Leventhal, 2003, pp.57). Furthermore, nursing metaparadigm concepts of human being, health, and environment were described through the CSM by stating the fact that upon developing health problems, individuals perceive and initially interpret such problems based on their common-sense...

Words: 391 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Human Security and National Security

...NATIONAL SECURITY: ENMESHING CONCEPTUALIZATION OF SECURITY PARADIGM IN EMERGING SECURITY DYNAMICS Introduction and Background In the realm of international relations and political science, there has been the recurring debate on the human versus national security. Theorists and scholars, like Goucha and Crowley (2008, 57) enrolled into the ethos of realism take the state-oriented view of the security and places the dominance of national security over human security; whereas, those who take the idealistic view of the entire episode take the human security as the primary level of security to be protected by the state (Mathew, 2010, 78). The idea of human security gained eminence in security studies with developments taken place in the aftermath of the post-Cold War era. The Cold War put the security apparatuses and concepts over all other dominant themes of national and pubic life and couched them into strategic and national cultures all over the world. Now as the world is moving into new era of globalization, economic expansion and post-industrial revolution, the focus has also been shifted from national security to other facets of global world like climate change, AIDS/HIV and poverty. In this work, the contrasting debate between national security and human security will be presented in an argumentative style. For this purpose, the concept of human security will be derived from UNHP Report of 1994 whereas the concept of national security will be couched in its classical sense...

Words: 2210 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Fayol and Mintzberg

...approach. Mintzberg (2005) said the four words; planning, organizing, coordinating and controlling introduced by Fayol only indicate vague objectives that managers have when they work. Throughout this essay I am going to explore the claim that Fayol’s classic analysis of the management function has been made redundant by the more recent views of Mintzberg through comparing and contrasting both theorists’ conceptions of what a manager actually does. Henri Fayol Henri Fayol was a French industrialist who worked as a young mining engineer. He spent his life working his way up in the mine until he became the managing director. Under Fayol the business thrived and grew despite it nearly being bankrupt when he took over. Fayol, who undertook the classical approach to management meant he was mostly concerned with issues such as the establishment of a hierarchy of authority within a business, the span of control and also division of work. Fayol and Frederick Taylor were the main founders of the classical approach. It is from this approach that other theorists founded their ideas on. From Fayol, theorists such as Mintzberg developed and expanded their...

Words: 2036 - Pages: 9