...Death Penalty: Humane or Unjust Martin Luther King Jr. stated in his quote, “The old law of an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind”. For example, a murder occurs, therefore, someone maliciously decides to end a life in revenge. Consequently, another counterpart kills the person who started the crime. Eventually, if this pattern were to continue, there would be no one left in the chain of misconduct. How is death an effective way to try and show that someone was wrong? This sparks another question: How is the death penalty legal? Throughout the years, there has been much opposition regarding the death penalty. Ample people believe that it is unconstitutional, yet in 31 out of the 50 states, the death penalty remains a sentencing...
Words: 1300 - Pages: 6
... As of July 1, 2015 there are thirty-one states with the death penalty and nineteen have abolished it. The death penalty should be abolished because there is a better alternative in life without parole, innocent lives are put at risk, and we pay millions each year to fund this process. First off, we have a much better way to punish people for the even most inhumane of crimes and we can find that in using life without parole. With death as a option after they commit such a crime, it is an easy way out of having to truly pay for their crimes. Life without parole is easily a better alternative because no one would want to spend the rest of their life in a prison cell until they died. There is also the option of life with the possibility of parole for an option, even then there is no guarantee for parole. The wait would be...
Words: 848 - Pages: 4
...446 executions (Death Penalty Information Center). 1,446 people have been put to death for committing crimes such as murder and treason. The death penalty is definitely not a new prospect; far from it, first known to be practiced in the 14th century B.C.E. (Death Penalty Information Center). In fact, some describe capital punishment as a barbaric, outdated, or unsophisticated form of justice. America is, after all, one of the only developed countries that still enforces the death penalty. Others argue that it is necessary in keeping law and order and helps to deter crime. The death penalty has an interesting history, and still today there is an argument about whether or not it should continue to be enforced, possibly because of the historically discriminatory nature of the death penalty. In early colonial America, the death penalty was fairly strictly enforced....
Words: 877 - Pages: 4
...The Death penalty is a necessity for the U.S. How would you feel if someone that you know was on death row? It's very unlikely to happen but, it's possible. There has been an ongoing debate, Whether the death penalty should be banned or still be an option for capital offenses. Out of the 50 states in America 31 states allow the death penalty. That means that 19 states have it banned. We are pretty divided on this issue.Some people believe that it is not okay to kill someone no matter what they did and other people believe in the “eye for an eye” phrase. You take a life. Your life should be taken. It’s a very controversial and touchy subject. It cost more for someone to be on death row because of all the court fees and death row can take a much longer time, than someone going in for life in prison. I personally believe that death row should NOT be banned. I believe...
Words: 999 - Pages: 4
...Should The Death Penalty be allowed in Canada The Death Penalty is given to someone who has been convicted of a major crime, ex: murder, rape, treason, espionage, genocide, hijacking and many more. I am here to give you some points from both perspectives for you to make your decision on if the death penalty should be allowed in Canada. Why we should have the death penalty? One reason some countries have the death penalty is so it will make the criminal face their action. We are taught that actions come with consequences… and they really do... from you getting a nobel prize to the death penalty there all caused by your actions. Another reason for the death penalty is so the most insane and smart people in prison can’t get out. Every country has its people that are insane and reckless that they get themselves in prison right… they can also be those people that can get themselves out of prison, and if they do than they can cause even more harm that can even kill people, so if they have the death penalty then it wouldn’t be a problem. And finally the death penalty would make the victims families feel that the person got what they deserved. Say a person's mom got killed by a murder, and...
Words: 478 - Pages: 2
...Death Penalty The death penalty is the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime. So where did it begin when was it added to the modern law system. Is it morale. The Death Penalty we’ll see the religious and social beliefs and if it is functioning. Thanks to the DPIC for this statement. “Britain influenced America's use of the death penalty more than any other country. When European settlers came to the new world, they brought the practice of capital punishment. The first recorded execution in the new colonies was that of Captain George Kendall in the Jamestown colony of Virginia in 1608.” (DPIC) This is how Kendall got hanged thanks to wikipedia. “In the fall of 1607, a fight broke out between...
Words: 1792 - Pages: 8
...The death penalty is not carried out enough. Until America gets the message death penalty should be carried out within six months after the first appeal. This gives the convicted time to get right with their god. In most case victim was not afforded the privilege of mercy. The right to a speedy trial is expressed in the U.S. Constitution on federal and state level. The Six amendment guarantee, among other things, that in all criminal prosecution cases, the accused may be allowed the right to a speed …trial. The death penalty was only used in most cases instituted at the federal level, it has since been incorporated on the state level via the fourteenth amendment. These amendments addressed the prolonged time for punishment. Punishment and executions varied from state to state based on appeals and the governor’s orders. Many states have lobby groups that never want to see speed execution have changed people opinions to...
Words: 518 - Pages: 3
...English essay Topic: capital punishment The causes, effects and solutions to the problems of serious crimes are causing a big debate all over the world. Should ‘capital punishment’ be restored? Capital punishment (also called death penalty or execution) is a way of punishing an inmate on the death row, who is accused of committing crimes. Everybody knows the expression “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” - but is this really how we want to live our lives? Is capital punishment all about getting revenge, or is it more about getting rid of the guilty prisoners - and how do we know whether they are guilty or not? And should one even be able to decide another one’s destiny, and whether they have a right to live or not? Either you punish, because there will be a beneficial outcome, or else you punish because the prisoner has deserved it. But the big question is: where do we draw the line of whether it’s right or wrong - which criminal actions deserve capital punishment, and which does not? The text “Capital punishment in the US” reads: “An argument often made by opponents of the death penalty is that innocent people are sometimes executed.” p. 31 ll. 8-10 A big problem could be, that if the prisoner is acquitted of the charge, they hand the prisoner some money, to make up for the “lost years”, but how is a human’s life even measured in the value of money? Perhaps it’s not, it’s just a way for the government to show that one actually is able to escape the death row, if...
