(Claim)My first contention is that the resolution will greatly protect refugees’ rights and make some other countries shoulder the responsibility.
(Warrant)The refugee problem is essentially about human rights. Refugees in the national country can not continue receiving the protection to life, liberty and property; even human rights and fundamental freedom be trampled and deprived. We have no control over like out place of birth and socioeconomic status and all persons including refugees are all moral equals, so lots of authoritative laws aiming to protect basic rights of refugees were enacted. For example, Prohibition on the forced return of a refugee is called nonrefoulement and is one of the most fundamental principles in international refugee law. This principle is laid out in Article 33 of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, which says that no state "shall expel or return a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where his life or freedom would be threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion."(我觉得这里可以根据时间长短再罗列几项法律)International legal instruments take the form of a treaty which may be binding on the contracting states. When negotiations are completed, the text of a treaty is established as authentic and definitive and is signed to that effect by the representatives of states. In other words, In legal dimensions, a country have to undertake the due obligations, or it will be called to account and will be punished by other countries and U.N. Standing on the moral side, we recall that every year millions of refugees suffer from the war, it’s the time to show how democratic a country is, which means a country ignores the differences in races and nationalities to accept the people who cannot find a place to live, to endow them the opportunities to better