1.0 Introduction

Over the years, the leadership has been widely studied in the different background and theoretical basis. In some cases, the leadership has been described as a process, but most of the research of theory and leadership to see a person for understanding (Bernard, 1926, Blake, shepard and mouton rothschild, 1964; Drath and Mr Lu, in 1994, federer, 1967; and the house of representatives and Mitchell, 1974). While admitting that the importance of leadership, however, there is still a certain mystique, in what leadership is or how to define it.
As a leader (Gary Yukl, 2006). "influence people to understand and agree with what you need to do, how to do, and the promotion of individual and collective efforts to achieve the common goal of the process". Peter Northouse (2010), leadership is defined as "a process, one of them affect a group of people, in order to achieve a common goal". These definitions suggest that a few parts of the phenomenon.
The purpose of this article is to find out the difference between traditional and contemporary leadership. In addition, it contains two kinds of style analysis. The last part of the key may be according to their own experience to judge what kind of leadership is effective.

2.0 Contemporary Leadership Theories

Understand the importance of model and the leadership of the technology continues to increase, due to the complexity, diversity and increase of rapid change, today's organizations. Traditional pattern and modern leadership models all leadership is the main difference between the traditional model of stress in a particular group, as a new model which provides a space, have more than one leadership characteristics at the same time or only a leader's behavior. The traditional model haven't told that leaders should possess skills. But emergency vehicles can pay more attention to special skills or