Words: 697 - Pages: 3
...The Death Penalty Can one justify an action of a cold killer? Furthermore, should death penalty be abolish? Lastly, is it possibly to end the debate about death penalty and the abolition of it? William Otis comes with his arguments in “The Death Penalty Saves Lives”, 2006, for why death penalty should not be abolish and his opinion of the abolitionists own arguments for it. The death penalty or capital punishment is a legit system where a person, who has committed a serious crime, it put to death by the state as punishment. The death penalty consist of two parts, the death sentence, which is the judicial decree that the person gets, and the other part is the actual execution. Death penalty has been used for many decades, and are still being used today, but of course not as often. In the past, it was performed by most societies and the most common execution method was beheading, which were most often public. In the United States, death penalty is a legal punishment in 32 states as well as the federal civilian and military legal systems. Since 1976, the most common method used to execute an inmate is lethal injection. Furthermore, in that same year the death penalty was reinstated after a ten-year long moratorium, which is a temporary stopping of a certain activity, thirty-four states have performed executions. A year that is very interesting, as far as death penalty goes, is 2012, because it was the year with the lowest executions in USA and, furthermore, by information...
Words: 1248 - Pages: 5
...Death Penalty in Contemporary Society Although some people may say that the death penalty is completely absurd and an unjust method of punishment, this is not true. In a contemporary society, the idea that the death penalty is necessary is partially valid. Recent studies have shown that the death penalty acts as a deterrent, preventing murders and saving lives. The death penalty also allows for reduced costs, instead of having that person in jail for the rest of their life. Lastly, it provides justice for the victims and the families who went through the pain and struggles of the crime. According to around a dozen studies, executions save lives. Studies show that for each inmate put to death, three to eighteen murders are prevented. Research; such as that from H. Naci Mocan, an economist at LSU shows that the death penalty has a deterrent effect. This shows that the death penalty has a lasting effect on a community and the criminals in that community. The death penalty shows that criminals could be subject to capital punishment for crimes they are committing, so it makes them realize that and to not do it. Also, if a person is put to death instead of being put in jail for a period of time, that person won’t be released from jail to do the same crime, such as murder, and go back into jail, thus saving lives of innocent people. (Source C and Source E) From previous arguments, the death penalty allows for reduced costs to taxpayers. It’s been stated that it costs roughly $100...
Words: 583 - Pages: 3
...Christi L.Patterson Professor: David Becker English 102 Forum week 4 September 26,2017 “In our name” Rewriting the U.S. death penalty, By Kimberly K. Gunter This essay was a great piece I must say first and foremost. I feel the essay by Mrs,Kimberly K. Gunter talks about a class trip taken by a group of her students to a prison in North Carolina. They tour death row and get to see the conditions of a prison. Throughout the essay I read many examples given to show how this will not only make a long term effect on the students but also develop an opinion of the prison system as well as help provide in-sighted views on their look at the death penalty. The purpose of this essay or even class tour would lead you to believe that it was to give them a well rounded judgment of the death penalty. Personally I felt the tour would impact the students throughout their entire lives. Claim: Within this essay I found the claim to be when the teacher Mrs,Gunter is trying to help her class learn about the prison system and the...
Words: 716 - Pages: 3
...Death penalty is a punishment for person to put to death by government. There are 103 countries who have abolished death penalty. In Tang Dynasty in China, the death penalty has already been abolished which the first-time human abolished death penalty. Most of the countries don’t use death penalty on teenagers. This essay will argue that death penalty should be abolished because it gives the court the possibility to release the innocent person; there is the race discriminant in using the death penalty; the death penalty is incompatible with human rights and there are other ways. Death penalty kills the possibility for citizens who are innocent to release. No matter how the times progress, misjudgment will always exist. Even though the proportion will be lower, the innocent case won’t be avoided. It is unfair for an innocent person alternative the criminal to sentence the death penalty without any remedy opportunities. In 1992, Cameron Todd Willinghai...
Words: 698 - Pages: 3
...In Edward Koch's essay “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life”, Koch brings up the issue that death penalty should be applied to atrocious crimes because it acts as a deterrent to crime. Koch goes on to say that the state is higher level than the individual therefore the state must govern. It is also morally right because according to Koch in the Bible and the Toran is said to be fine and supported in certain situations but he also states that Jefferson and Lincoln supported it. Koch goes on saying that having the death penalty will affirm the value of human life by acting as a deterrent because the majority of killers will make every effort to stay alive. The death sentence is the only way to guarantee that murders wont murder again. Koch also brings the argument that the sky high muder rates in the US require the...
Words: 1073 - Pages: 5
...In my argumentative essay I am choosing to write about the subject of the death penalty on prisoners. This is a very touchy subject to many people but it should not even be discussed at all. It should not be something that we have to worry about or even argue or fight about. This subject is about whether certain prisoners should be executed instead of being given a life sentence. There are many different opinions on this subject but I believe there is only one correct one and I will explain the to you in this essay. The death penalty should be allowed to be given to prisoners and convicts who rightfully deserve it. The death penalty is simply killing those convicts and prisoners who are convicted of crimes where they are given the death penalty. The form of the death penalty used today is lethal injection. It is...
Words: 1209 - Pages: 5
...2009), compares the deterrence capability of the death penalty to that of long term imprisonment. The article begins by detailing the context of the study through highlighting the declining support for the deterrence hypothesis, due in large part to flawed empirical research. Radelet and Lacock offer a brief history of studies on...
Words: 1264 - Pages: 6
